Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorPietrowiak, Kamil
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-03T07:40:17Z
dc.date.available2024-06-03T07:40:17Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/52265
dc.description.abstractTraining and working with a guide dog both take place largely on the move, in public spaces, on the way to the next destination. Trainers, puppy raisers, and visually impaired handlers travel many miles with the dog, learning about each other and interacting with various elements of the environment. The go-along method – used by sociologists, ethnographers, and geographers studying the interdependence of movement, space, perception, daily practices, and strategies – creates an opportunity to understand the dynamics of such interspecies cooperation. It has proved particularly useful in the ethnographic project focusing on different stages of training guide dogs and visually impaired handlers, as well as their verbal and non-verbal communication. Besides the substantive benefits of applying the go-along method, this article also discusses premises, practicalities, and limitations associated with go-alongs, including the dilemmas related to data recording and presentation.en
dc.description.abstractSzkolenie i praca z psem przewodnikiem odbywają się w znacznej mierze w ruchu, w przestrzeni publicznej, w drodze do następnego celu. Wolontariusze wychowujący szczeniaki, trenerzy oraz osoby z niepełnosprawnością wzroku przemierzają z psem wiele kilometrów, ucząc się siebie nawzajem i wchodząc w interakcje z różnymi elementami otoczenia. Metoda go-along, stosowana przez socjologów, etnografów i geografów badających współzależność ruchu, przestrzeni, percepcji, codziennych praktyk i strategii, stwarza możliwość zrozumienia dynamiki tak ukierunkowanej międzygatunkowej współpracy. Artykuł omawia zastosowanie tej metody w projekcie etnograficznym dotyczącym różnych etapów szkolenia psów przewodników dla osób z niepełnosprawnością wzroku, w tym jej przydatność w badaniu werbalnej i niewerbalnej komunikacji między uczestnikami tego procesu. Oprócz tego autor przybliża założenia, aspekty praktyczne i ograniczenia związane z wykorzystaniem metody go-along, w tym dylematy etyczne dotyczące rejestracji i prezentacji danych.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPrzegląd Socjologii Jakościowej;2pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectguide dogsen
dc.subjectvisual impairmenten
dc.subjectdisability studiesen
dc.subjectanimal studiesen
dc.subjectgo-along methoden
dc.subjectmetoda go-alongpl
dc.subjectpies przewodnikpl
dc.subjectniepełnosprawność wzrokupl
dc.subjectbadania nad niepełnosprawnościąpl
dc.subjectbadania nad zwierzętamipl
dc.title“Follow the Dog”: Using the Go-Along Method in Research on Training and Working with Guide Dogs for People with Visual Impairmenten
dc.title.alternative„Idź za psem”. Zastosowanie metody go-along w badaniach nad treningiem i pracą z psami przewodnikami dla osób z niepełnosprawnością wzrokupl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number62-89
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Gdańsk, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8069
dc.referencesAdekoya Adebusola A., Guse Lorna (2020), Walking Interviews and Wandering Behavior: Ethical Insights and Methodological Outcomes While Exploring the Perspectives of Older Adults Living With Dementia, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 19, pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920920135en
dc.referencesAnderson Jon (2004), Talking Whilst Walking: A Geographical Archaeology of Knowledge, “Area”, vol. 36(3), pp. 254–261.en
dc.referencesBane Christie (2021), Forward Together: An Inside Look at Guide Dog Training, Las Vegas: Independently Published.en
dc.referencesBartlett Ruth, Koncul Ana, Lid Inger Marie, George Elizabeth Onyedikachi, Haugen Ingebjørg (2023), Using Walking/Go Along Interviews With People in Vulnerable Situations: A Synthesized Review of the Research Literature, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 22, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231164606en
dc.referencesBates Charlotte, Rhys-Taylor Alex (2017), Finding Our Feet, [in:] C. Bates, A. Rhys-Taylor (eds.), Walking through social research, New York–London: Routledge, pp. 1–11.en
dc.referencesBattista Geoffrey A., Manaugh Kevin (2017), Using Embodied Videos of Walking Interviews in Walkability Assessment, “Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board”, vol. 2661(1), pp. 12–18, https://doi.org/10.3141/2661-02en
dc.referencesBell Sarah L., Bush Tanvir N. (2021), ‘Never mind the bullocks’: animating the go-along interview through creative nonfiction, “Mobilities”, vol. 16(3), pp. 306–321, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1817685en
dc.referencesBergeron Julie, Paquette Sylvain, Poullaouec-Gonidec Philippe (2014), Uncovering landscape values and micro-geographies of meanings with the go-along method, “Landscape and Urban Planning”, vol. 122, pp. 108–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.009en
dc.referencesBlewett Jessica, Hanlon Neil (2016), Disablement as inveterate condition: Living with habitual ableism in Prince George, British Columbia: Disablement in Prince George, “The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographecanadien”, vol. 60(1), pp. 46–55, https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12254en
dc.referencesBohan Danial Bin, Tuck Wah James Chan (2015), Mobility of a guide dog team in Singapore: A case study, “British Journal of Visual Impairment”, vol. 33(1), pp. 54–65, https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619614561691en
dc.referencesButler Mary, Derrett Sarah (2014), The Walking Interview: An Ethnographic Approach to Understanding Disability, “Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice”, vol. 12(3), 6, https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ijahsp/vol12/iss3/6/ (accessed: 15.01.2022).en
dc.referencesBüscher Monika, Urry John (2009), Mobile Methods and the Empirical, “European Journal of Social Theory”, vol. 12(1), pp. 99–116, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008099642en
dc.referencesCarpiano Richard M. (2009), Come take a walk with me: The “Go-Along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being, “Health & Place”, vol. 15(1), pp. 263–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003en
dc.referencesCastrodale Mark Anthony (2018), Mobilizing Dis/Ability Research: A Critical Discussion of Qualitative Go-Along Interviews in Practice, “Qualitative Inquiry”, vol. 24(1), pp. 45–55, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417727765en
dc.referencesClark Andrew (2017), Walking Together: Understanding Young People’s Experiences of Living in Neighbourhoods in Transition, [in:] C. Bates, A. Rhys-Taylor (eds.), Walking through social research, New York–London: Routledge, pp. 87–103.en
dc.referencesCoren Stanley (2000), How to Speak Dog: Mastering the Art of Dog-Human Communication, New York: Free Press.en
dc.referencesCurtis Sarah Anne (2017), Human-Animal Relations. Agency, Inter-dependence, and Emotion between Humans and Assistance Dogs, Adelaide: University of Adelaide, School of Social Sciences, PhD thesis, https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/119195/1/Curtis2017_PhD.pdf (accessed: 1.10.2022).en
dc.referencesCzarniawska Barbara (2007), Shadowing and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies, Malmö–Oslo: Liber Universitetsforl.en
dc.referencesDonaldson Jean (2013), The Culture Clash, Wenatchee: The Academy for Dog Trainers.en
dc.referencesDue Brian (2023), Interspecies intercorporeality and mediated haptic sociality: distributing perception with a guide dog, “Visual Studies”, vol. 38(1), pp. 3–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2021.1951620en
dc.referencesDue Brian, Bierring Lange Simon (2018), The Moses Effect: The Spatial Hierarchy and Joint Accomplishment of a Blind Person Navigating, “Space and Culture”, vol. 21(2), pp. 129–144, https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331217734541en
dc.referencesDue Brian, Bierring Lange Simon (2019), Troublesome Objects: Unpacking Ocular-Centrism in Urban Environments by Studying Blind Navigation Using Video Ethnography and Ethnomethodology, “Sociological Research Online”, vol. 24(4), pp. 475–495, https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418811963en
dc.referencesDue Brian, Lange Simon (2018), Semiotic resources for navigation: A video ethnographic study of blind people’s uses of the white cane and a guide dog for navigating in urban areas, “Semiotica”, vol. 222, pp. 287–312, https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0196en
dc.referencesDuedahl Eva, Stilling Blichfeldt Bodil (2020), To walk the talk of go-along methods: navigating the unknown terrains of being-along, “Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism”, vol. 20(5), pp. 438–458, https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2020.1766560en
dc.referencesEvans James, Jones Phil (2011), The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place, “Applied Geography”, vol. 31(2), pp. 849–858, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005en
dc.referencesGarcia Carolyn M., Eisenberg Marla E., Frerich Ellen A., Lechner Kate E., Lust Katherine (2012), Conducting Go-Along Interviews to Understand Context and Promote Health, “Qualitative Health Research”, vol. 22(10), pp. 1395–1403, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452936en
dc.referencesHammer Gili (2019), Blindness through the Looking Glass: The Performance of Blindness, Gender, and the Sensory Body, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.en
dc.referencesHein Jane Ricketts, Evans James, Jones Phil (2008), Mobile Methodologies: Theory, Technology and Practice, “Geography Compass”, vol. 2(5), pp. 1266–1285, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00139.xen
dc.referencesHorowitz Alexandra (2009), Inside of a Dog: What Dogs See, Smell, and Know, New York: Scribner.en
dc.referencesIngold Tim (1994), Introduction, [in:] T. Ingold (ed.), What is an animal?, London: Routledge, pp. 1–16.en
dc.referencesIngold Tim (2011), Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description, London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesIttyerah Miriam, Gaunet Florence (2009), The response of guide dogs and pet dogs (Canis Familiaris) to cues of human referential communication (pointing and gaze), “Animal Cognition”, vol. 12(2), pp. 257–265, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0188-6en
dc.referencesKoski Leena, Bäcklund Pia (2017), Whose Agency? Humans and Dogs in Training, [in:] T. Räsänen, T. Syrjämaa (eds.), Shared lives of humans and animals: animal agency in the global North, London–New York: Routledge, pp. 11–23.en
dc.referencesKuckartz Udo, Rädiker Stefan (2019), Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA: Text, Audio, and Video, Cham: Springer.en
dc.referencesKusenbach Margarethe (2003), Street Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool, “Ethnography”, vol. 4(3), pp. 455–485, https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007en
dc.referencesLarsen Jonas, Urry John, Axhausen Kay (2006), Mobilities, Networks, Geographies, Aldershot: Ashgate.en
dc.referencesLestel Dominique (2015), Myśleć sierścią. Zwierzęcość w perspektywie drugoosobowej, translated Anastazja Dwulit, [in:] A. Barcz, D. Łagodzka (eds.), Zwierzęta i ich ludzie: zmierzch antropocentrycznego paradygmatu, Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN, pp. 17–33.en
dc.referencesLieberman Lauren J., Haibach-Beach Pamela S., Sherwood Jenna, Trad Alyssa (2019), “We now fly”: Perspectives of adults who are blind with guide dogs trained for running, “British Journal of Visual Impairment”, vol. 37(3), pp. 213–226, https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619619842989en
dc.referencesLynch Jonathan, Mannion Greg (2016), Enacting a place-responsive research methodology: walking interviews with educators, “Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning”, vol. 16(4), pp. 330–345, https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2016.1163271en
dc.referencesMacpherson Hannah (2009), Articulating Blind Touch: Thinking through the Feet, “The Senses and Society”, vol. 4(2), pp. 179–193, https://doi.org/10.2752/174589309X425120en
dc.referencesMacpherson Hannah (2016), Walking methods in landscape research: moving bodies, spaces of disclosure and rapport, “Landscape Research”, vol. 41(4), pp. 425–432, https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1156065en
dc.referencesMacpherson Hannah (2017), Walkers with visual-impairments in the British countryside: Picturesque legacies, collective enjoyments and well-being benefits, “Journal of Rural Studies”, vol. 51, pp. 251–258, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.001en
dc.referencesMagnus Riin (2014), The Function, Formation and Development of Signs in the Guide Dog Team’s Work, “Biosemiotics”, vol. 7(3), pp. 447–463, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-014-9199-7en
dc.referencesMagnus Riin (2016), The Semiotic Challenges of Guide Dog Teams: The Experiences of German, Estonian and Swedish Guide Dog Users, “Biosemiotics”, vol. 9(2), pp. 267–285, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9233-4en
dc.referencesMarcotte Justine, Grandisson Marie, Milot Élise, Dupéré Sophie (2022), The Walking Interview: A Promising Method for Promoting the Participation of Autistic People in Research Projects, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 21, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221090065en
dc.referencesMeijer Eva (2019), When Animals Speak: Toward an Interspecies Democracy, New York: New York University Press.en
dc.referencesMichalko Rod (1999), The Two-in-One: Walking with Smokie, Walking with Blindness, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.en
dc.referencesModlin Susan J. (2000), Service Dogs as Interventions: State of the Science, “Rehabilitation Nursing”, vol. 25(6), pp. 212–219, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2000.tb01914.xen
dc.referencesNaderi Szima, Miklósi Ádam, Dóka Antal, Csányi Vilmos (2001), Co-operative interactions between blind persons and their dogs, “Applied Animal Behaviour Science”, vol. 74(1), pp. 59–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00152-6en
dc.referencesNeal Sarah, Bennett Katy, Jones Hannah, Cochrane Allan, Mohan Giles (2015), Multiculture and Public Parks: Researching Super‐diversity and Attachment in Public Green Space, “Population, Space and Place”, vol. 21(5), pp. 463–475, https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1910en
dc.referencesO’Neill Maggie (2018), Walking, Well-Being and Community: Racialized Mothers Building Cultural Citizenship Using Participatory Arts and Participatory Action Research, “Ethnic and Racial Studies”, vol. 41(1), pp. 73–97.en
dc.referencesParent Laurence (2016), The wheeling interview: mobile methods and disability, “Mobilities”, vol. 11(4), pp. 521–532, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211820en
dc.referencesPink Sarah (2007), Walking with video, “Visual Studies”, vol. 22(3), pp. 240–252, https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657142en
dc.referencesPorkertová Hana (2020), Reconfiguring Human and Nonhuman Animals in a Guiding Assemblage. Toward Posthumanist Conception of Disability, [in:] S. Karkulehto, A.-K. Koistinen, E. Varis (eds.), Reconfiguring human, nonhuman and posthuman in literature and culture, New York: Routledge, pp. 182–200.en
dc.referencesPoser Anitavon, Willamowski Edda (2020), The Power of Shared Embodiment: Renegotiating Non/Belonging and In/Exclusion in an Ephemeral Community of Care, “Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry”, vol. 44(4), pp. 610–628, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-020-09675-5en
dc.referencesQuinlan Elizabeth (2008), Conspicuous Invisibility: Shadowing as a Data Collection Strategy, “Qualitative Inquiry”, vol. 14(8), pp. 1480–1499, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408318318en
dc.referencesReed Edward S. (1994), The Affordances of the Animate Environment: Social Science from the Ecological Point of View, [in:] T. Ingold (ed.), What is an animal?, London: Routledge, pp. 110–126.en
dc.referencesRogowski Łukasz (2016), Wideozwiedzanie. Badania miasta w perspektywie paradygmatu mobilności, „Kultura i Społeczeństwo”, vol. 60(2), pp. 123–144, https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2016.60.2.8en
dc.referencesSanders Clinton R. (1999), Understanding dogs: living and working with canine companions, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.en
dc.referencesSanders Clinton R. (2000), The Impact of Guide Dogs on the Identity of People with Visual Impairments, “Anthrozoös”, vol. 13(3), pp. 131–139, https://doi.org/10.2752/089279300786999815en
dc.referencesSheller Mimi, Urry John (2006), The New Mobilities Paradigm, “Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space”, vol. 38(2), pp. 207–226, https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268en
dc.referencesSirris Stephen, Lindheim Tone, Askeland Harald (2022), Observation and Shadowing: Two Methods to Research Values and Values Work in Organisations and Leadership, [in:] G. Espedal, B. Jelstad Løvaas, S. Sirris, A. Wæraas (eds.), Researching Values: Methodological Approaches for Understanding Values Work in Organisations and Leadership, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 133–151.en
dc.referencesSpinney Justin (2011), A Chance to Catch a Breath: Using Mobile Video Ethnography in Cycling Research, “Mobilities”, vol. 6(2), pp. 161–182, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2011.552771en
dc.referencesSurmiak Adrianna (2022), Etyka badań jakościowych w praktyce. Analiza doświadczeń badaczy w badaniach z osobami podatnymi na zranienie, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.en
dc.referencesThompson Claire, Reynolds Joanna (2019), Reflections on the go‐along: How “disruptions” can illuminate the relationships of health, place and practice, “The Geographical Journal”, vol. 185(2), pp. 156–167, https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12285en
dc.referencesUexküll Jakob von (2010), A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With A Theory of Meaning, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.en
dc.referencesUrry John (2000), Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty First Century, London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesVainini Phillip, Vannini April (2017), Wild Walking. A Twofold Critique of the Walk-Along Method, [in:] C. Bates, A. Rhys-Taylor (eds.), Walking through social research, New York–London: Routledge, pp. 179–195.en
dc.referencesWästerfors David (2021), Required to be creative. Everyday ways for dealing with inaccessibility, “Disability & Society”, vol. 36(2), pp. 265–285, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1720610en
dc.referencesWegerif Marc C.A. (2019), The ride-along: a journey in qualitative research, “Qualitative Research Journal”, vol. 19(2), pp. 121–131, https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00038en
dc.referencesWeil Kari (2012), Thinking Animals: Why Animal Studies Now?, New York: Columbia University Press.en
dc.referencesWiggett-Barnard Cindy, Steel Henry (2008), The experience of owning a guide dog, “Disability and Rehabilitation”, vol. 30(14), pp. 1014–1026, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701466517en
dc.referencesWłodarczyk Justyna (2018), Genealogy of Obedience: Reading North American Dog Training Literature, 1850s–2000s, Boston: Brill.en
dc.referencesWoods Tania (1994), Guide Dogs as Eyes and Companions of Blind People, “Medische Antropologie”, vol. 6(1), pp. 85–107.en
dc.referencesYork Sarah, Whiteside Helen (2018), Exploring Social (Non-working) Behavior in Guide Dogs from the Perspective of Guide Dog Owners, “Anthrozoös”, vol. 31(5), pp. 525–536, https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2018.1505259en
dc.contributor.authorEmailkamil.pietrowiak@ug.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8069.20.2.04
dc.relation.volume20


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0