Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKaźmierska, Kaja
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T15:38:45Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29T15:38:45Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-07
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38383
dc.description.abstractThe paper deals with the ethical aspects of the research process and contemporary changes in this field, which make the discussion on ethical dilemmas and concerns more dynamic and varied. Although in natural science and social sciences one can find a common ground related to the most general ethical principles. In the article I refer primarily to the social sciences. The article discusses three aspects affecting the dynamics of ethical discussions: the development of research in the field of natural sciences leading to many ethical dilemmas and forcing ethical codification of research proceedings also in the area of social sciences; the increase in sensitivity and social consciousness and not only awareness of research as such (processes of democratization, emphasizing human and animal rights, protection of minority rights, the process of individualization); the dynamics of contemporary social changes resulting from the development of technology, especially the Internet, which has become a global resource of data and their exchange. This forces qualitative researchers to consider the issue of data archiving, their reanalysis, and determining the boundary for creating Big Qualidata from them. The article discusses these three dimensions, with particular emphasis on the last of them, which will be commented on in relation to the specific methodological approach, which is biographical research.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;3en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectEthical Concernsen
dc.subjectArchivingen
dc.subjectBig Qualidataen
dc.subjectBiographical Researchen
dc.titleEthical Aspects of Social Research: Old Concerns in the Face of New Challenges and Paradoxes. A Reflection from the Field of Biographical Methoden
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number118-135
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesBertaux, Daniel. 1981. Biography and Society. The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences. London: Sage.en
dc.referencesBurawoy, Michael. 2005. “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review 70:4-28.en
dc.referencesCzyżewski, Marek. 1992. “Uwagi o badaniach biograficznych [Comments on Biographical Research].” Pp. 93-100 in Bunty i służebność uczonego: profesor Józef Chałasiński [Rebellion and Servitude of the Scholar: Professor Józef Chałasiński], edited by L. Wojtczak. Lodz: Wydawnictwo UŁ.en
dc.referencesDenzin, Norman and Michael Giardina. 2007. “Introduction: Ethical Futures in Qualitative Research.” Pp. 9-44 Ethical Futures in Qualitative Research: Decolonizing the Politics of Knowledge, edited by N. Denzin and M. Giardina. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.en
dc.referencesDopierała, Renata and Katarzyna Waniek. 2016. Biografia i wojna. Metoda biograficzno w badaniu procesów społecznych. Wybór tekstów [Biography and War. The Biographical Method in the Study of Social Processes]. Lodz: Wydawnictwo UŁ.en
dc.referencesGalewicz, Włodzimierz. 2009. “O etyce badań naukowych [On the Ethics of Scientific Research].” Diametros 19:48-57.en
dc.referencesGluza, Zbigniew. 2002. “Archiwa Społeczne [Social Archives].” KARTA 36:140-142.en
dc.referencesGoble, Erika et al. 2012. “Habits of Mind and the Split-Mind Effect: When Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software Is Used in Phenomenological Research.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13(2). Retrieved March 10, 2020 http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1709en
dc.referencesHammersley, Martyn. 2009. “Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data Via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues.” Sociological Research Online 15(1)5. Retrieved March 06, 2020 http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/1/5.htmlen
dc.referencesHammersley, Martyn and Anna Traianou. 2012. Ethics in Qualitative Research. Controversies and Contexts. London: Sage.en
dc.referencesHammersley, Martyn and Anna Traianou. 2014. “An Alternative Ethics? Justice and Care as Guiding Principles for Qualitative Research.” Sociological Research Online 19(3)24. Retrieved March 06, 2020 http://www.socresonline.org.uk/19/3/24.htmlen
dc.referencesKaźmierska, Kaja. 2018. “Doing Biographical Research—Ethical Concerns in Changing Social Contexts.” Polish Sociological Review 3:393-411.en
dc.referencesKincaid, Harold, John Dupré, and Alison Wylie. 2007. Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesKlockars, Carl B. 2000. “Field Ethics for the Life History.” Pp. 377-399 in Street Ethnography, edited by R. S. Wappner. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en
dc.referencesKonecki, Krzysztof T. 2019. Advances in Contemplative Social Research. Lodz, Cracow: Wydawnictwo UŁ, Jagiellonian University Press.en
dc.referencesKohn, Tamara and Cris Shore. 2017. “The Ethics of University Ethics Committees: Risk Management and the Research Imagination.” Pp. 229-249 in Death of the Public University?, edited by S. Wright and C. Shore. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.en
dc.referencesMead, Margaret. 1970. Culture and Commitment: A Study of the Generation Gap. Garden City, NY: Doubleday for the American Museum of Natural History.en
dc.referencesMauthner, Natasha S. 2014. “Digital Data Sharing: A Genealogical and Performative Perspective.” Studia Socjologiczne 3:177-186.en
dc.referencesMauthner, Natasha S. 2019. “Toward a Posthumanist Ethics of Qualitative Research in a Big Data Era.” American Behavioral Scientist 63(6):669-698.en
dc.referencesMerrill, Barbara and Linden West. 2009. Using Biographical Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.en
dc.referencesMiller, Tina and Linda Bell. 2002. “Consenting What? Issues of Access, Gate-Keeping and ‘Informed’ Consent.” Pp. 53-69 in Ethics in Qualitative Research, edited by M. Mauthner et al. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.en
dc.referencesNora, Pierre. 1989. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire.” Representations 26:7-24.en
dc.referencesOgburn, William F. 1922. Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature. New York: B. W. Huebsch.en
dc.referencesPotter, Van Rensselaer. 1971. Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en
dc.referencesPrzanowski, Karol. 2014. Credit Scoring w erze Big Data. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.en
dc.referencesRancew-Sikora, Dorota and Borys Cymbrowski. 2016. “W stronę socjologicznego ujęcia etyki badań naukowych [Towards a Sociological Understanding of Research Ethics].” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 12(3):22-39.en
dc.referencesSchütze, Fritz. 2003. “Hülya’s Migration to Germany as Self-Sacrifice Undergone and Suffered in Love for her Parents, and her Later Biographical Individualisation. Biographical Problems and Biographical Work of Marginalisation and Individualisation of a Young Turkish Woman in Germany.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 4(3). Retrieved July 07, 2020 http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/671en
dc.referencesSchütze, Fritz. 2008. “Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyse Autobiographical Narrative Interviews—Part One and Two.” European Studies on Inequalities and Social Cohesion 1/2:153-242, 243-298; 3/4:6-77.en
dc.referencesShaw, Clifford R. 1966. The Jack-Roller. A Delinquent Boy’s Own Story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesSzczepański, Jan. 1982. “Foreword.” Sisyphus Sociological Studies 2:7-8.en
dc.referencesThomas, William I. and Florian Znaniecki. 1918-1920. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America, Vol. I-V. Boston: Richard G. Badger.en
dc.referencesTufte, Edward. 1990. Envisioning Information, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.en
dc.referencesVentura-Juncá, Patricio. 2011. “Science and Ethics: Bridge to the Future for Regenerative Medicine.” International Journal of Stem Cells 4:79-84.en
dc.referencesWaniek, Katarzyna. 2019. “Emigration of Władek Wiśniewski As an Escape—A Reinterpretation of The Polish Peasant in Europe and America Volume 3 in Light of the Autobiographical Narrative Interview Method.” Przegląd Socjologiczny 4:49-73.en
dc.referencesWawrzyniak, Jan. 2005. “Aksjologiczność i etyczność nauk społecznych [Axiology and Ethicality of Social Sciences].” Człowiek i Społeczeństwo 24:59-76.en
dc.referencesWierzchoś, Dariusz. 2008. Zwyczajne życie zwykłych ludzi. Losy archiwum Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Pamiętnikarstwa [The Ordinary Life of Ordinary People. The Fate of the Archives of the Friends of Memoirs Society]. Retrieved March 10, 2020 http://histmag.orgen
dc.referencesWiśniewski, Ryszard. 2005. “O trudnościach wpływania etyki na moralność, czyli o różnych wymiarach i granicach absolutyzacji i deabsolutyzacji etyki [On the Difficulties of Influencing Ethics on Morality, That Is, On Various Dimensions and Limits of the Absolutization and Deabsolutization of Ethics].” Człowiek i Społeczeństwo 24:29-42.en
dc.referencesZimmer, Michael. 2010. “‘But the Data Is Already Public’: On the Ethics of Research in Facebook.” Ethics and Information Technology 12:313-325.en
dc.referencesŻulicki, Remigiusz. 2017. “Potencjał big data w badaniach społecznych [Big Data Potential in Social Research].” Studia Socjologiczne 3:175-207.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailkaja.kazmierska@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.16.3.08
dc.relation.volume16


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0