Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAntonowicz, Dominik
dc.contributor.authorLenart-Gansiniec, Regina
dc.contributor.authorSułkowski, Łukasz
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-03T12:04:23Z
dc.date.available2024-09-03T12:04:23Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/53107
dc.description.abstractThe operationalization of a research problem is a constitutive stage of the process of implementing any scientific research. However, carrying operationalization out is a challenge for the researcher, because it requires good, complete, and up-to-date knowledge of the analyzed issues. Therefore, researchers are increasingly encouraged to look for ways or procedures that make it possible to search, clarify, and understand in a multi-aspect manner phenomena that may become the subject of empirical research. This is particularly important in the context of research on higher education, which requires a qualitative approach. Crowdsourcing in science has entered the popularization phase and seems to be promising in the context of the operationalization of any research problem. The aim of this article is to present a proposal for the use of crowdsourcing in science as an auxiliary (supplementary) procedure at the stage of the operationalization of the research problem and to consider its effectiveness in the context of research on higher education.en
dc.description.abstractOperacjonalizacja problemu badawczego stanowi konstytutywny etap procesu realizacji każdego badania naukowego. Jednak jej przeprowadzenie jest dla badacza wyzwaniem, wymaga bowiem dobrej, pełnej i aktualnej znajomości analizowanej problematyki. Dlatego też coraz częściej zachęca się badaczy do poszukiwania sposobów czy postępowań, dzięki którym możliwe jest doprecyzowanie i zrozumienie w sposób wieloaspektowy zjawisk, które mogą stać się przedmiotem badań empirycznych. W szczególności nabiera to znaczenia w kontekście badań nad szkolnictwem wyższym, które wymagają podejścia jakościowego. Crowdsourcing naukowy wszedł w fazę popularyzacji i wydaje się obiecujący w kontekście operacjonalizacji problemu badawczego. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie propozycji wykorzystania crowdsourcingu naukowego jako pomocniczego (uzupełniającego) postępowania na etapie operacjonalizacji problemu badawczego oraz zastanowienie się nad jego skutecznością w kontekście badań nad szkolnictwem wyższym.pl
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPrzegląd Socjologii Jakościowej;3pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectcrowdsourcingpl
dc.subjectcrowdsourcing naukowypl
dc.subjectoperacjonalizacjapl
dc.subjectszkolnictwo wyższepl
dc.subjectbadania jakościowepl
dc.subjectcrowdsourcingen
dc.subjectcrowdsourcing in scienceen
dc.subjectoperationalizationen
dc.subjecthigher educationen
dc.subjectqualitative researchen
dc.titleMożliwości wykorzystania crowdsourcingu naukowego do operacjonalizacji problemu badawczego w badaniach nad szkolnictwem wyższympl
dc.title.alternativeThe Possibilities of Using Crowdsourcing in Science to Operationalize a Research Problem in Research on Higher Educationen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number166-189
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationAntonowicz, Dominik - Uniwersytet Mikołaj Kopernika w Toruniupl
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationLenart-Gansiniec, Regina - Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowiepl
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSułkowski, Łukasz - Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowiepl
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8069
dc.referencesAfuah Allan, Tucci Christopher L. (2012), Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 37(3), s. 355–375, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0146pl
dc.referencesAfuah Allan, Tucci Christopher L., Viscusi Gianluigi (2018), Creating and capturing value through crowdsourcing, London: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.referencesAga Firdissa Jebessa (2022), Determinants of Academic Research Quality: The Case at Three Ethiopian Universities, „SSRN Electronic Journal”, vol. 7(1), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4248966pl
dc.referencesAntonowicz Dominik (2015), Między siłą globalnych procesów a lokalną tradycją, Toruń: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika.pl
dc.referencesAntonowicz Dominik, Donina Davide, Hladchenko Myroslava, Budzanowska Anna (2024), Impact of university councils on the core academic values of Polish universities: limited but benign, „International Journal of Leadership in Education”, s. 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2024.2302062pl
dc.referencesArditte Kimberly A., Çek Demet, Shaw Ashley M., Timpano Kiara R. (2016), The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in Mechanical Turk research, „Psychological Assessment”, vol. 28(6), s. 684–691, https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000217pl
dc.referencesBarbarosa Ligia, Dwyer Tom (2016), Higher education in crisis: critical voices from emerging countries, [w:] James E. Cote, Andy Furlong (red.), Routledge Handbook of the Sociology of Higher Education, London: Routledge, s. 315–327.pl
dc.referencesBarchard Kimberly A., Williams John (2008), Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists, „Behavior Research Methods”, vol. 40(4), s. 1111–1128, https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1111pl
dc.referencesBaron Nancy (2010), Escape from the Ivory Tower: A Guide to Making Your Science Matter, Washington: Island Press.pl
dc.referencesBeck Susanne, Bergenholtz Carsten, Bogers Marcel, Brasseur Tiare-Maria, Conradsen Marie Louise, Di Marco Diletta, Distel Andreas P., Dobusch Leonhard, Dörler Daniel, Effert Agnes, Fecher Benedikt, Filiou Despoina, Frederiksen Lars, Gillier Thomas, Grimpe Christoph, Gruber Marc, Haeussler Carolin, Heigl Florian, Hoisl Karin, Hyslop Katie, Kokshagina Olga, LaFlamme Marcel, Lawson Cornelia, Lifshitz-Assaf Hila, Lukas Wolfgang, Nordberg Markus, Norn Maria Theresa, Poetz Marion, Ponti Marisa, Pruschak Gernot, Pujol Priego Laia, Radziwon Agnieszka, Rafner Janet, Romanova Gergana, Ruser Alexander, Sauermann Henry, Shah Sonali K., Sherson Jacob F., Suess-Reyes Julia, Tucci Christopher L., Tuertscher Philipp, Vedel Jane Bjørn, Velden Theresa, Verganti Roberto, Wareham Jonathan, Wiggins Andrea (2022), The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach, „Industry and Innovation”, vol. 29(2), s. 136–185, https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274pl
dc.referencesBelcher Brian M., Rasmussen Katherine E., Kemshaw Matthew R., Zornes Deborah A. (2016), Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context, „Research Evaluation”, vol. 25(1), s. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv025pl
dc.referencesBen Kei Daniel, Bisaso Ronald (red.) (2023), Higher Education in Sub-Saharan Africa in the 21st, Dordrecht: Springer.pl
dc.referencesBouncken Ricarda B., Komorek Malvine, Kraus Sascha (2015), Crowdfunding: The Current State of Research, „International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER)”, vol. 14(3), s. 407–416, https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v14i3.9206pl
dc.referencesBrem Alexander M., Tucci Christopher L., Brown Terrence, Chen Jin (2023), Guest Editorial: The Age of Crowdsourcing and Crowdfunding for Technological Innovation: Where We Are, and Where to Go?, „IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management”, vol. 70(9), s. 3015–3020, https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2023.3270022pl
dc.referencesBücheler Thierry, Sieg Jan Henrik (2011), Understanding Science 2.0: Crowdsourcing and Open Innovation in the Scientific Method, „Procedia Computer Science”, no. 7, s. 327–329, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2011.09.014pl
dc.referencesBuhrmester Michael, Kwang Tracy, Gosling Samuel D. (2011), Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, yet High-Quality, Data?: A New Source of Inexpensive, yet High-Quality, Data?, „Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science”, vol. 6(1), s. 3–5, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980pl
dc.referencesBuhrmester Michael D., Talaifar Sanaz, Gosling Samuel D. (2018), An Evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, Its Rapid Rise, and Its Effective Use, „Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science”, vol. 13(2), s. 149–154, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706516pl
dc.referencesClark Burton (1984), Introduction, [w:] Burton Clark (red.), Perspectives on higher education: Eight disciplinary and comparative views, Berkeley: University of California Press, s. 1–16.pl
dc.referencesCuprjak Magdalena (2019), Dane w badaniach jakościowych. Uwikłanie w kontekst, „Forum Oświatowe”, nr 31(1), s. 111–124, https://doi.org/10.34862/fo.2019.1.7pl
dc.referencesCywińska Maria, Górak-Sosnowska Katarzyna, Markowska-Manista Urszula (2022), Decolonising “Those Who Are Not” in Polish Higher Education Institutions, [w:] Anna Cohen Miller, Tamsin Hinton-Smith, Fawzia Haeri Mazanderani, Napur Samuel (red.), Leading Change in Gender and Diversity in Higher Education from Margins to Mainstream, London: Routledge, s. 208–232.pl
dc.referencesDenzin Norman K., Lincoln Yvonna S. (2009), Metody badań jakościowych, t. 1–2, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.pl
dc.referencesDrozdowicz Zbigniew (red.) (2009), Uniwersytet. Tradycje, dzień dzisiejszy, przyszłość, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Adama Mickiewicza.pl
dc.referencesDzogovic Sauda A., Bajrami Vedat (2023), Qualitative Research Methods in Science and Higher Education, „Human Research in Rehabilitation”, vol. 13(1), s. 156–166.pl
dc.referencesFord John B. (2017), Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A Comment, „Journal of Advertising”, vol. 46(1), s. 156–158, https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1277380pl
dc.referencesFrankfort-Nachmias Chava, Nachmias David (2001), Metody badawcze w naukach społecznych, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.pl
dc.referencesFranzoni Chiara, Sauermann Henry (2014), Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects, „Research Policy”, vol. 43(1), s. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005pl
dc.referencesGerring John (2012), Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815492pl
dc.referencesGeschwind Lars, Broström Anders, Larsen Katarina (red.) (2020), Technical Universities: Past, Present and Future, Cham: Springer International Publishing.pl
dc.referencesGhezzi Antonio, Gabelloni Donata, Martini Antonella, Natalicchio Angelo (2018), Crowdsourcing: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research: Crowdsourcing, „International Journal of Management Reviews”, vol. 20(2), s. 343–363, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12135pl
dc.referencesGórak-Sosnowska Katarzyna, Piwowar-Sulej Katarzyna. (2023), The well-being of female administrative staff in managerial positions in Polish Higher Education Institutions, „Central European Management Journal”, vol. 31(2), s. 207–221, https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-12-2021-0151pl
dc.referencesHammersley Martyn (1997), Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on Its Prospects and Problems, „Sociology”, vol. 31(1), s. 131–142, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038597031001010pl
dc.referencesHecker Susanne, Haklay Muki, Bowser Anne, Makuch Zen, Vogel Johannes, Bonn Aletta (2018), Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy – Setting the Agenda for Citizen Science, [w:] Susanne Hecker, Muki Haklay, Anne Bowser, Zen Makuch, Johannes Vogel, Aletta Bonn, Citizen Science, London: UCL Press, s. 1–24.pl
dc.referencesHowe Jeff (2006), The Rise of Crowdsourcing, „Wired”, June 1, https://www.wired.com/2006/06/crowds/ [dostęp: 20.06.2023].pl
dc.referencesHowe Jeff (2008), Crowdsourcing: How the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business, London: Random House Books.pl
dc.referencesHughson John, Inglis David, Free Marcus (2005), The Uses of Sport. A Critical Study, Abingdon: Routledge.pl
dc.referencesHuisman Jeroen (2023), Higher Education and Organizational Theory: Systems, Fields, Markets, and Populations in an Increasingly Global Context’, [w:] Paola Mattei, Xavier Dumay, Eric Mangez, Jacqueline Behrend (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Education and Globalization, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197570685.013.31pl
dc.referencesHuisman Jeroen, Meek Lynn, Wood Fiona (2007), Institutional Diversity in Higher Education: A Cross-National and Longitudinal Analysis, „Higher Education Quarterly”, vol. 61(4), s. 563–577, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2007.00372.xpl
dc.referencesJaspers Karl (1946), Die Idee Der Universität, Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer.pl
dc.referencesKlenk Tanja, Antonowicz Dominik, Geschwind Lars, Pinheiro Rómulo, Pokorska Anna (2022), Taking women on boards: a comparative analysis of public policies in higher education, „Policy Reviews in Higher Education”, vol. 6(2), s. 128–152, https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2022.2066014pl
dc.referencesKuhlmann Stefan, Rip Arie (2018), Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges, „Science & Public Policy”, vol. 45(4), s. 448–454, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy011pl
dc.referencesLenart-Gansiniec Regina (2019), Organizacyjne uczenie się w organizacjach publicznych – perspektywa crowdsourcingu, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.pl
dc.referencesLenart-Gansiniec Regina (2023), Crowdsourcing naukowy. Perspektywa mikro, Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.pl
dc.referencesLenart-Gansiniec Regina, Czakon Wojciech, Sułkowski Łukasz, Pocek Jasna (2022), Understanding crowdsourcing in science, „Review of Managerial Science”, vol. 17, s. 2797–2830, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00602-zpl
dc.referencesLiu Wenlong, He Changqing, Jiang Yi, Ji Rongrong, Zhai Xuesong (2020), Effect of Gig Workers’ Psychological Contract Fulfillment on Their Task Performance in a Sharing Economy – A Perspective from the Mediation of Organizational Identification and the Moderation of Length of Service, „International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health”, vol. 17(7), 2208, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072208pl
dc.referencesMacfarlane Bruce, Grant Barbara (2012), The Growth of higher education studies: from forerunners to pathtakers, „Higher Education Research & Development”, vol. 31(5), s. 621–624, https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.719283pl
dc.referencesNeave Guy (2002), The Stakeholder Perspective Historically Explored [w:] Jürgen Enders, Oliver Fulton (red.), Higher Education in a Globalising World: International Trends and Mutual Observations A Festschrift in Honour of Ulrich Teichler, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, s. 17–37.pl
dc.referencesNgo Jenny, Boer Harry de, Enders Jurgen (2014), The way deans run their faculties in Indonesian universities, „Tertiary Education and Management”, vol. 20(1), s. 1–13.pl
dc.referencesNikolic Sasha, Daniel Scott, Haque Rezwanul, Belkina Marina, Hassan Ghulam M., Grundy Sarah, Lyden Sarah, Neal Peter, Sandison Caz (2023), ChatGPT versus engineering education assessment: a multidisciplinary and multi-institutional benchmarking and analysis of this generative artificial intelligence tool to investigate assessment integrity, „European Journal of Engineering Education”, vol. 48(4), s. 559–614, https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2213169pl
dc.referencesOppenlaender Jonas, Milland Kristy, Visuri Aku, Ipeirotis Panos, Hosio Simo (2020), Creativity on Paid Crowdsourcing Platforms, [w:] CHI ‘20: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, s. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376677pl
dc.referencesPaolacci Gabriele, Chandler Jesse (2014), Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool, „Current Directions in Psychological Science”, vol. 23(3), s. 184–188, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598pl
dc.referencesParrick Rebecca, Chapman Brendan (2020), Working the crowd for forensic research: A review of contributor motivation and recruitment strategies used in crowdsourcing and crowdfunding for scientific research, „Forensic Science International. Synergy”, vol. 2, s. 173–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.05.002pl
dc.referencesPavlidou Ioanna, Papagiannidis Savvas, Tsui Eric (2020), Crowdsourcing: a systematic review of the literature using text mining, „Industrial Management + Data Systems”, vol. 120(11), s. 2041–2065, https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-08-2020-0474pl
dc.referencesPittman Matthew, Sheehan Kim (2016), Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a digital sweatshop? Transparency and accountability in crowdsourced online research, „Journal of Media Ethics”, vol. 31(4), s. 260–262.pl
dc.referencesPolanyi Michael (1962), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago: Chicago University Press.pl
dc.referencesPszczołowski Piotr (1978), Mała encyklopedia prakseologii i teorii organizacji, Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.pl
dc.referencesSadler D. Royce (2016), Three in-course assessment reforms to improve higher education learning outcomes, „Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education”, vol. 41(7), s. 1081–1099, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1064858pl
dc.referencesSalemans Luc, Budding Tjerk (2022), Operationalizing public value in higher education: the use of narratives as an alternative for performance indicators, „Journal of Management & Governance”, vol. 26(2), s. 337–363, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09596-4pl
dc.referencesSavenye Wilhelmina C., Robinson Rhonda S. (2005), Using qualitative research methods in higher education, „Journal of Computing in Higher Education”, vol. 16(2), s. 65–95, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02961475pl
dc.referencesSchlagwein Daniel, Daneshgar Farhad (2014), User Requirements of a Crowdsourcing Platform for Researchers: Findings from a Series of Focus Groups, PACIS 2014 Proceedings, https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2014/195/ [dostęp: 20.06.2023].pl
dc.referencesShin Jung Cheol, Kehm Barbara M. (red.) (2014), Institutionalization of World-Class University in Global Competition, Dordrecht: Springer.pl
dc.referencesSin Cristina, Antonowicz Dominik, Wiers-Jenssen Jannecke (2021), Attracting International Students to Semi-Peripheral Countries: A Comparative Study of Norway, Poland and Portugal, „Higher Education Policy”, vol. 34(1), s. 297–320, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00135-3pl
dc.referencesSingh Kapil Dev (2015), Creating Your Own Qualitative Research Approach: Selecting, Integrating and Operationalizing Philosophy, Methodology and Methods, „Vision”, vol. 19(2), s. 132–146, https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262915575657pl
dc.referencesSławek Tadeusz (2002), Antygona w świecie korporacji, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.pl
dc.referencesSowa Kazimierz (2009), Gdy myślę Uniwersytet…, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.pl
dc.referencesStritch Justin M., Pedersen Mogens Jin, Taggart Gabel (2017), The Opportunities and Limitations of Using Mechanical Turk (MTURK) in Public Administration and Management Scholarship, „International Public Management Journal: IPMJ”, vol. 20(3), s. 489–511, https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1276493pl
dc.referencesSułkowski Łukasz, Lenart-Gansiniec Regina (2021), Epistemologia, metodologia i metody badań w naukach o zarządzaniu i jakości, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Społecznej Akademii Nauk.pl
dc.referencesSurowiecki James (2005), The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economics, Society and Nations, London: Abacus.pl
dc.referencesSurowiecki James (2010), Mądrość tłumu: większość ma rację w ekonomii, biznesie i polityce, Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Helion.pl
dc.referencesSztompka Piotr (2005), Socjologia, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.pl
dc.referencesTaylor Maureen P., Bloom Allan (1988), The Closing of the American Mind: How Higher Education Has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today’s Students, „Michigan Law Review”, vol. 86(6), 1135–1140, https://doi.org/10.2307/1289159pl
dc.referencesTeichler Ulrich (1998), The Transition from Higher Education to Employment in Europe, „Higher Education in Europe”, vol. 23(4), s. 535–558, https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772980230411pl
dc.referencesTeichler Ulrich (2014), Teaching and Research in Germany: The Notions of University Professors, [w:] Jung Cheol Shin, Akira Arimoto, William K. Cummings, Ulrich Teichler (red.), Teaching and Research in Contemporary Higher Education, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, s. 61–87.pl
dc.referencesTeichler Ulrich (2015), Changing Perspectives: The Professional Relevance of Higher Education on the Way towards the Highly-Educated Society: Changing Perspectives: The Professional Relevance of Higher Education on the Way towards the Highly-Educated Society, „European Journal of Education”, vol. 50(4), s. 461–477, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12146pl
dc.referencesTight Malcolm (2020), Higher education: discipline or field of study?, „Tertiary Education and Management”, vol. 26, s. 415–428, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-020-09060-2pl
dc.referencesTight Malcolm (2022), Internationalisation of higher education beyond the West: challenges and opportunities – the research evidence, „Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice”, vol. 27(3–4), s. 239–259, https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2041853pl
dc.referencesUhlmann Eric Luis, Ebersole Charles R., Chartier Christopher R., Errington Timothy M., Kidwell Mallory C., Lai Calvin K., McCarthy Randy J., Riegelman Amy, Silberzahn Raphael, Nosek Brian A. (2019), Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science, „Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science”, vol. 14(5), s. 711–733, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561pl
dc.referencesVermicelli Silvia, Cricelli Livio, Grimaldi Michele (2021), How can crowdsourcing help tackle the COVID‐19 pandemic? An explorative overview of innovative collaborative practices, „R&D Management”, vol. 51(2), s. 183–194.pl
dc.referencesWiggins Andrea, Crowston Kevin (2011), From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE.pl
dc.referencesWilliams Carrie (2007), Research Methods, „Journal of Business & Economic Research”, vol. 5(3), s. 65–72, https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v5i3.2532pl
dc.referencesXia Huichuan, McKernan Brian (2020), Privacy in Crowdsourcing: a Review of the Threats and Challenges, „Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)”, vol. 29, s. 263–301.pl
dc.referencesZhao Yuxiang, Zhu Qinghua (2014), Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on participation in crowdsourcing contest: A perspective of self-determination theory, „Online Information Review”, vol. 38(7), s. 896–917, https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-08-2014-0188pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailAntonowicz, Dominik - dominik.antonowicz@umk.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailLenart-Gansiniec, Regina - regina.lenart-gansiniec@uj.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailSułkowski, Łukasz - lukasz.sulkowski@uj.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8069.20.3.08
dc.relation.volume20


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0