| dc.contributor.author | Koperska, Alicja | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-20T11:32:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-20T11:32:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-09-02 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1733-3180 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/59165 | |
| dc.description.abstract | New Working Spaces (NWS) constitute an innovative organisational form that deviates from traditional organisational structures. Characterised by open membership, these spaces integrate craftsmen, artists, and creators operating as freelancers or micro- entrepreneurs. A distinct category of NWS encompasses makerspaces, hackerspaces, and fab labs, which – in contrast to conventional coworking offices – emphasise production, construction, and craft activities, frequently employing advanced technologies. These spaces not only facilitate access to technical infrastructure but also cultivate an environment conducive to development through knowledge exchange and networking. Research on NWS has developed within two main disciplines: socioeconomic geography and management sciences. While socioeconomic geography focuses on spatial distribution patterns, impacts on local economy, and regional development dynamics, management sciences have made significant contributions to understanding the organisational aspects of new working spaces, community-building within them, and the mechanisms of innovation processes occurring there. Given the growing number of such spaces in Poland and the simultaneous lack of research combining management and geographical perspectives, there appears to be a need to deepen knowledge transfer between these disciplines. This article presents a systematic literature review of makerspaces, hackerspaces, and fab labs in social sciences, with particular emphasis on research useful for scholars within socioeconomic geography. The article presents scientific achievements from various disciplines, covering the main research streams concerning collaborative spaces, key concepts, and empirical findings. One of the objectives is to facilitate access for socioeconomic geography researchers to findings on NWS from management sciences and related fields. Two bibliometric analysis tools were used to prepare the analysis, namely Bibliometrix and VOSviewer. This overview can serve as a starting point for further research on the role of new working spaces in local and regional development. | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Nowe przestrzenie pracy [ang. new working spaces (NWS)] stanowią innowacyjną formę organizowania działalności, odbiegającą od tradycyjnego rozumienia organizacji. Charakteryzują się otwartym członkostwem. Łączą rzemieślników, artystów i twórców działających jako freelancerzy lub prowadzących mikroprzedsiębiorstwa. Szczególną kategorią NWS są przestrzenie współpracy takie jak makerspace, hackerspace i fab lab, które – w przeciwieństwie do podobnych doń biur coworkingowych – koncentrują się na działalności produkcyjnej, konstrukcyjnej i rzemieślniczej. Często wykorzystują zaawansowane technologie. Przestrzenie te nie tylko zapewniają dostęp do infrastruktury technicznej, ale również tworzą środowisko wspierające rozwój poprzez wymianę wiedzy i networking. Badania nad NWS rozwijają się w ramach dwóch głównych dyscyplin: geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej oraz nauk o zarządzaniu. O ile geografia społecznoekonomiczna koncentruje się na wzorcach rozmieszczenia przestrzennego, wpływie na lokalną gospodarkę i dynamice rozwoju regionalnego, o tyle nauki o zarządzaniu wniosły istotny wkład w zrozumienie aspektów organizacyjnych nowych przestrzeni pracy, budowania weń społeczności i mechanizmów zachodzących tam procesów innowacyjnych. Wobec rosnącej liczby tego typu przestrzeni w Polsce i jednoczesnego niedoboru badań łączących perspektywę zarządzania z geograficzną, można założyć istnienie potrzeby pogłębienia transferu wiedzy między tymi dyscyplinami. Prezentowany artykuł to systematyczny przegląd literatury na temat makerspace’ów, hackerspace’ów i fab lab’ów w naukach społecznych, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem badań użytecznych dla badaczy zagadnień z zakresu geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej. Artykuł prezentuje dorobek naukowy z różnych dyscyplin. Obejmuje główne nurty badawcze dotyczące przestrzeni współpracy, kluczowe koncepcje i ustalenia empiryczne. Jednym z jego celów jest ułatwienie badaczom geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej dostępu do ustaleń dotyczących NWS z zakresu nauk o zarządzaniu i nauk pokrewnych. Do przygotowania przeglądu wykorzystano dwa narzędzia służące analizom bibliometrycznym – Bibliometrix oraz VOSviewer. Artykuł może służyć jako punkt wyjścia do dalszych badań nad NWS, łączących perspektywę organizacyjną z geograficzną. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Space – Society – Economy;36 | pl |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
| dc.subject | new working space | en |
| dc.subject | collaborative spaces | en |
| dc.subject | fabrication laboratory | en |
| dc.subject | makerspace | en |
| dc.subject | hackerspace | en |
| dc.subject | nowe przestrzenie współpracy | pl |
| dc.subject | organizacje kooperacyjne | pl |
| dc.subject | fablab | pl |
| dc.subject | makerspace | pl |
| dc.subject | hackerspace | pl |
| dc.title | New working spaces in management sciences: a systematic review and knowledge transfer for socioeconomic geography | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Nowe przestrzenie pracy w naukach z zakresu zarządzania – przegląd literatury dla geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej | pl |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.page.number | 27-51 | |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Poznan University of Economics and Business, Department of Labour and Social Policy | en |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2451-3547 | |
| dc.references | Akhavan M., Astolfi L., Canevari A., Mariotti I., 2018, Coworking Spaces and New Social Relations: A Focus on Italy, [in:] City Street3 Conference, Notre Dame University Louaize (FAAD), 31 October – 3 November, Lebanon (pp. 1–18). LBN. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010002 | en |
| dc.references | Akhavan M., Hölzel M., Leducq D., 2023, Introduction to the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Coworking, [in:] M. Akhavan, M. Hölzel, D. Leducq (eds), European Narratives on Remote Working and Coworking During the COVID-19 Pandemic, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(), Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6_1 | en |
| dc.references | Allen D.W., 2017, Hackerspaces as entrepreneurial anarchy, Available at SSRN 2749016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2749016 | en |
| dc.references | Ananian P., Shearmur R., Borde M.A., Lachapelle U., Paulhiac F., Tremblay D.G., Rodrigue T., 2024, Coworking spaces in Montreal (Canada): Moving beyond classic location patterns, “Geoforum”, 152, 104016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104016 | en |
| dc.references | Anderson C., 2012, Makers: The new industrial revolution, Crown, New York. | en |
| dc.references | Assenza P., 2015, If you build it will they come? The influence of spatial configuration on social and cognitive functioning and knowledge spillover in entrepreneurial co-working and hacker spaces, “Journal of Management Policy and Practice”, 16(3): 35–48. | en |
| dc.references | Bednář P., Mariotti I., Rossi F., Danko L., 2021, The Evolution of Coworking Spaces in Milan and Prague: Spatial Patterns, Diffusion and Urban Change, [in:] M. Orel, O. Dvouletý, V. Ratten (eds), The Flexible Workplace. Human Resource Management, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62167-4_4 | en |
| dc.references | Beltagui A., Sesis A., Stylos N., 2021, A bricolage perspective on democratising innovation: The case of 3D printing in makerspaces, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, 163, 120453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120453 | en |
| dc.references | Bosworth G., Whalley J., Fuzi A., Merrell,I., Chapman P., Russell E., 2023, Rural co-working: New network spaces and new opportunities for a smart countryside, “Journal of Rural Studies”, 97: 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.003 | en |
| dc.references | Botsman R.R., Rogers W., 2011, How Collaborative Consumption is Changing the Way We Live, ed. R. Botsman, R. Rogers, HarperCollinsPublishers, London. | en |
| dc.references | Bouncken R., Clauß T., Reuschl A., 2016, Coworking-spaces in Asia: A Business Model Design Perspective. | en |
| dc.references | Bouncken R.B., Fredrich V., Ritala P., Kraus S., 2018, Coopetition in new product development alliances: advantages and tensions for incremental and radical innovation, “British Journal of Management”, 29(3): 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12213 | en |
| dc.references | Bouncken R.B., Reuschl A.J., 2016, Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship, “Review of Managerial Science”, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y | en |
| dc.references | Brafman O., Beckstrom R.A., 2006, The starfish and the spider: The unstoppable power of leaderless organizations, Penguin, New York. | en |
| dc.references | Brouwer A.E., Mariotti I., 2023, Remote Working and New Working Spaces During the COVID-19 Pandemic – Insights from EU and Abroad, [in:] M. Akhavan, M. Hölzel, D. Leducq (eds), European Narratives on Remote Working and Coworking During the COVID-19 Pandemic, “SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology”(), Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6_2 | en |
| dc.references | Browder R.E., Aldrich H.E., Bradley S.W., 2019, The emergence of the maker movement: implications for entrepreneurship research, “Journal of Business Venturing”, 34: 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.005 | en |
| dc.references | Burret A., Pierre X., 2014, The added value of co-working spaces in the area of business development support: Encouraging peer networks, “Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat”, 13(1): 51–73. https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.131.0051 | en |
| dc.references | Butcher T., 2016, Co-working communities: Sustainability citizenship at work, [in:] R. Horne, J. Fien, B.B. Beza, A. Nelson (eds), Sustainability Citizenship in Cities: Theory and practice. Advances in Urban Sustainability, Routledge, Abingdon–Oxon: 93–103. | en |
| dc.references | Capdevila I., 2015, Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona, “International Journal of Innovation Management”, 19(03), 1540004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615400046 | en |
| dc.references | Capdevila I., 2017, Knowing communities and the innovative capacity of cities, “City, Culture and Society”. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.05.003 | en |
| dc.references | Castilho M.F., Quandt C.O., 2017, “Convenience Sharing” or “Community Building”: Collaborative capability in coworking spaces. In 28th ISPIM Innovation Symposium. Composing the Innovation Symphony, 18–21 June, Vienna. | en |
| dc.references | Chon H., Abu Bakar N.H., 2018, Collective Individualism in Design. To Get There: Designing Together. Cumulus Conference Proceedings Paris 2018, Cumulus International Association of Universities and Colleges of Art, Design and Media. | en |
| dc.references | Dale K., Burrell G., 2007, The spaces of organisation and the organisation of space: Power, identity and materiality at work, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350389373 | en |
| dc.references | Dandoy A., 2016, Collaborative communities and their roles in education in the city (No. hal-01919899). | en |
| dc.references | Danko L., Bednář P., Lux G., Kalman J., Belvončíková E., Horeczki R., Bálint D., 2024, Coworking Spaces and Mid‐Sized Cities in Peripheral Contexts: Conceptualising Development Trajectories, “Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie”, 115(5): 706–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12622 | en |
| dc.references | D’Andria A., Gabarret I., 2017, The entrepreneurial connection, [in:] A. d’Andria, I. Gabarret (eds), Building 21st century entrepreneurship, pp. 73–92, Wiley, London. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119419709.ch4 | en |
| dc.references | Derviş H., 2019, Bibliometric analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package, “Journal of Scientometric Research”, 8(3): 156–160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32 | en |
| dc.references | Diez T., 2012, Personal fabrication: Fab labs as platforms for citizen-based innovation, from microcontrollers to cities, “Nexus Network Journal”, 14(3): 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-012-0131-7 | en |
| dc.references | Dougherty D., 2012, The maker movement, “Innovations”, 7(3): 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135 | en |
| dc.references | van Eck N.J., Waltman L., 2017, Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer, “Scientometrics”, 111(2): 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7 | en |
| dc.references | Frick J.A., 2015, A comparative study of entrepreneurial clusters and co-working spaces in Norway: The sudden boom of private initiatives from 2010–2015, [in:] Operations Management for Sustainable Competitiveness, 22nd Conference of European Operation Management Association (Euroma 2015), June 26–July 1, Neuchatel, Switzerland. | en |
| dc.references | Fuzi A., 2015, Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: the case of South Wales, “Regional Studies, Regional Science”, 2(1): 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1072053 | en |
| dc.references | Fuzi A., Clifton N., Loudon G., 2014, New in-house organizational spaces that suport creativity and innovation: the co-working space, R&D Management Conference 2014, 3–6 June, Stuttgart. | en |
| dc.references | Gandini A., 2015, The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review, “Ephemera Journal: Theory and Politics in Organisation”, 15(1): 193–205. | en |
| dc.references | Gauntlett D., 2011, Media studies 2.0 and other battles around the future of media research. | en |
| dc.references | Gertner D., Mack E., 2017, The Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) of incubators, accelerators and co-working spaces, “International Journal of Regional Development”, 4(2): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijrd.v4i2.10210 | en |
| dc.references | Gerdenitsch C., Scheel T.E., Andorfer J., Korunka C., 2016, Coworking spaces: A source of social support for independent professionals, “Frontiers in Psychology”, 7, 581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581 | en |
| dc.references | Grant M.J., Booth A., 2009, A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies, “Health Information & Libraries Journal”, 26(2): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x | en |
| dc.references | DeGuzman G.V., Tang A.I., 2011, Working in the unoffice: A guide to coworking for indie workers, small businesses and nonprofits, Night Owls Press LLC. | en |
| dc.references | Hackley C., 2013, Marketing in context: Setting the scene, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297112 | en |
| dc.references | Hatch M., 2013, The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers and tinkerers, McGraw Hill Professional, New York. | en |
| dc.references | Holienka M., Racek F., 2015, Coworking spaces in Slovakia, “Management Review”, 9(2): 29–43. | en |
| dc.references | van Holm E.J., 2014, What are Makerspaces, Hackerspaces and Fab Labs? Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2548211 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2548211 | en |
| dc.references | Huang H., Liu Y., Liang Y., Vargas D., Zhang L., 2020, Spatial perspectives on coworking spaces and related practices in Beijing, “Built Environment”, 46(1): 40–54. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.46.1.40 | en |
| dc.references | Hurry C.J., 2012, The Hub Halifax: A qualitative study on coworking, MBA Research Project, St. Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. | en |
| dc.references | Janssens F., Glänzel W., De Moor B., 2008, A hybrid mapping of information science, “Scientometrics”, 75(3): 607–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2002-7 | en |
| dc.references | Kostakis V., Niaros V., Giotitsas C., 2015, Open source 3D printing as a means of learning: An educational experiment in two high schools in Greece, “Telematics and informatics”, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.001 | en |
| dc.references | DeKoven B., 2002, The well-played game: A playful path to wholeness, iUniverse, Bloomington. | en |
| dc.references | de Lange T., Wittek L., 2018, Creating shared spaces: developing teaching through peer supervision, “Mind, Culture and Activity”, 25: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2018.1544645 | en |
| dc.references | Leducq D., Demazière C., 2023, Narratives on COVID-19 Effects on Coworking Spaces in France: A Winning Ticket for the Peripheries?, [in:] M. Akhavan, M. Hölzel, D. Leducq (eds), European Narratives on Remote Working and Coworking During the COVID-19 Pandemic, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(), Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6_4 | en |
| dc.references | Levy S., 2001, Crypto: How the code rebels beat the government – saving privacy in the digital age, Penguin. | en |
| dc.references | Mariotti I., Akhavan M., Rossi F., 2023, The preferred location of coworking spaces in Italy: an empirical investigation in urban and peripheral areas, “European Planning Studies”, 31(3): 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1895080 | en |
| dc.references | Mariotti I., Di Vita S., Akhavan M (2021), New Workplaces-Location Patterns, Urban Effects and Development Trajectories (pp. 53–63), Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8_4 | en |
| dc.references | Mariotti I., Pacchi C., 2021, Coworkers and coworking spaces as urban transformation actors. An Italian perspective, [in:] I. Mariotti, S. Di Vita, M. Akhavan (eds), New workplaces – location patterns, urban effects and development trajectories. Research for development, pp. 53–63, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8_4 | en |
| dc.references | Maxigas P., 2012, Hacklabs and hackerspaces: Tracing two genealogies, “Journal of Peer Production”, 2. | en |
| dc.references | McKay G. (ed.), 1998, DiY culture: party and protest in nineties’ Britain, Verso. | en |
| dc.references | Méndez‐Ortega C., Smit M.J., Micek G., 2024, Location patterns and drivers of coworking spaces in European regions, “Tijdschrift voor economische en socjale geografie”, 115(2): 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12603 | en |
| dc.references | Méndez-Ortega C., Micek G., Malochleb K., 2022, How do coworking spaces coagglomerate with service industries?, “The tale of three European cities. Cities”, 130, 103875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103875 | en |
| dc.references | Micek G., Baycan T., Lange B., 2024, A Taxonomy of New Working Spaces, [in:] I. Mariotti, E. Tomaz, G. Micek, C. Méndez-Ortega (eds), Evolution of New Working Spaces, “SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology”(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50868-4_3 | en |
| dc.references | Moriset B., 2014, Building new places of the creative economy. The rise of coworking spaces, proceedings of the 2nd Geography of Innovation, International Conference 2014, Utrecht University, Utrecht (The Netherlands). | en |
| dc.references | Mengual P., Danzinger F., Roth A., 2023, Physical interaction platforms: A taxonomy of spaces for interactive value creation, Creativity and Innovation Management. | en |
| dc.references | Oldenburg R., 1989, The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts and how they get you through the day, Paragon House Publishers, Vadnais Heights, Minnesota. | en |
| dc.references | Paré G., Trudel M.C., Jaana M., Kitsiou S., 2015, Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews, “Information & Management”, 52(2): 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 | en |
| dc.references | Pompa L., 2017, From the unusual to the useful: Digital platforms and co-working spaces as instruments for human resource management in emerging economic and organizational environments, “International Journal of Business and Management”, 12(8): 143–159. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n8p143 | en |
| dc.references | Qiu Y., Bouncken R.B., Arndt F., Ng W., 2023, Microfoundations and dynamics of do-ityourself ecosystems, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, 193, 122611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122611 | en |
| dc.references | Raffaele C., Connell J., 2016, Telecommuting and co-working communities: What are the implications for individual and organizational flexibility? [in:] J. Connell, J. Burgess (eds.), Flexible work organizations: The challenges of capacity building in Asia, pp. 21–35, Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2834-9_2 | en |
| dc.references | Ratto M., Boler M., 2014, DIY Citizenship, Critical Making and Social Media, The MIT Press, 10, 2. | en |
| dc.references | Schmidt S., Brinks V., 2017, Open creative labs: Spatial settings at the intersection of communities and organizations, “Creativity and Innovation Management”, 26(3): 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12220 | en |
| dc.references | Smit M.J., Schutjens V., Brouwer A., 2023, Not going back to the office any time soon: Coworking spaces in The Netherlands, [in:] M. Akhavan, M. Hölzel, D. Leducq (eds), European narratives on remote working and coworking during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multidisciplinary perspective, pp. 63–72, Springer, Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26018-6_7. | en |
| dc.references | Soerjoatmodjo G., Bagasworo D., Joshua G., Kalesaran T., van den Broek K., 2015, Sharing workspace, sharing knowledge: Knowledge sharing amongst entrepreneurs in Jakarta co-working spaces, International Conference on Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning (p. 259), Academic Conferences International Limited. | en |
| dc.references | Spreitzer G., Bacevice P., Garrett L., 2015, Why people thrive in coworking spaces, “Harvard Business Review”, 93(7): 28–30. | en |
| dc.references | Tomaz E., Henriques C., 2023, The evolution and spatial dynamics of coworking spaces in Lisbon: a qualitative analysis, “Cidades. Comunidades e Territórios”, 46. https://doi.org/10.15847/cct.31140 | en |
| dc.references | Tomaz E., Moriset B., Teller J., 2022, Rural coworking spaces in the COVID-19 era: A window of opportunity?, [in:] The COVID-19 pandemic and the future of working spaces, pp. 122–135, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181163-12 | en |
| dc.references | Walter-Herrmann J., 2013, Fab Labs – A Global Social Movement, FabLab: Of machines, makers and inventors. https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839423820 | en |
| dc.references | Van Weele M.A., Van Rijnsoever F.J., Steinz H., 2014, Start-ups down under: How start-up communities facilitate Australian entrepreneurship, In DRUID (Dynamics of Organizations, Industries, Systems and Regions) Society Conference, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, June 16–18 (27 pp.). | en |
| dc.references | Wolf M., McQuitty S., 2011, Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes, “AMS Review”, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-011-0021-2 | en |
| dc.references | Zakoth D., Mauroner O., Emes J., 2023, The role of makerspaces in innovation processes: an exploratory study, R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12594 | en |
| dc.references | Zhai L., 2021, How do socioeconomic and urban form factors affect the spatial distribution of coworking spaces? The case of Shanghai, China, University of Washington. | en |
| dc.references | Zhang S., Mendez-Ortega C., Mariotti I., 2024, Location dynamics of coworking spaces in China: Insights from Beijing metropolitan, “Regional Studies, Regional Science”, 11(1): 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2024.2381641 | en |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | alicja.koperska@ue.poznan.pl | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/1733-3180.36.02 | |