dc.contributor.author | Niebelska-Rajca, Barbara | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-12T06:19:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-12T06:19:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0084-4446 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/43654 | |
dc.description.abstract | According to the traditional view, the notion of imagination in early modern aesthetics was a rather marginal and subsidiary concept within the classical doctrine of mimesisdominated by rules and reason. The present paper raises some doubts about this well-established opinion. It argues that even if imagination in early modern aesthetics did not play as prominent role as in Romantic poetics, the concept had significant relevance. It presents one important episode from the Renaissance debate on imagination, which arose from the sixteenth century literary quarrel over the artistic quality and the uncertain genre of Dante’s Commedia. Its main distinctive category was “fantastic imitation” — a concept derived from Plato, yet misunderstood and thus transformed. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Zagadnienia Rodzajów Literackich;1 | |
dc.subject | phantasia | pl_PL |
dc.subject | imagination | pl_PL |
dc.subject | fantastic imitation | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Renaissance poetics | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Renaissance aesthetics | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Jacopo Mazzoni | pl_PL |
dc.title | The Poetics of Phantasia: Some Remarks on the Renaissance Concepts of Imagination and “Fantastic Imitation” | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 37-51 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, Wydział Nauk Humanistycznych, Instytut Filologii Polskiej | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2451-0335 | |
dc.references | Armisen Mireille (1979), La notion d’imagination chez les Anciens. I: Les philosophes, „Pallas” 26, 11–51. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Armisen Mireille (1980), La notion d’imagination chez les Anciens. II: La rhétorique, „Pallas” 27, 3–37. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Avicenna (1546), Compendium de anima ab Andrea Alpago Bellunensi philosopho ac medico, idiomati-sque arabici peritissimo ex arabico in latinum versa, Venetiis, apud Iuntas. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bulgarini Bellisario (1583), Alcune considerazioni sopra il Discorso di M. Giacopo Mazzoni, fatto in Difesa della Comedia di Dante, stampato in Cesena l’anno 1573, apresso Luca Bonetti, Siena. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Castravilla (1608), Discorso di M. Ridolfo Castravilla nel quale si mostra l’imperfettione della Commedia di Dante [in:] Bulgarini Belissario, Annotazioni ovvero chiose marginali di Belissario Bulgarini... sopra la prima parte della Difesa, fatta da M. Iacopo Mazzoni..., Aggiontovi il Discorso di M. Ridol-fo Castravilla sopra la medesima Commedia, Siena. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Chevrolet Teresa (2007), L’idée de fable. Théories de la fiction poétique à la Renaissance, Librairie Droz, Genève. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cocking John M. (1991), Imagination. A Study in a History of Ideas, ed. P. Murray, Routledge, London–New York. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Coleridge Samuel Taylor (1834), Biographia Litteraria or Biographical Sketches of My Literary Life and Opinions, Leavitt, Lord & Co., New York. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Comanini Gregorio (1591), Il Figino overo del fine della pittura. dialogo del rever. padre D. Gregorio Comanini Canonico Regolare Lateranese. Ove quistionandosi, se’l fine della pittura sia l’utile overo il diletto, si tratta dell’uso di quella nel Christanesimo e si mostra, qual sia imitator più perfetto, & che più diletti, il Pittore, overo il Poeta, per Francesco Osanna, Mantova. | pl_PL |
dc.references | De la phantasia à l’imagination (2003), eds. D. Lories et L. Rizzerio, Société des Études Classi-ques, Namur. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Faivre Antoine (1981), L’imagination creatrice. (Fonction magique et fondement mythique de l’image), “Revue d’Allemagne” 3, no 2. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Ficino Marsilio (1576), Marsilii Ficini Florentini, translatio simul & explanatio in Prisciani Lydi interpretationem super Theophrastum de phantasia & intellectu [in:] idem, Opera, ex officina Hen-ricpertina, Basileae. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Ficino Marsilio (1987), El libro dell’amore, ed. S. Niccoli, Olschki Editore, Firenze. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Ficino Marsilio (1989), Commentaria in Platonis Sophistam [in:] M.J.B. Allen, Icastes: Marsilio Ficino’s Interpreta-tion of Plato’s „Sophist”, University of California Press, Berkeley. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Gigante Claudio (2001), Per un’edizione critica ‘Della Difesa della Commedia di Dante’ di Jacopo Mazzoni, „Rivista di Studi Danteschi” 1. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Gigante Claudio 2003), Esperienze di filologia cinquecentesca: Salviati, Mazzoni, Trissino, Costo, Il Bargeo, Tasso, Salerno, Roma. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Giglioni Guido (2010), The Matter of Imagination. The Renaissance Debate over Icastic and Fantastic Imitation, „Camenae” 8, p. 1–21. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Halliwell Stephen (2002), The Aesthetics of Mimesis. Ancient Texts and Modern Problems, Prince-ton UP, Princeton–Oxford. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hathaway Baxter (1962), The Age of Criticism. The Late Renaissance in Italy, Cornell UP, Itaca–New York. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Imago in phantasia depicta’. Studi sulla teoria dell’immaginazione (1999), ed. L. Formigari, G. Caser-tano, Carocci, Roma. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Junius Franciscus (1638), The Painting of the Ancients in Three Bookes, Declaring by Historical Obse-rvations and Examples... written first in Latin by Franciscus Junius and now by him Englished with some additions and alterations, printed by Richard Hodkinsonne, London. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kemp Martin (1977), From „mimesis” to „fantasia”: The Quattrocento Vocabulary of Creation, Inspi-ration and Genius in the Visual Arts, „Viator” 8. | pl_PL |
dc.references | La Primaudaye Pierre de (1580), Suite de l‘Academie françoise, en laquelle il est traicté de l’homme et comme par une histoire du corps et de l’âme, Paris. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Manieri Alessandra (1998), L’immagine poetica nella teoria degli antichi. Phantasia ed enargeia, Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali, Pisa–Roma. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mazzoni Jacopo (1587), Della Difesa della „Comedia“ di Dante distinta in sette libri, nella quale si risponde alle oppositioni fatte al Discorso di M. Iacopo Mazzoni, e si tratta pienamente dell’arte poetica e di molt’altre cose pertenenti alla philosophia & alle belle lettere (parte prima che contiene i primi tre libri con due tavole copiosissime), Cesena. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mazzoni Jacopo (2017), Della difesa della “Comedia” di Dante, eds. C. Moreschini, L. Businarolo, Società di Studi Romagnoli, Cesena. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Modrak Deborah (1986), Φαντασια Reconsidered, „Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie” 68, p. 47–69. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Moreschini Claudio (2016), Idolo, fantasia e poesia da Ficino a Mazzoni, “Bruniana & Campanel-liana” 22, no 1. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Napolitano Valditara Lidia M. (2007), Platone e le ragioni dell’immagine. Percorsi filosofici e deviazioni tra metafore e miti, Vita e Pensiero, Milano. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Notomi Noburu (1999), The Unity of Plato’s “Sophist”. Between the Sophist and the Philosopher, Cambridge UP, Cambridge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Panofsky Erwin (1968), Idea. A Concept in Art Theory, trans. J.J.S. Peake, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Patrizi Francesco (1970), La deca ammirabile, La deca disputata [in:] idem, Della poetica, vol. 2, ed. D. Aguzzi Barbagli, Firenze. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Patrizi Francesco (1971), La deca plastica [in:] idem, Della poetica, vol. 3, ed. D. Aguzzi Barbagli, Firenze. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Phantasia-imaginatio (1988), V Colloquio Internazionale Roma 9–11 Gennaio 1986, Atti eds. M. Fattori, M. Bianchi, Lessico Intelettuale Europeo XLVI, Roma. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Puttenham George (2007), The Art of English Poesy by George Puttenham. A Critical Edition, ed. F. Whigham, W.A. Rebhorn, Cornell University Press, Ithaca–London. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Rispoli Gioia Maria (1985), L’artista sapiente. Per una storia della fantasia, Liguori Editore, Napoli. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Ronsard Pierre de (1870), Abbregé de l’art poétique françois [in:] Oeuvres choisies, avec notice, notes et commentaires par C.A. Sainte-Beuve, nouvelle édition, revue et augmentée par M.L. Moland, Garnier, Paris. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Russo Emilio (2002), L’oridne, la fantasia e l’arte. Ricerche per un quinquennio tassiano (1588–1592), Bulzoni Editore, Roma. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Scarpati Claudio (1985), Iacopo Mazzoni fra Tasso e Marino, „Aevum” 59. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Scarpati Claudio (2002), 1585–1587: Tasso, Patrizi e Mazzoni, „Aevum” 76. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sheppard Anne (2014), The Poetics of Phantasia. Imagination in Ancient Aesthetics, Bloomsbury, London. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sidney Philip (2002), An Apology for Poetry or The Defence of Poesy, ed. G. Shepherd, revisited and expanded for third edition by R.W. Maslen, Manchester UP, Manchester–New York. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Starobinski Jean (1970), Jalons pour une histoire du concept d’imagination [in:] idem, L’oeil vivant II, Gallimard, Paris. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Summers David (1981), Michelangelo and the Language of Art, Princeton UP, Princeton. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tasso Torquato (1804), Lettere [in:] idem, Opera, vol. 3, dalla Società Tipografica de’Classici Italiani, Milano. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tasso Torquato (1859), I Dialoghi, a cura di Cesare Guasti, vol. III, Le Monnier, Firenze. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tasso Torquato (1964), Discorsi dell’arte poetica e del poema eroico, ed. L. Poma, Gius. Laterza & Figli (Scrittori d’Italia N. 228), Bari. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tesauro Emanuele (1670), La filosofia morale derivata dall’alto fonte del grande Aristotele Stagirita, Bartolomeo Zapata, Torino. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tomitano Bernardino (1570), Quattro libri della lingua toscana, ove si prova la philosophia esser neces-saria al perfetto oratore & poeta, Marcantonio Olmo, Padova. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Varchi Benedetto (1549), Due lezioni di M. Benedetto Varchi nella prima delle quali si dichiara un sonetto di M. Michelangelo Buonarotti. Nella seconda si disputa quale sia piu nobile arte, la scultura o la Pittura, Lorenzo Torrentino, Fiorenza. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Vasari Giorgio (1568), Le Vite de piu eccellenti architetti, pittori, et scultori italiani da Cimabue insino a’tempi nostri, descritte in lingua toscana, da Giorgio Vasari Pittore Aretino, con una sua utile & necessaria introduzione e le arti loro, Primo volume della terza parte, I Giunti, Fiorenza. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Watson Gerard (1988), Phantasia in Classical Thought, Galway UP, Galway. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Weinberg Bernard (1961), A History of Literary Criticism in the Italian Renaissance, vol. 1–2, Chicago UP, Chicago. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wels Volkhard (2005), Zur Vorgeschichte des Begriffs der ‘kreativen Phantasie’, “Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft” 50, no 2. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wolfson Harry Austryn (1973), Studies in the History of Philosophy and Religion, vol. I, Harvard UP, Cambridge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wordsworth William (1850), The Prelude, or Growth of a Poet’s Mind: An Autobiographical Poem, Edward Moxon, London. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Zawadzki Andrzej (2007), ‘Symploke’ jako figura Platońskiej mimesis, „Wielogłos” 1, nr 1. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.26485/ZRL/2018/61.1/3 | |
dc.relation.volume | 61 | pl_PL |
dc.discipline | literaturoznawstwo | pl_PL |