Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Ritwik
dc.contributor.authorDas, Manashi
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-04T10:51:47Z
dc.date.available2023-05-04T10:51:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-30
dc.identifier.issn1898-6773
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/46934
dc.description.abstractPalm prints are one of the most important forensic tools for human identification in medico-legal investigation. Palm prints are often used for forensic sex estimation to narrow down the pool of suspects through a process of elimination. The aim of this study was to test whether a novel approach of sex estimation from palmar inter-triradial distances previously posited by Badiye and colleagues [Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 2019; 65(March):22–26] can be used as a primary tool for forensic sexing. For this study the bilateral palm prints from 200 Bengali Hindu adults (100 male, 100 female) were collected using traditional ink printing method and were analysed. Descriptive statistics were presented in tables and linear discriminant analysis was conducted to estimate the extent of sexual dimorphism in the inter-triradial distances and to find out variables with the strongest sex discriminating potential. Binary logistic regression analysis (BLR) was performed to derive sex estimation equations. Sexual dimorphism has been found to be statistically significant (p< 0.001) using linear discriminant analysis with a sexing accuracy of 79.0 percent for the left and 79.5 percent for the right palm. Distance between a and t triradius has been found to be the most influential on this model followed by the combined abcd-t distance. For the BLR analysis, the correct classification percentage was found to be the highest on the a-t distance of the right palm with a success rate of 80.5 percent which is closely followed by the combined abcd-t distance which has a classification success rate of 80.0 percent for the right palm. The present study has concluded that, inter-triradial distance of the palm is fairly dimorphic sexually but can only be used as a supplementary tool in inference of sex for medico-legal investigation. Due to a higher accuracy, the distance between a and t triradius has been proposed to be used instead of combined abcd-t distance which was suggested in the original study conducted by Badiye and colleagues (2019).en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnthropological Review;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectForensic Anthropologyen
dc.subjectPalm Printen
dc.subjectTriradiien
dc.subjectSex Estimationen
dc.subjectDiscriminant Function Analysisen
dc.subjectDermatoglyphicsen
dc.titleSexual variation in the inter-triradial distance of the palm among Bengali Hindu population of Kolkata, Indiaen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number67-75
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBanerjee, Ritwik - Research Scholar (UGC-NET), Discipline of Anthropology, IGNOU, New Delhi, Indiaen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDas, Manashi - Master in Anthropology student, Discipline of Anthropology, IGNOU, New Delhi, Indiaen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4594
dc.referencesBadiye A, Kapoor N, Mishra SD. 2019. A Novel Approach for Sex Determination Using Palmar Tri-Radii: A Pilot Study. J Forencic Leg Med 65(3):22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.04.005en
dc.referencesBhat G, Mukhdoomi M, Shah B, Ittoo M. 2014. Dermatoglyphics: In Health and Disease - a Review. IJRMS 2(1):31.en
dc.referencesChristofidis G, Morrissey J, Birkett JW. 2018. Detection of Fingermarks–Applicability to Metallic Surfaces: A Literature Review. JFS 63(6):1616–1627.en
dc.referencesCummins H, Midlo C. 1926. Palmar and Plantar Epidermal Ridge Configurations (Dermatoglyphics) in European-Americans. Am J Phys Anthropol 9(4):471–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330090422en
dc.referencesCummins H, Waits WJ, McQuitty JT. 1941. The Breadths of Epidermal Ridges on the Finger Tips and Palms: A Study of Variation. Am J Anat 68(1):127–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000680106en
dc.referencesDavid TJ. 1981. Distribution, Age and Sex Variation of the Mean Epidermal Ridge Breadth. Hum Hered 31(5):279–282.en
dc.referencesDorjee B, Mondal N, Sen J. 2014. Applications of Dermatoglyphics in Anthropological Research. South Asian Anthropologist 14(2):171–180.en
dc.referencesGutiérrez-Redomero E, Alonso-Rodríguez C. 2013. Sexual and Topological Differences in Palmprint and Ridge Density in the Caucasian Spanish Population. Forensic Sci Int 229(1-3):159.e1-159.e10.en
dc.referencesJain AK, Feng J. 2009. Latent Palmprint Matching. IEEE TPAMI 31(6):1032–1047.en
dc.referencesJerković I, Ljubić T, Bardić L, Kolić A, Anđelinović Š. 2023. Application of Palmar Digital Intertriradial Distances for Sex Classification from Palmprints: A Preliminary Study. Aust J Forensic Sci 55(1):34–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2021.1882573en
dc.referencesKanchan T, Krishan K. 2011. Anthropometry of Hand in Sex Determination of Dismembered Remains - A Review of Literature. JFLM 18 (1):14–17.en
dc.referencesKrishan K, Kanchan T, Sharma R, Pathania A. 2014. Variability of Palmprint Ridge Density in a North Indian Population and Its Use in Inference of Sex in Forensic Examinations. HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology 65(6):476–488. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2014.08.003en
dc.referencesMeier RJ. 1980. Anthropological Dermatoglyphics: A Review. Am J Phys Anthropol 23(1S):147–178.en
dc.referencesOhler EA, Cummins H. 1942. Sexual Differences in Breadths of Epidermal Ridges on Finger Tips and Palms. Am J Phys Anthropol 29(3):341–362.en
dc.referencesPerini TA, de Oliveira GL, dos Santos Ornellas J, Palha de Oliveira F. 2005. Technical Error of Measurement in Anthropometry. Rev Bras de Medicina Do Esporte 11(1):81–90.en
dc.referencesRajaah M, Jamaiyah H, Geeta A, Safiza MN, Khor GL, Wong NF, Kee CC, et al. 2010. Reliability, Technical Error of Measurements and Validity of Length and Weight Measurements for Children under Two Years Old in Malaysia. Med J Malays 65:131–137.en
dc.referencesSchaumann BA, Meier RJ. 1989. Trends in Dermatoglyphic Research. Int J Anthropol 4(4):247–254.en
dc.referencesSingh A, Gupta R, Zaidi S, Singh A. 2016. Dermatoglyphics: A Brief Review. Int J Adv Integr Med Sci 1(3):111–115.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailBanerjee, Ritwik - ritwik.banerjee@yahoo.co.in
dc.contributor.authorEmailDas, Manashi - manashidas98@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1898-6773.86.1.06
dc.relation.volume86


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0