Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNiebelska-Rajca, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-12T06:19:32Z
dc.date.available2022-10-12T06:19:32Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0084-4446
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/43654
dc.description.abstractAccording to the traditional view, the notion of imagination in early modern aesthetics was a rather marginal and subsidiary concept within the classical doctrine of mimesisdominated by rules and reason. The present paper raises some doubts about this well-established opinion. It argues that even if imagination in early modern aesthetics did not play as prominent role as in Romantic poetics, the concept had significant relevance. It presents one important episode from the Renaissance debate on imagination, which arose from the sixteenth century literary quarrel over the artistic quality and the uncertain genre of Dante’s Commedia. Its main distinctive category was “fantastic imitation” — a concept derived from Plato, yet misunderstood and thus transformed.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherŁódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesZagadnienia Rodzajów Literackich;1
dc.subjectphantasiapl_PL
dc.subjectimaginationpl_PL
dc.subjectfantastic imitationpl_PL
dc.subjectRenaissance poeticspl_PL
dc.subjectRenaissance aestheticspl_PL
dc.subjectJacopo Mazzonipl_PL
dc.titleThe Poetics of Phantasia: Some Remarks on the Renaissance Concepts of Imagination and “Fantastic Imitation”pl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number37-51pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKatolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, Wydział Nauk Humanistycznych, Instytut Filologii Polskiejpl_PL
dc.identifier.eissn2451-0335
dc.referencesArmisen Mireille (1979), La notion d’imagination chez les Anciens. I: Les philosophes, „Pallas” 26, 11–51.pl_PL
dc.referencesArmisen Mireille (1980), La notion d’imagination chez les Anciens. II: La rhétorique, „Pallas” 27, 3–37.pl_PL
dc.referencesAvicenna (1546), Compendium de anima ab Andrea Alpago Bellunensi philosopho ac medico, idiomati-sque arabici peritissimo ex arabico in latinum versa, Venetiis, apud Iuntas.pl_PL
dc.referencesBulgarini Bellisario (1583), Alcune considerazioni sopra il Discorso di M. Giacopo Mazzoni, fatto in Difesa della Comedia di Dante, stampato in Cesena l’anno 1573, apresso Luca Bonetti, Siena.pl_PL
dc.referencesCastravilla (1608), Discorso di M. Ridolfo Castravilla nel quale si mostra l’imperfettione della Commedia di Dante [in:] Bulgarini Belissario, Annotazioni ovvero chiose marginali di Belissario Bulgarini... sopra la prima parte della Difesa, fatta da M. Iacopo Mazzoni..., Aggiontovi il Discorso di M. Ridol-fo Castravilla sopra la medesima Commedia, Siena.pl_PL
dc.referencesChevrolet Teresa (2007), L’idée de fable. Théories de la fiction poétique à la Renaissance, Librairie Droz, Genève.pl_PL
dc.referencesCocking John M. (1991), Imagination. A Study in a History of Ideas, ed. P. Murray, Routledge, London–New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesColeridge Samuel Taylor (1834), Biographia Litteraria or Biographical Sketches of My Literary Life and Opinions, Leavitt, Lord & Co., New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesComanini Gregorio (1591), Il Figino overo del fine della pittura. dialogo del rever. padre D. Gregorio Comanini Canonico Regolare Lateranese. Ove quistionandosi, se’l fine della pittura sia l’utile overo il diletto, si tratta dell’uso di quella nel Christanesimo e si mostra, qual sia imitator più perfetto, & che più diletti, il Pittore, overo il Poeta, per Francesco Osanna, Mantova.pl_PL
dc.referencesDe la phantasia à l’imagination (2003), eds. D. Lories et L. Rizzerio, Société des Études Classi-ques, Namur.pl_PL
dc.referencesFaivre Antoine (1981), L’imagination creatrice. (Fonction magique et fondement mythique de l’image), “Revue d’Allemagne” 3, no 2.pl_PL
dc.referencesFicino Marsilio (1576), Marsilii Ficini Florentini, translatio simul & explanatio in Prisciani Lydi interpretationem super Theophrastum de phantasia & intellectu [in:] idem, Opera, ex officina Hen-ricpertina, Basileae.pl_PL
dc.referencesFicino Marsilio (1987), El libro dell’amore, ed. S. Niccoli, Olschki Editore, Firenze.pl_PL
dc.referencesFicino Marsilio (1989), Commentaria in Platonis Sophistam [in:] M.J.B. Allen, Icastes: Marsilio Ficino’s Interpreta-tion of Plato’s „Sophist”, University of California Press, Berkeley.pl_PL
dc.referencesGigante Claudio (2001), Per un’edizione critica ‘Della Difesa della Commedia di Dante’ di Jacopo Mazzoni, „Rivista di Studi Danteschi” 1.pl_PL
dc.referencesGigante Claudio 2003), Esperienze di filologia cinquecentesca: Salviati, Mazzoni, Trissino, Costo, Il Bargeo, Tasso, Salerno, Roma.pl_PL
dc.referencesGiglioni Guido (2010), The Matter of Imagination. The Renaissance Debate over Icastic and Fantastic Imitation, „Camenae” 8, p. 1–21.pl_PL
dc.referencesHalliwell Stephen (2002), The Aesthetics of Mimesis. Ancient Texts and Modern Problems, Prince-ton UP, Princeton–Oxford.pl_PL
dc.referencesHathaway Baxter (1962), The Age of Criticism. The Late Renaissance in Italy, Cornell UP, Itaca–New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesImago in phantasia depicta’. Studi sulla teoria dell’immaginazione (1999), ed. L. Formigari, G. Caser-tano, Carocci, Roma.pl_PL
dc.referencesJunius Franciscus (1638), The Painting of the Ancients in Three Bookes, Declaring by Historical Obse-rvations and Examples... written first in Latin by Franciscus Junius and now by him Englished with some additions and alterations, printed by Richard Hodkinsonne, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesKemp Martin (1977), From „mimesis” to „fantasia”: The Quattrocento Vocabulary of Creation, Inspi-ration and Genius in the Visual Arts, „Viator” 8.pl_PL
dc.referencesLa Primaudaye Pierre de (1580), Suite de l‘Academie françoise, en laquelle il est traicté de l’homme et comme par une histoire du corps et de l’âme, Paris.pl_PL
dc.referencesManieri Alessandra (1998), L’immagine poetica nella teoria degli antichi. Phantasia ed enargeia, Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali, Pisa–Roma.pl_PL
dc.referencesMazzoni Jacopo (1587), Della Difesa della „Comedia“ di Dante distinta in sette libri, nella quale si risponde alle oppositioni fatte al Discorso di M. Iacopo Mazzoni, e si tratta pienamente dell’arte poetica e di molt’altre cose pertenenti alla philosophia & alle belle lettere (parte prima che contiene i primi tre libri con due tavole copiosissime), Cesena.pl_PL
dc.referencesMazzoni Jacopo (2017), Della difesa della “Comedia” di Dante, eds. C. Moreschini, L. Businarolo, Società di Studi Romagnoli, Cesena.pl_PL
dc.referencesModrak Deborah (1986), Φαντασια Reconsidered, „Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie” 68, p. 47–69.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoreschini Claudio (2016), Idolo, fantasia e poesia da Ficino a Mazzoni, “Bruniana & Campanel-liana” 22, no 1.pl_PL
dc.referencesNapolitano Valditara Lidia M. (2007), Platone e le ragioni dell’immagine. Percorsi filosofici e deviazioni tra metafore e miti, Vita e Pensiero, Milano.pl_PL
dc.referencesNotomi Noburu (1999), The Unity of Plato’s “Sophist”. Between the Sophist and the Philosopher, Cambridge UP, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesPanofsky Erwin (1968), Idea. A Concept in Art Theory, trans. J.J.S. Peake, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.pl_PL
dc.referencesPatrizi Francesco (1970), La deca ammirabile, La deca disputata [in:] idem, Della poetica, vol. 2, ed. D. Aguzzi Barbagli, Firenze.pl_PL
dc.referencesPatrizi Francesco (1971), La deca plastica [in:] idem, Della poetica, vol. 3, ed. D. Aguzzi Barbagli, Firenze.pl_PL
dc.referencesPhantasia-imaginatio (1988), V Colloquio Internazionale Roma 9–11 Gennaio 1986, Atti eds. M. Fattori, M. Bianchi, Lessico Intelettuale Europeo XLVI, Roma.pl_PL
dc.referencesPuttenham George (2007), The Art of English Poesy by George Puttenham. A Critical Edition, ed. F. Whigham, W.A. Rebhorn, Cornell University Press, Ithaca–London.pl_PL
dc.referencesRispoli Gioia Maria (1985), L’artista sapiente. Per una storia della fantasia, Liguori Editore, Napoli.pl_PL
dc.referencesRonsard Pierre de (1870), Abbregé de l’art poétique françois [in:] Oeuvres choisies, avec notice, notes et commentaires par C.A. Sainte-Beuve, nouvelle édition, revue et augmentée par M.L. Moland, Garnier, Paris.pl_PL
dc.referencesRusso Emilio (2002), L’oridne, la fantasia e l’arte. Ricerche per un quinquennio tassiano (1588–1592), Bulzoni Editore, Roma.pl_PL
dc.referencesScarpati Claudio (1985), Iacopo Mazzoni fra Tasso e Marino, „Aevum” 59.pl_PL
dc.referencesScarpati Claudio (2002), 1585–1587: Tasso, Patrizi e Mazzoni, „Aevum” 76.pl_PL
dc.referencesSheppard Anne (2014), The Poetics of Phantasia. Imagination in Ancient Aesthetics, Bloomsbury, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesSidney Philip (2002), An Apology for Poetry or The Defence of Poesy, ed. G. Shepherd, revisited and expanded for third edition by R.W. Maslen, Manchester UP, Manchester–New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesStarobinski Jean (1970), Jalons pour une histoire du concept d’imagination [in:] idem, L’oeil vivant II, Gallimard, Paris.pl_PL
dc.referencesSummers David (1981), Michelangelo and the Language of Art, Princeton UP, Princeton.pl_PL
dc.referencesTasso Torquato (1804), Lettere [in:] idem, Opera, vol. 3, dalla Società Tipografica de’Classici Italiani, Milano.pl_PL
dc.referencesTasso Torquato (1859), I Dialoghi, a cura di Cesare Guasti, vol. III, Le Monnier, Firenze.pl_PL
dc.referencesTasso Torquato (1964), Discorsi dell’arte poetica e del poema eroico, ed. L. Poma, Gius. Laterza & Figli (Scrittori d’Italia N. 228), Bari.pl_PL
dc.referencesTesauro Emanuele (1670), La filosofia morale derivata dall’alto fonte del grande Aristotele Stagirita, Bartolomeo Zapata, Torino.pl_PL
dc.referencesTomitano Bernardino (1570), Quattro libri della lingua toscana, ove si prova la philosophia esser neces-saria al perfetto oratore & poeta, Marcantonio Olmo, Padova.pl_PL
dc.referencesVarchi Benedetto (1549), Due lezioni di M. Benedetto Varchi nella prima delle quali si dichiara un sonetto di M. Michelangelo Buonarotti. Nella seconda si disputa quale sia piu nobile arte, la scultura o la Pittura, Lorenzo Torrentino, Fiorenza.pl_PL
dc.referencesVasari Giorgio (1568), Le Vite de piu eccellenti architetti, pittori, et scultori italiani da Cimabue insino a’tempi nostri, descritte in lingua toscana, da Giorgio Vasari Pittore Aretino, con una sua utile & necessaria introduzione e le arti loro, Primo volume della terza parte, I Giunti, Fiorenza.pl_PL
dc.referencesWatson Gerard (1988), Phantasia in Classical Thought, Galway UP, Galway.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeinberg Bernard (1961), A History of Literary Criticism in the Italian Renaissance, vol. 1–2, Chicago UP, Chicago.pl_PL
dc.referencesWels Volkhard (2005), Zur Vorgeschichte des Begriffs der ‘kreativen Phantasie’, “Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft” 50, no 2.pl_PL
dc.referencesWolfson Harry Austryn (1973), Studies in the History of Philosophy and Religion, vol. I, Harvard UP, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesWordsworth William (1850), The Prelude, or Growth of a Poet’s Mind: An Autobiographical Poem, Edward Moxon, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesZawadzki Andrzej (2007), ‘Symploke’ jako figura Platońskiej mimesis, „Wielogłos” 1, nr 1.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.26485/ZRL/2018/61.1/3
dc.relation.volume61pl_PL
dc.disciplineliteraturoznawstwopl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record