Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWaniak-Michalak, Halina
dc.contributor.authorPerica, Ivana
dc.contributor.authorLeitoniene, Sviesa
dc.contributor.authorChojnacka, Ewa
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-01T13:31:50Z
dc.date.available2021-04-01T13:31:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-29
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/34908
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the paper is to describe the process of creating institutional settings in three post-communist countries and analyze the change of the social trust in these countries in line with the development of legal and accounting rules and norms for NGOs. The design and methodology include a literature analysis and the inductive method to analyze historical data for each country. The countries that were selected for the research are Lithuania – one of the Baltic states, which is in the last place in the World Giving Index (WGI) ranking, Poland with the average result in WGI ranking, and Croatia – the best post-communist country in the WGI ranking. Research limitations include the use of the descriptive method and the small number of countries included in the analysis. The originality and value of this paper lie in the fact that the problem of low social trust in NGOs in post-communist countries is analyzed by linking it with the development of NGO accountability and civil control over them.en
dc.description.abstractCelem artykułu jest analiza procesu tworzenia otoczenia instytucjonalnego sektora organizacji pozarządowych w trzech wybranych krajach postkomunistycznych oraz analiza zmian zaufania społecznego w tych krajach w odniesienu do zmian norm prawnych i rachunkowości dla organizacji pozarządowych. Metodologia badań obejmuje analizę literatury i indukcyjną metodę analizy danych historycznych dla wybranych krajów postkomunistycznych. Do badań wybrano trzy kraje postkomunistyczne: Litwę – jeden z krajów bałtyckich, zajmujący ostatnie miejsce w rankingu World Giving Index, Polskę i Chorwację – dwa najlepsze kraje postkomunistyczne w rankingu World Giving Index. Ograniczenia badawcze wynikają z zastosowania metody opisowej i niewielkiej liczby krajów objętych analizą. Oryginalność i wartość niniejszego opracowania polega analizie problemu niskiego zaufania społecznego do organizacji pozarządowych w krajach postkomunistycznych w kontekście rozwoju otoczenia instytucjonalnego organizacji pozarządowych oraz wzrostu ich rozliczalności i cywilnej kontroli nad nimi.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe;3pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectNGOsen
dc.subjectpost-communist countriesen
dc.subjectinstitutional theoryen
dc.subjectNGOs accountabilityen
dc.subjectcivil trusten
dc.subjectWorld Giving Indexpl
dc.subjectkraje postkomunistycznepl
dc.subjectorganizacje pozarządowepl
dc.subjectteoria instytucjonalnapl
dc.subjectrachunkowośćpl
dc.titleThe Institutional Settings of the Recovery of the NGO Sector in Post-Communist Countriesen
dc.title.alternativeUwarunkowania instytucjonalne w rozwoju sektora organizacji pozarządowych w krajach postkomunistycznychpl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number133-154
dc.identifier.eissn2082-6737
dc.referencesAgyemang, G., Awumbila, M., Unerman, J., O’Dwyer, B. (2009), NGO accountability and aid delivery, The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/13120503.pdf (accessed: 18.03.2020)en
dc.referencesBaehr, P. (2001), The “Iron Cage” and the “Shell as Hard as Steel”: Parsons, Weber, and the Stahlhartes Gehäuse Metaphor in the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, “History and Theory”, 40 (2), pp. 153–169. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2678029 (accessed: 18.03.2020)en
dc.referencesBežovan, G. (1995)., Neprofitne organizacije i kombinirani model socijalne politike [Non-profit organizations and the combined model of social policy], “Revija za socijalnu politiku”, 2 (3), pp. 195–214. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v2i3.515en
dc.referencesBežovan, G. (2003a), Razvoj organizacija civilnog društva kao pretpostavka uspješne reforme socijalne države u Hrvatskoj [Development of civil society organizations as a precondition for successful reform of the welfare state in Croatia], “Politička misao”, 40 (01), pp. 72–91.en
dc.referencesBežovan, G. (2003b), Preispitivanje okvira i potencijala za razvoj kombinirane socijalne politike u Hrvatskoj [Reviewing the Framework and Potential for the Development of Combined Social Policy in Croatia], “Socijalna ekologija: časopis za ekološku misao i sociologijska istraživanja okoline”, 12 (1–2), pp. 87–108.en
dc.referencesBežovan, G., Zrinščak, S., Vugec, M. (2005), Civilno društvo u procesu stjecanjapovjerenja u Hrvatskoj i izgradnje partnerstva s državom i drugim dionicima [The civil society in Croatia: the process of gaining trust and establishing partnership with the state and other stakeholders]. (Croatia report), Centre for Development of NonProfit Organizations (CERANEO), Croatia, Zagreb.en
dc.referencesBorowiecki, R., Dziura, M. (2014), Third Sector: Theoretical and Empirical Approach, Cracow University of Economics, Cracow.en
dc.referencesBoxenbaum, E., Jonsson, S. (2017), Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. , [in:] R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence and R.E. Meyer (eds), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 2nd Ed., pp. 79–104, Sage Publications, London. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stefan_Jonsson4/publication/279755008_Isomorphism_Diffusion_and_Decoupling/links/563f936708ae8d65c0150efb/Isomorphism-Diffusion-and-Decoupling.pdf (accessed: 18.03.2020).en
dc.referencesColeman, J.S. (1990), Foundations of social theory, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.en
dc.referencesdel Mar Gálvez-Rodríguez, M., Stuart, D., Caba-Perez, C., López-Godoy, M. (2014), Drivers for the proactive online disclosure of information in the NGO sector: the Colombian case, „Online Information Review”, 38 (6), pp. 769–787. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2014-0113en
dc.referencesEpperly, B., Lee, T. (2015), Corruption and NGO sustainability: A panel study of post-communist states, “Voluntas”, 26 (1), pp. 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9404-3en
dc.referencesFassin, Y. (2009), Inconsistencies in activists behaviours and the ethics of NGOs, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 90 (4), pp. 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0056-6en
dc.referencesGray, R., Bebbington, J., Colisson, D. (2006), NGOs, Civil Society and Accountability: Making the People Accountable to Capital, “Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal”, 19 (3), pp. 319–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610670325en
dc.referencesGuogis, A., Gudelis, D., Stasiukynas, A. (2007), The importance of the NGO-municipal relations in developing local democracy: case study of two Lithuanian municipalities, “Public Policy and Administration”, 1 (22), pp. 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-008-0004-7en
dc.referencesHechter, M. (1990), Social Institutions: their Emergence, Maintenance, and Effects, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.en
dc.referencesHodges, B.H. (2014), Rethinking conformity and imitation: Divergence, convergence, and social understanding, “Frontiers in psychology”, 5, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00726en
dc.referencesHoward, M.M. (2003), The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840012en
dc.referencesKėrytė, Ž. (2010), Pilietiškumo konstravimas globalumo kontekste: NVO vaidmens kaita Lietuvoje [Construction of Citizenship in a Global Context: The Change of NGOs” Role in Lithuania], “Kultūra ir visuomenė: socialinių tyrimų žurnalas”, 1 (2), pp. 67–83.en
dc.referencesKoster, M., Simaens, A., Vos, B. (2019), The advocate’s own challenges to behave in a sustainable way: An institutional analysis of advocacy NGOs, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 157 (2), pp. 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3674-4en
dc.referencesKroll, B. (1985), Rada Główna Opiekuńcza: 1939–1945 [Central Welfare Council: 1939–1945], Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa.en
dc.referencesKrugman, P., Wells, R. (2018), Macroeconomics.U.S.: Worth Publishers Inc.en
dc.referencesLaw on Financial Operations and Accountancy of Non-Profit Organizations, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Croatia”, 121 (2014), 30.en
dc.referencesLeś, E. (1994), The voluntary sector in post-communist East Central Europe: From small circles of freedom to civil society, CIVICUS-World Alliance for Citizen Participation, Washington.en
dc.referencesLeś, E. (2001), Zarys historii dobroczynności i filantropii w Polsce, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa.en
dc.referencesLeś, E., Nałęcz, S., Pieliński, B. (2016), Third sector barriers in Poland (TSI National Report Series, No. 7, Seventh Framework Programme – grant agreement 613034), European Union, Brussels: Third Sector Impact.en
dc.referencesLing, Q., Gordon, N.D. (2013), Journal of Public Budgeting, “Accounting & Financial Management”, 25 (1), pp. 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-25-01-2013-B004en
dc.referencesLissowska, M. (2004), Instytucjonalne wymiary procesu transformacji w Polsce [Institutional dimensions of the transformation process in Poland], Szkoła Głowna Handlowa, Warsaw.en
dc.referencesMacLean, T.L., Behnam, M. (2010), The dangers of decoupling: The relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct, “Academy of Management Journal”, 53 (6), pp. 1499–1520. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57319198en
dc.referencesMarksaityte, R., Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė, K., Seibokaite, L., Endriulaitiene, A. (2017), The importance of social trust for the prediction of well-being of Lithuanians and Lithuanian emigrants, “International Journal of Psychology”, 21, pp. 71–92. https://doi.org/10.7220/2345-024X.21.4en
dc.referencesMatonytė, I. (2003), Theoretical Approaches in Civil Society Research, “Public Policy and Administration”, 1 (5), pp. 39–47.en
dc.referencesMeyer, J.W., Rowan, B. (1977), Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, “American journal of sociology”, 83 (2), pp. 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550en
dc.referencesMinistry of Finance (2018), Registry of non-profit organizations. https://banovac.mfin.hr/rnoprt/ (accessed: 18.03.2020)en
dc.referencesNacrt Nacionalne strategije – radni materijal za savjetovanje : nacionalna strategija stvaranja poticajnog okruženja za razvoj civilnoga društva od 2017. do 2021. [Draft National Strategy – Working Material for Counseling A National Strategy for Creating an Enabling Environment for Civil Society Development from 2017 to 2021]. (2017). https://esavjetovanja.gov.hr/ECon/MainScreen?entityId=5697 (accessed: 18.03.2020)en
dc.referencesNorth, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678en
dc.referencesPowell, W.W., DiMaggio, P.J. (1986), The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, “American Sociological Review”, 48 (2), pp. 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101en
dc.referencesScott, W.R. (2008), Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests, Sage Publications, Los Angeles.en
dc.referencesSkocpol, T. (1985), Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research., [in:] P.B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, T. Skocpol (eds), Bringing the State Back In, 3–38, Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628283.002en
dc.referencesStasiukynas, A. (2014), Traditions and Management Perspectives of Community and Non-Profit Organizations in Lithuania, “Social Technologies”, 4 (2), pp. 370–384. https://doi.org/10.13165/ST-14-4-2-10en
dc.referencesStasiukynas, A., Žuromskaitė, B. (2014), Jaunimo nevyriausybinės organizacijos LKJBS „Žingsnis“ vertybės – sėkmingos veiklos pagrindas, [in:] A.G. Raišienė (eds), Veiksmingos vadybos gairės: teorinės įžvalgos ir Lietuvos organizacijų atvejai, 144–177, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Vilnius.en
dc.referencesŠimašius, R. (2007), Ne pelno organizacijos: prigimtis ir reglamentavimas, Leidykla Eugrimas, Vilnius.en
dc.referencesTolbert, P.S., Zucker, L.G. (1996), The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1430&context=articles (accessed: 18.03.2020)en
dc.referencesWaniak-Michalak, H., Michalak, J. (2016), Corporate and NGOs Voluntary Disclosure on Collaboration. Evidence from Poland, “Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics”, 27 (1), pp. 98–108. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.27.1.9338en
dc.referencesWilliamson, O.E. (2000), The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead, “Journal of Economic Literature”, 38 (3), pp. 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595en
dc.referencesŽalimienė, L., Rimšaitė, E. (2007), The metamorphosis of the role of nongovernmental organizations – from charity in XVIII century to market of social services in modern society, “Social Work”, 6 (1), pp. 83–95.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailWaniak-Michalak, Halina - halina.michalak@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailPerica, Ivana - ivana.perica@efst.hr
dc.contributor.authorEmailLeitoniene, Sviesa - sviesa.leitoniene@ktu.lt
dc.contributor.authorEmailChojnacka, Ewa - echoj@umk.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1508-2008.23.24
dc.relation.volume23


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0