Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorTomášková, Renáta
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-22T14:42:24Z
dc.date.available2021-02-22T14:42:24Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-30
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/33796
dc.description.abstractThe article focuses on blogs related to research activities of the academic community. Research-related blogs as components of university websites have developed into an array of sub-genres shaped by specific foci, their authors and the desired audiences. The data set consists of fifty posts from ten blogs of six universities. Drawing upon Swales’ methodology of genre analysis, the study explores the generic structure of the blog posts, reveals the communicative purposes they can fulfil within the landscape of university websites, identifies significant communication strategies, and explores the roles the blogs may serve in communicating science to the diverse audiences they potentially address. The analysis has shown that the blogs help accomplish the general goals of informing about the university and promoting it providing a personalized view and engaging the reader, manifest loose but recurrent generic structuring, and can be vehicles of knowledge dissemination as well as knowledge construction.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;3en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectacademic discourseen
dc.subjectcommunicating scienceen
dc.subjectgenre analysisen
dc.subjectgeneric structureen
dc.subjectresearch blogen
dc.subjectuniversity websiteen
dc.title“Finishing One Big Adventure in Order to Embark on Another”: Exploring University Research Blogsen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number253-272
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republicen
dc.referencesAskehave, Inger and John M. Swales. 2001. Genre Identification and Communicative Purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics 22(2). 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.195en
dc.referencesBarton, David and Carmen Lee. 2013. Language Online. Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesBawarshi, Anis S. and Mary Jo Reiff. 2010. Genre. An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy. West Lafayette: Parlor Press.en
dc.referencesBhatia, Vijay J. 1997. Genre-Mixing in Academic Introductions. In English for Specific Purposes. Vol. 16, No. 3. 181-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00039-7en
dc.referencesBhatia, Vijay J. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. London and New York: Continuum.en
dc.referencesBiber, Douglas and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesDaneš, František. 1974. Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text. In: F. Daneš (ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia, 106-128.en
dc.referencesDontcheva-Navratilova, Olga. 2016. Interaction and Intersubjective Positioning in Book Reviews. In: Renáta Tomášková, Christopher Hopkinson and Gabriela Zapletalová (eds.), Professional Genres from an Interpersonal Perspective. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 140-157.en
dc.referencesDorgeloh, Heidrun and Anja Wanner. 2010. Syntactic Variation and Genre. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.en
dc.referencesFairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesFairclough, Norman. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.en
dc.referencesHalliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.en
dc.referencesHalliday, Michael A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1989. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.en
dc.referencesHalliday, Michael A. K. 2002. The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse, with reference to Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species. In: M. Coulthard (ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge, 136-156.en
dc.referencesHerring, Susan C., Lois A. Scheidt, Elijah Wright and Sabrina Bonus. 2005. Weblogs as a Bridging Genre. Information Technology & People 18 (2), 142-171. DOI: 10.1108/09593840510601513en
dc.referencesHoey, Michael. 1986. The Discourse Colony: A Preliminary Study of a Neglected Discourse Type. In: M. Coulthard (ed.), Talking about Text. Studies presented to David Brazil on his retirement. Birmingham: Birmingham Instant Print Ltd., 1-26.en
dc.referencesHoey, Michael. 2001. Textual Interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesIedema, Rick, Susan Feez and Peter White. 1994. Media Literacy. Sydney: Disadvantaged Schools Programme, NSW Department of School Education.en
dc.referencesLovink, Geert. 2008. Zero Comments. Blogging and Critical Internet Culture. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesKjellberg, Sara. 2010. I am a blogging researcher: Motivations for blogging in a scholarly context. First Monday. Peer-reviewed journal on the internet 15 (8), 2 August 2010. Available from: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2962/2580 [Accessed: 15th September 2017].en
dc.referencesKuteeva, Maria. 2016. Research blogs, wikis, and tweets. In: K. Hyland. And P. Shaw (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. London: Routledge, 433-445.en
dc.referencesLuzón, Maria José. 2011. “Interesting post, but I disagree”: Social Presence and Antisocial Behaviour in Academic Weblogs. Applied Linguistics 32 (5), 517-540. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ964110en
dc.referencesLuzón, Maria José. 2013. Public communication of science in blogs: Recontextualizing scientific discourse for a diversified audience. Written Communication 30 (4), 428-457.en
dc.referencesLuzón, Maria José. 2018. Constructing Academic Identities Online: Identity performance in research group blogs written by multilingual scholars. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 33, 24-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.01.004en
dc.referencesMartin, James R. 1997. Analysing genre: functional parameters. In: F. Christie and J. R. Martin (eds.) Genre and Institutions. Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London and New York: Continuum, 3–39.en
dc.referencesMartin, James R. and David Rose. 2008. Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.en
dc.referencesMatušincová, Renata. 2016 (ms). Translating TED Talks. Ostrava: University of Ostrava, unpublished MA thesis.en
dc.referencesMauranen, Anna. 1993. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.en
dc.referencesMauranen, Anna. 2013. Hybridism, edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet. Nordic Journal of English Studies 13(1), 7-36.en
dc.referencesMiller, Carolyn and Shepherd, Dawn. 2004. Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Weblog. In: L. Gurak, S. Antonijevic, L. Johnson, C. Ratliff and J. Reyman (eds.), Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric,Community and the Culture of Weblogs. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/172818en
dc.referencesMotta-Roth, Desiree. 1998. Discourse Analysis and Academic Book Reviews: A Study of Text and Disciplinary Cultures. In: I. Fortanet et al. (eds.), Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes. Castelló de la Plana: Publicaciones de la Universitat Jaume I, 29-58.en
dc.referencesMyers, Greg. 2002. Narratives of science and nature in popularizing molecular genetics. In: M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London. Routledge, 179-190.en
dc.referencesMyers, Greg. 2010. The Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London: Continuum.en
dc.referencesPeterson, Eric. 2011. How Conversational Are Weblogs? Language & Internet, Vol. 8. Available from: http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2011/Peterson [Accessed: 23rd October 2017].en
dc.referencesPuschmann, Cornelius. 2010. Interpersonal pronouns in corporate web logs. In: H. Dorgeloh and A. Wanner (eds.) Syntactic Variation and Genre. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 167-191.en
dc.referencesRussell, Nicholas. 2010. Communicating Science. Professional, Popular, Literary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesSchmidt, Jan. 2007. Blogging practices: An analytical Framework. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4), 1409-1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00379.xen
dc.referencesShaw, Phillip. 2016. Genre analysis. In: K. Hyland and P. Shaw (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. London: Routledge, 243-255.en
dc.referencesSokół, Małgorzata. 2012. Metadiscourse and the Construction of the Author’s Voices in the Blogosphere: Academic Weblogs as a Form of Self-promotion. In: S. Campagna, G. Garzone, C. Ilie and E. Rowley-Jolivet (eds.) Evolving Genres in Web-mediated Communication. Bern: Peter Lang AG, 265-287.en
dc.referencesSwales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesVirtanen, Tuija. 2010. Variation across texts and discourses: Theoretical and Methodological perspectives on text type and genre. In: H. Dorgeloh and A. Wanner (eds.), Syntactic Variation and Genre. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 53-84.en
dc.referencesZapletalová, Gabriela. 2016. “I have to admit that my position will be more difficult…”: A Genre Analysis of Introducing the Conference Paper Move. In: R. Tomášková, Ch. Hopkinson and G. Zapletalová (eds.) Professional Genres from an Interpersonal Perspective. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 76-111.en
dc.referenceshttp://blog.journals.cambridge.org/en
dc.referenceshttp://blog.qeh.ox.ac.uk/en
dc.referenceshttp://blogs.bournemouth.ac.uk/research/en
dc.referenceshttp://historiansatbristol.blogs.ilrt.org/en
dc.referenceshttp://unlockingresearch.blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/en
dc.referenceshttp://www.blogs.hss.ed.ac.uk/en
dc.referenceshttp://www.ed.ac.uk/medicine-vet-medicine/postgraduate/postgraduate-life/blogsen
dc.referenceshttp://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/en
dc.referenceshttp://www.ox.ac.uk/news/science-blog/en
dc.referenceshttp://www.younglives.org.uk/content/en
dc.referenceshttps://cambridgemedicine.wordpress.com/en
dc.referenceshttps://theviewofgeorgesquare.wordpress.comen
dc.contributor.authorEmailRenata.Tomaskova@osu.cz
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1731-7533.17.3.03
dc.relation.volume17


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0