Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorRehmann-Sutter, Christoph
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T08:01:49Z
dc.date.available2022-06-30T08:01:49Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2300-1690
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/42358
dc.description.abstractIn a letter published on March 30, 2021, 24 world leaders have called for global solidarity in the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic. This commitment to act in solidarity with low-income countries however was won under duress, and it was in part at least self-serving. Can this still be called solidarity? On the basis of a functional view on solidarity the paper argues that states can indeed act in solidarity, if they accept costs to assist others with whom they recognize similarity in a relevant respect. States can act in solidarity, or they can fail to act in solidarity, also in situations of duress and if solidary acts also serve their own interests. The paper concludes that if this is true for the Covid-19 pandemic it is also true for the climate crisis, where damage of even much bigger dimensions are to be prevented. Also in regard to anthropogenic global heating, nobody is safe until everyone is safe.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherKatedra Socjologii Polityki i Moralności, Wydział Ekonomiczno-Socjologicznypl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWładza Sądzenia;21
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectComplexitypl_PL
dc.subjectTrustpl_PL
dc.subjectInequalitiespl_PL
dc.subjectCovid-19pl_PL
dc.subjectJudgementpl_PL
dc.titleLearning global solidarity in the Covid-19 pandemic?pl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number8-15pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationInstitute for History of Medicine and Science Studies, University of Lübeck, Germanypl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteChristoph Rehmann-Sutter is Professor of Theory and Ethics in the Biosciences at the University of Lübeck in Germany and honorary professor of philosophy at the University of Basel, Switzerland. He has widely published in philosophy and ethics of biomedicine and biotechnology. Research interests include philosophical foundations of bioethics and phenomenological philosophy of biology. With a hermeneutic approach to ethics and often with qualitative empirical methods, he has been working about ethical issues of genetic engineering, of prenatal genetics, transplantation, stem cell medicine and palliative care, currently also on the ethics of climate change. Together with Heike Gudat and Kathrin Ohnsorge he edited a volume at Oxford University Press on The Patient's Wish to Die. Research, Ethics, and Palliative Care (2015). Genes in Development. Re-Reading the Molecular Paradigm (Duke University Press 2006) was edited together with Eva Neumann-Held. His last books are on our views of death and dying: Was uns der Tod bedeutet (Berlin: Kadmos 2018) and on the ethics of bone marrow transplantation from children as donors: Stem cell transplantation between siblings as a social phenomenon: The child’s body and family decision-making (ed. together with Christina Schües, Madeleine Herzog and Martina Jürgensen; Springer 2022).pl_PL
dc.referencesBundesverfassungsgericht (2021). Beschluss über Verfassungsbeschwerden zum Klimaschutzgesetz vom 24. März 2021. Downloaded from: https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/ SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2021/03/ rs20210324_1bvr265618.htmlpl_PL
dc.referencesCapron, A. M. (2007). Imagining a New World. Using Internationalism to Overcome the 10/90 Gap in Bioethics. Bioethics, 21(8), 409–412.pl_PL
dc.referencesHamilton, I., et al. (2021). The public health implications of the Paris Agreement: A modelling study. Lancet Planet Health, 5, e74–83.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson, B., et al. (30 March 2021). No government can address the threat of pandemics alone – we must come together. We must be better prepared to predict, prevent, detect, assess and effectively respond. The Telegraphpl_PL
dc.referencesKellenberger, J. (1995). Relationship Morality. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesMann, M. E. (2021). The New Climate Ware. The Fight to Take Back Our Planet. London: Scribe.pl_PL
dc.referencesPerkowski, N. (2018). Frontex and the convergence of humanitarianism, human rights and security. Security Dialogue, 49(6), 457–475.pl_PL
dc.referencesPrainsack, B., Buyx, A. (2015). Solidarity in bioethics and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPrainsack, B., Buyx, A. (2016). Thinking ethical and regulatory frameworks in medicine from the perspective of solidarity on both sides of the Atlantic. Theor Med Bioeth, 37, 489–501.pl_PL
dc.referencesSquire, V., et al. (2017). Crossing the Mediterranean Sea by Boat: Mapping and documenting migratory journeys and experiences [Final project report]. University of Warwick. Downloaded from: www. warwick.ac.uk/crossingthemed.pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response. (2021). Covid-19: Make it the Last Pandemic. Geneva: WHO. Downloaded from: https://theindependentpanel.org/mainreport/pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailchristoph.rehmannsutter@uni-luebeck.depl_PL
dc.disciplinenauki socjologicznepl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe