Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKittová, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorDružbacká, Barbora
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-30T13:27:58Z
dc.date.available2024-09-30T13:27:58Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-30
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/53262
dc.description.abstractThe EU’s economic relations with China are characterised by a significant trade deficit. Enhancing EU exports of high-tech products, in particular, to China is the best way out of this imbalance. In doing so, EU countries can take advantage of the opportunities provided by the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) that intends to improve connectivity between Europe and Asia.Objective: This study aims to identify the untapped potential for high-tech exports of selected EU countries in trade with China and to evaluate the opportunities arising from the BRI in utilising this potential.Research Design & Methods: To assess the overall high-tech export potential of selected EU countries to China, the export gap was calculated using the concept of revealed comparative advantages.Findings: Among the examined EU countries, Hungary and the Czech Republic were found to have the greatest high-tech export growth potential to China. The largest export gaps were recorded in electrical machinery and equipment.Implications & Recommendations: The findings of the study can be used by European businesses to adjust their export strategies. It can also be used by government institutions of the studied countries when designing their economic and trade policies, particularly vis-à-vis China and the BRI initiative, within the field of supporting infrastructure projects, as well as high-tech industries.Contribution & Value Added: The study contributes to the literature on the potential of EU export growth to China that has not been sufficiently explored yet. The novelty of the study is in identifying specific high-tech commodities with the highest potential for export to China.en
dc.description.abstractStosunki gospodarcze UE z Chinami charakteryzują się znacznym deficytem handlowym. Zwiększenie unijnego eksportu produktów zaawansowanych technologicznie, w szczególności do Chin, jest najlepszym sposobem wyjścia z tej nierównowagi. W ten sposób kraje UE mogą skorzystać z możliwości oferowanych przez Inicjatywę Pasa i Szlaku (BRI), która ma na celu poprawę łączności między Europą a Azją.Cel: Niniejsze opracowanie ma na celu identyfikację niewykorzystanego potencjału eksportowego produktów zaawansowanych technologicznie wybranych krajów UE w handlu z Chinami oraz ocenę możliwości wynikających z BRI w zakresie wykorzystania tego potencjału.Metody badawcze: Aby ocenić ogólny potencjał w zakresie eksportu produktów zaawansowanych technologii wybranych krajów UE do Chin, dokonano kalkulacji luki eksportowej przy użyciu koncepcji ujawnionych przewag komparatywnych.Ustalenia: Spośród badanych krajów UE największy potencjał wzrostu eksportu produktów zaawansowanych technologicznie do Chin mają Węgry i Czechy. Największe luki eksportowe odnotowano w przypadku maszyn i urządzeń elektrycznych.Implikacje i zalecenia: Wyniki badań mogą być wykorzystane przez europejskie przedsiębiorstwa do dostosowania swoich strategii eksportowych. Mogą być również wykorzystywane przez instytucje rządowe badanych państw przy projektowaniu ich polityki gospodarczej i handlowej, szczególnie wobec Chin i inicjatywy BRI, w zakresie wspierania projektów infrastrukturalnych, a także branż high-tech.Wkład i wartość dodana: Opracowanie wnosi wkład do literatury na temat potencjału wzrostu eksportu UE do Chin, który nie został jeszcze wystarczająco zbadany. Nowością przeprowadzonych badań jest identyfikacja konkretnych produktów zaawansowanych technologicznie o najwyższym potencjale eksportowym do Chin.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe;3pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen
dc.subjectChinaen
dc.subjectexport potentialen
dc.subjecthigh‑tech productsen
dc.subjectUnia Europejskapl
dc.subjectChinypl
dc.subjectpotencjał eksportowypl
dc.subjectprodukty high‑techpl
dc.titleThe Potential for High‑tech Exports from Selected EU Member States to China and the Related Opportunities Arising from the Belt and Road Initiativeen
dc.title.alternativePotencjał eksportu produktów zaawansowanych technologicznie z wybranych państw członkowskich UE do Chin i związane z nim możliwości wynikające z inicjatywy Pasa i Szlakupl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number67-92
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKittová, Zuzana - University of Economics in Bratislava, Faculty of Commerce Department of International Trade, Bratislava, Slovak Republicen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDružbacká, Barbora - University of Economics in Bratislava, Faculty of Commerce, Department of International Trade Bratislava, Slovak Republicen
dc.identifier.eissn2082-6737
dc.referencesArsyad, M., Amiruddin, A., Suharno, S., Jahroh, S. (2020), Competitiveness of Palm Oil Products in International Trade: An Analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia, “Journal of Sustainable Agriculture”, 35 (2), pp. 157–167, https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v35i2.41091en
dc.referencesAstana Times (2019), As BRI enters Italy, whom should EU blame?, https://asiatimes.com/2019/04/as-bri-enters-italy-whom-should-eu-blame/ (accessed: 11.01.2022).en
dc.referencesBalassa, B.A. (1965), Trade Liberalization and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage, “The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies”, 33 (2), pp. 92–123, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.xen
dc.referencesBalassa, B.A. (1986), Comparative Advantages in Manufactured Goods: A Reappraisal, “Review of Economics and Statistics”, 68 (2), pp. 315–319, https://doi.org/10.2307/1925512en
dc.referencesBraja, M., Gemzik Salwach, A. (2020), Competitiveness of high-tech exports in the EU countries, “Journal of International Studies”, 3 (1), pp. 359–372, https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-1/23en
dc.referencesBrakman, S., Tijl, H., Van Marrewijk, Ch., Olsen, J. (2022), On the revealed comparative advantages of Dutch cities, “Review of International Economics”, 31 (3), pp. 785–825, https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12644en
dc.referencesBronček, J. (2019), Identifikácia exportného potenciálu Slovenskej republiky pri obchodovaní s Čínskou ľudovou Republikou – Ricardovský prístup, “Ekonomické rozhľady: vedecký časopis Ekonomickej univerzity v Bratislave”, 48 (2), pp. 158–178.en
dc.referencesDecreux, Y., Spies, J. (2016), Export Potential Assessments: A methodology to identify export opportunities for developing countries, https://umbraco.exportpotential.intracen.org/media/cklh2pi5/epa-methodology_230627.pdf (accessed: 11.01.2022).en
dc.referencesEuropean Commission (2021), Production and international trade in high-tech products, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Production_and_international_trade_in_high-tech_products (accessed: 9.01.2022).en
dc.referencesFalkowski, K. (2018), Competitiveness of the Baltic States in International High-Technology Goods Trade, “Comparative Economic Research – Central and Eastern Europe”, 21 (1), pp. 25–43, https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0002en
dc.referencesFardella, E., Prodi, G. (2017), The Belt and Road Initiative Impact on Europe: An Italian Perspective, “China & World Economy”, 25 (5), pp. 125–138, https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12217en
dc.referencesFontagné, L., Freudenberg, M., Ünal Kesenci, D. (1999), Haute technologie et échelles de qualité: de fortes asymétries en Europe, “CEPII Research Center – Working Papers”, 8, http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/1999/wp1999-08.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2022).en
dc.referencesFrench, S. (2017), Revealed comparative advantage: What is it good for?, “Journal of International Economics”, 106, pp. 83–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.02.002en
dc.referencesGarcia-Herrero, A., Xu, J. (2016), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Can Europe Expect Trade Gains?, “Working Paper Series”, 5, Bruegel Research Institute, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2842517en
dc.referencesGigler, C. (2021), The EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI): A glance at the schedules, https://www.roedl.com/insights/china-eu-cai-comprehensive-agreement-on-investment-schedules (accessed: 20.01.2022).en
dc.referencesHadzhiev, V. (2014), Overall Revealed Comparative Advantages, “Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance”, 2 (1), pp. 47–53.en
dc.referencesHauk, W.R., Deb, K. (2017), RCA indices, multinational production and the Ricardian trade model, “International Economics and Economic Policy”, 14 (1), pp. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-015-0317-zen
dc.referencesHinloopen, J., Van Marrewijk, C. (2001), On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index, “Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv”, 137 (1), pp. 1–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707598en
dc.referencesHoen, A.R., Oosterhaven, J. (2006), On the measurement of comparative advantage, “The Annals of Regional Science”, 40 (3), pp. 677–691, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0076-4en
dc.referencesInternational Trade Center (2022a), Trade Map, https://www.trademap.org/ (accessed: 11.01.2022).en
dc.referencesInternational Trade Center (2022b), Market Access Map, https://www.macmap.org/ (accessed: 11.01.2022).en
dc.referencesKarkanis, D. (2018), EU-China Trade: Geography and Institutions form 2001 to 2015, “Journal of Economic Integration”, 33 (1), pp. 1158–1175, https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2018.33.1.1158en
dc.referencesKašťáková, E., Luptáková, A., Družbacká, B. (2022), EU – China trade cooperation in the context of the BRI: Analysis and perspectives on different examples of the EU countries, “St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies”, 38 (3), pp. 3–25, https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2022.101en
dc.referencesLemoine, F., Ünal-Kesenci, D. (2002), China in the International Segmentation of Production Processes, “CEPII Research Center – Working Papers”, 2, http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2002/wp2002-02.pdf (accessed: 7.01.2022).en
dc.referencesLi, Y., Bolton, K., Westphal, T. (2018), The effect of the New Silk Road railways on aggregate trade volumes between China and Europe, “Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies”, 16 (2), pp. 275–292, https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2018.1453720en
dc.referencesLiu, D., Wen, H., Guo, F., Wang, C. (2019), The Impact of Northern Sea Route on Sino-European Trade Potential Based on Gravity Model, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2019), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 310, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332664895_The_Impact_of_Northern_Sea_Route_on_Sino-European_Trade_Potential_Based_on_Gravity_Model (accessed: 11.01.2022).en
dc.referencesMa, D., Lei, C., Ullah, F., Ullah, R., Baloch, Q.B. (2020), China’s One Belt and One Road Initiative and Outward Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Europe, “Sustainability”, 11 (24), 7055, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247055en
dc.referencesMayer, T., Zignago, S. (2006), Notes on CEPII’s distances measures, http://www.cepii.fr/%5C/distance/noticedist_en.pdf (accessed: 7.01.2022).en
dc.referencesPitoňáková, R. (2020), Measuring trade specialisation of Slovakia on extra EU market, “International Journal of Trade and Global Markets”, 13 (1), pp. 3–10, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2020.104914en
dc.referencesResearch and Markets (2021), Global Corticosteroids Market Report 2021 Featuring Major Players – Sumitomo, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, Johnson and Johnson, GSK, AstraZeneca, Cipla, and LEO Pharma, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/05/13/2228869/28124/en/Global-Corticosteroids-Market-Report-2021-Featuring-ajor-Players-Sumitomo-Pfizer-Novartis-Merck-Sanofi-Johnson-and-Johnson-GSK-AstraZeneca-Cipla-and-LEO-Pharma.html (accessed: 11.01.2022).en
dc.referencesRibeiro, P., Carvalho, V., Santos, P. (2016), Export-Led Growth in the EU: Where and What to Export?, “The International Trade Journal”, 30 (4), pp. 319–344, https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2016.1197806en
dc.referencesRicardo, D. (1817), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, John Murray, London.en
dc.referencesStellian, R., Danna-Buitrago, J. (2019), Revealed comparative advantages and regional specialization: Evidence from Colombia in the Pacific Alliance, “Journal of Applied Economics”, 22 (1), pp. 349–379, https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2019.1627722en
dc.referencesTorrecillas, C., Martínez, C. (2022), Patterns of specialisation by country and sector in olive applications, “Technology in Society”, 70, 102003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102003en
dc.referencesVollrath, T.L. (1991), A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage, “Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv”, 127 (2), pp. 265–280, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707986en
dc.referencesWilson, J. (2021), Australia Shows the World What Decoupling From China Looks Like, https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/11/09/australia-china-decoupling-trade-sanctions-coronavirus-geopolitics/ (accessed: 12.01.2022).en
dc.referencesWorld Bank (2010), Trade Indicators, https://wits.worldbank.org/wits/wits/witshelp/Content/Utilities/e1.trade_indicators.htm (accessed: 11.01.2022).en
dc.referencesWorld Bank (2022), High-technology exports (% of manufactured exports), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS (accessed: 10.01.2022).en
dc.referencesWorld Intellectual Property Organization (2021), High-Tech Trade Rebounded Strongly in the Second Half of 2020, with New Asian Exporters Benefiting, https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/news/2021/news_0001.html (accessed: 18.01.2022).en
dc.referencesXinhua (2020), Xinhua Headlines: Railway freight express puts China-EU cooperation amid pandemic on fast tracks, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-06/27/c_139170811.htm (accessed: 5.01.2022).en
dc.referencesZábojník, S., Borovská, Z. (2021), Competitiveness of the Slovak Republic as a Determinant of its Success in Third Country Markets, The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020, 92, pp. 21–22, https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219209018en
dc.contributor.authorEmailKittová, Zuzana - zuzana.kittova@euba.sk
dc.contributor.authorEmailDružbacká, Barbora - barbora.druzbacka@gmail.sk
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1508-2008.27.22
dc.relation.volume27


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0