Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSlováček, Petr
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-26T07:15:33Z
dc.date.available2021-02-26T07:15:33Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1689-4286
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/33894
dc.description.abstractThe present text deals with two layers of philosophic psychology/anthropology in the works of Thomas Aquinas and strives to examine the mutual relationships and interrelated meanings between these layers while paying particular attention to the biblical image of a human being as imago Dei. With respect to this aim, the paper contains a justification of the distinction between philosophic psychology, which understands soul as a substantial form of the human being, and dualistic philosophic psychology, which views soul as the subject of activities, or as incomplete substance. This distinction is then confirmed as confronted with the way Thomas Aquinas delimits the human being as imago Dei in his Summa Theologiae, by which means the way we understand this expression becomes more exact, and the importance of Thomas's dualistic terminology, which we encounter in his works, is emphasised at the same time.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherUniwersytet Łódzkipl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny HYBRIS ;50
dc.subjectThomas Aquinaspl_PL
dc.subjectanthropologypl_PL
dc.subjectphilosophic psychologypl_PL
dc.subjectsoulpl_PL
dc.subjectbodypl_PL
dc.subjectformpl_PL
dc.subjectsubstancepl_PL
dc.subjectimago Deipl_PL
dc.titleUnitary and Dualistic Aspects of Anthropology by Thomas Aquinas in Relation to a Human Being as Imago Deipl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number1-18pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSilesian University in Opavapl_PL
dc.referencesAertsen, J. A. (2005). Aquinas and the Human Desire for Knowledge. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79, 411˗430.pl_PL
dc.referencesAristotle (1987). De anima/On the soul. Penguin Classics.pl_PL
dc.referencesArmstrong, A. H. (2002). Filosofie pozdní antiky. Praha: Oiku mene .pl_PL
dc.referencesBaza n, C. B. (1983). La corporalite selon saint Thomas. Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 80, 369-409.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaza n, C. B. (1991). The Highest Encomium of Human Body. Litera, sensus, sententia, 99-116.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaza n, C. B. (1996). Pluralisme de formes ou dualisme de substances? Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 67, 30˗73.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaza n, C. B. (1997). The Human Soul: Form and Substance? Thomas Aquinas' Critique of Eclectic Aristotelianism. Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge, 64, 95˗126.pl_PL
dc.referencesBieniak, B. (2010). The Soul-Body Problem at Paris, ca. 1200˗1250. Hugh of st. Scher and his Contemporaries. Leuven: Leuven University Press. Davidson, H. A. (1986). Averroes and the Material Intellect. Viator, 17, 91- 137.pl_PL
dc.referencesMensching, G. (2006). Toma s Akvinsky a sve tlo rozumu. Studia philosophica, B53, 31˗39.pl_PL
dc.referencesPasnau, R. (2004). Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesShin, Ch.-S. (1993). „Imago Dei“ und „Natura Hominis“. Der Doppelansatz der thomistischen Handlungslehre. Wu rzburg: Ko nigshausen & Neumann.pl_PL
dc.referencesSlova c ek, P. (2014). Filosofické základy psychologie Tomáše Akvinského. Studie k filosofické psychologii a metafyzice vrcholného středověku. Opava: Slezska univerzita v Opave .pl_PL
dc.referencesSweeney, M. J. (1999). Soul as Substance and Method in Thomas Aquinas´ Anthropological Writings. Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge, 66, 43˗87.pl_PL
dc.referencesTomarchio, J. (1998). Four indices for the Thomistic principle quod recipitur in aliquo est in eo per modum recipientis. Mediaeval Studies, 60, 315˗368.pl_PL
dc.referencesTomarchio, J. (2000-2001). Aquinas´s Division of Being According to Modes of Existing. The Review of Metaphysics, 54, 585˗613.pl_PL
dc.referencesVerbeke, G. (1977). Introduction Doctrinale. In: S. Van Riet(ed.), Avicenna Latinus, Liber de Philosophia Prima sive Scientia Divina I-IV. Leiden.pl_PL
dc.referencesWippel, J. F. (1984). Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWippel, J. F. (1988). Thomas Aquinas and the Axiom “What is received is received according to the mode of the receiver. In: Salinger, R. L. (ed.), Straight Path (279˗289). Washington: Catholic University of America.pl_PL
dc.referencesZavalloni, R. (1951). Richard de Mediavilla et la controverse sur la pluralité des formes. Louvain.pl_PL
dc.disciplinefilozofiapl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record