Show simple item record

The Vandal habrosýne and its Significance in Procopius’ Narrative on the Rise and Fall of the Vandal State

dc.contributor.authorStachura, Michał
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-10T10:31:25Z
dc.date.available2025-03-10T10:31:25Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-23
dc.identifier.issn2084-140X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/54885
dc.description.abstractThe description of the Vandals’ habrosýne (Procopius, De bellis, IV, 6, 5–9) apparently fit in with the topos of “a nation once valiant who, living among the luxuries, succumbed to effeminacy”, which had been present in Greco-Roman literature since the time of Herodotus. Following such a course of interpretation, this description could explain why the once formidable conquerors were so easily defeated by a comparatively smaller force under Belisarius’ command. However, a closer look at the actual function of this passage in Procopius’ narrative on the rise and fall of the Vandal state brings this seemingly obvious interpretation into question. It gains a particular significance when we discover some surprising parallels between the fates of the last Vandal king, Gelimer, and the last Lydian king, Croesus – as these two are depicted by Procopius and Herodotus, respectively. If we should recognize that what we have here is a particular literary allusion, a re-application of a Herodotean pattern for the purpose of recounting a contemporary story, this passage takes on a new meaning: representing the former affluence and the present misery of the Vandals serves as a starting point to deliberations on human helplessness in the face of Fate, while referring to habrosýne, as a stereotypical characteristic attributed to the Lydians, is an additional clue to put us on a track leading to associations between the two narratives.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudia Ceraneaen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectProcopius of Caesareaen
dc.subjectHerodotus of Halicarnassusen
dc.subjectVandalsen
dc.subjectGelimeren
dc.subjecthabrosýneen
dc.subjectTýcheen
dc.titleThe Vandal habrosýne and its Significance in Procopius’ Narrative on the Rise and Fall of the Vandal Stateen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number85-111
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJagiellonian University, Institute of Historyen
dc.identifier.eissn2449-8378
dc.referencesC. Iulii Caesaris Commentarii, vol. I, Commentarii belli gallici, ed. A. Klotz, Leipzig 1920.en
dc.referencesCorpus Iuris Civilis, vol. II, Codex Iustinianus, rec. P. Krüger, Berlin 1954.en
dc.referencesFlavii Cresconii Corippi Iohannidos seu De Bellis Libycis Libri VIII, ed. J. Diggle, D. Goodyear, F. Richard, Cambridge 1970.en
dc.referencesHérodote, Histoire, ed. Ph.-E. Legrand, Paris 1932–1956.en
dc.referencesIsocrates, Panegyrikos, [in:] Isocratis Orationes, vol. I, ed. F. Blass, Leipzig 1907, p. 41–87.en
dc.referencesMalchus of Philadelphia, Fragments, [in:] The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of Late Roman Empire: Eunapius, Olympiodoros, Priscus and Malchus, vol. II, ed. R.C. Blockley, Liverpool 1983, p. 402–462.en
dc.referencesMauritii Strategicon, ed. G. Dennis, trans. E. Gamillscheg, Wien 1981 [= Corpus fontium historiae byzantinae, 17].en
dc.referencesProcopii Caesarensis Opera Omnia, vol. I–II, De bellis libri VIII, ed. J. Haury, G. Wirth, Leipzig 1962–1963.en
dc.referencesProcopii Caesarensis Opera Omnia, vol. III, Historia quae dicitur Arcana, ed. J. Haury, G. Wirth, Leipzig 1964.en
dc.referencesSalvien de Marseille, Oeuvres II. Du gouverment de Dieu, ed. G. Lagarrigue, Paris 1975 [= Sources Chrétiennes, 220].en
dc.referencesTheodosiani Libri XVI cum Constitutionibus Sirmondianis et Leges Novellae ad Theodosianum pertinentes, ed. Th. Mommsen, P.M. Meyer, Berlin 1905.en
dc.referencesTiti Livii Ab urbe condita libri XXIII–XXV, ed. Th.A. Dorey, Leipzig 1976.en
dc.referencesXenophon, Helléniques, ed., trans. J. Hatzfeld, Paris 2019.en
dc.referencesXenophon, Institutio Cyri, ed. W. Gemoll, Leipzig 1968 [= Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana], https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110948912en
dc.referencesHerodotus, Books I–II, ed. J. Henderson, trans. A.D. Godley, Cambridge, Mass.–London 1999 [= Loeb Classical Library, 117].en
dc.referencesProcopios, The Wars of Justinian, trans. H.B. Dewing, revised and modernized, with Introduction and notes by A. Kaldellis, Indianapolis–Cambridge, Mass. 2014.en
dc.referencesProkop, Werke, vol. IV, Vandalenkriege, ed. O. Veh, München 1971.en
dc.referencesProkopiusz z Cezarei, Historia wojen, vol. I, ed., trans. D. Brodka, Kraków 2013.en
dc.referencesAger S.L., Familiarity Breeds: Incest and the Ptolemaic Dynasty, “Journal of Hellenic Studies” 125, 2005, p. 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0075426900007084en
dc.referencesAndres H., Der καιρός bei Prokop von Kaisareia, “Millennium” 14, 2017, p. 73–102, https://doi.org/10.1515/mill-2017-0003en
dc.referencesBasso F., Greatrex G., How to Interpret Procopius’ Preface to the Wars, [in:] Procopius of Caesarea. Literary and Historical Interpretations, ed. C. Lilington-Martin, E. Turquois, London–New York 2018, p. 59–72, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602288-5en
dc.referencesBörm H., Justinians Triumph und Belisars Erniedrigung, Überlegungen zum Verhältnis zwischen Kaiser und Militär im späten Römischen Reich, “Chiron” 43, 2013, p. 63–91.en
dc.referencesBörm H., Procopius, his Predecessors, and the Genesis of the Anecdota: Antimonarchic Discourse in Late Antique Historiography, [in:] Antimonarchic Discourse in Antiquity, ed. H. Börm, Stuttgart 2015, p. 305–346, https://doi.org/10.25162/9783515110969en
dc.referencesBraun H., Die Nachahmung Herodots durch Prokop, Nürnberg 1894.en
dc.referencesBriant P., History and Ideology: The Greeks and the ‘Persian Decadence’, [in:] Greeks and Barbarians, ed. Th. Harrison, New York 2002, p. 193–210, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474468916-016en
dc.referencesBrodka D., Die Geschichtsphilosophie in der spätantiken Historiographie. Studien zu Prokopios von Kaisareia, Agathias von Myrina und Theophylaktos Simokattes, Frankfurt am Main 2004 [= Studien und Texte zur Byzantinistik, 5].en
dc.referencesBrodka D., Prokop von Caesarea, Hildesheim–Zürich–New York 2022.en
dc.referencesCameron A., Gelimer’s Laughter: The Case of Byzantine Africa, [in:] Tradition and Innovation in Late Antiquity, ed. F.M. Clover, R.S. Humphreys, Madison 1989, p. 171–190.en
dc.referencesCameron A., The ‘Scepticism’ of Procopius, “Historia” 15, 1966, p. 466–482.en
dc.referencesConant J., Staying Roman. Conquest and Identity in Africa and the Mediterranean, 439–700, Cambridge 2012 [= Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought, 82], https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048101en
dc.referencesCozzoli U., La τρυφή nella interpretazione delle crisi politiche, [in:] Tra Grecia e Roma. Temi antichi e metodologie moderne, Roma 1980, p. 133–145.en
dc.referencesDorati M., La Lidia e la τρυφή, “Aevum Antiquum” N.S. 3, 2003, p. 503–530.en
dc.referencesEidinow E., TYCHĒ (τύχη, ἡ), [in:] The Herodotus Encyclopaedia, ed. Ch. Baron, Hoboken 2021, p. 1507–1509.en
dc.referencesFisher N., Hybris. A Study in the Values of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greece, Warminster 1992.en
dc.referencesFleischer R., Hellenistic Royal Iconography on Coins, [in:] Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship. Studies in Hellenistic civilisation, vol. VII, ed. P. Bilde, T. Engberg-Petersen, L. Hannestad, J. Zahle, Aarhus 1996, p. 28–40.en
dc.referencesGrabowski T., Tryphé w ideologii Ptolemeuszy, [in:] Społeczeństwo i religia w świecie antycznym. Materiały z ogólnopolskiej konferencji naukowej (Toruń 20–22 września 2007), ed. Sz. Olszaniec, P. Wojciechowski, Toruń 2010, p. 91–107.en
dc.referencesGruen E.S., Rethinking the Other in Antiquity, Princeton–Oxford 2011, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400836550en
dc.referencesHarrison Th., Divinity and History – The Religion of Herodotus, Oxford 2000 [= Oxford Classical Monographs].en
dc.referencesHeinen H., Die Tryphè von Ptolemaios VIII Euergetes II. Beobachtungen zum ptolomäischen Herrscherideal und zu einer römischen Gesandtschaft in Ägypten (140/139 v. Chr.), [in:] Althistorische Studien Hermann Bengtson zum 70. Geburtstag dargebracht von Kollegen und Schülern, ed. H. Heinen, K. Stroheker, G. Walser, Wiesbaden 1983, p. 116–128.en
dc.referencesIsaac B., The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity, Princeton–Oxford 2004, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400849567en
dc.referencesKaegi W.E., Arianism and the Byzantine Army in Africa 533–546, “Traditio” 21, 1965, p. 23–53, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362152900017657en
dc.referencesKaldellis A., Ethnography after Antiquity. Foreign Lands and Peoples in Byzantine Literature, Philadelphia 2013, https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812208405en
dc.referencesKaldellis A., Procopius of Caesarea. Tyranny, History, and Philosophy at the End of Antiquity, Philadelphia 2004, https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812202410en
dc.referencesKaldellis A., Procopius’s Vandal War. Thematic Trajectories and Hidden Transcripts, [in:] North Africa under Byzantium and Early Islam, ed. S.T. Stevens, J. Conant, Cambridge, Mass. 2016 [= Dumbarton Oaks Byzantine Symposia and Colloquia], p. 13–21.en
dc.referencesKnaepen A., L’image du roi vandale Gélimer chez Procope de Césarée, “Byzantion” 71, 2001, p. 383–403.en
dc.referencesKruse M., Archery in the Preface to Procopius’ Wars. A Figured Image of Agonistic Authorship, “Studies in Late Antiquity” 1, 2017, p. 381–406, https://doi.org/10.1525/sla.2017.1.4.381en
dc.referencesKurke L., The Politics of ἁβροσύνη in Archaic Greece, “Classical Antiquity” 11, 1992, p. 91–120, https://doi.org/10.2307/25010964en
dc.referencesLambert D., The Barbarians in Salvian’s De gubernatione Dei, [in:] Ethnicity and Culture in Late Antiquity, ed. S. Mitchell, G. Greatrex, London 2000, p. 103–115, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1n357t2.13en
dc.referencesLausberg H., Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. A Foundation for Literary Study, trans. M.T. Bliss, A. Jansen, D.E. Orton, Leiden–Boston–Köln 1998, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004663213en
dc.referencesMeaker M., Von Blumenkranzen, Salbölen und Purpurgewänder. Luxus und Geschlechtsrollen in archaischen Griechenland, [in:] Luxus, Perspektiven von der Antike bis Neuzeit, ed. E. Luppi, J. Voges, Stuttgart 2022, p. 51–79.en
dc.referencesMiles R., Vandal North Africa and the Fourth Punic War, “Classical Philology” 112.3, 2017, p. 384–410, https://doi.org/10.1086/692906en
dc.referencesPasserini A., La ΤΡΥΦΗ nella storiografia ellenistica, “Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica” 11, 1934, p. 35–56.en
dc.referencesPazdernik Ch., Xenophon’s Hellenica in Procopius’ Wars: Pharnabazus and Belisarius, “Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies” 46, 2006, p. 175–206.en
dc.referencesRanston H., Ecclesiastes and the Early Greek Wisdom Literature, London 1925.en
dc.referencesSchmidt-Hofner S., Das Klassische Griechenland. Der Krieg und die Freiheit, München 2016, https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406679162en
dc.referencesSidebottom H., Ancient Warfare. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford–New York 2004, https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192804709.001.0001en
dc.referencesSignes Codoñer J., Kaiserkritik in Prokops Kriegsgeschichte, [in:] Freedom and its Limits in the Ancient World. Proceedings of the Colloquium Held at the Jagellonian University, Kraków, September 2003, ed. D. Brodka, J. Janik, S. Sprawski, Kraków 2003 [= Electrum. Studia z Historii Starożytnej, 9], p. 215–229.en
dc.referencesStachura M., Inspirations from Herodotus Found in Procopius’ Account on the Fall of the Vandal Kingdom, [in:] Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium of Byzantine and Medieval Studies “Days of Justinian I”, Skopje 9–11 November 2023 (forthcoming).en
dc.referencesStachura M., The Distant Origins of “Fat Shaming” or why the People of Antiquity did not Ridicule Fat Women, “Studia Ceranea” 12, 2022, p. 181–213, https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.12.36en
dc.referencesStachura M., Der persische Krieger bei Prokop. Ein Beitrag zur Militärethnographie der Spätantike, [in:] Byzantina et Slavica. Studies in Honour of Professor Maciej Salamon, ed. S. Turlej, M. Stachura, B.J. Kołoczek, A. Izdebski, Kraków 2019, p. 367–381.en
dc.referencesSteinacher R., Gruppen und Identitäten. Gedanken zur Bezeichnung „vandalisch”, [in:] Das Reich der Vandalen und seine (Vor-)geschichten, ed. G.M. Berndt, R. Steinacher, Wien 2008, p. 243–260.en
dc.referencesStewart M.E., Between Two Worlds: Men’s Heroic Conduct in the Writings of Procopius, Diss. San Diego 2003.en
dc.referencesStewart M.E., The Danger of the Soft Life. Manly and Unmanly Romans in Procopius’s Gothic War, “Journal of Late Antiquity” 10, 2017, p. 473–502, https://doi.org/10.1353/jla.2017.0025en
dc.referencesStewart M.E., Masculinity, Identity, and Power Politics in the Age of Justinian. A Study of Procopius, Amsterdam 2020, https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048540259en
dc.referencesStewart M.E., The Soldier’s Life. Martial Virtues and Manly Romanitas in the Early Byzantine Empire, Leeds 2016, p. 247–316.en
dc.referencesTondriau J., La tryphè: philosophie royale ptolémaïque, “Revue des études anciennes” 50, 1948, p. 49–54, https://doi.org/10.3406/rea.1948.3388en
dc.referencesVan Nuffelen P., The Wor(l)ds of Procopius, [in:] Procopius of Caesarea. Literary and Historical Interpretations, ed. C. Lilington-Martin, E. Turquois, London–New York 2018, p. 40–55, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602288-4en
dc.referencesWilczyński M., Gejzeryk i „czwarta wojna punicka”, Oświęcim 2016.en
dc.referencesWood Ph.I., Being Roman in Procopius’ Vandal Wars, “Byzantion” 81, 2011, p. 424–447.en
dc.referencesZali V., Fate, Divine phthonos, and the Wheel of Fortune: the Reception of Herodotean Theology in Early and Middle Byzantine Historiography, [in:] God in History. Reading and Rewriting Herodotean Theology from Plutarch to the Renaissance, ed. A. Ellis, Newcastle upon Tyne 2015, p. 85–126, https://doi.org/10.29173/histos88en
dc.contributor.authorEmailmistachu@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2084-140X.14.14
dc.relation.volume14


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
85-111_Stachura.pdf
Size:
404.7Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0