Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorTotomanova, Anna-Maria
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-27T10:00:21Z
dc.date.available2021-08-27T10:00:21Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-30
dc.identifier.issn2084-140X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38854
dc.description.abstractDuring the last dеcade the history of the Synodikon of the Оrthodoxy in Medieval Bulgaria has been tackled upon from different points of view. The author of this paper provided substantial evidence proving that the Synodikon of Tsar Boril did not survive in its original form. By the end of the 14th c. the original translation was amended and edited in order to be installed in a canonical-liturgical compilation (archieratikon) that includes texts and services related to the Feast of Orthodoxy. The compilation is kept in the National Library in Palauzov’s collection No 289. Additional information about the different sources of some rubrics of the Synodikon, which do not correspond to its Greek version, was also provided. Recently we have discovered that the text, preserved in a collection of Damasckin type from the beginning of 16th c. (Drinov’s copy) represents indeed a compilation: its first part (the canonical one) contains the translation of the Palaeologan version of the Synodikon, which survived also in a triodion from the Library of the Romanian Academy of Sciences. The second part of the compilation however coincides with the text of the Synodikon of Tsar Boril with all amendments related to the Bulgarian history – rulers, patriarchs, bishops and nobles. This “Bulgarian” part of the Synodikon includes a series of anathemas against Bogomils, that do not have Greek correspondences and generally repeat the anti-Bogomils anathemas taken from the Letter of Patriarch Kosmas in a simpler language more understandable to the faithful. This paper is tracing the connection between these anathemas and the Anti-Bogomils anathemas in the Discourse of Kosmas the Presbyter against the Bogomils.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europeen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectSynodikon of Tsar Borilen
dc.subjectanti-Bogomils anathemasen
dc.subjectKosmas the Presbyteren
dc.titleThe Anti-Bogomil Anathemas in the Synodikon of Tsar Boril and in the Discourse of Kosmas the Presbyter against the Bogomilsen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number107-122
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSofia University, Faculty of Slavic Studies, Department of Cyrill and Methodius Studiesen
dc.identifier.eissn2449-8378
dc.referencesBegunov Ju., Kozma Prezviter v slavjanskich literaturach, Sofija 1973.en
dc.referencesBiljarski I., Paleologovijat sinodik v slavjanski prevod, Sofija 2013.en
dc.referencesBožilov I., Totomanova A., Biljarski I., Borilov sinodik. Izdanie i prevod, Sofija 2010.en
dc.referencesConstantini Porphyrogeniti Imperatoris. De cerimoniis aulae Byzantinae libri duo, vol. I–II, ed. J.J. Reiske, Bonnae 1829–1830 [= Corpus scriptorum historiae byzantinae, 16–17].en
dc.referencesEleuteri P., Rigo A., Eretici, dissident, musulmani ed ebrei a Bysanzio, Venezia 1993.en
dc.referencesGouillard J., Une source grecque du Synodik de Boril: la lettre du patriarche Cosmas, “Travaux et memoires du Centre de recherches d’histoire et civilisation byzantines” 4, 1970, p. 361–374.en
dc.referencesGouillard J., Le Synodikon de l’Orthodoxie: edition et commentaire, “Travaux et memoires du Centre de recherches d’histoire et civilisation byzantines” 2, 1967, p. 1–316.en
dc.referencesNikolov A., Meždu Rim i Konstantinopol. Iz antikatoličeskata literatura v Bălgarija i slavjanskija pravoslaven svjat (ХІ–ХVІІ v.), Sofija 2016.en
dc.referencesRigo A., L’Assemblea generale atonita del 1344 su un gruppo di monaci bogomili (ms. Vat.Gr. 604 ff. 11r–12v), “Cristianesimo nella Storia. Ricerche storiche, esegetiche, teologiche” 5, 1984, p. 475–506.en
dc.referencesRigo A., Monaci esicasti e monaci bogomili. Le accuse di messalianismo e bogomilismo rivolte agli esicasti ed il problema dei rapporti tra esicasmo e bogomilismo, Firenze 1989 [= Orientalia Venetiana, 2].en
dc.referencesTotomanova A., Ezikăt na XIV vek i săstavăt na Palauzovija sbornik, “Palaeobulgarica / Старобъ- лгаристика” 36, 1, 2012, p. 24–37.en
dc.referencesTotomanova A., Sinodik carja Borila v sbornike Palauzova (NBKM № 289), [in:] XXI ežegodnaja bogoslovskaja konferencija. Cerkovno-istoričeskie issledovanija v kontekste sovremennoj nauki, Moskva 2011, p. 165–171.en
dc.referencesTotomanova A., Synodicum Bulgaricum 1211 (Critical Edition with Introduction), [in:] The Councils of the Orthodox Churches in the Byzantine and Post-Byzantine Era, ed. A. Melloni, F. Lauritzen, G. Vlantis, C. Hovorun, D. Dainese, Turnhout 2016 [= Conciliorum Oecumenicorum Generaliumque Decreta, 4], p. 426–468.en
dc.referencesTotomanova A., The Synodikon of Orthodoxy in Medieval Bulgaria, “Studia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Center for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-Eastern Europe” 7, 2017, p. 169–227.en
dc.referencesVačkova V., Serdikijskijat săbor: 1670 godini istorija i interpretacii, Sofija 2013.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailatotomanova@slav.uni-sofia.bg
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2084-140X.09.06
dc.relation.volume9


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0