dc.contributor.author | Dudek, Michał | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-22T09:48:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-22T09:48:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1689-4286 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33776 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article focuses on political accelerationism—an idea that proposes
to use capitalism against itself either by making it as a whole go even
faster, pushing it to its limits and beyond until it collapses, or by
appropriating some of its elements or tendencies for alternative,
emancipatory purposes. It analyses two significant versions of this
idea—that of Benjamin Noys and that of Nick Srnicek and Alex
Williams—from the perspective of the following question: Is political
accelerationism similar to certain previous developments in left critical
thought in that it offers a new approach to law or, if it does not contain
any explicitly expressed original take on law, enables a novel and fresh
conceptualisation of law to be drawn from it? The article concludes that
so far political accelerationism does not offer an original approach to law
and that any perspectives on law that can be drawn from this idea are
reminiscent of basic Marxist approaches to law. | pl_PL |
dc.description.abstract | Niniejszy artykuł skupia się na politycznym akceleracjonizmie—idei
proponującej by użyć kapitalizm przeciwko niemu samemu, albo przez
przyspieszenie go jako pewnej całości, popchnięcie go do jego granic, a
nawet jeszcze dalej aż upadnie, albo przez przejmowanie niektórych
jego elementów bądź tendencji na rzecz realizacji alternatywnych,
emancypacyjnych celów. Analizuje się tu dwie istotne wersje tej idei—
Benjamina Noysa oraz Nicka Srniceka i Alexa Williamsa—z perspektywy
następującego pytania: Czy polityczny akceleracjonizm jest podobny do
niektórych wcześniejszych osiągnięć lewicowej myśli krytycznej, w tym
sensie, że oferuje nowe podejście do prawa, albo, jeśli nie zawiera
jakiegokolwiek jasno wyrażonego oryginalnego ujęcia prawa, umożliwia
zrekonstruowanie na swojej podstawie nowatorskiej i świeżej
konceptualizacji prawa? Zgodnie z konkluzją artykułu, na razie polityczny akceleracjonizm nie oferuje oryginalnego podejścia do prawa,
a perspektywy na prawo możliwe do zrekonstuowania na jego podstawie
przypominają podstawowe marksistowskie ujęcia prawa. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Uniwersytet Łódzki | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris ;41 | |
dc.subject | political accelerationism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Benjamin Noys | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Nick Srnicek | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Alex Williams | pl_PL |
dc.subject | law | pl_PL |
dc.subject | critical theory | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Marxism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | polityczny akceleracjonizm | pl_PL |
dc.subject | prawo | pl_PL |
dc.subject | teoria krytyczna | pl_PL |
dc.subject | marksizm | pl_PL |
dc.title | Nihil novi sub sole: law from the perspective of political accelerationism | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | Nihil novi sub sole: prawo z perspektywy politycznego akceleracjonizmu | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 1-19 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Jagiellonian University in Krakow | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnote | Michał Dudek – PhD in Law, works at the
Department of Sociology of Law, Faculty of Law and Administration,
Jagiellonian University in Krakow. Author of monograph Komunikowanie
prawa w dobie pluralizmu kulturowego [The Communication of Law in the
Age of Cultural Pluralism] (NOMOS, Kraków, 2014) and various
publications on the influence of multiculturalism on law-making and lawapplying, legal policy, axiology of law, visuality and law and application of
selected threads from contemporary philosophy of technology and
science & technology studies to sociology of law. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Derrida, J. (1992). Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority”. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, D. G. Carlson (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice (3–67). New York and London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Land, N. (2014). Teleoplexy: Notes on Acceleration. In R. Mackay, A. Avanessian (eds.), #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader (509–520). Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Merve. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Lefebvre, A. (2008). The Image of Law: Deleuze, Bergson, Spinoza. Stanford: Stanford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mackay, R., Avanessian, A. (eds.) (2014). #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader. Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Merve. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mackay, R., Avanessian, A. (2014). Introduction. In R. Mackay, A. Avanessian (eds.), #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader (1–47). Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Merve | pl_PL |
dc.references | Marx, K. (1977). Preface. In K. Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. With some notes by R. Rojas. Moscow: Progress Publishers. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1859/critique-poleconomy/preface.htm, accessed 16 June 2017. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Murray, J. (2013). Deleuze & Guattari: Emergent Law. Abingdon: Routledge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mussawir, E. (2011). Jurisdiction in Deleuze: The Expression and Representation of Law. Abingdon: Routledge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Negri, A. (2014). Some Reflections on the #Accelerate Manifesto. Trans. M. Pasquinelli. In R. Mackay, A. Avanessian (eds.), #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader (363–378). Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Merve. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Noys, B. (2010). The Persistence of the Negative: A Critique of Contemporary Continental Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Noys, B. (2014). Malign Velocities. Accelerationism and Capitalism. Winchester and Washington: Zero Books. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pashukanis, E. B. (2003). The General Theory of Law & Marxism. Trans. B. Einhorn. With a new introduction by D. Milovanovic. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Power, N. (2015). Decapitalism, Left Scarcity, and the State. Fillip, 20, Fall. http://fillip.ca/content/decapitalism-left-scarcity-and-the-state, accessed 16 June 2017. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Reed, P. (2014). Reorientate, Eccentricate, Speculate, Fictionalize, Geometricize, Commonize, Abstractify: Seven Prescriptions for Accelerationism. In R. Mackay, A. Avanessian (eds.), #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader (521–536). Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Merve. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Renner, K. (2010). The Institutions of Private Law and Their Social Functions. Trans. A. Schwarzschild. With a new introduction by A. J. Treviño. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Shaviro, S. (2010). Post Cinematic Affect. Winchester and Washington: Zero Books. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Srnicek, N., Williams, A. (2016). Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. Revised and Updated Edition. London and New York: Verso. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Treviño, A. J. (2010). The Sociology of Law: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Williams, A., Srnicek, N. (2014). #Accelerate: Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics. In R. Mackay, A. Avanessian (eds.), #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader (347–362). Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Merve. | pl_PL |
dc.relation.volume | 2 | pl_PL |
dc.discipline | filozofia | pl_PL |