dc.contributor.author | Płuciennik, Jarosław | |
dc.contributor.editor | Wdowik, Agata | |
dc.contributor.editor | Rejman, Zofia | |
dc.contributor.editor | Wichrowska, Elżbieta | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-26T11:56:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-26T11:56:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Płuciennik, J. (2022), How to Study the Enlightenment? Study and Defend, "Wiek Oświecenia" 38, p. 172–186. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 0137–6942 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/43386 | |
dc.description.abstract | We live in a time of uncertainty and transition. Some would claim that Enlight- enment has already died (Kissinger, in Bendyk 2018, and Agata Bielik-Robson 2019), and its values are no longer relevant to our values. However, quite recently, some outstanding scientists, like Steven Pinker (2018), have published a good defence of the Enlightenment, claiming instead that we need the Enlightenment values . What follows is a quick overview of the defences of the Enlightenment from Adorno, Horkheimer and Habermas, and Todorov, Nussbaum and others to Pinker, arguing for pragmatic rationality. Rationality, even if it is impossible to define it with any universality from the objectivist point of view (Cartesian rationalism is impossible to defend), then it may function, together with human dignity, as a multi-faced criterium for intersubjective reality and tolerant, peaceful society. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Wiek Oświecenia; | |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | enlightenment | pl_PL |
dc.subject | recent literature on enlightenment | pl_PL |
dc.subject | defending enlightenment | pl_PL |
dc.subject | rationality | pl_PL |
dc.title | How to Study the Enlightenment? Study and Defend | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | Jarosław Płuciennik | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 172-186 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Łódź | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2720–2062 | |
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnote | professor of the humanities, cultural studies, literary studies, cognitive semantics, history of ideas, Jarosław Płuciennik is employed as a professor at the University of Łódź. Vice-Rector for Education at the University of Lodz in 2012–2016. Rector's Plenipotentiary for Open Educational Resources in 2016–2020. Member of the Committee of Cultural Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Editor-in-chief of the international quarterly "Zagadnienia Rodzajów Literackich/ The Problems of Literary Genres". He conducted studies and research at Lund University Cognitive Science in Sweden, at Westminster College and Clare Hall in Cambridge, at the Cultural Institute in Bolzano and at CEU in Budapest. He has been a guest lecturer at the University of Warsaw, the Academy of Music in Łódź, Lund University and Seton Hall University in New Jersey, USA. He promoted 7 doctors. He is the author of almost 200 publications. He was the local coordinator of the Erasmus project called The iProfessional (iPro), the Erasmus + project entitled Boys Reading (also research project) and the Erasmus + project DIGI.COM/YOUTH and LLOM. Current research on the act of reading from a comparative and cognitive perspective and educational technologies (especially iphonology and MOOC), the idea of the university, and critical media literacy. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bauman, Zygmunt. Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 2000. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Benedykt XVI. Aby odnaleźć Boga musimy zstąpić z konia naszego „oświeconego” rozumu. https://ekai.pl/aby-odnalezc-boga-musimy-zstapic-z-konia-naszegooswieconego- rozumu/ [Accessed: 3.06.2019] | pl_PL |
dc.references | Black, Edwin. IBM and the Holocaust: the strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and America’s most powerful corporation. 1st ed, Crown Publishers, 2001. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Braudel, Ferdinand. “History and Social Sciences: The Long Duration”. tłum. Morton Kroll i Florence Kroll, Political Research, Organization and Design, nr 3 (6), 1960, s. 3–13. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cascardi, Anthony J. Consequences of Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press, 1999. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Foucault, Michel. Filozofia, historia, polityka: wybór pism. Przetłumaczone przez Damian Leszczyński i Lotar Rasiński, Wydaw. Naukowe PWN, 2000. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Habermas, Jürgen. Strukturalne przeobrażenia sfery publicznej. Zredagowane przez Andrzej Maciej Kaniowski, Przetłumaczone przez Wanda Lipnik i in., Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2007. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Horkheimer, Max, i in. Dialektyka oświecenia: fragmenty filozoficzne. Wydaw. Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii PAN [Polskiej Akademii Nauk], 1994. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kellner, Douglas. “Jean Baudrillard”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Winter 2015, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2015. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ win2015/entries/baudrillard/. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Klemperer, Victor. LTI: Lingua Tertii Imperii: notatnik filologa. PolFundusz Wydaww Kanadzie, 1992. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kula M., Kategoria rozumowania historyków: długie trwanie, „Kultura i Społeczeństwo” 44 (2000), nr 4, s. 61–86. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Abraham Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address. http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/ lincoln/speeches/1inaug.htm. [Accessed 1.09.2019]. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Morris, Damien. “Barbra Streisand: Walls Review — a Fearless Riposte to the White House”. The Observer, 11 November 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/ 2018/nov/11/barbra-streisand-walls-review-searing-comeback-anti-trump. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Neiman, Susan. Moral Clarity: A Guide for Grown-up Idealists. 1st ed. Orlando, Fla: Harcourt, Inc, 2008. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Neiman, Susan. Learning from the Germans: race and the memory of evil. First edition, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2019. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pinker, Steven. Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. New York, New York: Viking, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC, 2018. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pinker, Steven. Nowe Oświecenie: argumenty za rozumem, nauką, humanizmem i postępem. Przetłumaczone przez Tomasz Bieroń, Zysk i S-ka Wydawnictwo, 2018. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pinker, Steven. Zmierzch przemocy: lepsza strona naszej natury. Zysk i S-ka Wydawnictwo, 2015. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Schmidt, James, ed. What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth- Century Questions. Philosophical Traditions 7. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Todorov, Tzvetan. In Defence of the Enlightenment. London: Atlantic Books, 2009. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wichrowska, Elżbieta. „O romantykach i klasykach, raz jeszcze...Kilka przypomnień”. Długie trwanie. Różne oblicza klasycyzmu, zredagowane przez Roman Dąbrowski i Bogusław Dopart, I, Księgarnia Akademicka, 2011, s. 217–33. | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | jaroslaw.pluciennik@uni.lodz.pl | pl_PL |
dc.relation.volume | 38 | pl_PL |
dc.discipline | nauki o kulturze i religii | pl_PL |