dc.contributor.author | Wieczorek, Anna Ewa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-07T14:40:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-07T14:40:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1461-4456 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/39000 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article aims to discuss conceptual levels of narrative representations of utterances based on reported speech frames employed in presidential speeches. It adopts some assumptions from Chilton’s Deictic Space Theory and Cap’s Proximisation Theory, both primarily used to indicate exclusive reference, a clash of interests and threat-oriented conceptualisation of events. This article, however, extends their scope to include strategies for inclusion and positive image construction and makes a distinction between primary, secondary and tertiary embedding as discursive means that contribute to presentation of self and legitimisation. Data for this research comprise a corpus of 125 presidential speeches (25 per tenure) divided into three subcorpora: JKC – John Kennedy Corpus, BCC – Bill Clinton Corpus, and BOC – Barrack Obama Corpus. A total of 1251 instances of narrative reports have been analysed to investigate primary and multilevel embedding, which constitute the basis for this study. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Discourse Studies;22 | |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | deictic centre | pl_PL |
dc.subject | discourse analysis | pl_PL |
dc.subject | discourse space theory | pl_PL |
dc.subject | embedding | pl_PL |
dc.subject | image construction | pl_PL |
dc.subject | inclusion | pl_PL |
dc.subject | legitimisation | pl_PL |
dc.subject | narrative analysis | pl_PL |
dc.subject | narrative reports | pl_PL |
dc.subject | political discourse | pl_PL |
dc.subject | presidential speeches | pl_PL |
dc.subject | proximisation theory | pl_PL |
dc.subject | reported speech frames | pl_PL |
dc.subject | sayer | pl_PL |
dc.subject | short narratives | pl_PL |
dc.subject | storytelling | pl_PL |
dc.title | Embedded discourse spaces in narrative reports | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 221-240 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Department of Pragmatics, Institute of English Studies, University of Lodz, Pomorska 171/173, 90-236 Lodz, Poland | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1461-7080 | |
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnote | Anna Ewa Wieczorek obtained her PhD in linguistics from the University of Lodz, Poland. Her research interests include pragma-cognitive approach to political discourse analysis, especially proximisation, inclusion and exclusion practices and storytelling techniques involving narrative reports in political speeches. Her most recent book is Clusivity: A New Approach to Association and Dissociation in Political Discourse (2013, Cambridge Scholars). | pl_PL |
dc.references | Abbott, HP (2008) The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bal, M (2009) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bauman, R (1986) Story, Performance and Event: Contextual Studies of Oral Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bruner, J (1991) The narrative construction of reality. Narrative Inquiry 18(1): 1–21. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cap, P (2006) Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cap, P (2010) Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cap, P (2013) Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cap, P (2017) The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Chilton, PA (2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Chilton, PA (2005) Discourse space theory: Geometry, brain and shifting viewpoints. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3: 78–116. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Chilton, PA (2010) The conceptual structure of deontic meaning: A model based on geometrical principles. Language and Cognition 2(2): 191–220. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Chilton, PA (2014) Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Conceptual Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Clark, HH, Gerrig, RJ (1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66(4): 764–805. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Fauconnier, G (1985) Mental Spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Fauconnier, G (1994) Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Constructions in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Fillmore, C (1975) Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Frege, G (1967 [1892]) The thought: A logical enquiry. In: Strawson, PF (ed.) Philosophical Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–38. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Gavins, J (2007) Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Halliday, MAK (1981) Explorations in the Function of Language. London: Edward Arnold. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Halliday, MAK (1985) An Introduction to Functional Linguistics. London: Edward Arnold. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hodges, A (2011) The ‘War on Terror’ Narrative: Discourse and Intertextuality in the Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality. New York: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Irvine, J (1996) Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. In: Silverstein, M, Urban, G (eds) Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 131–159. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Levelt, WJ (1989) Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Levinson, S (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Levinson, S (2000) Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Lyons, J (1982) Deixis and subjectivity. In: Jarvella, R, Klein, W (eds) Speech, Place and Action: Studies of Deixis and Related Topics. New York: Wiley, pp. 101–124. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Nunberg, G (1998) Indexicality and deixis. In: Kasher, A (ed.) Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, Vol III: Indexicals and Reference. London: Routledge, pp. 145–184. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tannen, D (1989) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tannen, D (2006) Intertextuality in interaction: Reframing family arguments in public and private. Text & Talk 26(4–5): 597–617. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tversky, B, Lee, P, Mainwaring, S (1999) Why do speakers mix perspectives? Spatial Cognition and Computation 1: 399–412. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Vandelanotte, L (2008) Dependency, framing, scope? The syntagmatic structure of sentences of speech or thought representation. Word 59(1): 55–82. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Vandelanotte, L (2009) Speech and Thought Representation in English. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Verschueren, J (1999) Understanding Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Werth, P (1999) Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1461445619893776 | |
dc.relation.volume | 2 | pl_PL |
dc.discipline | językoznawstwo | pl_PL |
dc.discipline | literaturoznawstwo | pl_PL |
dc.discipline | nauki o komunikacji społecznej i mediach | pl_PL |