Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMalatras, Christos
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-10T10:31:30Z
dc.date.available2025-03-10T10:31:30Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-30
dc.identifier.issn2084-140X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/54900
dc.description.abstractThe issue of the rise of the thematic system of administration sparked off an intense debate that has engaged scholars for the past few decades. Those inclined to the view of a one-time reform have argued that the themata formed administrative units into which the Byzantine state was divided in the 7th century, and that the strategoi, who served as governors and commanders of particular themata, combined civil and military authority. However, it now seems that the changes in provincial administration were gradual, having been implemented over a period of more than three centuries. At some point in time, army units became permanently based in specific areas which evolved into military districts and which were then referred to by the names of those units. At the same time, the system of the Late Roman provinces headed by the praetorian prefects, the proconsuls and the praesides/consulares (archontes) continued to operate until the dawn of the 8th century. These officials must have retained at least some of their civil-judicial functions, since the state finances had been centrally administered by the mid-7th century. However, during that period, the military officials began to play an increasing role in civil administration, which affected not only the power held by the old civil officials, but also the extent to which their activity was reflected in primary sources.From the 730s to the 750s Leon III and Konstantinos V introduced a number of reforms that consolidated the new system. The emperors dissolved the old provinces (most likely altogether) and abolished the office of provincial governor. At the same time, the terms thema and strategia, which were used synonymously, began to appear on various seals. Soon after that, the entire civil administration was re-organized along thematic lines. New officials were appointed (protonotarios, chartoularios, anagrapheus, etc.) to control the finances of the themata. However, judicial authority was left in the hands of the military governors. A century later, after a period of internal turmoil, possibly during the reign of Theophilos (829–842), the government appointed new judicial officials with a view to undermining the power of the strategos. These new officials were initially referred to by classicizing names (anthypatos, praitor). By the early 10th century, the Greek title krites (judge) had become dominant.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudia Ceraneaen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectByzantium in the 10th centuryen
dc.subjectcivil authority,en
dc.subjectthematic system,en
dc.subjectadministrationen
dc.subjectthemataen
dc.titleCivil Authority in the Byzantine Provinces (7th–9th Centuries)en
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number463-499
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSorbonne Université, UMR 8167: Orient et Méditerranéeen
dc.identifier.eissn2449-8378
dc.referencesBasilicorum Libri LX. [Series Α], vol. I–VIII, Textus Librorum I–LX, rec. Η. J. Scheltema, Ν. van der Wal, Groningen 1955–1988.en
dc.referencesByzantina engrafa tēs monēs Patmou, vol. II, Dēmosiōn Leitourgōn, rec. M. Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou, Athēnai 1980.en
dc.referencesChronique de Michel le Syrien, vol. I–III, rec. J.-B. Chabot, Paris 1899–1905.en
dc.referencesChronographiae quae Theophanis Continuati nomine fertur. Libri I–IV, rec. M. Featherstone, J. Signes Codoñer, Boston–Berlin 2015 [= Corpus fontium historiae byzantinae, 53].en
dc.referencesConcilium universale Constantinopolitanum tertium (pars 1: concilii actiones 1–XI; pars 2: concilii actiones XII–XVIII), ed. R. Riedinger, Berlin 1990–1992 [= Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum, series II, 2.1–2].en
dc.referencesConstantini Porphyrogeniti Liber de cerimoniis. Le livre des Cérémonies, rec. G. Dagron, B. Flusin, Paris 2020 [= Corpus fontium historiae byzantinae, 52].en
dc.referencesEcloga. Das Gesetzbuch Leons III. und Konstantinos’ V., ed. L. Burgmann, Frankfurt am Main 1983 [= Forschungen zur Byzantinischen Rechtsgeschichte, 10].en
dc.referencesThe Greek Life of St Leo Bishop of Catania (BHG 981b), ed. A. G. Alexakis, trans. S. Wessel, Brussels 2011 [= Subsidia hagiographica, 91].en
dc.referencesLeonis VI Tactica, rec. G. Dennis, Washington, D. C. 2010 [= Dumbarton Oaks Texts, 12, 49].en
dc.referencesProkopius, Historia Arcana, [in:] Procopii Caesariensis opera omnia, rec. G. Wirth, Leipzig 1963.en
dc.referencesS. Gregorii Magni Opera: Registrvm epistvlarvm, ed. D. Norberg, Turnhout 1982 [= Corpus christianorum, Series latina, 140].en
dc.referencesSynaxarium ecclesiae Constantinopolitanae (e codice Sirmondiano nunc Berolinensi), rec. H. Delehaye, Brussels 1902.en
dc.referencesTheodori Studitae Epistulae, vol. I–II, ed. G. Fatouros, Berlin 1992 [= Corpus fontium historiae byzantinae, 31].en
dc.referencesTheophanis Chronographia, vol. I, rec. C. De Boor, Leipzig 1883.en
dc.referencesAhrweiler H., Byzance et la mer, Paris 1966.en
dc.referencesAhrweiler H., Recherches sur l’administration de l’empire byzantin aux IX–XIème siècles, “Bulletin de correspondance hellénique” 84, 1960, p. 1–111, https://doi.org/10.3406/bch.1960.1551en
dc.referencesAvramea A., Anékdota molybdoboulla apo ta nēsia tou Argolikou kolpou, “Βυζαντινά Σύμμεικτα” / “Byzantina Symmeikta” 10, 1996, p. 11–25, https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.803en
dc.referencesBileta V., At the Crossroads of Late Antiquity and Early Middle Ages. The Rise and Fall of the Military Elite of Byzantine Histria, “Annual of Medieval Studies at the Central European University” 11, 2017, p. 100–123.en
dc.referencesBorovkov D. S., Protonotarii fem v Vizantii IX–X vv.: proiskhozhdenie instituta i osnovnye funktsii, “Античная древность и средние века” / “Antichnaja drevnost’ i sredniye veka” 42, 2014, p. 90–100.en
dc.referencesBorri F., Duces e magistri militum nell’Italia esarcale (VI–VIII secolo), “Reti Medievali Rivista” 6.2, 2005, p. 1–46.en
dc.referencesBrandes W., Finanzverwaltung in Krisenzeiten. Untersuchungen zur byzantinischen Administration im 6.–9. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt am Main 2002 [= Forschungen zur Byzantinischen Rechtsgeschichte, 25].en
dc.referencesBrown T. S., Gentlemen and Officers. Imperial Administration and Aristocratic Power in Byzantine Italy A. D. 554–800, London 1984.en
dc.referencesBrubaker L., Haldon J., Byzantium in the Iconoclast Era, c. 680–850. A History, New York 2011.en
dc.referencesBulgurlu V., Ilaslı A., Seals from the Museum of Afyon (Turkey), “Studies in Byzantine Sigillography” 8, 2003, p. 131–149, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110960082.131en
dc.referencesCharalampakis P., Towards a New Prosopographic Corpus of the Kibyrraiotai: Sources, Methods, Benefits, [in:] TAKTIKON. Studies on the Prosopography and Administration of the Byzantine themata, ed. O. Karagiorgou, P. Charalampakis, C. Malatras, Athens 2021, p. 515–602.en
dc.referencesCharalampakis P., Malatras C., Seals of Officials in Seleukeia, [in:] ΧΕΡΣΩΝΟΣ ΘΕΜΑΤΑ. Imperija i Polis. XI Meždunarodnyy Bizantiyskiy Seminar. Materialy Naučnoy Konferecii, Sevastopol 2019, p. 228–236.en
dc.referencesCheynet J.-Cl., La mise en place des thèmes d’après les sceaux: les stratèges, “Studies in Byzantine Sigillography” 10, 2010, p. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110227055.1en
dc.referencesCheynet J.-Cl., Les sceaux byzantins de la collection Savvas Kofopoulos, Paris 2022.en
dc.referencesCheynet J.-Cl., Les sceaux byzantins de la collection Yavuz Tatış, Izmir 2019.en
dc.referencesCheynet J.-Cl., Les sceaux byzantins de musée de Selçuk (Ephèse), “Revue numismatique” 154, 1999, p. 317–352, https://doi.org/10.3406/numi.1999.2246en
dc.referencesCheynet J.-Cl., Sceaux de la collection Zacos (Bibliothèque nationale de France) se rapportant aux provinces orientales, Paris 2001.en
dc.referencesCheynet J.-Cl., Caseau B., Sealing Practices in the Byzantine Administration, [in:] Seals and Sealing Practices in the Near East. Developments in Administration and Magic from Prehistory to the Islamic Period. Proceedings of an International Workshop at the Netherlands Flemish Institute in Cairo on December 2–3, 2009, ed. Ι. Regulski, K. Duistermaat, P. Verkinderen, Leuven–Paris–Walpole 2012, p. 133–148.en
dc.referencesCheynet J.-Cl., Gökyildirim T., Bulgurlu V., Les sceaux byzantins du Musée archéologique d’Istanbul, Istanbul 2012.en
dc.referencesCheynet J.-Cl., Morrisson C., Seibt W., Les sceaux byzantins de la collection Henri Seyrig, Paris 1991.en
dc.referencesDemirer Ü., Elam Ν., Lead Seals of the Kibyra Excavations, “Adalya” 21, 2018, p. 245–277.en
dc.referencesFerluga J., Nize vojno-administrativne jedinice tematskog uredenja, “Зборник Радова Византо-лошког Института” / “Zbornik Radova Vizantološkog Instituta” 2, 1953, p. 61–98.en
dc.referencesGelzer H., Die Genesis der byzantinischen Themenverfassung, Leipzig 1899.en
dc.referencesGkoutzioukostas A., Ē aponomē dikaiosynēs sto Byzantio (9os–12os aiōnes). Ta kosmika dikaiodotika organa kai dikastēria tēs prōtévousas, Thessalonikē 2004.en
dc.referencesGkoutzioukostas A., Ē dioikēsē Thrakēs kata tēn prōimē byzantinē periodo, [in:] Anatolikē Rōmylia (Boreia Thrakē). Istoria kai Politismos, Thessalonikē 2009, p. 105–121.en
dc.referencesGkoutzioukostas A., The Prefect of Illyricum and the Prefect of Thessaloniki, “Βυζαντιακά” / “Byzantiaka” 30, 2012–2013, p. 45–80.en
dc.referencesGkoutzioukostas A., Moniaros X., Ē perifereiakē dioikitikē anadiorganōsē tis Byzantinēs Aftokratorias apo ton Ioustiniano A’ (527–565). Ē periptōsē tēs Quaestura Iustiniana Exercitus, Thessalonikē 2009.en
dc.referencesGoria F., La giustizia nell’impero romano d’Oriente: organizzazione giudiziaria, [in:] La giustizia nell’alto medioevo (secoli V–VIII). Settimane di studio del Centro ltaliano di Studi sull’ Alto Medioevo, XLII, 7–13 aprile 1994, Spoleto 1995.en
dc.referencesGregoriou-Ioannidou M., Parakmē kai ptōsi tou thematikou thesmou. Symvolē stēn exelixē tēs dioikētikēs kai stratiōtikēs organōsēs tou Byzantiou apo to 10o aiōna k.e., Thessalonikē 1985.en
dc.referencesHaldon J., A Context for Two ‘Evil Deeds’: Nikephoros I and the Origins of the Themata, [in:] Mélanges Michel Kaplan, Paris 2016 (= “Travaux et mémoires” 20.1), p. 245–265, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.psorbonne.37663en
dc.referencesHaldon J., Military Service, Military Lands, and the Status of Soldiers: Current Problems and Interpretations, “Dumbarton Oaks Papers” 47, 1993, p. 1–67, https://doi.org/10.2307/1291670en
dc.referencesHaldon J., Seventh-century Continuities: the “Ajnad” and the “Thematic Myth”, [in:] Arab-Byzantine Relations in Early Islamic Times, ed. M. D. Bonner, Aldershot 2004, p. 95–139, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315262284-5en
dc.referencesHumphreys M. T.G., Law, Power, and Imperial Ideology in the Iconoclast Era, c. 680–850, Oxford 2015 [= Oxford Studies in Byzantium], https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701576.001.0001en
dc.referencesJones A. H.M., The Later Roman Empire. A Social, Economic, and Administrative Survey, vol. II, Oxford 1964.en
dc.referencesJordanov I., Corpus of Byzantine Seals from Bulgaria, vol. III, Sofia 2009.en
dc.referencesKaegi W., Two Studies in the Continuity of Late Roman and Byzantine Military Institutions, “Byzantinische Forschungen” 8, 1982, p. 87-113.en
dc.referencesKaragiorgou O., Yet another TAKTIKON?, [in:] TAKTIKON. Studies on the Prosopography and Administration of the Byzantine themata, ed. O. Karagiorgou, P. Charalampakis, C. Malatras, Athens 2021, p. 63–110.en
dc.referencesKarayannopulos J., Die Entstehung der byzantinischen Themenordnung, Munich 1959, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112325766en
dc.referencesKelly C., John Lydus and the Eastern Praetorian Prefecture in the Sixth Century AD, “Byzantinische Zeitschrift” 98.2, 2005, p. 431–458, https://doi.org/10.1515/BYZS.2005.431en
dc.referencesKoltsida-Makre I., Byzantina molybdoboulla syllogēs Orfanidē-Nikolaidē Nomismatikou Mouseiou Athinōn, Athēnai 1996.en
dc.referencesKoltsida-Makre I., Ē syllogē molybdoboullōn Dēmētriou Douka, [in:] Hypermachos. Studien zu Byzantinistik, Armenologie und Georgistik. Festschrift für Werner Seibt zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. C. Stavrakos et al., Vienna 2008, p. 139–152.en
dc.referencesKonstantopoulos K., Byzantiaka molybdóboulla tou en Athēnais Ethnikou Nomismatikou Mouseiou, Athēnai 1917.en
dc.referencesLaflı E., Seibt W., Seven Byzantine Lead Seals from the Museum of Ödemiş in Western Anatolia, “Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies” 44.1, 2020, p. 21–39, https://doi.org/10.1017/byz.2019.22en
dc.referencesLaflı E., Seibt W., Çağlayan D., Middle and Late Byzantine Sigillographic Evidence from Western Anatolia: Eighth- to Early Twelfth-century Lead Seals from Bergama (Ancient Pergamon), “Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies” 46.1, 2022, p. 41–63, https://doi.org/10.1017/byz.2021.29en
dc.referencesLaurent V., Les sceaux byzantins de Médailler Vatican, Vatican 1962.en
dc.referencesLilie R.-J., Die zwei-hundertjährige Reform: Zu den Anfängen der Themenorganisation im 7. und 8. Jahrhundert, I. Die Reform der Verwaltung, “Byzantinoslavica” 45.1, 1984, p. 27–39.en
dc.referencesLounghis T., Eisagōgē, [in:] Ē Mikra Asia tōn thematōn. Erevnes panō stēn geōgrafikē fysiognōmia kai prosōpografia tōn byzantinōn thematōn tēs Mikras Asias (7os–11os ai.) (= Asia Minor and its Themes. Studies on the Geography and Prosopography of the Byzantine Themes of Asia Minor (7th–11th Century)), ed. V. Vlyssidou et al., Athens 1998, p. 37–67.en
dc.referencesMalatras C., In the Service of the Imperial Opsikion: the Corpus of Officials, [in:] TAKTIKON. Studies on the Prosopography and Administration of the Byzantine themata, ed. O. Karagiorgou, P. Charalampakis, C. Malatras, Athens 2021, p. 411–514.en
dc.referencesMalatras C., The Early genikoi logothetai: Status, Seals and Prosopography (mid-7th to mid-9th c.), [in:] In memoriam Jordanov, Sofia 2024 (forthcoming).en
dc.referencesMalatras C., The Early History of the thema of the Boukellarioi (8th Century), “Byzantinische Zeitschrift” 116.1, 2023, p. 127–164, https://doi.org/10.1515/bz-2023-0006en
dc.referencesMalatras C., The thema of the Anatolikoi: Prosopography and Administrative Structure, [in:] TAKTIKON. Studies on the Prosopography and Administration of the Byzantine themata, ed. O. Karagiorgou, P. Charalampakis, C. Malatras, Athens 2021, p. 277–402.en
dc.referencesMcGeer E., Nesbitt J., Oikonomides N., Catalogue of Byzantine Seals at Dumbarton Oaks and the Fogg Museum of Art, vol. IV, The East, Washington, D. C. 2001.en
dc.referencesMcGeer E., Nesbitt J., Oikonomides N., Catalogue of Byzantine seals at Dumbarton Oaks and the Fogg Museum of Art, vol. V, The East (Continued), Constantinople and Environs, Unknown Locations, Addenda, Uncertain Readings, Washington, D. C. 2005.en
dc.referencesMetcalf M. D., Byzantine Lead Seals from Cyprus, Nicosia 2004.en
dc.referencesMetcalf M. D., Byzantine Lead Seals from Cyprus, vol. II, Nicosia 2014.en
dc.referencesMontinaro F., Les premiers commerciaires byzantins, [in:] Constructing the Seventh Century, ed. C. Zuckermann, Paris 2013 (= “Travaux et mémoires” 17), p. 351–538en
dc.referencesMorrisson C., Prigent V., Les bulles de plomb du Musée National de Carthage, source méconnue pour l’histoire del’Afrique byzantine (533–695/698), “Comptes rendus des séances de l’année de l’Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres” 162.4, 2018, p. 1803–1834, https://doi.org/10.3406/crai.2018.96661en
dc.referencesNesbitt J., Oikonomides N., Catalogue of Byzantine seals at Dumbarton Oaks and the Fogg Museum of Art, vol. I, Italy, North of the Balkans, North of the Black Sea, Washington, D. C. 1991.en
dc.referencesNesbitt J., Oikonomides N., Catalogue of Byzantine seals at Dumbarton Oaks and the Fogg Museum of Art, vol. II, South of the Balkans, the Islands, South of Asia Minor, Washington, D. C. 1994.en
dc.referencesNesbitt J., Oikonomides N., Catalogue of Byzantine Seals at Dumbarton Oaks and the Fogg Museum of Art, vol. III, West, Northwest and Central Asia Minor and the Orient, Washington, D. C. 1996.en
dc.referencesOikonomides N., L’évolution de l’organisation administrative de l’empire byzantin au XIe siècle (1025–1118), “Travaux et mémoires” 6, 1976, p. 126–152.en
dc.referencesOikonomides N., Les listes de préséance byzantines des IXe et Xe siècles, Paris 1972.en
dc.referencesOstrogorsky G., Sur la date de la composition du Liνre des Thèmes et sur l’époque de la constitution des premiers thèmes d’Asie Mineure, “Byzantion” 23, 1953, p. 31–66.en
dc.referencesPalme B., Die Officia der Statthalter in der Spätantike. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven, “Antiquité tardive” 7, 2000, p. 85–133, https://doi.org/10.1484/J.AT.2.300807en
dc.referencesPertusi Α., La formation des thèmes byzantines, [in:] Berichte zum ΧΙ. lnternazionalen Byzantinistenkongresses, Munich 1958, p. 1–40.en
dc.referencesPrigent V., Retour sur l’origine et la nature des thèmes byzantins, “Travaux et mémoires” 24.2, 2020, p. 105–135.en
dc.referencesRagia E., The Geography of the Provincial Administration of the Byzantine Empire (Ca. 600–1200): I.3. Apothekai of Africa and Sicily, Final Notes and Conclusions, “Εώα και Εσπέρια” / “Eōa kai Esperia” 8, 2012, p. 113–144, https://doi.org/10.12681/eoaesperia.13en
dc.referencesRoueché C., Provincial Governors and their Titulature in the Sixth Century, “Antiquité tardive” 6, 1998, p. 83–89, https://doi.org/10.1484/J.AT.2.300876en
dc.referencesSchlumberger G., Sigillographie de l’empire byzantin, Paris 1884.en
dc.referencesSeibt W., Siegel als Quelle für Slawenarchonten in Griechenland, “Studies in Byzantine Sigillography” 6, 1999, p. 27–36.en
dc.referencesSeibt W., Wassiliou-Seibt A.-K., Die byzantinischen Bleisiegel in Österreich, vol. II, Zentral- und Provinzialverwaltung, Vienna 2004, https://doi.org/10.1553/0x00048795en
dc.referencesSode C., Byzantinische Bleisiegel in Berlin II, mit Unterstützung durch P. Speck, Bonn 1997.en
dc.referencesStein E., Studien zur Geschichte des byzantinischen Reiches, vornehmlich unter den Kaisern Justinus II. und Tiberius-Konstantinus, Stuttgart 1919.en
dc.referencesStein E., Untersuchungen über das officium der prätorianerpräfektur seit Diokletian, Vienna 2022. Tsatsoulis C., Some Remarks on the Date of Creation and the Role of the Maritime Theme of Cephalonia (End of the 7th–11th Century), “Studies in Byzantine Sigillography” 11, 2011, p. 153–172, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110271140.153en
dc.referencesVandorpe K., Seals in and on the Papyri of Greco-Roman and Byzantine Egypt, [in:] Archives et Sceaux du monde hellénistique, ed. M.-Fr. Boussac, A. Invernizzi, Paris 1997 [= Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique, Suppl. 29], p. 231–291.en
dc.referencesVlyssidou V., Quelques remarques sur l’apparition des juges (première moitié du Χe siècle), [in:] Ē Βυζαντινē Μικρa Ασiα (6ος–12ος αι.), ed. S. Lampakis, Athēnai 1998, p. 59–66en
dc.referencesVlyssidou V., Thema Thrakēsiōn, [in:] Ē Mikra Asia tōn thematōn. Erevnes panō stēn geōgrafikē fysiognōmia kai prosōpografia tōn byzantinōn thematōn tēs Mikras Asias (7os–11os ai.) (= Asia Minor and its Themes. Studies on the Geography and Prosopography of the Byzantine Themes of Asia Minor (7th–11th Century)), ed. V. Vlyssidou et al., Athens 1998, p. 201–234.en
dc.referencesVoegtli H., Die Fundmünzen aus der Stadtgrabung von Pergamon, Berlin–New York 1993 [= Pergamenische Forschungen, 8].en
dc.referencesWassiliou-Seibt A.-K., From magister militum to strategos: the Evolution of the Highest Military Commands in Early Byzantium (5th–7th c.), “Travaux et mémoires” 21.1, 2017, p. 789–802.en
dc.referencesWassiliou-Seibt A.-K., O Christos autos sfragis asfalestatē – Byzantinische Bleisiegel der Sammlung Gert Boersema, Thessaloniki 2022.en
dc.referencesWiewiorowski J., Βικάριος Θράκης (Vicarius Thraciae) as the Roman Official of the New Type, “Bulgaria Mediaevalis” 4–5, 2013–2014, p. 297–306.en
dc.referencesWinkelmann F., Byzantinische Rang- und Ämterstruktur im 8. und 9. Jahrhundert, Berlin 1985 [= Berliner byzantinistische Arbeiten, 53], https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112565209en
dc.referencesZachariä von Lingenthal K.-E., Geschichte des griechisch-römischen Rechts, Berlin 1892.en
dc.referencesZacos G., Veglery A., Byzantine Lead Seals I, Basel 1972.en
dc.referencesZafraka A., Ta themata tou Makedonikou chōrou. To thema tēs Thessalonikis ōs tis arches tou 10ou ai., “Βυζαντινά” / “Byzantina” 19, 1998, p. 157–170.en
dc.referencesZografopoulos K., Die byzantinischen Bleisiegel aus Karthago, PhD thesis, University of Vienna 2005.en
dc.referencesZuckerman C., Learning from the Enemy and More. Studies in “Dark Centuries” Byzantium, “Millennium” 2, 2005, p. 79–135, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110182545.79en
dc.referencesŽivkovič T., Uspenskij’s Taktikon and the Theme of Dalmatia, “Βυζαντινά Σύμμεικτα” / “Byzantina Symmeikta” 17, 2005, p. 49–85, https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.918en
dc.contributor.authorEmailchrkak@hotmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2084-140X.14.25
dc.relation.volume14


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/