dc.contributor.author | Slováček, Petr | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-26T07:15:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-26T07:15:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1689-4286 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33894 | |
dc.description.abstract | The present text deals with two layers of philosophic
psychology/anthropology in the works of Thomas Aquinas and strives to
examine the mutual relationships and interrelated meanings between
these layers while paying particular attention to the biblical image of a
human being as imago Dei. With respect to this aim, the paper contains a
justification of the distinction between philosophic psychology, which
understands soul as a substantial form of the human being, and dualistic
philosophic psychology, which views soul as the subject of activities, or
as incomplete substance. This distinction is then confirmed as
confronted with the way Thomas Aquinas delimits the human being as
imago Dei in his Summa Theologiae, by which means the way we
understand this expression becomes more exact, and the importance of
Thomas's dualistic terminology, which we encounter in his works, is
emphasised at the same time. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Uniwersytet Łódzki | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny HYBRIS ;50 | |
dc.subject | Thomas Aquinas | pl_PL |
dc.subject | anthropology | pl_PL |
dc.subject | philosophic psychology | pl_PL |
dc.subject | soul | pl_PL |
dc.subject | body | pl_PL |
dc.subject | form | pl_PL |
dc.subject | substance | pl_PL |
dc.subject | imago Dei | pl_PL |
dc.title | Unitary and Dualistic Aspects of Anthropology by Thomas Aquinas in Relation to a Human Being as Imago Dei | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 1-18 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Silesian University in Opava | pl_PL |
dc.references | Aertsen, J. A. (2005). Aquinas and the Human Desire for Knowledge. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79, 411˗430. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Aristotle (1987). De anima/On the soul. Penguin Classics. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Armstrong, A. H. (2002). Filosofie pozdní antiky. Praha: Oiku mene . | pl_PL |
dc.references | Baza n, C. B. (1983). La corporalite selon saint Thomas. Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 80, 369-409. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Baza n, C. B. (1991). The Highest Encomium of Human Body. Litera, sensus, sententia, 99-116. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Baza n, C. B. (1996). Pluralisme de formes ou dualisme de substances? Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 67, 30˗73. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Baza n, C. B. (1997). The Human Soul: Form and Substance? Thomas Aquinas' Critique of Eclectic Aristotelianism. Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge, 64, 95˗126. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bieniak, B. (2010). The Soul-Body Problem at Paris, ca. 1200˗1250. Hugh of st. Scher and his Contemporaries. Leuven: Leuven University Press. Davidson, H. A. (1986). Averroes and the Material Intellect. Viator, 17, 91- 137. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mensching, G. (2006). Toma s Akvinsky a sve tlo rozumu. Studia philosophica, B53, 31˗39. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pasnau, R. (2004). Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Shin, Ch.-S. (1993). „Imago Dei“ und „Natura Hominis“. Der Doppelansatz der thomistischen Handlungslehre. Wu rzburg: Ko nigshausen & Neumann. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Slova c ek, P. (2014). Filosofické základy psychologie Tomáše Akvinského. Studie k filosofické psychologii a metafyzice vrcholného středověku. Opava: Slezska univerzita v Opave . | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sweeney, M. J. (1999). Soul as Substance and Method in Thomas Aquinas´ Anthropological Writings. Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge, 66, 43˗87. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tomarchio, J. (1998). Four indices for the Thomistic principle quod recipitur in aliquo est in eo per modum recipientis. Mediaeval Studies, 60, 315˗368. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tomarchio, J. (2000-2001). Aquinas´s Division of Being According to Modes of Existing. The Review of Metaphysics, 54, 585˗613. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Verbeke, G. (1977). Introduction Doctrinale. In: S. Van Riet(ed.), Avicenna Latinus, Liber de Philosophia Prima sive Scientia Divina I-IV. Leiden. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wippel, J. F. (1984). Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wippel, J. F. (1988). Thomas Aquinas and the Axiom “What is received is received according to the mode of the receiver. In: Salinger, R. L. (ed.), Straight Path (279˗289). Washington: Catholic University of America. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Zavalloni, R. (1951). Richard de Mediavilla et la controverse sur la pluralité des formes. Louvain. | pl_PL |
dc.discipline | filozofia | pl_PL |