Processing Presuppositions. Are Implicative Verbs Soft Triggers?
| dc.contributor.author | Włodarczyk, Mateusz | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-10T17:36:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-10T17:36:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-03-30 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1731-7533 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/41083 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper investigates the question whether implicative verbs should be considered as soft presupposition triggers, i.e., as triggers activating optional context repairs. I present the results of an experiment in which test subjects were asked to read short dialogues containing either presupposition triggers or conversational implicatures and, next, answer the questions regarding the information communicated on the level of presupposition or implicatures, respectively. The results of within-subject ANOVA show that presuppositions activated by the use of implicative verbs are significantly less accessible and illicit significantly longer response times than presuppositions activated by the use of hard triggers, suggesting that they can be classified as soft presupposition triggers. The obtained results also show that presuppositions activated by the use of different triggers are heterogenous in regards to the accessibility of information. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Research in Language;1 | en |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
| dc.subject | conversational implicature | en |
| dc.subject | implicative verbs | en |
| dc.subject | presuppositions | en |
| dc.title | Processing Presuppositions. Are Implicative Verbs Soft Triggers? | en |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.page.number | 47-75 | |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Szczecin, Poland | en |
| dc.references | Abbott, Barbara. 2000. Presuppositions as nonassertions. Journal of pragmatics, 32(10), 1419-1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00108-3 | en |
| dc.references | Abusch, Dorit. 2002. Lexical alternatives as a source of pragmatic presuppositions. Semantics and Linguistic Theory,12, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v12i0.2867 | en |
| dc.references | Abusch, Dorit. 2010. Presupposition triggering from alternatives. Journal of Semantics, 27(1), 37-80.https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp009 | en |
| dc.references | Beaver, David, Geurts, Bart. 2014. Presupposition, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, N. Zalta (ed.), URL = . https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-033952 | en |
| dc.references | Beaver, David, et al. 2017. Questions under discussion: Where information structure meets projective content. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 265-284. | en |
| dc.references | Domaneschi, Filippo. 2016. Presuppositions and Cognitive Processes: Understanding the Information Taken for Granted. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57942-3 | en |
| dc.references | Domaneschi, Filippo, Di Paola, Simone. 2018. The Processing Costs of Presupposition Accommodation. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 47(3), 483-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9534-7 | en |
| dc.references | Von Fintel, Kai. 2008. What is presupposition accommodation, again?. Philosophical perspectives, 22(1), 137-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2008.00144.x | en |
| dc.references | Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, C: 25–50. Sense and Reference. Translation by Max Black. The Philosophical Review 57:3, 209–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181485 | en |
| dc.references | Geis, Michael, L., Zwicky, Arnold, M. 1971. On invited inferences. Linguistic inquiry, 2(4), 561-566. | en |
| dc.references | Jayez, Jacques, et al. 2015. Weak and strong triggers. In Florian Schwarz (ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions, 173-193. New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07980-6_8 | en |
| dc.references | Glanzberg, Michael. 2003. Felicity and presupposition triggers. University of Michigan Workshop in Philosophy and Linguistics | en |
| dc.references | Glanzberg, Michael. 2005. Presuppositions, truth values and expressing propositions. In Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning, and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative verbs. Language, 340-358. https://doi.org/10.2307/412084 | en |
| dc.references | Karttunen, Lauri. 2016. Presupposition: What went wrong?. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Vol. 26), 705-731. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3954 | en |
| dc.references | Levinson, Stephen, C. 1983. Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. In Bäuerle Rainer, Urs Egli, and Av Stechow (eds.) Semantics from different points of view, 172-187. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67458-7_12 | en |
| dc.references | Roberts, Craige. 2015. Accommodation in a language game. In Barry Loewer, and Jonathan Schaffer (eds.) A Companion to David Lewis, 345-366. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118398593.ch22 | en |
| dc.references | Sadock, J. 1978. On Testing for Conversational Implicature. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics Volume 9: Pragmatics, 281-298. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368873_011 | en |
| dc.references | Schwarz, Florian. (Ed.). 2014. Experimental perspectives on presuppositions (Vol. 45). Springer. | en |
| dc.references | Simons, Mandy. 2013. On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In Marco Carapezza, Franco Lo Piparo and Alessandro Capone (eds.) Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics, 329-348. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_13 | en |
| dc.references | Noveck, Ira, A., Sperber, Dan. 2004. Experimental pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524125 | en |
| dc.references | Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic Presuppositions, In Milton K. Munitz and Peter K. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy. New York: New York University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Stalnaker, Robert. 1998. On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 7(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008254815298 | en |
| dc.references | Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and philosophy, 25(5), 701-721. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902 | en |
| dc.references | Strawson, Peter, F. 1950. On referring. Mind, 59(235), 320-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320 | en |
| dc.references | Tiemann, Sonja, et al. 2011. Psycholinguistic evidence for presuppositions: On-line and off-line data. Proceedings of sinn and bedeutung, 15(15). | en |
| dc.references | Davis, Wayne. 2019. Implicature, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = . | en |
| dc.references | Witek, Maciej. 2019. Accommodation in Linguistic Interaction. On the so-called triggering problem. In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophical Insights into Pragmatics, Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 163-192. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110628937-009 | en |
| dc.references | Włodarczyk, Mateusz. 2019. Are Implicative Verbs Presupposition Triggers? Evidence from Polish. In Maciej Witek, Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka (eds.), Varieties and Dynamics of Speech Actions, 206-230. Leiden: Brill Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004366527_011 | en |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | mateusz.wlodarczyk@usz.edu.pl | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/1731-7533.19.1.04 | |
| dc.relation.volume | 19 |
Pliki tej pozycji
Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0