Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authordi Pace, Lucia
dc.contributor.authorPannain, Rossella
dc.contributor.editorLipińska, Magdalena
dc.contributor.editorSzeflińska-Baran, Magdalena
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-25T15:46:56Z
dc.date.available2022-08-25T15:46:56Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationPace L., Pannain R., Discorso figurato e pandemia : una focalizzazione sulla metafora del PERCORSO, [w:] L’art de vivre, de survivre, de revivre. Approches linguistiques. Le 50e anniversaire des études romanes à l’Université de Łódź, Lipińska M., Szeflińska-Baran M. (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2022, s. 179-193, https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-879-5.15pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8220-879-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/42945
dc.description.abstractAmong the linguistic outcomes of the pandemic are the discourse strategies applied by speakers belonging to different sociolinguistic groups in different communicative contexts. In particular, the study highlights the widespread use in Italian of a densely figurative language, aimed at representing in an effective and cognitively manageable way the dramatic novelty of the phenomenon and the exceptionality of proposed measures (typically, on the part of institutions, politicians and the press), and at expressing the unique and emotionally charged nature of the new experience (typically, on the part of the ordinary speaker). Among different possible source domains, the study focuses on that of the journey, which appears to have been overlooked in the literature, though it constitutes, crosslinguistically, a fundamental resource for the representation of several aspects of human experience.pl_PL
dc.language.isoitpl_PL
dc.publisherPresses Universitaires de Łódźpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofLipińska M., Szeflińska-Baran M. (red.), L’art de vivre, de survivre, de revivre. Approches linguistiques. Le 50e anniversaire des études romanes à l’Université de Łódź, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2022;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectFigurative languagepl_PL
dc.subjectMetaphorpl_PL
dc.subjectJourney methaphorpl_PL
dc.subjectpandemicpl_PL
dc.subjectItalianpl_PL
dc.titleDiscorso figurato e pandemia : una focalizzazione sulla metafora del PERCORSOpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeFigurative discourse and the pandemic : a focus on the JOURNEY metaphorpl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2022; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2022pl_PL
dc.page.number179-193pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversità di Napoli l’Orientale, Dip. di Studi Letterari, Linguistici e Comparati, Via Duomo 219 - 80138, Napoli.pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8220-880-1
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteLucia di Pace è Professore associato presso l’Università di Napoli “L’Orientale” dove in¬segna “Linguistica Generale” e “Modelli descrittivi delle lingue”. Le sue recenti aree di ricerca riguardano: aspetti di morfologia non-prototipica ; i linguaggi speciali tra cui il linguaggio politico e il linguaggio specialistico della medicina (si segnala il volume „La lingua del bugiardino”, Cesati 2019) ; le conseguenze linguistiche della pandemia con particolare attenzione alla comunicazione istituzionale.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteRossella Pannain è Professore associato presso l’Università di Napoli “L’Orientale” dove insegna “Linguistica Generale” e “Approcci Cognitivi al Lessico”. Di recente, le sue pubblicazioni (tra cui, la coedizione di un volume per Benjamins e un articolo nella „Review of Cognitive Linguistics”) si sono concentrate su: il ruolo della metonimia nella formazione del lessico e nella polisemia; la metafora e le problematiche terminologiche nella comunicazione istituzionale sulla pandemia di Covid-19.pl_PL
dc.referencesCASADEI, F. (1999). Alcuni pregi e limiti della teoria cognitivista della metafora. Lingua e Stile, 34/2, pp. 167-180.pl_PL
dc.referencesDÁVID, G. & FURKÓ, B.P. (2015). The journey metaphor in mediatized political discourse. Cognitive and critical perspectives. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 7/2, pp. 7-20.pl_PL
dc.referencesdi PACE, L. & PANNAIN, R. (2020). Il frame bellico nella comunicazione istituzionale sulla pandemia da coronavirus. Laboratorio dell’ISPF, 17, pp. 1-33. http://www.ispflab.cnr.it/article/ Sommario2020NumeroXVII.pl_PL
dc.referencesGRADY, J.E. (2007). Metaphor. In Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 188-213.pl_PL
dc.referencesGRADY, J.E., OAKLEY, T. & COULSON, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In Steen, G.J. & Gibbs, R.W. (eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Philadelphia : John Benjamins, pp. 101-124.pl_PL
dc.referencesJOHNSON, M. (1987). The body in the mind : The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKÖVECSES, Z. (2010). Metaphor. A practical introduction. Second edition. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLAKOFF, G . (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Second edition. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 202-251.pl_PL
dc.referencesLAKOFF, G. & JOHNSON, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMÜLLER, C . (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPANASENKO, N. et Alii (2020). Covid-19 as a media-cum-language event: cognitive, communicative, and cross-cultural aspects. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow, 5/2, pp. 122-210.pl_PL
dc.referencesSONTAG, S. (1989). AIDS and its metaphors. New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux.pl_PL
dc.referencesSPINA, S. (2020). La peste, il terremoto e altre metafore. Il coronavirus nel discorso della stampa italiana. Treccani, Lingua Italiana. https://www.treccani.it/magazine/lingua_italiana/articoli/scritto_e_parlato/peste.htmlpl_PL
dc.referencesWICKE, P. & BOLOGNESI, M.M. (2020). Framing COVID-19 : How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter. PLoS ONE, 15/9: e024001. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240010pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailldipace@unior.itpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailrpannain@unior.itpl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8220-879-5.15
dc.disciplinejęzykoznawstwopl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe