Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorValmarin, Luisa
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-27T10:03:08Z
dc.date.available2021-08-27T10:03:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-23
dc.identifier.issn2084-140X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38914
dc.description.abstractThe article shows that the mythologem associated with the ascension of the soul, despite its very antique origin and its presence as a citation in the writings of the Fathers of the Eastern Church, emerges with time displaying specific connotations, thanks to which it enters the Gnostic imaginary, to be refracted later in Christianized key in the hagiographic-eschatological narrative hinged on S. Basil the Younger.Saint Basil, who lived in the 10th century and died probably circa 950, becomes a protagonist of a hagiographic narration. In fact, although the manuscript tradition received by Acta Sanctorum does not diverges from the canonical elements displayed by the life of a saint, a conspicuous numer of Greek testimonies introduces in the narration attributed to Gregory (a disciple of the saint), an eschatological part that includes a description of the afterworld, of the Hell and the punishments received by the sinners, together with textual inserts, considered to be later than the “life” as such. The narrative begins with the story of Theodora, who describes to Gregory the path of her soul through 21 heavenly customs.The mythologem of Theodora’s heavenly customs is attested by tens of codices from the whole Orthodox area, but it is the Rumanian area only to retransmit and rework, also at folkloric level, the suggestive belief in the heavenly customs. Dualistic memory, oral tradition, and Orthodox hagiography seem to blend, at last, without any contradiction into an extraordinarily vivid and imaginative psychanody.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europeen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectheavenly customsen
dc.subjectvămile văzduhuluien
dc.subjectorthodoxyen
dc.subjectheterodoxyen
dc.subjectLife of Saint Basil the Youngeren
dc.subjectRumanian funeral ceremonyen
dc.subjectRumanian folkloreen
dc.titleOrthodoxy and Heterodoxy in the Mythologem of “Heavenly Customs”, between Rumanian Popular Books and Folkloreen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number445-471
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationThe Sapienza University of Rome, Faculty of Literature and Philosophy, Department of European, American and Intercultural Studiesen
dc.identifier.eissn2449-8378
dc.referencesCyrilli Alexandriae archiepiscopi Epistolae, [in:] Patrologiae cursus completus, Series graeca, vol. LXXVII, ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris 1864, col. 1071–1090.en
dc.referencesL’Évangile selon Marie. (BG 1), ed. A. Pasquier, Québec 1983 [= Bibliothèque Copte de Nag Hammadi. Section Textes, 10].en
dc.referencesThe Gospel of Mary, ed. C. Tuckett, Oxford–New York 2007 [= Oxford Early Christian Gospel Texts].en
dc.referencesLa première apocalypse de Jacques (NH V, 3); La seconde apocalypse de Jacques (NH V, 4), ed A. Veilleux, Québec 1986 [= Bibliothèque Copte de Nag Hammadi. Section Textes, 17].en
dc.referencesViața Sfântului Vasilie cel nou și vămile văzduhului, ed. M. Stanciu-Istrate, București 2004.en
dc.referencesVisioni dell’aldilà in occidente. Fonti, modelli, testi, ed. M.P. Ciccarese, Firenze 1987 [= Biblioteca Patristica, 8].en
dc.referencesAlexandrescu-Vianu M., The Treasury of Sculptures from Tomis. The Cult Inventory of a Temple, “Dacia” N.S. 53, 2009, p. 27–46.en
dc.referencesAlicu D., Vases décorés de serpents, découverts à Sarmizegetusa, “Latomus” 39, 1980, p. 717–725.en
dc.referencesAndreesco I., Bacou M., Morire all’ombra dei Carpazi. Dieci anni di indagine nella Romania rurale, Milano 1990.en
dc.referencesBraet H., Les visions de l’invisible (VIe–XIIIe siècle), [in:] C. Kappler et al., Apocalypses et voyages dans l’au-delà, Paris 1987, p. 405–419.en
dc.referencesCantacuzino G., Les tombes de bogomiles découvertes en Roumanie et leur rapport avec les communautés hérétiques byzantines et balkaniques, [in:] Actes du XIV Congrès International des Études Byzantines, Bucarest, 6–12 septembre 1971, ed. M. Berza, E. Stănescu, Bucarest 1975, p. 515–528.en
dc.referencesCarozzi C., Eschatologie et au-delà. Récherches sur l’Apocalypse de Paul, Aix-en-Provence 1994, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pup.1695en
dc.referencesCartojan N., Cărțile populare în cultura românească, vol. I, Epoca influenței sud-slave; vol. II, Epoca influenței grecești, 2București 1974.en
dc.referencesChiş S., Cultul șarpelui Glykon în imperiul roman, “Buletinul Cercurilor Științifice Studentești” 1, 1995, p. 97–101.en
dc.referencesClucer A., Cultul lui Glycon la Tomis şi la Apulum, “Apulum” 6, 1967, p. 611–617.en
dc.referencesConte F., Le chemin vers ‘l’autre monde’ dans la vision traditionnelle des paysans d’Europe centrale et orientale, “Revue des études slaves” 69, 1997, p. 281–297.en
dc.referencesCouliano I. [Culianu], I miti dei dualismi occidentali. Dai sistemi gnostici al mondo moderno, Milano 1989.en
dc.referencesCovacef Z., Şarpele Glykon – un artefact unic în lume, https://www.historia.ro/sectiune/timp-liber/articol/sarpele-glykon-un-artefact-unic-in-lumeen
dc.referencesCulianu I., L’«Ascension de l’âme» dans les mystères et hors des mystères, [in:] La soteriologia dei culti orientali nell’impero romano, ed. U. Bianchi, M.J. Vermaseren, Leiden 1982 [= Études préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l’empire romain, 92], p. 276–302, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004295704_019en
dc.referencesCulianu I., «Démonisation du cosmos» et dualisme gnostique, “Revue de l’histoire des religions” 196.3 1979, p. 3–40, https://doi.org/10.3406/rhr.1979.6884en
dc.referencesCulianu I., “Pons subtilis”. Storia e significato di un simbolo, “L’année épigraphique” 53, 1979, p. 301–312.en
dc.referencesCulianu I., Psychanodia, Leiden 1983 [= Études préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l’empire romain, 99].en
dc.referencesCumont F., À propos des écritures manichéennes, “Revue de l’histoire des religions” 78, 1920, p. 1–12.en
dc.referencesDa Costa-Louillet G., Saints de Constantinople, “Byzantion. Revue internationale des études byzantines” 24, 1954, p. 492–511.en
dc.referencesDaniélou J., Les démons de l’air dans la «Vie d’Antoine», “Studia Anselmiana” 38, 1956, p. 136–147.en
dc.referencesDaniélou J., Théologie du judéo-christianisme, Tournai 1958.en
dc.referencesDinzelbacher P., La «Visio S. Pauli». Circulation et influence d’un apocryphe eschatologique, “Apocrypha” 2, 1991, p. 165–180, https://doi.org/10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.301294en
dc.referencesDizionario dell’Occidente medievale, vol. I, Temi e percorsi, ed. J. Le Goff, J.-C. Schmitt, Torino 2003.en
dc.referencesEliade M., A History of Religious Ideas, vol. II, From Gautama Buddha to the Triumph of Christianity, trans. W.R. Trask, Chicago–London 1982, https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226027357.001.0001en
dc.referencesEliade M., Storia delle credenze e delle idee religiose, vol. II, Da Gautama Buddha al trionfo del cristianesimo, Firenze 1980.en
dc.referencesEliade M., Storia delle credenze e delle idee religiose, vol. III, Da Maometto all’età delle riforme, Firenze 1983.en
dc.referencesEnciclopedia delle religioni, vol. I, ed. M. Gozzini, Firenze 1970.en
dc.referencesThe Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. V, ed. M. Eliade, New York 1987.en
dc.referencesEtnografija na Bălgarija, vol. III, Duhovna kultura, ed. I. Georgieva, Sofija 1985.en
dc.referencesFiloramo G., L’attesa della fine. Storia della gnosi, Roma–Bari 1993.en
dc.referencesGarzaniti M., Les apocryphes dans la littérature slave ecclésiastique de pèlerinage en Palestine (XIIe–XVe s.), “Apocrypha” 9, 1998, p. 157–173, https://doi.org/10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.300863en
dc.referencesHalkin F., Auctarium Bibliotheca Hagiographica Graeca, Bruxelles 1969 [= Subsidia hagiographica, 47].en
dc.referencesHalkin F., Bibliotheca Hagiographica Graeca, 3Bruxelles 1957 [= Subsidia hagiographica, 8a].en
dc.referencesHalkin F., Novum Auctarium Bibliotheca Hagiographica Graeca, Bruxelles 1984 [= Subsidia hagiographica, 65].en
dc.referencesIvanov J., Livres et légendes bogomiles (aux sources du catharisme), trans. M. Ribeyrol, praef. R. Nelli, Paris 1976.en
dc.referencesJonas H., The Gnostic Religion, 3Boston 2001.en
dc.referencesJugie M., La doctrine des fins dernières dans l’église gréco-russe, “Échos d’Orient” 17, 1914, p. 5–22, https://doi.org/10.3406/rebyz.1914.4107en
dc.referencesKappler C. et al., Apocalypses et voyages dans l’au-delà, Paris 1987.en
dc.referencesvan Lantschoot A., Révélations de Macaire et de Marc de Tarmaqa sur le sort de l’âme après la mort, “Le Muséon” 53, 1950, p. 159–189.en
dc.referencesLouis R., Le serpent Glycon d’Abônouteichos à Athènes et Artémis d’Éphèse à Rome, “Comptes rendus des séances de l’année de l’Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres” 125, 1981, p. 513–535, https://doi.org/10.3406/crai.1981.13875en
dc.referencesLupaşcu S., In the Ninth Heaven: the Gnostic Background of the Rumanian Folklore Tradition of “Heaven’s Customs-houses”, “Southeastern Europe/L’Europe du Sud-Est” 30, 2003, p. 131–146 (= https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/revista?codigo=10284).en
dc.referencesMacaire, Théologie dogmatique orthodoxe, vol. II, Paris 1860.en
dc.referencesMagri A., Le serpent guérisseur et l’origine de la gnose ophite, “Revue de l’histoire des religions” 224, 2007, p. 395–434, https://doi.org/10.4000/rhr.5351en
dc.referencesMarian S.F., Înmormîntarea la Români, Bucureşti 1892.en
dc.referencesMarinov D., Izbrani proizvedenja, vol. I, Narodna vjara i religiozni narodni obicai, Sofija 1981.en
dc.referencesMastrocinque A., Alessandro di Abonouteichos e il culto di Asclepio, [in:] Il culto di Asclepio nell’area mediterranea, Atti del Convegno Internazionale – Agrigento 20–22 novembre 2005, ed. E. De Miro, G. Sfameni Gasparro, V. Calì, Roma 2009, p. 195–200.en
dc.referencesMastrocinque A., Le gemme gnostiche, [in:] Sylloge Gemmarum Gnosticarum, p. 1, Roma 2003 [= Bollettino di Numismatica. Monografia, 8.2.1], p. 66–67 (= http://www.numismaticadellostato.it ).en
dc.referencesMastrocinque A., Studi sulle gemme gnostiche, “Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik” 122, 1998, p. 111–122.en
dc.referencesMastrocinque A., Un’altra immagine transculturale: Chnoubis, [in:] Images et religion dans l’antiquité gréco-romaine. Acts of Images et religion dans l’antiquité gréco-romaine, Roma, 11–13 dicembre 2003, Napoli 2008, p. 391–397, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pcjb.4620en
dc.referencesMimouni S.C., Les «Apocalypses de la Vièrge». Etat de la question, “Apocrypha” 4, 1993, p. 101–112, https://doi.org/10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.301227en
dc.referencesNeagota B., Demonologia iudeo-creștină. Mecanisme hermeneutice și reguli de generare, “Orma.en
dc.referencesRevistă de studii istorico-religioase” 1, 2004, p. 110–117.en
dc.referencesOcheşeanu R., O gemă gnostică descoperită la Constanța, “Pontica” 4, 1971, p. 303–309.en
dc.referencesOgden D., Drakon. Dragon Myth and Serpent Cult in the Greek and Roman Worlds, Oxford 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557325.001.0001en
dc.referencesOrbe A., Los primeros herejes ante la persecucion. Estudios valentinianos, vol. V, Romae 1956 [= Analecta Gregoriana. Series Facultatis Theologicae, 83].en
dc.referencesPârvan V., Contribuții epigrafice la istoria creștinismului daco-roman, București 1911.en
dc.referencesPaşca C., O reprezentare unică a Şarpelui Glykon, expusă la Muzeul de Istorie, http://www.telegrafonline.ro/1169503200/articol/19121en
dc.referencesPatlagean E., Remarques sur la diffusion et la production des apocryphes dans le monde byzantin, “Apocrypha” 2, 1991, p. 155–164, https://doi.org/10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.301293en
dc.referencesPiovanelli P., Les origines de l’«Apocalypse de Paul» reconsidérées, “Apocrypha” 4, 1993, p. 25–64, https://doi.org/10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.301224en
dc.referencesvan der Ploeg G., The Impact of the Roman Empire on the Cult of Asclepius, University of Warwick 2016 (PhD Thesis), http: webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b2870430~S1en
dc.referencesPolitēs N., Paradoseis, vol. I, Athēnai 1965.en
dc.referencesProtase D., Problema continuității în Dacia în lumina arheologiei și numismaticii, București 1966.en
dc.referencesPuech H.-C., Cosmas le prêtre et le bogomilisme Le traité contre le Bogomiles de Cosmas le Prêtre, ed. et trans. A. Vaillant, H.-C. Puech, Paris 1945, p. 129–346.en
dc.referencesRecheis A., Engel, Tod und Seelenreise. Das Wirken der Geister beim Heimgang des Menschen in der Lehre der Alexandrinischen und Kappadokischen Väter, Roma 1958.en
dc.referencesRivière J., Rôle du démon au jugement particulier chez les pères, “Revue des sciences religieuses” 4, 1924, p. 43–64, https://doi.org/10.3406/rscir.1924.1244en
dc.referencesRousso D., Studii bizantino-romîne, Bucuresti 1907.en
dc.referencesRunciman S., Le manichéisme médiéval. L’hérésie dualiste dans le christianisme, trans. S. Pétrement, J. Marty, Paris 1949.en
dc.referencesRusu Z., Der Kult der Schlange von Tomis, “Dacoromania” 6, 1981–1982, p. 133–160.en
dc.referencesScopello M., Contes apocalyptiques et apocalypse philosophiques dans la bibliothèque de Nag Hammadi, [in:] C. Kappler et al., Apocalypses et voyages dans l’au-delà, Paris 1987, p. 321–350.en
dc.referencesSfameni Gasparro G., Oracoli e teologia: praxis oracolare e riflessioni, “Kernos” 26, 2013, p. 139–156, https://doi.org/10.4000/kernos.2208en
dc.referencesStahl P.-H., L’autre monde. Les signes de reconnaissance, “Buletinul Bibliotecii Române din Freiburg” S.N. 10, 1983, p. 87–106.en
dc.referencesStewart C., Demons and the Devil. Moral Imagination in Modern Greek Culture, Princeton N.J. 1992 [= Princeton Modern Greek Studies, 38], https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884391en
dc.referencesȘtrempel G., Catalogul manuscriselor românești, vol. I–IV, București 1978–1992.en
dc.referencesStroumsa G., Paradosis. Traditions ésotériques dans le christianisme des premiers siècles, “Apocrypha” 2, 1991, p. 133–154, https://doi.org/10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.301292en
dc.referencesSzabó C., Discovering the Gods in Apulum. Historiography and New Perspectives, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265736195en
dc.referencesTimotin A., L’eschatologie byzantine. Historiographie et perspectives de recherche, “Revue des études sud-est européennes” 41, 2003, p. 248–252.en
dc.referencesTimotin A., La littérature eschatologique byzantine et post-byzantine dans les manuscrits roumains, “Revue des études sud-est européennes” 40, 2002, p. 151–167.en
dc.referencesVlăduţescu G., Filosofia legendelor cosmogonice românești, București 1982.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailluisa.valmarin@virgilio.it
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2084-140X.10.22
dc.relation.volume10


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0