Show simple item record

Pope Honorius (625–638) – a Pacifist or a Doctrinal Arbiter?

dc.contributor.authorKashchuk, Oleksandr
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-27T10:03:04Z
dc.date.available2021-08-27T10:03:04Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-23
dc.identifier.issn2084-140X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38907
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this article is to analyze the standpoint of Pope Honorius (625–638) at the early stage of the controversy over operation in Christ. Patriarch Sophronius (633/634–638) expressed his protest against the statement on one operation in Christ after it had been officially expressed in the Alexandrian Pact of unity in 633. The Pact was supported by both Sergius of Constantinople (610–638) and Emperor Heraclius (610–641). Patriarch Sergius developed his tactics in order to defend the stance of both the Church of Constantinople and the Emperor. As a result, a significant tension between both Patriarchs arose. After the confrontation between Sophronius of Jerusalem and Sergius of Constantinople, Pope Honorius (625–638) was concerned with the matter of operation in Christ. He maintained the standpoint of Sergius and became one of the implicit initiators of the Ekthesis issued by Emperor Heraclius.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europeen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectPope Honoriusen
dc.subjectSophronius of Jerusalemen
dc.subjectSergius of Constantinopleen
dc.subjectMonenergismen
dc.subjectMonothelitismen
dc.subjectoperationen
dc.subjectwillen
dc.subjectChurchen
dc.subjectEkthesisen
dc.subjectdoctrineen
dc.subjectChristologyen
dc.titlePope Honorius (625–638) – a Pacifist or a Doctrinal Arbiter?en
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number321-335
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationIvan Franko National University of Lviv, Faculty of History, Department of History of Middle Ages and Byzantine Studies; Ukrainian Catholic University, Theology and Philosophy Faculty, Department of Theologyen
dc.identifier.eissn2449-8378
dc.referencesAmbrosius Mediolanensis, De fide, [in:] Patrologiae cursus completus, Series latina, vol. XVI, ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris 1845, col. 549A–726D.en
dc.referencesAugustinus, De civitate Dei (Libri XIV–XXII), rec. E. Hoffmann, Pragae–Vindobonae–Lipsiae 1900 [= Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum latinorum, 40.2].en
dc.referencesAugustinus, Epistulae (124–184A), rec. A. Goldbacher, Vindobonae–Lipsiae 1904 [= Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum latinorum, 44].en
dc.referencesGeorge of Resh‛aina, An Early Syriac Life of Maximus the Confessor, ed. et trans. S. Brock, “Analecta Bollandiana” 91, 1973, p. 299–346, https://doi.org/10.1484/J.ABOL.4.01267en
dc.referencesHeraclius Imperator, Ekthesis, [in:] Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum, ser. II, vol. I, ed. R. Riedinger, Berolini 1984, p. 156.27–162.13.en
dc.referencesHonorius, Epistola ad Sergium, [in:] Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum, ser. II, vol. II.2, Actiones XII–XVIII. Epistulae. Indices, ed. R. Riedinger, Berolini 1992, p. 548.1–558.8.en
dc.referencesHonorius, Epistola II ad Sergium, [in:] Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum, ser. II, vol. II.2, Actiones XII–XVIII. Epistulae. Indices, ed. R. Riedinger, Berolini 1992, p. 620.20–626.9.en
dc.referencesLeo Magnus, Epistolae, [in:] Patrologiae cursus completus, Series latina, vol. LIV, ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris 1846, col. 581–1218B.en
dc.referencesMaximus Confessor, Ambigua ad Thomam una cum Epistula secunda ad eundem, ed. B. Janssens, Turnhout–Leuven 2002 [= Corpus christianorum, Series graeca, 48].en
dc.referencesDer monenergetisch-monotheletische Streit, ed. F. Winkelmann, Frankfurt am Main 2001 [= Berliner byzantinistische Studien, 6].en
dc.referencesLe Patriarcat Byzantin, ser. I, Les Regestes des Actes du Patriarcat de Constantinople, vol. I, Les Actes des Patriarches, fasc. I, Les Regestes de 381 a 715, ed. V. Grumel, Paris 1972.en
dc.referencesSacrorum Conciliorum Nova et Amplissima Collectio, vol. XI, ed. J.D. Mansi, Florentiae 1765.en
dc.referencesSatisfactio facta inter Cyrum et eos qui erant ex parte Theodosianorum, [in:] Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum, ser. II, vol. II.2, Actiones XII–XVIII. Epistulae. Indices, ed. R. Riedinger, Berolini 1992, p. 594.17–600.20.en
dc.referencesSergius Constantinopolitanus, Epistola ad Honorium, [in:] Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum, ser. II, vol. II.2, Actiones XII–XVIII. Epistulae. Indices, ed. R. Riedinger, Berolini 1992, p. 534.1–546.25.en
dc.referencesSergius Constantinopolitanus, Epistola II ad Cyrum, [in:] Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum, ser. II, vol. I, ed. R. Riedinger, Berolini 1984, p. 134.31–138.37.en
dc.referencesSophronius Hierosolymitanus, Epistola synodica ad Sergium Constantinopolitanum, [in:] Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum, ser. II, vol. II.2, Actiones XII–XVIII. Epistulae. Indices, ed. R. Riedinger, Berolini 1992, p. 410.13–494.9.en
dc.referencesSynodicon Vetus, ed. et trans. J. Duffy, J. Parker, Washington 1979 [= Corpus fontium historiae byzantinae, 15].en
dc.referencesAllen P., Life and Times of Maximus the Confessor, [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Maximus the Confessor, ed. P. Allen, B. Neil, Oxford 2015, p. 3–18, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199673834.013.1en
dc.referencesBooth P., Crisis of Empire. Doctrine and Dissent at the End of Late Antiquity, Berkeley–Los Angeles–London 2014 [= Transformation of the Classical Heritage, 52], https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520280427.001.0001en
dc.referencesBörjesson J., Augustine on the Will, [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Maximus the Confessor, ed. P. Allen, B. Neil, Oxford 2015, p. 212–234.en
dc.referencesDagron G., Kościół bizantyński i chrześcijaństwo bizantyńskie między najazdami a ikonoklazmem (VII wiek – początek VIII wieku), [in:] Historia chrześcijaństwa. Religia – kultura – polityka, vol. IV, Biskupi, mnisi i cesarze 610–1054, ed. J.M. Mayer, C.I.L. Pietri, A. Vauchez, M. Venard, Polish ed. J. Kłoczowski, Warszawa 1999, p. 17–85.en
dc.referencesFrend W.H.C., The Rise of the Monophysite Movement. Chapters in the History of the Church in the Fifth and Sixth Centuries, Cambridge 2008.en
dc.referencesHovorun C., Will, Action and Freedom. Christological Controversies in the Seventh Century, Leiden–Boston 2008 [= The Medieval Mediterranean, 77], https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004166660.i-203en
dc.referencesJankowiak M., Essai d’histoire politique du monothélisme à partir de la correspondance entre les empereurs byzantins, les patriarches de Constantinople et les papes de Rome [PhD Thesis, University of Warsaw 2009].en
dc.referencesJankowiak M., The Invention of Dyotheletism, [in:] Studia patristica, vol. LXIII, ed. M. Vinzent, Leuven 2013, p. 335–342.en
dc.referencesJankowiak M., Żywoty Maksymusa Wyznawcy, [in:] Chrześcijaństwo u schyłku starożytności. Studia Źródłoznawcze, vol. V, ed. T. Derda, E. Wipszycka, Kraków 2004, p. 153–196.en
dc.referencesJankowiak M., Booth P., A New Date-List of the Works of Maximus the Confessor, [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Maximus the Confessor, ed. P. Allen, B. Neil, Oxford 2015, p. 19–83.en
dc.referencesKaegi W.E., Heraclius: Emperor of Byzantium, Cambridge 2003.en
dc.referencesKashchuk O., Monotelitstvo u Vizantii VII stolittja. Doktryna, polityka ta ideoloija vlady, L’viv 2019.en
dc.referencesKashchuk O., The Promotion of Miaenergism as a Challenge to Identity of non-Chalcedonian Christianity, “Vox Patrum. Antyk Chrześcijański” 69, 2018, p. 257–283, https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.3263en
dc.referencesKashchuk O., Sophronius, a Monk of Palestine, and Miaenergism. The Tension between Exactness and Ambiguity, “Vox Patrum. Antyk Chrześcijański” 70, 2018, p. 259–280.en
dc.referencesLéthel F.-M., Théologie de l’agonie du Christ. La liberté humaine du Fils de Dieu et son importance sotériologique mises en lumière par saint Maxime le Confesseur, Paris 1979 [= Théologie Historique, 52], https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782701000855en
dc.referencesMarkesinis B., Les débuts du monoénergisme. Rectifications concernant ce qui s’est passé entre Cyrus d’Alexandrie, Serge de Constantinople et S. Sophrone de Jérusalem, “Analecta Bollandiana” 133, 2015, p. 5–22, https://doi.org/10.1484/J.ABOL.5.107708en
dc.referencesMaximus the Confessor and his Companions. Documents from Exile, ed. et trans. P. Allen, B. Neil, Oxford 2002.en
dc.referencesOhme H., Wer hat den Dyotheletismus erfunden? Zur Frage der Authentizität der Apologia Honorii Papst Iohannes’ IV. (640–642), “Byzantinische Zeitschrift” 110.1, 2017, p. 89–139, https://doi.org/10.1515/bz-2017-0008en
dc.referencesParente P., Uso e significato del termine θεοκίνητος nella controversia monotelitica, “Revue des études byzantines” 11, 1953, p. 241–251, https://doi.org/10.3406/rebyz.1953.1087en
dc.referencesPrice R., Monotheletism: A Heresy or a Form of Words?, [in:] Studia patristica, vol. XLVIII, ed. J. Baun, A. Cameron, M. Edwards, M. Vinzent, Leuven 2010, p. 221–232.en
dc.referencesSchönborn C. von, Sophrone de Jérusalem. Vie monastique et confession dogmatique, Paris 1972 [= Théologie Historique, 20], https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782701000541en
dc.referencesStratos A.N., Byzantium in the Seventh Century, vol. I, 602–634, trans. M. Ogilvie-Grant, Amsterdam 1968.en
dc.referencesStratos A.N., Byzantium in the Seventh Century, vol. II, 634–641, trans. H.T. Hionides, Amsterdam 1972.en
dc.referencesWolfson H.A., The Philosophy of the Church Fathers. Faith, Trinity, Incarnation, Cambridge–London 1970.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailoleks_andr@ucu.edu.ua
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2084-140X.10.15
dc.relation.volume10


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8985-Article_Text-23251-1-10-2 ...
Size:
277.7Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0