Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKozłowski, Maciej
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-05T15:02:50Z
dc.date.available2024-03-05T15:02:50Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/50565
dc.description.abstractProblems of degeneration and planning horizon have been analysed very widely and attempted to be solved through numerous empirical investigations. The investigations in cooperatives and democracy in a workplace also tended to indicate circumstances that accelerate and precipitate degeneration or, alternatively, the internal and external conditions which can help sustain democracy as well as counteract processes transforming cooperatives info typical private enterprises. There are many historical examples confirming that the possibility of sustaining genuinely democratic forms of cooperative organizations through their growth and pressure for greater efficiency is very limited and usually fails. This can be seen among other forms of employee ownership as well, though the post-socialist economies show high incidence of employee ownership. However, the available evidence suggests that the number of employee-owned firms (especially - cooperatives) is declining quite rapidly because of the degeneration process. On the other hand, there are same examples evidencing that degeneration is not inevitable as cooperatives grow. In the economic reality we can observe that various cooperatives face different combinations of conditions and environments that they can interpret, as well as to react to in different ways. Therefore, economic growth and outstanding economic results of cooperatives do not have to be these parameters and factors that are perceived as causing degeneration. Different kinds of empirical investigations show that the opposite is possible, namely, emergence of the regeneration processes that open new possibilities of supporting democratic forms of management in cooperatives.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe;1-2
dc.titleDegeneration and development of worker cooperatives - selected aspectspl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number137-154pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódź, Faculty of Economics and Sociologypl_PL
dc.identifier.eissn2082-6737
dc.referencesAbell P., The Viability of Producer Cooperation, International Yearbook of Organizational Democracy, New York: Wiley, 1983.pl_PL
dc.referencesAbrahamsson B., Bureaucracy or Participation: The Logic of Organization, Beverly Hills, CA and London: Sage, 1977.pl_PL
dc.referencesAskildsen J.E., Essays on the theory labour-managedfirm, report no. 9/1987, Centre for Applied Research Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen 1987.pl_PL
dc.referencesBader E., From profit sharing to common ownership, Journal of Current Social lssues, 1971, Vol. 10.pl_PL
dc.referencesBen-Ner A., On the Stability of Cooperative Type of Organization, Journal of Comparative Economics, 1984, No. 8.pl_PL
dc.referencesCornforth Ch., Creating success/ul cooperative businesses, Cooperative Research Unit, Open University, 1987.pl_PL
dc.referencesCornforth Ch., Patterns of Cooperative Management: Beyond the Degeneration Thesis, Economic and Industrial Democracy, SAGE, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi, London 1995, Vol. 16.pl_PL
dc.referencesDąbrowski M., Economic Consequences of Workers' Self-Management, Ossolineum, PANINE, Wrocław 1986.pl_PL
dc.referencesDąbrowski M., No competition - No Efficiency, Życie Gospodarcze 1984, No. 20.pl_PL
dc.referencesDickstein C., Stimulation of economic development through workers cooperatives, Community Economics Newsletter, Center for Community Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Madison, August 1996, No. 238.pl_PL
dc.referencesDomar E.D., The Soviet Collective Firm as a Producer Co-operative, American Economic Review, Sept. 1966, Vol. 56, No. 4.pl_PL
dc.referencesEstrin S., The Effects of Self-Management on Yugoslav Industrial Growth, Soviet Studies, 1982, Vol. 34.pl_PL
dc.referencesFanning C.M., McCarthy T., A Survey of the Economic Hypotheses Concerning the Non-Viability of Labor - Directed Firms in Capitalist Economies, in: Jansson, S., Hellmark, A. (eds), Labor-Owned Firms and Workers' Cooperatives, Aldershot, Hants, UK: Gower, 1986.pl_PL
dc.referencesFurubotn E.G., The Long-Run Analysis of the Labor-Managed Firm: An Alternative lnterpretation, American Economic Review, 66/1976.pl_PL
dc.referencesGedymin O., Selected lssues in lntensive Social Reproduction, Polish Scientific Conference: Model And the Practice of Economic Reform, ZOW PTE in Lublin, Lublin Technical University, Lublin, Nov. 1983.pl_PL
dc.referencesHunt G., Division ofLabour, Life Cycle and Democracy in Worker Cooperatives, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 1992, 13(1).pl_PL
dc.referencesJones D.C., The Economics and Industrial Relations of Producer Cooperatives in the US 1890 - 1940, Monthly Labor Review, July 1978.pl_PL
dc.referencesKalmi P., Does employee ownership survive the transition? Case study evidencefrom Estonia, 2nd version, presented in the 2nd International Conference "Transition and Enterprise Restructuring in Eastern Europe", HILLER0D, Aug. 17-19, 2000.pl_PL
dc.referencesKalmi P., Employee ownership and degeneration, evidence from Estonian case studies, 11 th Conference of the International Association For the Economics of Participation (IAFEP), Participation World-Wide, Catholic University ofBrussels, Brussels, 4-6 July 2002.pl_PL
dc.referencesKawalec S., What Can Be Hoped For in the Self-Management Market Reform, a paper presented at the conference: Self-Management And Economy, organised at the Socio-Economic Faculty of SGPiS, Warsaw, 6-9 Oct. 1986.pl_PL
dc.referencesMandel E., Self-management. Dangers and Possibilities, International, 1975, 2-3.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcCain, R.A., Empirical lmplications of Worker Participation in Management, 1982, in: Jones, D.C. and Svejnar, J. (eds), Participatory and Self-Managed Firms: Evaluating Economic Performance, Lexington, Mass.: Heath, 1982.pl_PL
dc.referencesMeade, J.E., The Theory of Labour-Managed Firms and Profit Sharing, Economic Journal, March 1972, Vol. 82.pl_PL
dc.referencesMeister A., Participation, Associacion, Development and Change, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1984.pl_PL
dc.referencesMellor M., Hannah J., Stirling J., Worker Cooperatives in Theory and Practice, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Philadelphia 1988.pl_PL
dc.referencesMichels R., Political Parties: A Sociological Study of Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, New York: Free Press, 1949.pl_PL
dc.referencesMill, J.S., On the Probable Futurity of Labouring Classes, Chapter 7 in Book 4 in: J.S. Mill, The Principles of Political Economy With Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, 1871.pl_PL
dc.referencesMiyazaki H., On Success and Dissolution of the Labor-managed Firm in the Capitalist Economy, Journal of Political Economy, 1984, No. 92.pl_PL
dc.referencesPotter B., The Cooperative Movement in Great Britain, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London 1891.pl_PL
dc.referencesRobinson J., The Soviet Collective Farm as a Producer Co-operative: Comment, American Economic Review, 1967, Vol. 57, No. 4.pl_PL
dc.referencesRothschild-Whitt J., Conditions Facilitating Participatory Democratic Organization, Sociological lnquiry, 1976, No. 46.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchlicht E., von Weizsacker Ch., Risk Financing in Labour-Managed Economies: The Commitment Problem, in: Zeitschriftfur die gesamte Staatwissenchaft, 1977, Vol. 133.pl_PL
dc.referencesShirom A., The Industrial Relations System ofIndustrial Cooperatives in the United States: 1890-1985, Labour History, Fall 1972.pl_PL
dc.referencesStryjan Y., Impossible Organizations: On Self-Management and Organizational Reproduction, Ph.D. thesis, Department ofSociology, University of Uppsala, Sweden 1987.pl_PL
dc.referencesStryjan Y., Understanding Cooperatives: The Reproduction Perspective, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 1994, No. 65(1).pl_PL
dc.referencesUvalić M., The Investment Behavior of a Labor - Managed Firm, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economy, 1986, 57(1).pl_PL
dc.referencesVanek J., Marktwirtschaft und Arbeiterselbstverwaltung, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, New York 1975.pl_PL
dc.referencesVanek J., The Participatory Economy. An Evolutionary Hypothesis and a Strategy for Development, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1971.pl_PL
dc.referencesWard B., The Firm in Jllyria: Market Syndicalism, American Economic Review, Sept. 1958, Vol. 48, No. 4.pl_PL
dc.referencesWebb S. and Webb B., A Constitution for the Socialist Commonwealth of Great Britain, with an introduction by Samuel H. Beer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1975.pl_PL
dc.referencesWebb S. and Webb B., Consumers' Cooperative Movement, published by the authors, 1921.pl_PL
dc.referencesWebb S. and Webb B., Cooperative Production and Profit Sharing, New Statesman, 1914.pl_PL
dc.relation.volume6pl_PL
dc.disciplineekonomia i finansepl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record