Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTrillò, Tommaso
dc.contributor.editorDesperak, Iza
dc.description.abstractIn mid-March, 2017, Italian public television channel RAI Uno aired the last episode of a popular show called Parliamone… Sabato. The episode discussed the romantic preferences of Italian men, and – particularly – why Italian men allegedly fantasize about Eastern European women as their ideal partners. Following the episode, a portion of the public rose in outrage for thesexist and racist content of the show. The protest obtained the cancellation of the show and a public apology by the RAI network soon thereafter. One of the key sites for the protest was the official Twitter hashtag of the show (#ParliamoneSabato). This paper offers a discourse-centered online ethnography of a corpus of tweets gathered from #ParliamoneSabato during the two weeks following the announcement that the show would be put off the air. Text circulated via Twitter was analyzed in light of its broader context thanks to online observation and limited ethnographic engagement in the analog realm. The protest tweeted at #ParliamoneSabato was analyzed through the lenses of Bennett and Sageberg’s ‘logic of connective action’ and Kelsey and Bennett’s ‘synoptic resistance’, as well as through the work of others involved in the study of the relationship between social media and social movements. This paper concludes that, despite its spontaneous character and its focus on singling out the misconducts of ‘the few’ running the Parliamone… Sabato, the overall features of the public involved in the protest (especiallythe narrowness of the user based) make it hard to characterize it as a self-organized protest of ‘the many’. In particular, it is crucial to notice that the protest might have originated somewhat spontaneously and mostly online, but almost immediately traveled into the analog world thanks to the brokerage of the Italian feminist movement “Non una di meno”. A closer look at the language used in the context of the protest highlights that much of the conversation betrays some level of anxiety on behalf of the Italian public because of a (real or imagined) growth in diversity within the country and its intertwining with gender issues and gender-related politics.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 675378.pl_PL
dc.publisherKatedra Socjologii Polityki i Moralności, Wydział Ekonomiczno-Socjologicznypl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWładza Sądzenia;14
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.subjectsocial mediapl_PL
dc.subjectParliamone Sabatopl_PL
dc.subjecttwitter politicspl_PL
dc.subjectNon una di menopl_PL
dc.titlePerforming Feminist Resistance on Twitter: The case of #ParliamoneSabato in the Italian Twitterspherepl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodzpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteTommaso Trillò is a Marie Skłodowska Curie Early Stage Researcher and PhD candidate at the University of Lodz, Poland, in the context of GRACE - Gender and Cultures of Equality in Europe (675378 – GRACE – H2020-MSCA-ITN- 2015/H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015). His main research focus is on the production of cultures of gender equality on social media platforms. His main research project aims at exploring how key institutions at the EU supranational level and at the Italian national level contribute to the construction of ‘gender equality’ as a core European value through a comparative analysis of the narratives they advance on Twitter. Trillò holds an MSc in Migration Studies from the University of Oxford and a BA in Political Sciences from John Cabot University, Rome, Italy.pl_PL
dc.referencesAndroutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography, Language@ internet, 5(8).pl_PL
dc.referencesAndroutsopoulos, J. (2013). Online data collection, In: C. Mallinson, B. Childs & G. Van Herk (eds.), Data collection in sociolinguistics: Methods and applications (pp. 236–250). New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarzilai-Nahon, K. (2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), pp. 1493–1512.pl_PL
dc.referencesBauman, Z., Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance: A conversation. Cambridge: Polity Presspl_PL
dc.referencesBennett, W.L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics, Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), pp. 739–768pl_PL
dc.referencesFoucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesFuchs, C. (2011). Foundations of critical media and information studies. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesFuchs, C. (2013). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage.pl_PL
dc.referencesGerbaudo P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJensen, J.L. (2007). The internet omnopticon: Surveillance or counter-insurgency. In: H. Bang, A. Esmark (eds.), New Publics with/out Democracy (pp. 351–380). Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.pl_PL
dc.referencesKelsey, D. and Bennett, L. (2014). Discipline and resistance on social media: Discourse, power and context in the Paul Chambers “Twitter Joke Trial”’, Discourse, Context & Media, 3, pp. 37–45.pl_PL
dc.referencesPredelli, L.N. and Halsaa, B. (eds.). (2012). Majorityminority relations in contemporary women’s movements: strategic sisterhood. London: Palgrave Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesMeraz, S. & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt, International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), pp. 138–166.pl_PL
dc.referencesPapacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesVan Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication, Discourse & Communication, 1(1), pp. 91–112.pl_PL
dc.referencesWodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. New York: Springerpl_PL
dc.referencesZacconi, J. (2017). Paola Perego assente: calano gli ascolti senza Parliamone Sabato, La nostra TV, 26 March [online]. Available at:
dc.disciplinenauki socjologicznepl_PL

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe