Pokaż uproszczony rekord

The Driving Lesson as a Socio-Technical Situation. A Case Study on the Interaction between Learner Driver, Driving Instructor, and the Motor Car

dc.contributor.authorSchmidl, Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T15:42:06Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29T15:42:06Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38410
dc.description.abstractA micro-sociological examination of the driving lesson raises the following question: How is the interaction between learner driver and driving instructor structured in this technical setting, and what meaning can be ascribed in this threefold constellation to the vehicle with its various technical elements? This case study examines the orientation patterns which exist between the learner driver, the driving instructor, and the car, which together constitute a socio-technical triangle, and what actions the learner driver needs to learn to enable them to drive the car safely. The theoretical background to the study is provided by interactionist theories, which have been broadened to include a greater sensitivity for the body and technology, and a sociological reading of postphenomenology. Using a method based on this theoretical background and informed by workplace studies, this study observed and made audiovisual recordings of driving lessons. This approach made it possible to undertake a detailed analysis of the situations, reveal how the human body interacts with technology, and how a person’s attention responds to technical information. In these situations, the driving instructor takes on the role of the translator by mediating between various situational definitions—one’s own, that of the inexperienced learner driver, other motorists, and the driver assistance systems in the car. The driving instructor represents the driving school as an institution that is responsible for creating an intersubjectively arranged understanding of how to deal with technology and socio-technical situations.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;2en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectMicorsociologyen
dc.subjectInteractionist Theoryen
dc.subjectPostphenomenological Sociologyen
dc.subjectWorkplace Studiesen
dc.subjectVideographyen
dc.titleThe Driving Lesson as a Socio-Technical Situation. A Case Study on the Interaction between Learner Driver, Driving Instructor, and the Motor Caren
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number6-21
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germanyen
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesBraidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesConley, Jim. 2012. “A Sociology of Traffic: Driving, Cycling, Walking.” Pp. 219-136 in Technologies of Mobility in the Americas, edited by P. Vannini. Oxford, Berlin: Peter Lang.en
dc.referencesDe Stefani, Elwys and Anne-Danièle Gazin. 2014. “Instructional Sequences in Driving Lessons: Mobile Participants and the Temporal and Sequential Organization of Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 65:63-79.en
dc.referencesGarfinkel, Harold, ed. 1986. Ethnomethodological Studies of Work. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.en
dc.referencesGarfinkel, Harold. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s Program. Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.en
dc.referencesGehlen, Arnold. 1957. Man in the Age of Technology. New York: Columbia University Press.en
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 1983. “The Interaction Order. American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address.” American Sociological Review 48(1):1-17.en
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.en
dc.referencesGoodwin, Charles and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1996. “Seeing as a Situated Activity: Formulating Planes.” Pp. 61-95 in Cognition and Communication at Work, edited by Y. Engeström and D. Middleton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesHenkel, Anna. 2016. “Posthumanism, the Social and the Dynamics of Material Systems.” Theory, Culture & Society 33(5):65-89.en
dc.referencesHitzler, Ronald. 1999. “Konsequenzen der Situationsdefinition. Auf dem Weg zu einer selbstreflexiven Wissenssoziologie [Consequences of the Definition of the Situation. On the Way to a Self-Reflective Sociology of Knowledge].” Pp. 289-308 in Hermeneutische Wissenssoziologie. Standpunkte zur Theorie der Interpretation [Hermeneutic Sociology of Knowledge. Viewpoints on the Theory of Interpretation], edited by R. Hitzler, J. Reichertz, and N. Schröer. Konstanz: UVK.en
dc.referencesIhde, Don. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld. From Garden to Earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.en
dc.referencesIhde, Don. 2009. Postphenomenology and Technoscience. The Peking University Lectures. SUNY series in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Albany, NY: State of University New York Press.en
dc.referencesIhde, Don. 2011. “Husserl’s Galileo Needed a Telescope!” Philosophy & Technology 24(1):69-82.en
dc.referencesIhde, Don. 2012. Experimental Phenomenology. Multistabilities. Albany, NY: State of University New York Press.en
dc.referencesKissmann, Ulrike T. 2014. Die Sozialität des Visuellen. Fundierung der hermeneutischen Videoanalyse und materiale Untersuchungen [The Sociality of the Visual. Foundation of Hermeneutic Video Analysis and Material Investigations]. Weilerswist: Velbrück.en
dc.referencesKissmann, Ulrike T. 2019. “What Makes Sensation of a Sentient Thing Possible: The Concept of Time in the Work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty.” Pp. 21-38 in Discussing New Materiality, edited by U. T. Kissmann and J. van Loon. Wiesbaden: Springer.en
dc.referencesKnoblauch, Hubert. 2000. “Workplace Studies und Video. Zur Entwicklung der visuellen Ethnographie von Technologie und Arbeit [Workplace Studies and Video. On the Development of the Visual Ethnography of Technology and Work].” Pp. 159-174 in Arbeitskulturen im Umbruch. Zur Ethnographie von Arbeit und Organisation [Working Cultures in Transition. On the Ethnography of Work and Organization], edited by I. Götz and A. Wittel. Munich: Waxmann.en
dc.referencesKnoblauch, Hubert and René Tuma. 2020. “Videography. An Interpretive Approach to Video-Recorded Micro-Social Interaction.” Pp. 129-142 in The Sage Handbook of Visual Methods, edited by E. Margolis and L. Pauwels. Los Angeles: SAGE.en
dc.referencesKnorr Cetina, Karin. 1997. “Sociality with Objects. Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies.” Theory, Culture & Society 14(4):1-43.en
dc.referencesLaurier, Eric et al. 2008. “Driving and ‘Passengering’: Notes on the Ordinary Organization of Car Travel.” Mobilities 3(1):1-23.en
dc.referencesLindemann, Gesa. 1999. “Doppelte Kontingenz und reflexive Anthropologie [Double Contingency and Reflexive Anthropology]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 28(3):165-181.en
dc.referencesLindemann, Gesa. 2009. “Gesellschaftliche Grenzregime und soziale Differenzierung [Societal Border Regimes and Social Differentiation].” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 38(2):94-112.en
dc.referencesLupton, Deborah. 2002. “Road Rage: Drivers’ Understandings and Experiences.” Journal of Sociology 38(2):275-290.en
dc.referencesMcLuhan, Marshall. 1994. Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. Cambridge: MIT Press.en
dc.referencesNazif-Munoz, Jose Ignacio. 2013. “Departing from Risky Drivers? A Sociological Analysis of Passengers’ Risk Factors.” Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine 57:357-360.en
dc.referencesSchmidl, Alexander. 2017. “Verbreiterte Realität und Vertiefte Rahmen-Analyse [Augmented Reality and In-Depth Frame-Analysis].” Pp. 1-10 in Geschlossene Gesellschaften. Verhandlungen des 38. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Bamberg 2016 [Closed Societies. Negotiations of the 38th Congress of the German Society for Sociology in Bamberg 2016], edited by S. Lessenich. Retrieved August 03, 2020 http://publikationen.soziologie.de/index.php/kongressband_2016/article/view/423en
dc.referencesSuchman, Lucy A. 1985. Plans and Situated Actions. The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Palo Alto: Xerox Corporation.en
dc.referencesVerbeek, Peter-Paul. 2005. What Things Do. Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailalexander.schmidl@fau.de
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.17.2.01
dc.relation.volume17


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
8449-Article_Text-25488-1-10-2 ...
Rozmiar:
581.7KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0