Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Remarks on the Letter of the Patriarch Theophylact to Tsar Peter in the Context of Certain Byzantine and Slavic Anti-heretic Texts

dc.contributor.authorMintchev, Gueorgui
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-03T13:58:19Z
dc.date.available2014-09-03T13:58:19Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn2084-140X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/5368
dc.descriptionTranslated by Marek Majerpl_PL
dc.description.abstractThe Letter of patriarch Theophylact to tsar Peter is the oldest, but seemingly not the most informative Greek source for the history of Bogomilism. It is in essence a standard document, a typical product of the patriarch’s chancery; it is not conceived as an in-depth investigation into the theological minutiae pertaining to the cosmogony, dogmas and social doctrines of the heretics and the orthodox Church, but rather as a practical tutorial on how to thwart any given neo-Manichaean dualist heresy. It brings to light the fact that Bogomilism, the ‘new’ heresy was treated as an ‘old’ one – as a ‘reactivation’ of earlier gnostic-dualist and neo-Manichaean movements. The letter also features a peculiar innovative feature, though not one directly related to the Bogomil heresy itself: the degree of commitment to preaching the dogmas of the heresy is used for differentiating the situation of the followers. The analysis of the Letter of patriarch Theophylact to tsar Peter raises the more general issue concerning the detailed study of Byzantine and Slavic liturgical texts as a source of information on neo-Manichaean doctrines.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego (Lodz University Press)pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Center for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europe;Vol. 3/2013
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.titleRemarks on the Letter of the Patriarch Theophylact to Tsar Peter in the Context of Certain Byzantine and Slavic Anti-heretic Textspl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number113-130pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzki (University of Lodz)pl_PL
dc.referencesDujčev I., L’epistola sui Bogomili del patriarcha Teofilatto, [in:] I. Dujčev, Medioevo bizantinoslavo, vol. I, Roma 1965, p. 283–315.
dc.referencesПетровский Н.М., Письмо патриарха Константинопольского Феофилакта царю Болгарии Петру, [in:] „Известия Отделения руcского языка и словесности [Императорской/Российской Академии Наук]” 18.3, 1913, p. 356–372.
dc.referencesЗлатарски В., История на българската държава през средните векове, vol. I.2, От славянизацията на държавата до падането на Първото царство (852–1018), София 1927, appendix XI, p. 840–845.
dc.referencesChristian Dualist Heresies in the Byzantine World c. 650 – c. 1450, ed. J. Hamilton, B. Hamilton, assist. Y. Stoyanov, Manchester–New York 1998, p. 98–102.
dc.referencesLeszka M.J., Wizerunek pierwszego państwa bułgarskiego w bizantyńskich źródłach pisanych (VIII – pierwsza połowa XII wieku), Łódź 2003, p. 124–138.
dc.referencesБилярскиИ., Покровители на Царството. Св. цар Петър и св. Параскева-Петка, София 2004.
dc.referencesHamilton B., The Cathars and Seven Churches in Asia, [in:] Byzantium and the West c. 850 – c. 1200: Proceedings of the XVIII Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies. Oxford, Amsterdam 1988, p. 284–290.
dc.referencesStoyanov Y., The Other God: Dualist Religions from Antiquity to the Cathar Heresy, New Haven–London 2000.
dc.referencesКирило-Мeтодиевска енциклопедия, vol. I–IV, София 1985–2003, vol. II, p. 169–194.
dc.referencesИванов Й., Богомилски книги и легенди, repr. София 1970.
dc.referencesLoos M., Le pretenduté moignage d’untraité de Jean Exarque in titulé “Šestodnev” et relative aux Bogomiles, „Byzantinoslavica. Revue internationale des études byzantines” 1, 1952, p. 59–88.
dc.referencesRunciman S., The Medieval Manichee: A Study of the Christian Dualist Heresy, Cambridge 2003.
dc.referencesKazhdan A., Theophylaktos, [in:] „The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, ed. A. Kazhdan et al., New York–Oxford 1991”, vol. III, p. 2068.
dc.referencesBurgmann L. in: The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, ed. A. Kazhdan et al., New York–Oxford 1991, vol. I, p. 673.
dc.referencesObolensky D., The Bogomils: A Study in Balcan Neo-Manichaeism, Cambridge 1948.
dc.referencesАнгелов Д., Богомилството в България, София 1969.
dc.referencesLes sources grecques pour l’histoire des Pauliciens d’Asie Mineure, ed. et trans. Ch. Astruc, W. Wolska-Conus, J. Gouillard, P. Lemerle, D. Papachryssanthou, J. Paramelle, „Travaux et mémoires du Centre de recherches d’histoire et civilisation byzantines” 4, 1970, p. 7–67, 99–183.
dc.referencesFicker G., Die Phundagiagiten, Leipzig 1908.
dc.referencesJugie M., Phundagiagites et Bogomiles, „Échos d’Orient” 12, 1909, p. 257–262.
dc.referencesСоловjев А., Фундаjаjити, патерини и кудугери у византиjским изворима, [in:] „Fontes graeci historiae bulgaricae / Грътски извори за българската история”, vol. I, София 1952, p. 122–126.
dc.referencesLoos M., Dualist Heresy in the Middle Ages, Praha 1974.
dc.referencesДрагоjловиќ Д., Антиќ В., Богомилството во средновековната изворна граѓа, Скопje 1978.
dc.referencesK[azhdan] A., Euthymios of Akmonia, [in:] „The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, ed. A. Kazhdan et al., New York–Oxford 1991”, vol. II, p. 756.
dc.referencesPatrologiae cursus completus, Series graeca, ed. J.-P. Migne Paris 1857–1866, vol. CXXX.
dc.referencesRigo A., Il processo del bogomilo Basilio (1099 ca.): una ricostruzione, „Orientalia Christiana Periodica” 58, 1992, p. 185–211.
dc.referencesAnna Comnena, The Alexiad, trans. E.R.A. Sweter, rev. P. Frankopan, London–New York 2009.
dc.referencesБегунов Ю.К., Козма Пресвитер в славянских литературах, София 1973.
dc.referencesБорилов синодик. Издание и превод, ed. И. Божилов, А. Тотоманова, И. Биляр ски, София 2010.
dc.referencesЦибранска-Костова М., Кратки сведения за богомилите в южнославянските текстове на църковното право, „Български език” 1, 2004, p. 40–50.
dc.referencesЦибранска-Костова М., Райкова М., Богомилите в църковно-юридическите текстове и паметници, „Старобългарска литература” 39/40, 2008, p. 197–219.
dc.referencesБенешевич В.Н., „Синагога в 50 титулов” и другие юридические сборники Иоанна Схоластика, Санкт-Петербург 1914.
dc.referencesGouillard J., Les formules d’abjuration, „Travaux et mémoires du Centre de recherches d’histoire et civilisation byzantines”4, 1970, p. 185–207.
dc.referencesДрагоjловић Д., Богомилство на Балкану и у Малоj Азиjи, I, Богомилски родоначалници, Београд 1974, p. 131–132.
dc.referencesДрагоjловић Д., Манихеjска формула проклињања у словенском преводу, „Balcanica. Annual of the Institute for Balkan Studies” 6, 1975, p. 51–61.
dc.referencesPeter the Hegumen, „Travaux et mémoires du Centre de recherches d’histoire et civilisation byzantines”4, 1970, p. 69–97.
dc.referencesDokumenty Soborów Powszechnych. Tekst grecki, łaciński, polski, vol. I–II, Kraków 2004–2005.
dc.referencesConcilium Quinisextum. Das Konzil Quinisextum, ed. et trans. H. Ohme, Brepols 2006.
dc.referencesArranz M., Les Sacrements del’ancien Euchologe constantinopolitain (2). 1ere partie: Admission dans l’Eglise des convertis des heresies oud’autres religions non-chretiens, „Orientalia Christiana Periodica” 49, 1983, p. 48–49.
dc.referencesБенешевич В.Н., Древнеславянская Кормчая XIV титулов без толкования, Санкт-Петербург 1906.
dc.referencesДобрев И., Номоканон, [in:] Кирило-Мeтодиевска енциклопедия, vol. I–IV, София 1985–2003, vol. II, София 1995, p. 825–833.
dc.referencesGregory T.E., Dioskoros, [in:] The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, ed. A. Kazhdan et al., New York–Oxford 1991, vol. I, p. 632–633.
dc.referencesL’Eucologio Barberini gr. 336, ed. S. Parenti et E. Velkovska, Roma 1995.
dc.referencesEleuteri P., Rigo A., Eretici, dissidenti, Musulmani ed Ebrei a Bisanzio, Venezia 1993.


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
Minczew.pdf
Rozmiar:
323.3KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Thumbnail
Nazwa:
license_rdf
Rozmiar:
1.203KB
Format:
application/rdf+xml
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska