Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorGalia, Riki
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T09:16:10Z
dc.date.available2023-02-13T09:16:10Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/45927
dc.description.abstractThere is a dearth of critical ethnographic research that focuses on the semiotic-discursive features of corporate social responsibility (CSR) framing in business and nonprofit (BUS-NPO) partnerships. This article contributes to CSR scholarship by combining ethnographic methods (participant observation, in-depth interviews, and textual materials) and semiotic analysis to demonstrate how a bank-NPO partnership is discursively framed in the context of agonistic interactions and its implications in terms of cooptation.This article crystallizes two arguments. First, the bank’s joint CSR initiatives represent a discursively framed and validated model of CSR as a commodity aiming at advancing bank interests at the cost of avoiding substantive and sustained social responsibility. Second, the joint CSR model, discursively framed as a cooptative partnership discourse, is effectively realized through the practices of the cooptative relationship between the bank and the NPOs.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectBUS-NPO Partnershipsen
dc.subjectJoint CSR Initiatives Modelen
dc.subjectCooptation and CSRen
dc.subjectContested Discursive Framingen
dc.subjectSymbolic Interactionist-Semiotic Analysisen
dc.subjectBanking and CSRen
dc.subjectEthnographic Methoden
dc.titleContested Discursive Framing of a Bank’s Cooptative Joint CSR Modelen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number52-75
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKinneret Academic College, Israelen
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesAL-Tabbaa, Omar, Desmond Leach, and John March. 2014. “Collaboration between Nonprofit and Business Sectors: A Framework to Guide Strategy Development for Nonprofit Organizations.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 25(3):657-678. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9357-6en
dc.referencesAlvesson, Mats and Dan Kärreman. 2000. “Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations through Discourse Analysis.” Human Relations 53(9):1125-1150.en
dc.referencesAustin, James E. 2000. “Strategic Collaboration between Nonprofits and Business.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 29(1):69-97.en
dc.referencesAustin, James E. and Maria M. Seitanidi. 2012a. “Collaborative Value Creation: A Review of Partnering between Nonprofits and Businesses: Part I. Value Creation Spectrum and Collaboration Stages.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41(5):726- 758. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012450777en
dc.referencesAustin, James E. and Maria M. Seitanidi. 2012b. “Collaborative Value Creation: A Review of Partnering between Nonprofits and Businesses. Part 2: Partnership Processes and Outcomes.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41(5):929-968. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012454685en
dc.referencesBarkay, Tamar. 2008. “Neoliberalism and Zionism: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Social Struggle on Israeliness.” Theory and Criticism 33:45-71. [In Hebrew].en
dc.referencesBarkay, Tamar. 2011. “When Business and Community Meet: A Case Study of Coca-Cola.” Critical Sociology 39(2):277-293. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0896920511423112en
dc.referencesBarnett, Michael L. 2019. “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critique and an Indirect Path Forward.” Business & Society 58(1):167-190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316660044en
dc.referencesBass, Erin A. and Ivana Milosevic. 2018. “The Ethnographic Method in CSR Research: The Role and Importance of Methodological Fit.” Business & Society 57(1):174-215. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650316648666en
dc.referencesBaur, Dorothea and Hans P. Schmitz. 2012. “Corporations and NGOs: When Accountability Leads to Cooptation.” Journal of Business Ethics 106(1):9-21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1057-9.en
dc.referencesBosscher, Judith L. 2009. “Commercialization in Nonprofits: Tainted Value?” SPNA Review 5(1):1-9.en
dc.referencesBrand, Teunis, Vincent Blok, and Marcel Verweij. 2020. “Stakeholder Dialogue as Agonistic Deliberation: Exploring the Role of Conflict and Self-Interest in Business-NGO Interaction.” Business Ethics Quarterly 30(1):3-30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/beq.2019.21en
dc.referencesBurchell, Jon and Joanne Cook. 2013. “CSR, Cooptation and Resistance: The Emergence of New Agonistic Relations between Business and Civil Society.” Journal of Business Ethics 115(4):741- 754. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1830-zen
dc.referencesCarroll, Archie B. and Kareem M. Shabana. 2010. “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice.” International Journal of Management Reviews 12(1):85-105.en
dc.referencesCook, Joanne and Jon Burchell. 2018. “Bridging the Gaps in Employee Volunteering: Why the Third Sector Doesn’t Always Win?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 47(1):165-184. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764017734649en
dc.referencesCornelissen, Joep P. and Mirjam D. Werner. 2014. “Putting Framing in Perspective: A Review of Framing and Frame Analysis across the Management and Organizational Literature.” Academy of Management Annals 8(1):181-235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.875669en
dc.referencesCostas, Jana and Dan Kärreman. 2013. “Conscience as Control—Managing Employees through CSR.” Organization 20:394- 415. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508413478584en
dc.referencesDawkins, Cedric. 2015. “Agonistic Pluralism and Stakeholder Engagement.” Business Ethics Quarterly 25(1):1-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/beq.2015.2en
dc.referencesDemuijnck, Geert. 2009. “From an Implicit Christian Corporate Culture to a Structured Conception of Corporate Ethical Responsibility in a Retail Company: A Case-Study in Hermeneutic Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 84:387-404. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0207-9en
dc.referencesGalia, Riki. 2016. “A Case Study in Self-Construction of Volunteering Employees as a Mechanism of Managerial Control.” International Journal of Work Organization and Emotion 7(4):316-335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWOE.2016.081840en
dc.referencesGalia, Riki. 2017. “Banking and Philanthropy: Particular ‘Sephardic’ Giving in the Guise of Zionist Giving for the Common Good.” Israel Affairs 23(2):342-360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2016.1274509en
dc.referencesGalia, Riki. 2021. “Culture, Ethnicity, Philanthropy and Sephardic Jewish Identity in Mandatory Palestine.” Jewish Culture and History 22(1):34-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1462169X.2021.1862506en
dc.referencesHamann, Ralph and Nicola Acutt. 2003. “How Should Civil Society (and the Government) Respond to ‘Corporate Social Responsibility?’ A Critique of Business Motivations and the Potential for Partnerships.” Development Southern Africa 20(2):255-270.en
dc.referencesHerlin, Heidi. 2015. “Better Safe Than Sorry: Nonprofit Organizational Legitimacy and Cross-Sector Partnerships.” Business and Society 54(6):822-858. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312472609en
dc.referencesKaplan, Sarah. 2008. “Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty.” Organization Science 19(5):729-752.en
dc.referencesKeller, Reiner. 2012. “Entering Discourses: A New Agenda for Qualitative Research and Sociology of Knowledge.” Qualitative Sociology Review 8(2):46-55.en
dc.referencesKourula, Arno and Minna Halme. 2008. “Types of Corporate Responsibility and Engagement with NGOs: An Exploration of Business and Societal Outcomes.” Corporate Governance 8(4):557-570. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720700810899275en
dc.referencesKurucz, Elizabeth C., Barry A. Colbert, and David Wheeler. 2008. “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility.” Pp. 83- 112 in The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, edited by A. Crane et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesLaasonen, Salla, Martin Fougère, and Arno Kourula. 2012. “Dominant Articulations in Academic Business and Society Discourse on NGO-Business Relations: A Critical Assessment.” Journal of Business Ethics 109(4):521-545. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1143-zen
dc.referencesMoratis, Lars. 2014. “The Perversity of Business Case Approaches to CSR.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 34(9/10):654-669.en
dc.referencesMoriceau, Jean-Luc and Geraldine Guerillot. 2012. “Gifted: The Monolingualism of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Revista de Administração de Empresas 52:153-164.en
dc.referencesNijhof, André H. J. and Ronald J. M. Jeurissen. 2010. “The Glass Ceiling of Corporate Social Responsibility: Consequences of a Business Case Approach towards CSR.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 30(11/12):618-631. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443331011085222en
dc.referencesPorter, Michael E. and Mark R. Kramer. 2006. “Strategy & Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility.” Harvard Business Review 84(12):78-92.en
dc.referencesPorter, Michael E. and Mark R. Kramer. 2011. “Creating Shared Value.” Harvard Business Review 89(1/2):62-77.en
dc.referencesSaiia, David H., Archie B. Carroll, and Ann K. Buchholtz. 2003. “Philanthropy as Strategy When Corporate Charity ‘Begins at Home.’” Business and Society 42(2):169-201.en
dc.referencesSanzo, María J. et al. 2015. “Business–Nonprofit Partnerships: Do Their Effects Extend Beyond the Charitable Donor-Recipient Model?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 44(2):379- 400. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764013517770en
dc.referencesSeitanidi, Maria M. and Andrew Crane. 2009. “Implementing CSR through Partnerships: Understanding the Selection, Design and Institutionalisation of Nonprofit-Business Partnerships.” Journal of Business Ethics 85:413-429. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9743-yen
dc.referencesSeitanidi, Maria M., Dimitrios N. Koufopoulos, and Paul Palmer. 2011. “Partnership Formation for Change: Indicators for Transformative Potential in Cross Sector Social Partnerships.” Journal of Business Ethics 94(1):139-161. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0784-2en
dc.referencesShamir, Ronen. 2004. “The De-Radicalization of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Critical Sociology 30(3):669-689.en
dc.referencesShamir, Ronen. 2005. “Mind the Gap: The Commodification of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Symbolic Interaction 28(2):229-253.en
dc.referencesShamir, Ronen. 2008. “The Age of Responsibilization: On Market-Embedded Morality.” Economy and Society 37(1):1-19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085140701760833en
dc.referencesShamir, Ronen. 2010. “Capitalism, Governance, and Authority: The Case of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6:531-553. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102209-153000en
dc.referencesSkouloudis, Antonis, Konstantinos Evangelinos, and Chrisovaladis Malesios. 2015. “Priorities and Perceptions for Corporate Social Responsibility: An NGO Perspective.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 22(2):95-112.en
dc.referencesSteinberg, Marc. 1999. “The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth Century English Cotton Spinners.” American Journal of Sociology 105:736-780.en
dc.referencesVeleva, Vesela. 2010. “Toward Developing a Framework for Measuring the Business Value of Corporate Community Involvement.” Applied Research in Quality of Life 5(4):309-324.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailrikitole@mx.kinneret.ac.il
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.19.1.03
dc.relation.volume19


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0