dc.contributor.author | Pietrowiak, Kamil | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-03T07:40:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-03T07:40:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-05-31 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/52265 | |
dc.description.abstract | Training and working with a guide dog both take place largely on the move, in public spaces, on the way to the next destination. Trainers, puppy raisers, and visually impaired handlers travel many miles with the dog, learning about each other and interacting with various elements of the environment. The go-along method – used by sociologists, ethnographers, and geographers studying the interdependence of movement, space, perception, daily practices, and strategies – creates an opportunity to understand the dynamics of such interspecies cooperation. It has proved particularly useful in the ethnographic project focusing on different stages of training guide dogs and visually impaired handlers, as well as their verbal and non-verbal communication. Besides the substantive benefits of applying the go-along method, this article also discusses premises, practicalities, and limitations associated with go-alongs, including the dilemmas related to data recording and presentation. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Szkolenie i praca z psem przewodnikiem odbywają się w znacznej mierze w ruchu, w przestrzeni publicznej, w drodze do następnego celu. Wolontariusze wychowujący szczeniaki, trenerzy oraz osoby z niepełnosprawnością wzroku przemierzają z psem wiele kilometrów, ucząc się siebie nawzajem i wchodząc w interakcje z różnymi elementami otoczenia. Metoda go-along, stosowana przez socjologów, etnografów i geografów badających współzależność ruchu, przestrzeni, percepcji, codziennych praktyk i strategii, stwarza możliwość zrozumienia dynamiki tak ukierunkowanej międzygatunkowej współpracy. Artykuł omawia zastosowanie tej metody w projekcie etnograficznym dotyczącym różnych etapów szkolenia psów przewodników dla osób z niepełnosprawnością wzroku, w tym jej przydatność w badaniu werbalnej i niewerbalnej komunikacji między uczestnikami tego procesu. Oprócz tego autor przybliża założenia, aspekty praktyczne i ograniczenia związane z wykorzystaniem metody go-along, w tym dylematy etyczne dotyczące rejestracji i prezentacji danych. | pl |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej;2 | pl |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
dc.subject | guide dogs | en |
dc.subject | visual impairment | en |
dc.subject | disability studies | en |
dc.subject | animal studies | en |
dc.subject | go-along method | en |
dc.subject | metoda go-along | pl |
dc.subject | pies przewodnik | pl |
dc.subject | niepełnosprawność wzroku | pl |
dc.subject | badania nad niepełnosprawnością | pl |
dc.subject | badania nad zwierzętami | pl |
dc.title | “Follow the Dog”: Using the Go-Along Method in Research on Training and Working with Guide Dogs for People with Visual Impairment | en |
dc.title.alternative | „Idź za psem”. Zastosowanie metody go-along w badaniach nad treningiem i pracą z psami przewodnikami dla osób z niepełnosprawnością wzroku | pl |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.page.number | 62-89 | |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Gdańsk, Poland | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1733-8069 | |
dc.references | Adekoya Adebusola A., Guse Lorna (2020), Walking Interviews and Wandering Behavior: Ethical Insights and Methodological Outcomes While Exploring the Perspectives of Older Adults Living With Dementia, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 19, pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920920135 | en |
dc.references | Anderson Jon (2004), Talking Whilst Walking: A Geographical Archaeology of Knowledge, “Area”, vol. 36(3), pp. 254–261. | en |
dc.references | Bane Christie (2021), Forward Together: An Inside Look at Guide Dog Training, Las Vegas: Independently Published. | en |
dc.references | Bartlett Ruth, Koncul Ana, Lid Inger Marie, George Elizabeth Onyedikachi, Haugen Ingebjørg (2023), Using Walking/Go Along Interviews With People in Vulnerable Situations: A Synthesized Review of the Research Literature, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 22, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231164606 | en |
dc.references | Bates Charlotte, Rhys-Taylor Alex (2017), Finding Our Feet, [in:] C. Bates, A. Rhys-Taylor (eds.), Walking through social research, New York–London: Routledge, pp. 1–11. | en |
dc.references | Battista Geoffrey A., Manaugh Kevin (2017), Using Embodied Videos of Walking Interviews in Walkability Assessment, “Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board”, vol. 2661(1), pp. 12–18, https://doi.org/10.3141/2661-02 | en |
dc.references | Bell Sarah L., Bush Tanvir N. (2021), ‘Never mind the bullocks’: animating the go-along interview through creative nonfiction, “Mobilities”, vol. 16(3), pp. 306–321, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1817685 | en |
dc.references | Bergeron Julie, Paquette Sylvain, Poullaouec-Gonidec Philippe (2014), Uncovering landscape values and micro-geographies of meanings with the go-along method, “Landscape and Urban Planning”, vol. 122, pp. 108–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.009 | en |
dc.references | Blewett Jessica, Hanlon Neil (2016), Disablement as inveterate condition: Living with habitual ableism in Prince George, British Columbia: Disablement in Prince George, “The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographecanadien”, vol. 60(1), pp. 46–55, https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12254 | en |
dc.references | Bohan Danial Bin, Tuck Wah James Chan (2015), Mobility of a guide dog team in Singapore: A case study, “British Journal of Visual Impairment”, vol. 33(1), pp. 54–65, https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619614561691 | en |
dc.references | Butler Mary, Derrett Sarah (2014), The Walking Interview: An Ethnographic Approach to Understanding Disability, “Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice”, vol. 12(3), 6, https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ijahsp/vol12/iss3/6/ (accessed: 15.01.2022). | en |
dc.references | Büscher Monika, Urry John (2009), Mobile Methods and the Empirical, “European Journal of Social Theory”, vol. 12(1), pp. 99–116, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008099642 | en |
dc.references | Carpiano Richard M. (2009), Come take a walk with me: The “Go-Along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being, “Health & Place”, vol. 15(1), pp. 263–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003 | en |
dc.references | Castrodale Mark Anthony (2018), Mobilizing Dis/Ability Research: A Critical Discussion of Qualitative Go-Along Interviews in Practice, “Qualitative Inquiry”, vol. 24(1), pp. 45–55, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417727765 | en |
dc.references | Clark Andrew (2017), Walking Together: Understanding Young People’s Experiences of Living in Neighbourhoods in Transition, [in:] C. Bates, A. Rhys-Taylor (eds.), Walking through social research, New York–London: Routledge, pp. 87–103. | en |
dc.references | Coren Stanley (2000), How to Speak Dog: Mastering the Art of Dog-Human Communication, New York: Free Press. | en |
dc.references | Curtis Sarah Anne (2017), Human-Animal Relations. Agency, Inter-dependence, and Emotion between Humans and Assistance Dogs, Adelaide: University of Adelaide, School of Social Sciences, PhD thesis, https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/119195/1/Curtis2017_PhD.pdf (accessed: 1.10.2022). | en |
dc.references | Czarniawska Barbara (2007), Shadowing and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies, Malmö–Oslo: Liber Universitetsforl. | en |
dc.references | Donaldson Jean (2013), The Culture Clash, Wenatchee: The Academy for Dog Trainers. | en |
dc.references | Due Brian (2023), Interspecies intercorporeality and mediated haptic sociality: distributing perception with a guide dog, “Visual Studies”, vol. 38(1), pp. 3–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2021.1951620 | en |
dc.references | Due Brian, Bierring Lange Simon (2018), The Moses Effect: The Spatial Hierarchy and Joint Accomplishment of a Blind Person Navigating, “Space and Culture”, vol. 21(2), pp. 129–144, https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331217734541 | en |
dc.references | Due Brian, Bierring Lange Simon (2019), Troublesome Objects: Unpacking Ocular-Centrism in Urban Environments by Studying Blind Navigation Using Video Ethnography and Ethnomethodology, “Sociological Research Online”, vol. 24(4), pp. 475–495, https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418811963 | en |
dc.references | Due Brian, Lange Simon (2018), Semiotic resources for navigation: A video ethnographic study of blind people’s uses of the white cane and a guide dog for navigating in urban areas, “Semiotica”, vol. 222, pp. 287–312, https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0196 | en |
dc.references | Duedahl Eva, Stilling Blichfeldt Bodil (2020), To walk the talk of go-along methods: navigating the unknown terrains of being-along, “Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism”, vol. 20(5), pp. 438–458, https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2020.1766560 | en |
dc.references | Evans James, Jones Phil (2011), The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place, “Applied Geography”, vol. 31(2), pp. 849–858, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005 | en |
dc.references | Garcia Carolyn M., Eisenberg Marla E., Frerich Ellen A., Lechner Kate E., Lust Katherine (2012), Conducting Go-Along Interviews to Understand Context and Promote Health, “Qualitative Health Research”, vol. 22(10), pp. 1395–1403, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452936 | en |
dc.references | Hammer Gili (2019), Blindness through the Looking Glass: The Performance of Blindness, Gender, and the Sensory Body, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. | en |
dc.references | Hein Jane Ricketts, Evans James, Jones Phil (2008), Mobile Methodologies: Theory, Technology and Practice, “Geography Compass”, vol. 2(5), pp. 1266–1285, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00139.x | en |
dc.references | Horowitz Alexandra (2009), Inside of a Dog: What Dogs See, Smell, and Know, New York: Scribner. | en |
dc.references | Ingold Tim (1994), Introduction, [in:] T. Ingold (ed.), What is an animal?, London: Routledge, pp. 1–16. | en |
dc.references | Ingold Tim (2011), Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description, London: Routledge. | en |
dc.references | Ittyerah Miriam, Gaunet Florence (2009), The response of guide dogs and pet dogs (Canis Familiaris) to cues of human referential communication (pointing and gaze), “Animal Cognition”, vol. 12(2), pp. 257–265, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0188-6 | en |
dc.references | Koski Leena, Bäcklund Pia (2017), Whose Agency? Humans and Dogs in Training, [in:] T. Räsänen, T. Syrjämaa (eds.), Shared lives of humans and animals: animal agency in the global North, London–New York: Routledge, pp. 11–23. | en |
dc.references | Kuckartz Udo, Rädiker Stefan (2019), Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA: Text, Audio, and Video, Cham: Springer. | en |
dc.references | Kusenbach Margarethe (2003), Street Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool, “Ethnography”, vol. 4(3), pp. 455–485, https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007 | en |
dc.references | Larsen Jonas, Urry John, Axhausen Kay (2006), Mobilities, Networks, Geographies, Aldershot: Ashgate. | en |
dc.references | Lestel Dominique (2015), Myśleć sierścią. Zwierzęcość w perspektywie drugoosobowej, translated Anastazja Dwulit, [in:] A. Barcz, D. Łagodzka (eds.), Zwierzęta i ich ludzie: zmierzch antropocentrycznego paradygmatu, Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN, pp. 17–33. | en |
dc.references | Lieberman Lauren J., Haibach-Beach Pamela S., Sherwood Jenna, Trad Alyssa (2019), “We now fly”: Perspectives of adults who are blind with guide dogs trained for running, “British Journal of Visual Impairment”, vol. 37(3), pp. 213–226, https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619619842989 | en |
dc.references | Lynch Jonathan, Mannion Greg (2016), Enacting a place-responsive research methodology: walking interviews with educators, “Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning”, vol. 16(4), pp. 330–345, https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2016.1163271 | en |
dc.references | Macpherson Hannah (2009), Articulating Blind Touch: Thinking through the Feet, “The Senses and Society”, vol. 4(2), pp. 179–193, https://doi.org/10.2752/174589309X425120 | en |
dc.references | Macpherson Hannah (2016), Walking methods in landscape research: moving bodies, spaces of disclosure and rapport, “Landscape Research”, vol. 41(4), pp. 425–432, https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1156065 | en |
dc.references | Macpherson Hannah (2017), Walkers with visual-impairments in the British countryside: Picturesque legacies, collective enjoyments and well-being benefits, “Journal of Rural Studies”, vol. 51, pp. 251–258, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.001 | en |
dc.references | Magnus Riin (2014), The Function, Formation and Development of Signs in the Guide Dog Team’s Work, “Biosemiotics”, vol. 7(3), pp. 447–463, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-014-9199-7 | en |
dc.references | Magnus Riin (2016), The Semiotic Challenges of Guide Dog Teams: The Experiences of German, Estonian and Swedish Guide Dog Users, “Biosemiotics”, vol. 9(2), pp. 267–285, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9233-4 | en |
dc.references | Marcotte Justine, Grandisson Marie, Milot Élise, Dupéré Sophie (2022), The Walking Interview: A Promising Method for Promoting the Participation of Autistic People in Research Projects, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 21, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221090065 | en |
dc.references | Meijer Eva (2019), When Animals Speak: Toward an Interspecies Democracy, New York: New York University Press. | en |
dc.references | Michalko Rod (1999), The Two-in-One: Walking with Smokie, Walking with Blindness, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. | en |
dc.references | Modlin Susan J. (2000), Service Dogs as Interventions: State of the Science, “Rehabilitation Nursing”, vol. 25(6), pp. 212–219, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2000.tb01914.x | en |
dc.references | Naderi Szima, Miklósi Ádam, Dóka Antal, Csányi Vilmos (2001), Co-operative interactions between blind persons and their dogs, “Applied Animal Behaviour Science”, vol. 74(1), pp. 59–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00152-6 | en |
dc.references | Neal Sarah, Bennett Katy, Jones Hannah, Cochrane Allan, Mohan Giles (2015), Multiculture and Public Parks: Researching Super‐diversity and Attachment in Public Green Space, “Population, Space and Place”, vol. 21(5), pp. 463–475, https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1910 | en |
dc.references | O’Neill Maggie (2018), Walking, Well-Being and Community: Racialized Mothers Building Cultural Citizenship Using Participatory Arts and Participatory Action Research, “Ethnic and Racial Studies”, vol. 41(1), pp. 73–97. | en |
dc.references | Parent Laurence (2016), The wheeling interview: mobile methods and disability, “Mobilities”, vol. 11(4), pp. 521–532, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211820 | en |
dc.references | Pink Sarah (2007), Walking with video, “Visual Studies”, vol. 22(3), pp. 240–252, https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657142 | en |
dc.references | Porkertová Hana (2020), Reconfiguring Human and Nonhuman Animals in a Guiding Assemblage. Toward Posthumanist Conception of Disability, [in:] S. Karkulehto, A.-K. Koistinen, E. Varis (eds.), Reconfiguring human, nonhuman and posthuman in literature and culture, New York: Routledge, pp. 182–200. | en |
dc.references | Poser Anitavon, Willamowski Edda (2020), The Power of Shared Embodiment: Renegotiating Non/Belonging and In/Exclusion in an Ephemeral Community of Care, “Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry”, vol. 44(4), pp. 610–628, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-020-09675-5 | en |
dc.references | Quinlan Elizabeth (2008), Conspicuous Invisibility: Shadowing as a Data Collection Strategy, “Qualitative Inquiry”, vol. 14(8), pp. 1480–1499, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408318318 | en |
dc.references | Reed Edward S. (1994), The Affordances of the Animate Environment: Social Science from the Ecological Point of View, [in:] T. Ingold (ed.), What is an animal?, London: Routledge, pp. 110–126. | en |
dc.references | Rogowski Łukasz (2016), Wideozwiedzanie. Badania miasta w perspektywie paradygmatu mobilności, „Kultura i Społeczeństwo”, vol. 60(2), pp. 123–144, https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2016.60.2.8 | en |
dc.references | Sanders Clinton R. (1999), Understanding dogs: living and working with canine companions, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. | en |
dc.references | Sanders Clinton R. (2000), The Impact of Guide Dogs on the Identity of People with Visual Impairments, “Anthrozoös”, vol. 13(3), pp. 131–139, https://doi.org/10.2752/089279300786999815 | en |
dc.references | Sheller Mimi, Urry John (2006), The New Mobilities Paradigm, “Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space”, vol. 38(2), pp. 207–226, https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268 | en |
dc.references | Sirris Stephen, Lindheim Tone, Askeland Harald (2022), Observation and Shadowing: Two Methods to Research Values and Values Work in Organisations and Leadership, [in:] G. Espedal, B. Jelstad Løvaas, S. Sirris, A. Wæraas (eds.), Researching Values: Methodological Approaches for Understanding Values Work in Organisations and Leadership, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 133–151. | en |
dc.references | Spinney Justin (2011), A Chance to Catch a Breath: Using Mobile Video Ethnography in Cycling Research, “Mobilities”, vol. 6(2), pp. 161–182, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2011.552771 | en |
dc.references | Surmiak Adrianna (2022), Etyka badań jakościowych w praktyce. Analiza doświadczeń badaczy w badaniach z osobami podatnymi na zranienie, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. | en |
dc.references | Thompson Claire, Reynolds Joanna (2019), Reflections on the go‐along: How “disruptions” can illuminate the relationships of health, place and practice, “The Geographical Journal”, vol. 185(2), pp. 156–167, https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12285 | en |
dc.references | Uexküll Jakob von (2010), A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With A Theory of Meaning, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. | en |
dc.references | Urry John (2000), Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty First Century, London: Routledge. | en |
dc.references | Vainini Phillip, Vannini April (2017), Wild Walking. A Twofold Critique of the Walk-Along Method, [in:] C. Bates, A. Rhys-Taylor (eds.), Walking through social research, New York–London: Routledge, pp. 179–195. | en |
dc.references | Wästerfors David (2021), Required to be creative. Everyday ways for dealing with inaccessibility, “Disability & Society”, vol. 36(2), pp. 265–285, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1720610 | en |
dc.references | Wegerif Marc C.A. (2019), The ride-along: a journey in qualitative research, “Qualitative Research Journal”, vol. 19(2), pp. 121–131, https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00038 | en |
dc.references | Weil Kari (2012), Thinking Animals: Why Animal Studies Now?, New York: Columbia University Press. | en |
dc.references | Wiggett-Barnard Cindy, Steel Henry (2008), The experience of owning a guide dog, “Disability and Rehabilitation”, vol. 30(14), pp. 1014–1026, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701466517 | en |
dc.references | Włodarczyk Justyna (2018), Genealogy of Obedience: Reading North American Dog Training Literature, 1850s–2000s, Boston: Brill. | en |
dc.references | Woods Tania (1994), Guide Dogs as Eyes and Companions of Blind People, “Medische Antropologie”, vol. 6(1), pp. 85–107. | en |
dc.references | York Sarah, Whiteside Helen (2018), Exploring Social (Non-working) Behavior in Guide Dogs from the Perspective of Guide Dog Owners, “Anthrozoös”, vol. 31(5), pp. 525–536, https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2018.1505259 | en |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | kamil.pietrowiak@ug.edu.pl | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/1733-8069.20.2.04 | |
dc.relation.volume | 20 | |