Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorRadzińska, Jowita
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-31T08:27:03Z
dc.date.available2022-08-31T08:27:03Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/43032
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the article is to present experiences and outcomes of applying asynchronous techniques in a qualitative longitudinal study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The article indicates benefits and limitations as well as opportunities and threats linked to the methodological approach that employed an asynchronous exchange and participant diaries. The temporal perspective enabled the capturing of the dynamics of change related to the pandemic, which determined the evolution of asynchronous techniques. The remaining challenge concerned keeping the balance between the flexibility and consistency of the methodology as well as ethical standards which would protect the participants’ welfare.en
dc.description.abstractCelem artykułu jest opisanie doświadczeń i wniosków płynących z zastosowania technik asynchronicznych w jakościowym badaniu podłużnym prowadzonym w trakcie pandemii COVID-19. Opracowanie ukazuje korzyści i ograniczenia oraz szanse i zagrożenia podejścia metodologicznego wykorzystującego wymianę asynchroniczną i dzienniczki. Perspektywa temporalna pozwoliła uchwycić dynamikę zmian związaną z pandemią, determinującą ewolucję technik asynchronicznych. Wyzwaniem pozostało zachowanie równowagi między elastycznością i spójnością metodologii oraz standardów etycznych mających na względzie dobro osób zaangażowanych w badanie.pl
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPrzegląd Socjologii Jakościowej;3pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectasynchronous techniquesen
dc.subjectqualitative longitudinal researchen
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectethicsen
dc.subjecttechniki asynchronicznepl
dc.subjectbadanie jakościowe podłużnepl
dc.subjectCOVID-19pl
dc.subjectetykapl
dc.titleMiędzy elastycznością a spójnością – wykorzystanie metod asynchronicznych w jakościowym badaniu podłużnym realizowanym w trakcie pandemii COVID-19pl
dc.title.alternativeBetween Flexibility and Consistency: Using Asynchronous Methods Within a Qualitative Longitudinal Research Conducted During the Pandemicen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number10-31
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Social Sciences and Humanitiespl
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8069
dc.referencesAlaszewski Andy (2006) Using Diaries for Social Research. London–Thousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi: Sage.pl
dc.referencesBampton Roberta, Cowton Christopher J. (2002) The E-interview. „Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, vol. 3(2) https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.2.848pl
dc.referencesBatorski Dominik, Olcoń-Kubicka Marta (2006) Prowadzenie badań przez Internet – podstawowe zagadnienia metodologiczne. „Studia Socjologiczne”, vol. 3(182), s. 99–132.pl
dc.referencesBeck Cheryl Tatano (2005) Benefits of Participating in Internet Discussions: Women Helping Women. „Qualitative Health Re-search”, vol. 15(3), s. 411–422 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304270837pl
dc.referencesBowker Natilene, Tuffin Keith (2004) Using the Online Medium for Discursive Research About People with Disabilities. „Social Science Computer Review”, vol. 22(2), s. 228–241 https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303262561pl
dc.referencesBraun Virginia, Clarke Victoria, Boulton Elicia, Davey Louise, McEvoy Charlotte (2020) The online survey as a qualitative research tool. „International Journal of Social Research Methodology”, vol. 24(6), s. 641–654 https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550pl
dc.referencesClarkson Gail P., Hodgkinson Gerard P. (2007) What can occupational stress diaries achieve that questionnaires can’t? „Personnel Review”, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 684–700 https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710773990pl
dc.referencesCorti Louise (1993) Using Diaries in Social Research. Surrey: University of Surrey.pl
dc.referencesCrivello Gina, Favara Marta (2021) COVID-19 and the ‘ethics of disruption’: Current dilemmas facing longitudinal research in low- and middle-income countries. „Methodological Innovations”, vol. 14(1), s. 1–5 https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799121994223pl
dc.referencesCrozier Sarah E., Cassell Catherine M. (2016) Methodological considerations in the use of audio diaries in work psychology: Adding to the qualitative toolkit. „Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology”, vol. 89(2), s. 396–419 https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12132pl
dc.referencesCrystal David (2001) Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.referencesDewe Philip J., O’Driscoll Michael P., Cooper Cary (2010) Coping with Work Stress: A Review and Critique. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470711712pl
dc.referencesDillman Don A. (2007) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.pl
dc.referencesEast Leah, Jackson Debra, O’Brien Louise, Peters Kathleen (2008) The benefits of computer-mediated communication in nursing research. „Contemporary Nurse”, vol. 30, s. 83–88 https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.673.30.1.83pl
dc.referencesEllis Carolyn (2007) Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Research with Intimate Others. „Qualitative Inquiry”, vol. 13(1), s. 3–29 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947pl
dc.referencesGłowacka Maja, Helak Monika, Kościńska Justyna (2020) Konkurs „Pamiętniki Pandemii”. Założenia, wyniki, wstępne refleksje. „Autobiografia Literatura Kultura Media”, vol. 15, s. 227–242 https://doi.org/10.18276/au.2020.2.15-17pl
dc.referencesHall Johanna, Gaved Mark, Sargent Julia (2021) Participatory Research Approaches in Times of Covid-19: A Narrative Literature Review. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–15 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211010087pl
dc.referencesHardy James (2006) Speaking clearly: A critical review of the self-talk literature. „Psychology of Sport and Exercise”, vol. 7(2), s. 81–97 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.04.002pl
dc.referencesHermanowicz Joseph C. (2013) The Longitudinal Qualitative Interview. „Qualitative Sociology”, vol. 36, s. 189–208 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-013-9247-7pl
dc.referencesHowlett Marnie (2021) Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. „Qualitative Research”, s. 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691pl
dc.referencesHughes J. (red.) (2012) SAGE Internet Research Methods. Internet-based Interviewing. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446268513pl
dc.referencesJames Nalita, Busher Hugh (2006) Credibility, authenticity and voice: Dilemmas in online interviewing. „Qualitative Research”, vol. 6(3), s. 403–420 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106065010pl
dc.referencesJankowski Nicholas W., Selm M. van (2005) Epilogue: Methodological concerns and innovations in internet research [w:] Christine Hine, red., Virtual methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg, s. 199–207.pl
dc.referencesJoinson Adam N. (2005) Internet behaviour and the design of virtual methods [w:] Christine Hine, red., Virtual methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg, s. 21–34.pl
dc.referencesKilkey Majella, Ryan Louise (2021) Unsettling Events: Understanding Migrants’ Responses to Geopolitical Transformative Episodes through a Life-Course Lens. “International Migration Review”, vol. 55(1), s. 227–253 https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918320905507pl
dc.referencesKołtan Jacek (2020) Świat wysokich prędkości i teoria krytyczna Hartmuta Rosa [w:] Hartmut Rosa, red., Przyspieszenie, wyobcowanie, rezonans. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności, s. 7–19.pl
dc.referencesLawrence Leigh (2020) Conducting cross-cultural qualitative interviews with mainland Chinese participants during COVID: Lessons from the field. „Qualitative Research”, vol. 22(1), s. 154–165 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120974157pl
dc.referencesLobe Bojana, Morgan David, Hoffman Kim A. (2020) Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 19, s. 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875pl
dc.referencesMarkham Tim, Couldry Nick (2007) Tracking the Reflexivity of the (Dis)Engaged Citizen: Some Methodological Reflections. „Qualitative Inquiry”, vol. 13, s. 675–695 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407301182pl
dc.referencesMazzetti Angela, Blenkinsopp John (2012) Evaluating a visual timeline methodology for appraisal and coping research. „Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology”, vol. 85(4), s. 649–665 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02060.xpl
dc.referencesMcCoy Lauren K. (2017) Longitudinal qualitative research and interpretative phenomenological analysis: Philosophical connections and practical considerations. „Qualitative Research in Psychology”, vol. 14(4), s. 442–458 https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1340530pl
dc.referencesMeho Lokman I. (2006) E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. „Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology”, vol. 57(10), s. 1284–1295 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20416pl
dc.referencesMenard Scott (2002) Longitudinal Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984867pl
dc.referencesMeskell Paulina, Houghton Catherine, Biesty Linda (2021) Opening Windows Behind Closed Doors: Reflections on Working Qualitatively During a Pandemic. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211008313pl
dc.referencesMonrouxe Lynn V. (2009) Solicited audio diaries in longitudinal narrative research: A view from inside. „Qualitative Research”, vol. 9(1), s. 81–103 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098032pl
dc.referencesNeale Bren (2019) Qualitative Longitudinal Research: Research Methods. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.pl
dc.referencesO’Connor Henrietta, Madge Clare (2001) Cyber-Mothers: Online Synchronous Interviewing using Conferencing Software. „Sociological Research Online”, vol. 5(4), s. 102–117 https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.543pl
dc.referencesPennebaker James W., Seagal Janel D. (1999) Forming a story: The health benefits of narrative. „Journal of Clinical Psychology”, vol. 55(10), s. 1243–1254 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199910)55:103.0.CO;2-Npl
dc.referencesPennebaker James W., Smyth Joshua M. (2018) Terapia przez pisanie. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.pl
dc.referencesRadzińska Jowita, Pustułka Paula (2021) A Win for the Middle Class? A Qualitative Study Mapping „Benefits” from the National Quarantine. „Kultura i Społeczeństwo”, t. 65, nr 1, s. 43–63 https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2021.65.1.1pl
dc.referencesRatislavová Kateřina, Ratislav Jakub (2014) Asynchronous email interview as a qualitative research method in the humanities. „Human Affairs”, vol. 24(4), s. 452–460 https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0240-ypl
dc.referencesRoberts J. Kessa, Pavlakis Alexandra E., Richards Meredith P. (2021) It’s More Complicated Than It Seems: Virtual Qualitative Research in the COVID-19 Era. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211002959pl
dc.referencesRosa Hartmut (2020) Przyspieszenie, wyobcowanie, rezonans. Przełożyli Jakub Duraj i Jacek Kołtan. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.pl
dc.referencesSanders Teela (2005) Researching the online sex community [w:] Christine Hine, red., Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg, s. 67–79.pl
dc.referencesStanley Liz (1993) On Auto/Biography in Sociology. „Sociology”, vol. 27(1), s. 41–52 https://doi.org/10.1177/003803859302700105pl
dc.referencesSurmiak Adrianna, Bielska Beata, Kalinowska Katarzyna (2022) Social Researchers’ Approaches to Research Ethics During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study. „Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics”, vol. 17(1–2), s. 213–222 https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211055056pl
dc.referencesSwenson Geoffrey, Roll Kate (2020) Theorizing Risk and Research: Methodological Constraints and Their Consequences. „PS: Political Science and Politics”, vol. 53(2), s. 286–291 https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651900177Xpl
dc.referencesThurlow Crispin, Lengel Laura, Tomic Alice (2004) Computer-Mediated Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.pl
dc.referencesTremblay Stephanie, Castiglione Sonia, Audet Li-Anne, Desmarais Michèle, Horace Minnie, Peláez Sandra (2021) Conducting Qualitative Research to Respond to COVID-19 Challenges: Reflections for the Present and Beyond. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211009679pl
dc.referencesUliński Maciej (2012) Etyka troski i jej pogranicza. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Aureus.pl
dc.referencesValdez Elizabeth Salerno, Gubrium Aline (2020) Shifting to Virtual CBPR Protocols in the Time of Coronavirus/COVID-19. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 19, s. 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920977315pl
dc.referencesVindrola-Padros Cecilia, Chisnall Georgia, Cooper Silvie, Dowrick Anna, Djellouli Nehla, Mulcahy Symmons Sophie, Martin Sam, Singleton Georgina, Vanderslott Samantha, Vera Norha, Johnson Ginger A. (2020) Carrying out Rapid Qualitative Research During a Pandemic: Emerging Lessons from COVID-19. „Qualitative Health Research”, vol. 30(14), s. 2102–2204 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320951526pl
dc.referencesWard Stephen (1999) Requirements for an Effective Project Risk Management Process. „Project Management Journal”, vol. 30, s. 37–43 https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000306pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailjradzińska@swps.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8069.18.3.02
dc.relation.volume18


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0