Redefining Death in Zero K by Don DeLillo
| dc.contributor.author | Jagła, Agnieszka | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-11T15:33:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-11T15:33:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-11-28 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2083-2931 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/56924 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Don DeLillo’s Zero K (2016) focuses on the possibility of overcoming death through cryonics. The narrative is set primarily in the Convergence—a facility which utilises cryonics to provide its subjects with the possibility of life extension, and a promise of a better life in the future. The result is achieved by removing the subjects’ internal organs and keeping them alive in a state of life suspension, in an attempt to renegotiate the limits of human existence. As his father and stepmother become patients of the Convergence, the protagonist of the novel, Jeff Lockhart, grapples with the questions of life and death. The paper analyses the theme of death in the novel from the posthumanist perspective of Rosi Braidotti’s text “The Ethics of Becoming Imperceptible,” and compares it with the pursuit of immortality highlighted by the transhumanist movement. The secondary purpose of this paper is to investigate how the novel redefines grief by using the framework provided by Monika Rogowska-Stangret’s ethical stance presented in Być ze świata (Being-of-the-World). | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Text Matters: A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture;15 | en |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
| dc.subject | DeLillo | en |
| dc.subject | Zero K | en |
| dc.subject | cryonics | en |
| dc.subject | death | en |
| dc.subject | transhumanism | en |
| dc.subject | posthumanism | en |
| dc.subject | Braidotti | en |
| dc.title | Redefining Death in Zero K by Don DeLillo | en |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.page.number | 406-425 | |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Lodz | en |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2084-574X | |
| dc.references | Ashman, Nathan. “‘Death Itself Shall Be Deathless’: Transrationalism and Eternal Death in Don DeLillo’s Zero K.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 60, no. 3, May 2019, pp. 300–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2018.1553845 | en |
| dc.references | Barad, Karen. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 28, no. 3, 2003, pp. 801–31. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 | en |
| dc.references | Barrett, Laura. ‘“[R]Adiance in Dailiness’: The Uncanny Ordinary in Don DeLillo’s Zero K.” Journal of Modern Literature, vol. 42, no. 1, 2018, pp. 106–23. https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.42.1.08 | en |
| dc.references | Bender, Stephanie. “Biopolitics of the Future: Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go (2006) and Don DeLillo’s Zero K (2016).” Ethics for the Future: Perspectives from 21st Century Fiction, by Stephanie Bender, Transcript Verlag, 2023, pp. 169–207. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839468203-007 | en |
| dc.references | Bostrom, Nick, et al. “The Transhumanist Declaration.” The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future, edited by Max More and Natasha Vita-More, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, pp. 54–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118555927.ch4 | en |
| dc.references | Boxall, Peter. Don DeLillo: The Possibility of Fiction. Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 2006. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203315422 | en |
| dc.references | Braidotti, Rosi. “The Ethics of Becoming-Imperceptible.” Deleuze and Philosophy, edited by Constantin Boundas, Edinburgh UP, 2006, pp. 133–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748627196-012 | en |
| dc.references | Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Polity, 2013. | en |
| dc.references | Cofer, Erik. “Owning the End of the World: Zero K and DeLillo’s Post-Postmodern Mutation.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 59, no. 4, Aug. 2018, pp. 459–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2017.1412936 | en |
| dc.references | Collins Dictionary. “Manhattanhenge Definition and Meaning.” Collins Dictionary, www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/manhattanhenge, accessed 14 Feb. 2025. | en |
| dc.references | DeLillo, Don. “Interview: The Edge of the Future: A Discussion with Don DeLillo.” Interview by Peter Boxall. Don DeLillo: Contemporary Critical Perspectives, edited by Katherine Da Cunha Lewin and Kiron Ward, Bloomsbury, 2019, pp. 159–64. | en |
| dc.references | DeLillo, Don. Zero K. Pan Macmillan, 2017. | en |
| dc.references | Dictionary.Com. “Manhattanhenge.” Dictionary.Com, 14 Apr. 2023, https://www.dictionary.com/e/historical-current-events/manhattanhenge/ accessed 14 Feb. 2025. | en |
| dc.references | Dini, Rachele. “Don DeLillo, Zero K.” European Journal of American Studies, May 2016, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.11393 | en |
| dc.references | Enteghar, Kahina, and Amar Guendouzi. “A Heideggerian Reading of the Posthuman Treatment of Death in Don DeLillo’s Zero K.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 62, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2020.1772190 | en |
| dc.references | Frodeman, Robert. Transhumanism, Nature, and the Ends of Science. Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199363 | en |
| dc.references | Front, Sonia. “Heads in the Fridge and Minds in New Bodies—Transfers of Consciousness in Hanif Kureishi’s the Body, Marcel Theroux’s Strange Bodies and Don DeLillo’s Zero K.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 61, no. 4, Aug. 2020, pp. 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2020.1749549 | en |
| dc.references | Furjanić, Lovro. “The Spectre of Death in Don DeLillo’s Zero K.” Anafora, vol. 6, no. 2, 2019, pp. 493–512. https://doi.org/10.29162/ANAFORA.v6i2.10 | en |
| dc.references | Glavanakova, Alexandra K. “The Age of Humans Meets Posthumanism: Reflections on Don DeLillo’s Zero K.” Studies in the Literary Imagination, vol. 50, no. 1, 2017, pp. 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1353/sli.2017.0007 | en |
| dc.references | Hall, Melinda Gann. The Bioethics of Enhancement: Transhumanism, Disability, and Biopolitics. Lexington, 2017. | en |
| dc.references | Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. U of Chicago P, 2010. | en |
| dc.references | Herbrechter, Stefan. “Posthuman/ist Literature? Don DeLillo’s Point Omega and Zero K.” Open Library of Humanities, vol. 6, no. 2, 2020, pp. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.592 | en |
| dc.references | Jacomino, Baptiste. “Rouvrir Des Possibles. François Jullien. Paris, Editions de L’Observatoire, 2022 [Reopening possibilities].” Le philosophoire, vol. 1, no. 59, 2023, p. 117–20. Cairn.Info, https://shs.cairn.info/journal-le-philosophoire-2023-1-page-117?lang=en accessed 1 Feb. 2025. | en |
| dc.references | Laguarta-Bueno, Carmen. “Don DeLillo’s Zero K (2016). Transhumanism, Trauma, and the Ethics of Premature Cryopreservation.” Representing (Post)Human Enhancement Technologies in Twenty-First Century US Fiction, by Carmen Laguarta-Bueno, Routledge, 2022, pp. 120–67. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003276401-4 | en |
| dc.references | Maffey, Ross, and Yugin Teo. “Changing Channels of Technology: Disaster and (Im)mortality in Don DeLillo’s White Noise, Cosmopolis and Zero K.” C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings, vol. 6, no. 2, 2018, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.16995/c21.74 | en |
| dc.references | More, Max. “The Philosophy of Transhumanism.” The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future, edited by Max More and Natasha Vita-More, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, pp. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118555927.ch1 | en |
| dc.references | Nel, Adéle. “‘Why not follow our words bodily into the future tense?’: Life, Death and Posthuman Bodies in Don DeLillo’s Zero K.” Literator, vol. 42, no. 2, 2021, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v42i1.1748 | en |
| dc.references | Ng, Lay Sion. “Transhumanism and the Biological Body in Don DeLillo’s Zero K: A Material Feminist Perspective.” ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, vol. 28, no. 2, Summer 2021, pp. 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isaa114 | en |
| dc.references | Pawlak, Barbara. “The Return of the Sublime and the Transcendental in Don DeLillo’s Zero K.” Explorations: A Journal of Language and Literature, vol. 10, Dec. 2022, pp. 65–74. https://doi.org/10.25167/EXP13.22.10.6 | en |
| dc.references | Rogowska-Stangret, Monika. Być ze świata. Wydawnictwo Słowo/Obraz Terytoria, 2021. | en |
| dc.references | Rose, Deborah. “What If the Angel of History Were a Dog?” Cultural Studies Review, vol. 12, no. 1, 2006, pp. 67–78. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v12i1.3414 | en |
| dc.references | Sheehan, Paul. “Don DeLillo’s Cinematic Imaginary: From A(mericana) to Z(ero K).” Textual Practice, vol. 35, no. 10, 2021, pp. 1685–1705. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1965296 | en |
| dc.references | Sougri, Laila. Representations of Technoculture in Don DeLillo’s Novels. Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003407768 | en |
| dc.references | Vågnes, Øyvind. “What Does It Mean to Be Human? Speculative Ekphrasis and Anthropocene Trauma in Don DeLillo’s Zero K.” Terrorizing Images: Trauma and Ekphrasis in Contemporary Literature, edited by Charles Ivan Armstrong and Unni Langas, De Gruyter, 2020, pp. 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110693959-003 | en |
| dc.references | Wolf, Philipp. Death, Time and Mortality in the Later Novels of Don DeLillo. Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003289937 | en |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | agnieszka.jagla@edu.uni.lodz.pl | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/2083-2931.15.22 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0