Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStandlee, Alecea
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T09:16:08Z
dc.date.available2023-02-13T09:16:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/45925
dc.description.abstractThis article considers the extent that new forms of communication technologies developed in the last half century have contributed to new forms of sexual and romantic relationships flourishing among early adults in the United States. This project pays particular attention to the implications of that during the 2020 pandemic lockdowns and the increased dependency on technology that followed. This empirical work uses the theoretical framework provided by the scholarship of George Ritzer (2004), which focuses on the social narratives that drive labor into increasingly rational and functionalist operations, which he terms McDonaldization. This project uses interview data collected from college students to explore attitudes and social forms related to casual sex and the development of serious romantic relationships among participants. In an analysis of the data, three key trends have emerged that can be understood within Ritzer’s theoretical frame. Research participants utilize and value technologies within their intimate relationships as information filters that provide efficiency in creating relationships. They also demonstrate the use of technological, organizational, and connective tools as means to control relationships. Finally, technological tools and symbols signal a kind of semi-standardized symbol of commitment to the relationship, though the meaning of these signs is still contested.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectSexual Behavioren
dc.subjectRelationshipsen
dc.subjectSocial Mediaen
dc.subjectTechnologyen
dc.titleSex, Romance, and Technology: Efficiency, Predictability, and Standardization in College Dating Culturesen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number6-21
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationGettysburg College, USAen
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesAllison, Rachel and Barbara J. Risman. 2014. “‘It Goes Hand in Hand with the Parties’: Race, Class, and Residence in College Student Negotiations of Hooking Up.” Sociological Perspectives 57(1):102-123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121413516608en
dc.referencesBakardjieva, Maria. 2014. “Social Media and the McDonaldization of Friendship.” Communications 39(4):369-387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0017en
dc.referencesBogle, Kathleen. 2008. Hooking Up: Sex, Dating, and Relationships on Campus. New York: NYU Press.en
dc.referencesCassar, Kacie. 2019. “The Effects of Social Media on College Dating Culture.” Retrieved December 05, 2022 https://mdsoar.org/handle/11603/17629en
dc.referencesChristopher, F. Scott and Susan Sprecher. 2000. “Sexuality in Marriage, Dating, and Other Relationships: A Decade Review.” Journal of Marriage and Family 62(4):999-1017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00999.xen
dc.referencesDavid, Gaby and Carolina Cambre. 2016. “Screened Intimacies: Tinder and the Swipe Logic.” Social Media + Society. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641976en
dc.referencesGiddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.en
dc.referencesGregg, Melissa. 2018. Counterproductive: Time Management in the Knowledge Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.en
dc.referencesGrello, Catherine M., Deborah P. Welsh, and Melinda S. Harper. 2006. “No Strings Attached: The Nature of Casual Sex in College Students.” Journal of Sex Research 43(3):255-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552324en
dc.referencesHelm, Herbert W., Stephanie D. Gondra, and Duane C. McBride. 2015. “Hook-Up Culture among College Students: A Comparison of Attitudes toward Hooking-Up Based on Ethnicity and Gender.” North American Journal of Psychology 17(2):221-232.en
dc.referencesHirsch, Jennifer S. 2020. Sexual Citizens: A Landmark Study of Sex, Power, and Assault on Campus. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.en
dc.referencesHjorth, Larissa and Sun Sun Lim. 2012. “Mobile Intimacy in an Age of Affective Mobile Media.” Feminist Media Studies 12(4):477-484. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.741860en
dc.referencesHoffman, Rachel. 2018. Dating and Mating in a Techno-Driven World: Understanding How Technology Is Helping and Hurting Relationships. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.en
dc.referencesHutmanová, Nikoleta and Peter Dorčák. 2021. “Impact of Social Media on Children’s Relationship with Brands.” SHS Web of Conferences 115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111501003en
dc.referencesKenney, Jacqueline, Antoine Hermens, and Thomas Clarke. 2004. “The Political Economy of E-Learning Educational Development: Strategies, Standardisation and Scalability.” Education & Training (London) 46(6/7):370-379. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910410555286en
dc.referencesKettrey, Heather Hensman and Aubrey D. Johnson. 2021. “Hooking Up and Pairing Off: Correlates of College Students’ Interest in Subsequent Hookups and Romantic Relationships with Other-Sex and Same-Sex Hookup Partners.” The Journal of Sex Research 58(7):915-942. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1766403en
dc.referencesKwok, Ian and Annie B. Wescott. 2020. “Cyberintimacy: A Scoping Review of Technology-Mediated Romance in the Digital Age.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 23(10):657-666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0764en
dc.referencesLamont, Ellen, Teresa Roach, and Sope Kahn. 2018. “Navigating Campus Hookup Culture: LGBTQ Students and College Hookups.” Sociological Forum (Randolph, N.J.) 33(4):1000-1022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12458en
dc.referencesLundquist, Jennifer Hickes and Celeste Vaughan Curington. 2019. “Love Me Tinder, Love Me Sweet.” Contexts (Berkeley, Calif.) 18(4):22-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504219883848en
dc.referencesMannheim, Karl. 1936. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. London, Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.en
dc.referencesNathanson, Amy I. 2018. “How Parents Manage Young Children’s Mobile Media Use.” Pp. 3-22 in Families and Technology, National Symposium on Family Issues, edited by J. Van Hook, S. M. McHale, and V. King. Cham: Springer International Publishing.en
dc.referencesOwen, Jesse J. et al. 2010. “‘Hooking Up’ Among College Students: Demographic and Psychosocial Correlates.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 39(3):653-663. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1en
dc.referencesProcentese, Fortuna, Flora Gatti, and Immacolata Di Napoli. 2019. “Families and Social Media Use: The Role of Parents’ Perceptions about Social Media Impact on Family Systems in the Relationship between Family Collective Efficacy and Open Communication.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(24). Retrieved December 14, 2021 https://gettysburg.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2336252049&context=PC&vid=01GETTYSBURG_INST:MUSCAT&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,social%20media%20impacts&facet=searchcreationdate,include,2015%7C,%7C2023&offset=0en
dc.referencesReed, Lauren A., Richard M. Tolman, and L. Monique Ward. 2016. “Snooping and Sexting: Digital Media as a Context for Dating Aggression and Abuse Among College Students.” Violence against Women 22(13):1556-1576. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216630143en
dc.referencesRitzer, George. 1998. The McDonaldization Thesis: Explorations and Extensions. London : SAGE Publications.en
dc.referencesRitzer, George. 2004. The McDonaldization of Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.en
dc.referencesRitzer, George and Steven Miles. 2019. “The Changing Nature of Consumption and the Intensification of McDonaldization in the Digital Age.” Journal of Consumer Culture 19(1):3-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518818628en
dc.referencesRosewarne, Lauren. 2016. Intimacy on the Internet: Media Representation of Online Connections. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesSchwartz, Pepper and Nicholas Velotta. 2018. “Online Dating: Changing Intimacy One Swipe at a Time?” Pp. 57-88 in Families and Technology, National Symposium on Family Issues, edited by J. Van Hook, S. M. McHale, and V. King. Cham: Springer International Publishing.en
dc.referencesSmart, Barry. 1999. Resisting McDonaldization. London: SAGE Publications.en
dc.referencesStandlee, Alecea. 2019. “Friendship and Online Filtering: The Use of Social Media to Construct Offline Social Networks.” New Media & Society 21(3):770-785. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818806844en
dc.referencesSutton, Tara E. and Leslie Gordon Simons. 2014. “Sexual Assault among College Students: Family of Origin Hostility, Attachment, and the Hook-Up Culture as Risk Factors.” Journal of Child and Family Studies 24(10):2827-2840. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0087-1en
dc.referencesVrangalova, Zhana. 2015. “Does Casual Sex Harm College Students’ Well-Being? A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role of Motivation.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 44(4):945-959. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0255-1en
dc.referencesWade, Lisa. 2018. American Hookup The New Culture of Sex on Campus. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.en
dc.referencesWang, Xiaolun et al. 2018. “Impact of Online Social Media Communication and Offline Geographical Distance on Elder Users’ Intergenerational Isolation: From Technology Affordance Perspective.” Pp. 547-559 in Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Acceptance, Communication and Participation, edited by J. Zhou and G. Salvendy. Cham: Springer International Publishing.en
dc.referencesWeber, Max, Peter Baehr, and Gordon C. Wells. 2002. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: And Other Writings. London: Penguin Classics.en
dc.referencesWilhite, Emily R. and Kim Fromme. 2019. “Swiping Right: Alcohol, Online Dating, and Sexual Hookups in Postcollege Women.” Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 33(6):552-560. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000493en
dc.contributor.authorEmailastandle@gettysburg.edu
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.19.1.01
dc.relation.volume19


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0