Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Morphology and morphometry of frontal sinuses as a tool in sex determination based on 17th–18th century skulls from Poland

dc.contributor.authorMrożek, Kamil
dc.contributor.authorMarchewka, Justyna
dc.contributor.authorBorowska, Beata
dc.contributor.authorBudnik, Alicja
dc.contributor.authorLeszczyński, Bartosz
dc.contributor.authorWróbel, Andrzej
dc.contributor.authorWronka, Iwona
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-25T10:40:30Z
dc.date.available2024-07-25T10:40:30Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-28
dc.identifier.issn1898-6773
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/52895
dc.description.abstractMorphological analysis of the frontal sinuses (FS) is one of the methods used to assess the sex of human remains. Depending on the methods, the results indicate the effectiveness of using the FS in the assessment of sex at the level of 60–85.9%. Our goal was to determine whether the morphological and morphometric methods of sex assessment based on the FS can be used for examining historical populations in anthropological studies. We assessed FS both morphologically and morphometrically on a sample of 76 dry skulls (41 females and 35 males) from 17th–18th century form Poland to evaluate the potential of applying this method for sex estimation in human remains. A total of 76 X–rays were taken in both frontal and lateral views. The morphology and morphometry of the FS were assessed with ImageJ software. There were no significant differences between the sexes in assessing the outline of the upper border of the FS, as well as the number of partial septa. There was a statistically significant difference between the sexes in the width of the right FS, the height of the right and left FS, and the right and left area of the FS. The lateral view indicated a statistically significant difference between the sexes regarding the depth and area of the FS. The accuracy rate in classifying males and females using FS morphometry ranged from 59.09% to 69.57%. The FS in the lateral view (69.57%) and the height of the left FS in the frontal view (68.18%) are the most appropriate regressors for sex determination. Statistically significant differences in some FS measurements between the sexes do not appear to be a sufficient indicator of sex. Morphological and morphometrical characteristics of the FS should not be used as a guideline for sex assessment in the historical Polish population.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnthropological Review;2en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectfrontal sinusesen
dc.subjectsex dimorphismen
dc.subjectmorphologyen
dc.subjectmorphometryen
dc.titleMorphology and morphometry of frontal sinuses as a tool in sex determination based on 17th–18th century skulls from Polanden
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number63-84
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMrożek, Kamil - Jagiellonian University, Nature Education Centre, Krakow, Poland; Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Laboratory of Anthropology, Krakow, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMarchewka, Justyna - Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Department of Human Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Warsaw, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBorowska, Beata - University of Lodz, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBudnik, Alicja - Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Department of Human Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Warsaw, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationLeszczyński, Bartosz - Jagiellonian University, Department of Medical Physics, Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Krakow, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWróbel, Andrzej - Jagiellonian University, Department of Medical Physics, Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Krakow, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWronka, Iwona - Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Laboratory of Anthropology, Krakow, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4594
dc.referencesAçar G, Cicekcibasi AE, Koplay M, Kelesoglu KS. 2020. The Relationship Between the Pneumatization Patterns of the Frontal Sinus, Crista Galli and Nasal Septum: A Tomography Study. Turk Neurosurg. 30(4): 532–541. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.26006-19.4en
dc.referencesAjanović Z, Ajanović U, Dervišević L, Hot H, Voljevica A, Talović E, Dervišević E, Hašimbegović S, Sarač-Hadžihalilović AA. 2023. Geometric Morphometrics Approach for Sex Estimation Based on the Orbital Region of Human Skulls from Bosnian Population. Scanning. Article e2223138. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2223138en
dc.referencesAlmeida Prado PS, Adams K, Fernandes LC, Kranioti E. 2021. Frontal sinus as an identity and sex indicator. Morphologie. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2020.12.005en
dc.referencesBasic S, Hajnsek S, Poljakovic Z, Basic M, Culic V, Zadro I. 2004. Estimation of cortical language dominance using functional transcranial Doppler sonography in left-handers. Clin Neurophysiol. 115: 154–160.en
dc.referencesBastir M, Godoy P, Rosas A. 2011. Common Features of Sexual Dimorphism in the Cranial Airways of Different Human Populations. Am J Phys Anthrop. 146: 414–422.en
dc.referencesBelaldavar C, Kotrashetti VS, Hallikerimath SR, Kale AD. 2014. Assessment of frontal sinus dimensions to determine sexual dimorphism among Indian adults. J Forensic Dent Sci. 6(1): 25–30.en
dc.referencesBesana JL, Rogers TL. 2010. Personal identification using the frontal sinus. J. Forensic Sci. 55(3): 584–589.en
dc.referencesBieniarzówna J, Małecki JM. 1984. Dzieje Krakowa. Kraków w wiekach XVI–XVIII. Wydawnictwo Literackie: Kraków.en
dc.referencesBrooks S, Suchey JM. 1990. Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: a comparison of the Acsadi-Nemeskeri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Hum Evol. 5(3): 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437238en
dc.referencesBruce MF, MacLaughlin SM. 1990. The accuracy of sex identification in European skeletal remains using the Phenice characters. J Forensic Sci. 35(6): 1384–1392.en
dc.referencesBuckland-Wright JC. 1970. A radiographic examination of frontal sinuses in early British populations. Man 5(3): 512–517.en
dc.referencesBudnik A, Pudło A. 2017. Biodemografia nowożytnego Gdańska w świetle badań nad ossuariami. Możliwości rekonstrukcji i problemy metodyczne, [in:] Pudło A., Henneberg M. (red.), Nowożytne ossuaria z klasztoru dominikańskiego w Gdańsku. Wyniki badań interdyscyplinarnych. Fontes Commentationesque ad Res Gestas Gedani et Pomeraniae 6: 141–171.en
dc.referencesBuikstra JE, Ubelaker DJ. 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains, Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 44, Fayetteville.en
dc.referencesButaric LN, Jones GC, Garvin HM. 2020. Revisiting global patterns of frontal sinus aplasia utilizing computed tomography. Forensic Science International, 315, 110458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110458en
dc.referencesÇakur B, Sumbullu MA, Durna NB. 2011. Aplasia and agenesis of the frontal sinus in Turkish individuals: a retrospective study using dental volumetric tomography. Int J Med Sci. 8(3): 278–282.en
dc.referencesCamargo JR, Daruge E, Prado FB, Caria PHF, Alves MC, Silva RF, Daruge Jr E. 2007. The frontal sinus morphology in radiographs of Brazilian subjects: its forensic importance. Braz. J. Morphol. Sci. 24(4): 239–243.en
dc.referencesCameriere R, Ferrante L, Mirtella D, Rollo FU, Cingolani M. 2005. Frontal sinuses for identification: quality of classifications, possible error and potential corrections. J of Forensic Sci. 50(4): 770–773.en
dc.referencesCattaneo C. 2007. Forensic anthropology: developments of a classical discipline in the new millennium. Forensic Sci Int. 165(2–3): 185–193.en
dc.referencesChovalopoulou ME, Bertsatos A, Zoi I, Manolis SK, Valakos E. 2018. Reliability testing of metric methods for sex determination in ancient skeletal remains in Greece. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 18(1): 37–47. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1069518en
dc.referencesChristensem AG. 2005. Assessing the variation in individual frontal sinus outlines. Am. J. Of Phys. Anthropol. 127(3): 291–296.en
dc.referencesChristensen AM, Hatch GM. 2018. Advances in the Use of Frontal Sinuses for Human Identification. New Perspectives in Forensic Human Skeletal Identification, 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-805429-1.00020-xen
dc.referencesCox M, Malcolm M, Fairgrieve SI. 2009. A New Digital Method for the Objective Comparison of Frontal Sinuses for Identification. Journal of Forensic Sciences 54(4): 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01075.xen
dc.referencesCryer MH. 1907. Some variations in the frontal sinuses. JAMA 48: 284–289.en
dc.referencesDonald PJ, Gluckman JL, Rice DH. 1994. The Sinuses. Raven Press, New York.en
dc.referencesDuray SM, Morter HB, Smith FJ. 1999. Morphological variation in cervical spinous processes: potential applications in the forensic identification of race from the skeleton. J Forensic Sci. 44(5): 937–944.en
dc.referencesDuzer S, Aydemir Y, Sakallioglu O, Akyigit A, Polat C, Centiner H. 2017. Significance of paranasal sinus aplasia. Acta Medica Mediterranea 33: 637–640.en
dc.referencesFalguera JR, Fernanda Pereira SF, Aparecido NM. 2012. Frontal sinus recognition using image foresting transform and shape context. (accessed in 2012).en
dc.referencesGodinho RM, O’Higgins P. 2018. The biomechanical significance of the frontal sinus in Kabwe 1 (Homo heidelbergensis). J Hum Evol. 114: 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.10.007en
dc.referencesGoyal M, Acharya AB, Sattur AP, Naikmasur VG. 2013. Are frontal sinuses useful indicators of sex? Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 20(2): 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2012.04.028en
dc.referencesGrummons DC, Kappeyne van de Coppello MA. 1987. A frontal asymmetry analysis. J Clin Orthod 21: 448–465.en
dc.referencesGuerram A, Le Minor J-M, Renger S, Bierry G. 2014. Brief Communication: The Size of the Human Frontal Sinuses in Adults Presenting Complete Persistence of the Metopic Suture. American Journal Of Physical Anthropology 154: 621–627.en
dc.referencesGulisano M, Pacini P, Orlandini GF, Colosi G. 1987. Anatomico-radiological findings on the frontal sinus: statistical study of 520 human cases. Arch. Ital. Anat. Embriol. 83, 9–32.en
dc.referencesHamed SS, El-Badrawy AM, Fattah SA. 2014. Sex identification from frontal sinus using multi-detector computed tomography. J. Forensic Radiol. Imaging 2: 117–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2014.03.006en
dc.referencesHanson CL, Owsley DW. 1980. Frontal sinus size in Eskimo population. Am J Phys Anthropol 53: 251–255.en
dc.referencesHarris AM, Wood RE, Nortje CJ, Thomas CJ. 1987. Sex and ethnic differences of the radiographic image of the frontal region. J. Forensic Odontostomatol. 5: 51–57.en
dc.referencesHens SM, Rastelli E, Belcastro G, 2008. Age estimation from the human Os Coxa: a test on a documented Italian collection. J Forensic Sci. 53(5): 1040–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00818.xen
dc.referencesHopkins C. 2016. Nose, nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. In: Standring S, editor. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. Elsevier: 565–567.en
dc.referencesHsiao TH, Chang HP, Liu KM. 1996. Sex estimation by discriminant function analysis of lateral radiographic cephalometry, J. Forensic Sci. 41(5): 792–795 (September).en
dc.referencesIkeda J. 1980. Interpopulation variations of the frontal sinus measurements: comparison between the Jamon and recent Japanese population. J Anthrop Soc Nippon Suppl. 90: 91–104.en
dc.referencesInskip S, Scheib CL, Wohns AW, Ge X, Kivisild T, Robb J. 2018. Evaluating macroscopic sex estimation methods using genetically sexed archaeological material: The medieval skeletal collection from St John’s Divinity School, Cambridge. Am J Phys Anthropol. 168(2): 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23753en
dc.referencesIşcan MY. 2001. Global forensic anthropology in the 21st century. Forensic Sci Int. 117(1–2): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00433-3en
dc.referencesKanat A, Yazar U, Ozdemir B, Coskun ZO, Erdivanil O. 2015. Frontal sinus asymmetry: Is it an effect of cranial asymmetry? X–ray analysis of 469 normal adult human frontal sinus. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice 6(4): 511–514.en
dc.referencesKim DI, Lee UY, Park SO, Kwak DS, Han SH. 2013. Identification using frontal sinus by three-dimensional reconstruction from computed tomography. J. Forensic Sci. 58 (1): 5–12.en
dc.referencesKracik J. 1989. Miasto zatrzymuje umarłych. Krakowskie nekropolie a kultura duchowa XVII–XVIII wieku, [in:] Z przeszłości Krakowa, J.M. Małecki, Warszawa–Kraków: 165–182.en
dc.referencesLovejoy CO, Meindl RS, Pryzbeck TR, Mensforth RP. 1985. Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: a new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death. Am J Phys Anthr. 68(1): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330680103en
dc.referencesLovell NC. 1989. Test of Phenice’s technique for determining sex from the os pubis. Am J Biol Anthr. 79(1): 117–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330790112en
dc.referencesLuo H, Wang J, Zhang S, Mi C. 2018. The application of frontal sinus index and frontal sinus area in sex estimation based on lateral cephalograms among Han nationality adults in Xinjiang. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 56: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.12.014en
dc.referencesMcLaughlin RB, Rehl RM, Lanza DC. 2001 Clinically relevant frontal sinus anatomy and physiology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 34(1): 1–22.en
dc.referencesMcGraw KO, Wong SP. 1996. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients Psychol Methods, 1(1): 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30en
dc.referencesMeindl RS, Lovejoy CO, Mensforth RP, Walker RA. 1985. A revised method of age determination using the os pubis, with a review and tests of the accuracy of other current methods of pubic symphyseal aging. Am J Phys Anthr. 68(1): 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330680104en
dc.referencesMichel J, Paganelli A, Varoquaux A, Piercecchi-Marti MD, Adalian P, Leonetti G, Dessi P. 2015. Estimation of sex: interest in frontal sinus 3D reconstructions. J. Forensic Sci. 60(2): 269–273.en
dc.referencesMoideen SP, Khizer Hussain Afroze M, Mohan M, Regina M, Sheriff RM, Moideen CP. 2017. Incidence of frontal sinus aplasia in Indian population. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 3: 108–111.en
dc.referencesMyszka M. 1996. Średniowieczne i nowożytne pochówki odkryte w kościele św. Marka w Krakowie. [in:] Wiadomości konserwatorskie województwa krakowskiego, Kraków, 4: 121–148.en
dc.referencesNikolova S, Toneva D, Georgiev I, Lazarov N. 2017. Digital radiomorphometric analysis of the frontal sinus and assessment of the relation between persistent metopic suture and frontal sinus development. Am J Phys Anthropol. 00:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23375en
dc.referencesOzcan KM, Hizli O, Sarisoy ZA, Ulusoy H, Yildirim G. Coexistence of frontal sinus hypoplasia with maxillary sinus hypoplasia: a radiological study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 275(4):931–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4892-9en
dc.referencesPajic SS, Antic S, Vukicevic AM, Djordjevic N, Jovicic G, Savic Z, Saveljic I, Janović A, Pesic Z, Djuric M, Filipovic N. 2017. Trauma of the Frontal Region Is Influenced by the Volume of Frontal Sinuses. A Finite Element Study. Frontiers in Physiology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00493en
dc.referencesPatil KR, Mody RN. 2005. Estimation of sex by discriminant function analysis and stature by regression analysis: A lateral cephalometric study. Forensic Science International, 147(2–3): 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.071en
dc.referencesPatil N, Karjodkar FR, Sontakke S, Sansare K, Salvi R. 2012. Uniqueness of radiographic patterns of the frontal sinus for personal identification. Imaging Science in Dentistry 42: 213–217.en
dc.referencesPhenice TW. 1969. A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis, Am J Phys Anthr, 30(2): 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330300214en
dc.referencesPhrabhakaran N, Naidu MDK, Subramaniam K. 1999. Anatomical variability of the frontal sinuses and their application in forensic identification. Clin Anat. 12: 16–19.en
dc.referencesPieradzka K. 1931. Garbary. Przedmieście Krakowa (13631587). Biblioteka Krakowska: Kraków.en
dc.referencesPondé J, Metzger M, Amaral P, Machado G, Prandini M. 2003. Anatomic variations of the frontal sinus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 46(1): 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-37956en
dc.referencesQuatrehomme G, Fronty P, Sapanet M, Grevin G, Bailet P, Ollier A. 1996. Identification by frontal sinus pattern in forensic anthropology. Forensic Sci Int. 83: 147–153.en
dc.referencesRiepert T, Ulmcke D, Schweden F, Nafe B. 2001. Identification of unknown dead bodies by X–ray image comparison of the skull using the X–ray simulation program FoXSIS. Forensic Sci Int, 117(1–2): 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00452-7en
dc.referencesRogers T. 2005. Determining the sex of human remains through cranial morphology. J. Forensic Sci. 50(3): 493–500.en
dc.referencesRubira-Bullen IRF, Rubira CMF, Sarmento VA, Azevedo RA. 2010. Frontal sinus size on facial plain radiographs. J. Morphol. Sci. 27(2): 77–81.en
dc.referencesRuiz CR, Nader Wafae N. 2004. Anatomo-radiological and morphometrical study of the frontal sinus in humans. Braz J Morphol Sci. 21(1): 53–56.en
dc.referencesSai Kiran Ch, Ramaswamy P, Khaitan T. 2014. Frontal sinus index – A new tool for sex estimation. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 2(2): 77–79.en
dc.referencesSchaeffer JP. 1916. Further observation of the anatomy of the sinus frontalis in man. Ann Surg. 665–671.en
dc.referencesScheuer L, Black S. 2000. Developmental Juvenile Osteology. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA.en
dc.referencesSchuller A. 1921. Das Roentgenogramm der Stirnhöle: Ein Hilfsmittel für die Identitätsbestimmung von Schadlen, Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol 55: 1617–1620.en
dc.referencesShamlou AA, Tallman SD. 2022. Frontal Sinus Morphological and Dimensional Variation as Seen on Computed Tomography Scans. Biology (Basel). 11(8): 1145. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11081145en
dc.referencesShrout PE, Fleiss JL. 1979. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2): 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420en
dc.referencesSpaeth J, Krügelstein U, Schlöndorff G. 1997. The paranasal sinuses in CT–imaging: development from birth to age 25. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 39: 25–40.en
dc.referencesSpradley MK, Jantz RL. 2011. Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci. 56(2): 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.xen
dc.referencesStone AC, Milner GR, Pääbo S, Stoneking M. 1996. Sex determination of ancient human skeletons using DNA.Am J Phys Anthropol. 99(2): 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199602)99:23.0.CO;2–1en
dc.referencesSzilvassy J. 1974. Die Stirnhohlen der Schadel aus dem awarischen Graberfeld von Zwolfaxing in Niederosterreich. Ann Naturhist Mus Wien. 78: 109–118.en
dc.referencesSzilvassy J. 1981. Zur Entwicklung der Stirnhöhlen. Anthropol. Anz. Stuttgart, 39 (1981), 138-149.en
dc.referencesSzilvassy J. 1982. Zur Variation, Entwicklung und Vererbung der Stirnhohlen. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, 84A: 97–125.en
dc.referencesTang JP, Hu DY, Jiang FH, Yu XJ. 2009. Assessing forensic applications of the frontal sinus in a Chinese Han population. Forensic Sci Int. 183:104.e1–3.en
dc.referencesTeul I, Czerwiński F, Zbisławski W, Wojciechowska I, Noceń I, Kołosowski P. 2005. Anthropological, Biochemical and Genetical Analysis of Osseous Material from Medieval Church Cemetery in Szczecin, [in:] Wszystkich rzeczy miarą jest Człowiek, ed. Jerzemowski J, Grzybiak M, Piontek J, Gdańsk, 649–653 (in Polish).en
dc.referencesTorwald CR, Hoppa RD. 2005. A test of sex estimation from measurements of chest radiographs. J Forensic Sci. 50(4): 785–790.en
dc.referencesThottungal RR, Obertova Z, Flavel A, Franklin D. 2024. Sex estimation of frontal sinus volume from computed tomography scans in a Western Australian adult population. Anthropol Anz. 81(2): 161–167. https://doi.org/ 10.1127/anthranz/2023/1718en
dc.referencesUbelaker DH, Volk CG. 2002. A test of the Phenice Method for the estimation of sex. J Forensic Sci. 47(1): 19–24.en
dc.referencesUbelaker DH, Wu Y. 2020. Fragment analysis in forensic anthropology. Forensic Sci Res. 5(4): 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2020.1811513en
dc.referencesUthman AT, Al-Rawi NH, Al-Naaimi AS, Tawfeeq AS, Suhail EH. 2010. Evaluation of frontal sinus and skull measurements using spiral CT scanning: an aid in unknown person identification. Forensic Sci Int. 197: 124.1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.064en
dc.referencesWalker PL. 2008. Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. Am J Phys Anthropol. 136: 39–50.en
dc.referencesWanzeler AMV, Alves-Júnior SM, Ayres L, da Costa Prestes MC, Gomes JT, Tuji FM. 2019. Sex estimation using paranasal sinus discriminant analysis: a new approach via cone beam computerized tomography volume analysis. Int J Legal Med. 133(6): 1977–1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02100-6en
dc.referencesWilliams BA, Rogers T. 2006. Evaluating the accuracy and precision of cranial Morphological traits for sex estimation J Forensic Sci, 51(4): 729–735.en
dc.referencesWyżga M. 2014. Funkcjonowanie wiejskich cmentarzy parafii katolickich w dobie przedrozbiorowej na przykładzie dekanatów Nowa Góra, Skała i Proszowice z okolic Krakowa. Kwartalnik Historii Kultury Materialnej, 62(3): 441–462.en
dc.referencesXavier TA, Terada ASSD, da Silva RHA. 2015. Forensic application of the frontal and maxillary sinus: a literature review. J. Forensic Radiol. Imaging. 3: 105–110.en
dc.referencesYazuci D. 2019. The effect of frontal sinus pneumatization on anatomic variants of paranasal sinuses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 276(4): 1049–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5259-yen
dc.referencesYoshino M, Miyasaka S, Sato H, Seta S. 1987. Classification system of frontal sinus patterns by radiography. Its application to identification of unknown skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int. 34: 289–299.en
dc.referencesYüksel Aslier NG, Karabay N, Zeybek G, Keskinoğlu P, Kiray A, Sütay S, Ecevit MC. 2016. The classification of frontal sinus pneumatization patterns by CT–based volumetry. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 38(8): 923–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1644-7en
dc.referencesZaremska H. 1974. Żywi wobec umarłych. Brackie i cechowe pogrzeby w Krakowie w XVI – 1 połowy XVI wieku. Kwartalnik Historyczny 81: 733–749.en
dc.referencesŻukow-Karczewski M. 1989. Cmentarze dawnego Krakowa. Echo Krakowa 212.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailMrożek, Kamil - kamil.mrozek@uj.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailMarchewka, Justyna - j.marchewka@uksw.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailBorowska, Beata - beata.borowska@biol.uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailBudnik, Alicja - a.budnik@uksw.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailLeszczyński, Bartosz - bartosz.leszczynski@uj.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailWróbel, Andrzej - andrzej.wrobel@uj.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailWronka, Iwona - iwona.wronka@uj.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1898-6773.87.2.03
dc.relation.volume87


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
63-84_Mrozek.pdf
Rozmiar:
3.286MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0