Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Relationships between Sociosexuality and Dermatoglyphic Traits

dc.contributor.authorIngrová, Pavlína
dc.contributor.authorKrálík, Miroslav
dc.contributor.authorPolcerová, Lenka
dc.contributor.authorPavlíková, Věra
dc.contributor.authorKlíma, Ondřej
dc.contributor.authorČuta, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-07T07:57:51Z
dc.date.available2025-04-07T07:57:51Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-02
dc.identifier.issn1898-6773
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/55296
dc.description.abstractIn humans, prenatal development of brain dispositions to sex differences in mating behavior is difficult to study directly. Indirect prenatal markers, including dermatoglyphics, present a viable option.In this study we tested a hypothesis that some radio-ulnar contrasts in dermatoglyphic ridge counts could be related with human sociosexuality.Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI) data from 180 young adults, along with fingerprints of their terminal phalanges (via hand scanning) were collected, and relationships between SOI and dermatoglyphics were analyzed.Typical sex differences in SOI were recorded with higher scores in males and lower in females. Among other results we found that on the index finger lower number of triradii and cores (i.e., mostly in loop type dermatoglyphic patterns) and radial-biased within-finger asymmetry in ridge counts typical for ulnar loops were connected with typical sex differences in SOI (higher in males and lower in females) while in subjects possessing an opposite dermatoglyphic arrangement – higher numbers of cores and triradii and ulnar-biased within-finger ridge count asymmetry typical in radial loops – sex differences in SOI scores disappeared. Recognized significant and systematic trends were mostly connected with variables derived from dermatoglyphic features on the 2nd and 4th fingers.Possible relationships with prenatal androgen causation are discussed.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnthropological Review;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectradio-ulnar asymmetryen
dc.subjectsex developmenten
dc.subjectprenatal programmingen
dc.subjectsexual behavioren
dc.subjectsex differencesen
dc.titleRelationships between Sociosexuality and Dermatoglyphic Traitsen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number33-60
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationIngrová, Pavlína - Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Archaeology and Museology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republicen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKrálík, Miroslav - Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republicen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPolcerová, Lenka - Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republicen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPavlíková, Věra - Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republicen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKlíma, Ondřej - Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Computer Graphics and Multimedia and IT4Innovations Centre of Excellence Brno, Faculty of Information Technology University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republicen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationČuta, Martin - Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republicen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4594
dc.referencesAkbarova SN. 2018. Dermatoglyphics can be as method of behavior genetics. GESJ Educ Sci Psychol. 4(50):26–37.en
dc.referencesAl-Jumaily RMK, Lafta FM, Al-Dahiri LKI, Fadhil LZ. 2010. Digital dermatoglyphic characteristics in patients with sex hormones anomalies. J Al-Nahrain Univ. 13(2):164–9. https://doi.org/10.22401/JNUS.13.2.21en
dc.referencesAlter M. 1965. Is Hyperploidy of Sex Chromosomes Associated with Reduced Total Finger Ridge Count? Am J Hum Genet. 17(6):473–75.en
dc.referencesArnold AP. 2014. Conceptual frameworks and mouse models for studying sex differences in physiology and disease: Why compensation changes the game. Exp Neurol. 259:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.01.021en
dc.referencesBabler WJ. 1991. Embryologic Development of Epidermal Ridges and Their Configurations. Birth Defects Orig. Artic. Ser. 27(2):95–112.en
dc.referencesBailey JM, Kirk KM, Zhu G, Dunne MP, Martin NG. 2000. Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. J Pers Soc Psychol. 78(3):537–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.537en
dc.referencesBarrett ES, Parlett LE, Redmon JB, Swan SH. 2014. Evidence for sexually dimorphic associations between maternal characteristics and anogenital distance, a marker of reproductive development. Am J Epidemiol. 179(1):57–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt220en
dc.referencesBörger D, Held KR, Lüttgen S. 1986. Dermatoglyphics in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH). Clin Genet. 30(3):173–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.1986.tb00591.xen
dc.referencesBracha HS, Torrey EF, Bigelow LB, Lohr JB, Linington BB. 1991. Subtle signs of prenatal maldevelopment of the hand ectoderm in schizophrenia: A preliminary monozygotic twin study. Biol Psychiatry 30(7):719–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(91)90017-Gen
dc.referencesCharles NE, Alexander GM. 2011. The Association Between 2D:4D Ratios and Sociosexuality: A Failure to Replicate. Arch Sex Behav. 40(3):587–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9715-zen
dc.referencesClark AP. 2004. Self-perceived attractiveness and masculinization predict women’s sociosexuality. Evol Hum Behav, 25(2):113–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00085-0en
dc.referencesCohen-Bendahan CCC, van de Beek C, Berenbaum SA. 2005. Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: Methods and findings. Prenat Program Behav Physiol Cogn. 29(2):353–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.004en
dc.referencesColl-Andreu M, Ayora-Mascarell L, Trullas-Oliva R, Morgado-Bernal I. 1989. Behavioral evaluation of the stress induced by the platform method for short-term paradoxical sleep deprivation in rats. Brain Res Bull. 22(5):825–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(89)90025-7en
dc.referencesCummins H, Midlo C. 1961. Finger prints, palms and soles. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.en
dc.referencesDel Cerro MCR, Ortega E, Gómez F, Segovia S, Pérez-Laso C. 2015. Environmental prenatal stress eliminates brain and maternal behavioral sex differences and alters hormone levels in female rats. Horm Behav. 73:142–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.07.004en
dc.referencesDeLecce TL, Polheber JP, Matchock RL. 2014. Sociosexual Orientation and 2D:4D Ratios in Women: Relationship to Men’s Desirability Ratings as a Long-Term Pair Bond. Arch Sex Behav. 43(2):319–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0201-2en
dc.referencesFatjó-Vilas M, Gourion D, Campanera S, Mouaffak F, Levy-Rueff M, Navarro ME, Chayet M, Miret S, Krebs MO, Fañanás L. 2008. New evidences of gene and environment interactions affecting prenatal neurodevelopment in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: A family dermatoglyphic study. Schizophr Res. 103(1–3):209–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.04.015en
dc.referencesGluckman PD, Hanson MA editors. 2006. Developmental origins of health and disease. New York: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesGolembo-Smith S, Walder DJ, Daly MP, Mittal VA, Kline E, Reeves G, Schiffman J. 2012. The presentation of dermatoglyphic abnormalities in schizophrenia: A meta-analytic review. Schizophr Res. 142(1–3):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2012.10.002en
dc.referencesGreen R, Young R. 2000. Fingerprint asymmetry in male and female transsexuals. Personal Individ Differ. 29(5):933–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00244-5en
dc.referencesGuo J, Wu C, Zhang J, Li W, Lv S, Lu D, Qi X, Feng C, Liang W, Chang X, Zhang Y, Xu H, Cao Y, Wang G, Zhou Z. 2021. Prenatal exposure to multiple phenolic compounds, fetal reproductive hormones, and the second to fourth digit ratio of children aged 10 years in a prospective birth cohort. Chemosphere 263:127877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127877en
dc.referencesHall JAY, Kimura D. 1994. Dermatoglyphic Asymmetry and Sexual Orientation in Men. Behav Neurosci. 108(6):1203–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.108.6.1203en
dc.referencesHall LS. 2000. Dermatoglyphic Analysis of Total Finger Ridge Count in Female Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Sexual Orientation. J Sex Res. 37(4):315–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552053en
dc.referencesHettmansperger TP, McKean JW. 2011. Robust Nonparametric Statistical Methods. 2nd edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.en
dc.referencesHo YYW, Evans DM, Montgomery GW, Henders AK, Kemp JP, Timpson NJ, St Pourcain B, Heath AC, Madden PAF, Loesch DZ, McNevin D, Daniel R, Davey-Smith G, Martin NG, Medland SE. 2016. Genetic variant influence on whorls in fingerprint patterns. J Invest Dermatol. 136(4):859–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2015.10.062en
dc.referencesHocking RR. 2003. Methods and Applications of Linear Models. 2nd edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.en
dc.referencesHolt SB. 1951. The Correlation Betwen Ridge-counts on Different Fingers. Ann Eugen. 16(1):287–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1951.tb02481.xen
dc.referencesHolt SB. 1961. Quantitative genetics of finger-print patterns. Br Med Bull. 17(3):247–50.en
dc.referencesHolt SB. 1979. Epidermal Ridge-counts. Coll Antropol. 3(1):97–106.en
dc.referencesIngrová P, Králík M, Bártová V, Jandová M, Daňko M, Skalická E. 2018. Sociosexualita mladých dospělých: Změny w 21. Století, wpływ pohlaví a sexuální orientace. Čes Antropol. 68(1–2):18–34.en
dc.referencesJantz RL. 2022. Finger ridge-counts correlate with the second to fourth digit ratio (2d:4d). Am J Hum Biol. 34(2): e23625. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23625en
dc.referencesJantz RL, Hunt DR. 1986. The influence of sex chromosomes on finger dermatoglyphic patterns. Ann Hum Biol. 13(3):287–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014468600008461en
dc.referencesKahn HS, Graff M, Stein AD, Lumey LH. 2009. A fingerprint marker from early gestation associated with diabetes in middle age: The Dutch Hunger Winter Families Study. Int J Epidemiol. 38(1):101–09. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn158en
dc.referencesKahn HS, Graff M, Stein AD, Zybert PA, McKeague IW, Lumey LH. 2008. A fingerprint characteristic associated with the early prenatal environment. Am J Hum Biol. 20(1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20672en
dc.referencesKahn HS, Ravindranath R, Valdez R, Narayan KMV. 2001. Fingerprint Ridge-Count Difference between Adjacent Fingertips (dR45) Predicts Upper-Body Tissue Distribution: Evidence for Early Gestational Programming. Am J Epidemiol. 153(4):338–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/153.4.338en
dc.referencesKasielska-Trojan A, Manning JT, Kałuża M, Głowacka E, Antoszewski B. 2024. First trimester maternal sex steroids and the digit ratios of mothers and children. Early Hum Dev. 195:106067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106067en
dc.referencesKimura D, Carson MW. 1995. Dermatoglyphic asymmetry: Relation to sex, handedness and cognitive pattern. Personal Individ Differ. 19(4):471–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00076-Ien
dc.referencesKimura D, Clarke PG. 2001. Cognitive pattern and dermatoglyphic asymmetry. Personal Individ Differ. 30(4):579–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00056-8en
dc.referencesKinsley CH, Bridges RS. 1988. Prenatal stress and maternal behavior in intact virgin rats: Response latencies are decreased in males and increased in females. Horm Behav. 22(1):76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(88)90032-3en
dc.referencesKloke JD, McKean JW. 2012. Rfit: Rank-based estimation for linear models. R J. 4(2):57–64. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2012-014en
dc.referencesKrálík M, Hupková A, Zeman T, Hložek M, Hlaváček L, Slováčková M, Čuta M, Urbanová P. 2019a. Family effects on the digit ratio (2D:4D): The role of the interbirth interval. Am J Hum Biol. 31(4): e23260. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23260en
dc.referencesKrálík M, Katina S, Urbanová P. 2014. Distal Part of the Human Hand: Study of Form Variability and Sexual Dimorphism Using Geometric Morphometrics. Anthropol Integra 5(2):7–25. https://doi.org/10.5817/AI2014-2-7en
dc.referencesKrálík M, Klíma O, Polcerová L. 2017. Dermatoglyphix 1.0. Software. [English; Windows]. Masaryk University, Faculty of Science, Department of Anthropology. LaMorFA. http://www.sci.muni.cz/lamorfa/veda-a-vyzkum#projektyen
dc.referencesKrálík M, Polcerová L, Čuta M. 2019b. Sex Differences in Frequencies of Dermatoglyphic Patterns by Individual Fingers. Ann Hum Biol. 46(3):231–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2019.1622778en
dc.referencesKunter M, Rühl M. 1995. Seiten- und Geschlechtsunterschiede quantitativer Hautleistenbefunde der Fingerbeeren bei einer mitteleuropäischen Stichprobe (Grießen, Hessen). Anthropol Anz. 53(1):79–90.en
dc.referencesKücken M. 2007. Models for fingerprint pattern formation. Forensic Sci Int. 171(2–3):85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.02.025en
dc.referencesLippa RA. 2007. The relation between sex drive and sexual attraction to men and women: A cross-national study of heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual men and women. Arch Sex Behav. 36(2):209–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9146-zen
dc.referencesLippa RA. 2009. Sex Differences in Sex Drive, Sociosexuality, and Height across 53 Nations: Testing Evolutionary and Social Structural Theories. Arch Sex Behav. 38(5):631–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9242-8en
dc.referencesLiu C, Xu X, Zhang Y, Li W, Huo X. 2016. Associations between maternal phenolic exposure and cord sex hormones in male newborns. Hum Reprod. 31(3):648–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev327en
dc.referencesLoesch DZ. 1983. Quantitative dermatoglyphics – classification, genetics, and pathology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesLyons MJ, Koenen KC, Buchting F, Meyer JM, Eaves L, Toomey R, Eisen SA, Goldberg J, Faraone SV, Ban RJ, Jerskey BA, Tsuang MT. 2004. A Twin Study of Sexual Behavior in Men. Arch Sex Behav. 33(2):129–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000014327.11433.66en
dc.referencesMangiafico SS. 2015. An R Companion for the Handbook of Biological Statistics. Version 1.3.8, revised 2023. http://rcompanion.org/rcompanion/index.htmlen
dc.referencesManning JT. 2002. Digit Ratio: A Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.en
dc.referencesManning JT, Scutt D, Wilson J, Lewis-Jones DI. 1998. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Hum Reprod. 13(11):3000–04.en
dc.referencesMillard SP. 2013. EnvStats: An R Package for Environmental Statistics. Springer.en
dc.referencesMitsui T, Araki A, Miyashita C, Ito S, Ikeno T, Sasaki S, Kitta T, Moriya K, Cho K, Morioka K, Kishi R, Shinohara N, Takeda M, Nonomura K. 2016. The Relationship between the Second-to-Fourth Digit Ratio and Behavioral Sexual Dimorphism in School-Aged Children. PLOS ONE 11(1):e0146849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146849en
dc.referencesMitsui T, Araki A, Miyashita C, Ito S, Ikeno T, Sasaki S, Kitta T, Moriya K, Cho K, Morioka K, Kishi R, Shinohara N, Takeda M, Nonomura K. 2019. Effects of prenatal sex hormones on behavioral sexual dimorphism. Pediatr Int. 61(2):140–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.13756en
dc.referencesMulvihill JJ, Smith DW. 1969. The genesis of dermatoglyphics. J Pediatr. 75(4):579–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(69)80453-1en
dc.referencesMustanski BS, Bailey M, Kaspar S. 2002. Dermatoglyphics, Handedness, Sex, and Sexual Orientation. Arch Sex Behav. 31(1):113–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014039403752en
dc.referencesPenke L, Asendorpf J. 2008. Beyond Global Sociosexual Orientations: A More Differentiated Look at Sociosexuality and Its Effects on Courtship and Romantic Relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 95(5):1113–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113en
dc.referencesPenrose LS. 1963. Finger-Prints, Palms and Chromosomes. Nature 197(4871):933–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/197933a0en
dc.referencesPenrose LS. 1967. Finger-print pattern and the sex chromosomes. The Lancet 289(7485):298–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(67)91237-8en
dc.referencesPolani PE, Polani N. 1979. Dermatoglyphics in the testicular feminization syndrome. Ann Hum Biol. 6:417–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014467900003811en
dc.referencesPolcerová L, Chovancová M, Králík M, Beňuš R, Klíma O, Meinerová T, Čuta M, Petrová ME. 2022a. Radioulnar contrasts in fingerprint ridge counts: Searching for dermatoglyphic markers of early sex development. Am J Hum Biol. 34(5):e23695. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23695en
dc.referencesPolcerová L, Jantz RL, Králík M, Chovancová M, Čuta M. 2023. Sex differences in radioulnar contrasts of the finger ridge counts across 21 human population samples. Ann Hum Biol. 50(1):370–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2023.2247970en
dc.referencesPolcerová L, Králík M, Meinerová T, Chovancová M, Čuta M. 2022b. Meta-analysis of radioulnar contrasts in dermatoglyphic ridge-counts between individual fingers. Anthropol Integra 13(1):39–52. https://doi.org/10.5817/AI2022-1-39en
dc.referencesPuts DA, Pope LE, Hill AK, Cárdenas RA, Welling LLM, Wheatley JR, Breedlove SM. 2015. Fulfilling desire: Evidence for negative feedback between men’s testosterone, sociosexual psychology, and sexual partner number. Horm Behav. 70:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.01.006en
dc.referencesQazi QH, Thompson MW. 1971. Dermatoglyphics in Congenital Virilizing Adrenal Hyperplasia. Am J Dis Child. 122(1):28–30. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1971.02110010064009en
dc.referencesR Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/en
dc.referencesSanders G, Sjodin M, de Chastelaine M. 2002. On the elusive nature of sex differences in cognition: Hormonal influences contributing, to within-sex variation. Arch Sex Behav. 31(1):145–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014095521499en
dc.referencesSchaumann B, Alter M. 1976. Dermatoglyphics in Medical Disorders. New York-Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer-Verlag.en
dc.referencesSchmitt DP. 2005. Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behav Brain Sci. 28(2):247–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000051en
dc.referencesSchwidetzky I, Jantz RL. 1977. Rassenunterschiede der Geschlechtsdifferenzierung von Hautleistenmerkmalen. Mitteilungen Anthropol Ges Wien 107:182–87.en
dc.referencesSchwidetzky I, Jantz RL. 1979. Race differences in the sex dimorphism of dermatoglyphic traits. J Hum Evol. 8(8):773–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(79)90006-Xen
dc.referencesSimpson J, Gangestad S. 1991. Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 60(6):870–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870en
dc.referencesSlabbekoorn D, van Goozen SHM, Sanders G, Gooren LJG, Cohen-Kettenis PT. 2000. The dermatoglyphic characteristics of transsexuals: Is there evidence for an organizing effect of sex hormones. Psychoneuroendocrinology 25(4):365–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(99)00063-3en
dc.referencesvan Anders SM, Hamilton LD, Watson NV. 2007. Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in North American men and women. Horm Behav. 51(3):454–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.002en
dc.referencesVelazquez-Moctezuma J, Salazar ED, Cruz Rueda ML. 1993. The effect of prenatal stress on adult sexual behavior in rats depends on the nature of the stressor. Physiol Behav. 53(3):443–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(93)90137-5en
dc.referencesVonk R, van der Schot AC, van Baal GCM, van Oel CJ, Nolen WA, Kahn RS. 2014. Dermatoglyphics in relation to brain volumes in twins concordant and discordant for bipolar disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 24(12):1885–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.09.010en
dc.referencesWong WI, Hines M. 2016. Interpreting digit ratio (2D:4D)–behavior correlations: 2D:4D sex difference, stability, and behavioral correlates and their replicability in young children. Horm Behav. 78:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.022en
dc.contributor.authorEmailIngrová, Pavlína - 252507@muni.cz
dc.contributor.authorEmailKrálík, Miroslav - 18313@muni.cz
dc.contributor.authorEmailPolcerová, Lenka - polcerova@seznam.cz
dc.contributor.authorEmailPavlíková, Věra - bartova@phil.muni.cz
dc.contributor.authorEmailKlíma, Ondřej - ondra.klima@seznam.cz
dc.contributor.authorEmailČuta, Martin - cuta@sci.muni.cz
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1898-6773.88.1.03
dc.relation.volume88


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
33-60_Ingrova_et_all.pdf
Rozmiar:
1.145MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Thumbnail
Nazwa:
Supplementary.pdf
Rozmiar:
1.655MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0