| dc.contributor.author | Annus, Iren | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-23T12:20:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-12-23T12:20:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-11 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1641-4233 | |
| dc.identifier.other | DOI: 10.2478/ipcj-2014-0001 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/5980 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Starting with a debate in September 2012 on the incorporation of
domestic violence as a distinct offence in Hungary’s new Criminal Code, the
issue of gender and proper womanhood has regularly re-surfaced in statements
made by ruling coalition MPs in parliamentary debates. Drawing on discourse
analysis, this study investigates a selection of these statements in the context of
the government’s current policy and public discourse. The paper argues that
these discourses outline an essentialist model reflective of a dominant ideology
that is traditional, Christian, patriarchal and heteronormative, which, by hinting
at women’s accountability for certain social ills, also allows for a chain of
associations that ultimately results in the subversion of the overall social status
of women, dividing and marginalising them further and discrediting any claims
or actions aimed at establishing a more egalitarian society in the country. | pl_PL |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
| dc.publisher | Lodz University Press | pl_PL |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 16(2014); | |
| dc.subject | Hungary, | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | political discourse, | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | FIDESZ-KDNP coalition, | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | gender hierarchy | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | proper womanhood | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | motherhood | pl_PL |
| dc.title | The Ruling Discourse on Proper Womanhood in the Hungarian Parliament | pl_PL |
| dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
| dc.page.number | 5-20 | pl_PL |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Szeged | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2300-8695 | |
| dc.references | Acsady Judit and Agnes Hochberg. “Feminism Misinterpreted in Hungary.” Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice 4 (1992): 4, 49-52. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Ahall, Linda. “Motherhood, Myth and Gendered Agency in Political Violence.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 14 (2012): 1, 103-120. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1991. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Arpad, Susan and Sarolta Marinovich. “Why Hasn’t There Been a Strong Women’s Movement in Hungary?” The Journal of Popular Culture 29 (1995): 2, 77-96. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Balogh, Margit. “A Horthy korszak keresztény nőképéről–Mindszenty József: Az édesanya című írása alapján [On the Christian Female Image in the Horthy Era—Based on József Mindszenty’s writing The Mother].” Rubicon 20 (2009): 4. Web. 5 January 2014 <http://www.rubicon.hu/magyar/oldalak/a_ korszak_kereszteny_nokeperol_mindszenty_jozsef_az_edesanya_cimu_irasa_ kapcsan/> | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Barát Erzsébet. “Variations to Co-optations: The Uses and Abuses of Feminism.” Women/Gender Studies: Against All Odds. Eds. Eva Blimlinger and Therese Garstenauer. Innsbruck: Studienverlag, 2005, 21-29. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Barker, Chris and Darius Galasinski. Cultural Studies and Discourse Analysis: A Dialogue on Language and Identity. London: Sage, 2001. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Bátory, Ágnes. “Kin-state Identity in the European Context: Citizenship, Nationalism and Constitutionalism in Hungary.” Nations and Nationalism 16 (2010): 1, 31-48. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Berkovitch, Nitza. “Motherhood as a National Mission: The Construction of Womanhood in the Legal Discourse in Israel.” Women’s Studies International Forum 20 (1997): 5-6, 605-619. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Bozóki, András. “Consolidation or Second Revolution? The Emergence of the New Right in Hungary.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 24 (2008): 2, 191-231. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Calhoun, Craig. “Imagining Solidarity: Cosmopolitanism, Constitutional Patriotism, and the Public Sphere.” Public Culture 14 (2002): 1, 147-171. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | DeRogatis, Amy. “Gender.” Themes in American Religion and Culture. Eds. Philip Goff and Paul Harvey. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004, 197-226. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Domosh, Mona and Joni Seager. Putting Women in Place: Feminist Geographers Make Sense of the World. New York: Guilford Press, 2001. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Fairclough, Norman. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge, 2003. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Fábián Katalin. “Naming Rights: Nation, Family, and Women’s Rights in the Debates on Domestic Violence in Contemporary Hungary.” Hungarian Studies Review 41 (2014): 1-2, 153-182. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Foucault, Michel. “A kormányozhatóság [On Governance].” A fantasztikus könyvtár: Válogatott tanulmányok, előadások, interjúk. Budapest: Pallas Stúdió, 1998, 106-124. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Greenfeld, Liah. Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Haney, Lynne. Inventing the Needy: Gender and the Politics of Welfare in Hungary. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Hill Collins, Patricia. “It’s All in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation.” Hypatia 13 (1998): 3, 62-82. Web. 11 December 2013. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810699> | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Hobsbawm, Eric. “Introduction: Inventing Traditions.” The Invention of Tradition. Eds. Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, 1-14. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Joó, Mária. “Egyetemi életképek – Kis magyar patriarchátus [University Genre Paintings–Petty Hungarian Patriarchy].” TNTeF 3 (2013): 1, 113-124. Web. 5 February 2014. <http://tntefjournal.hu/vol3/iss1/joo.pdf> | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kelly, Mary. “Beyond Boundaries.” Journal of the Early Republic 21 (2001): 1, 73-92. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kiss Endre. “A Typology of Nineteenth-Century Concepts of Nationalism.” Eastern European Quarterly 30 (1996): 1, 47-62.Magyar, Bálint et al. Magyar Polip [Hungarian Octopus]. Budapest: Libro, 2013. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | March, Margaret. Suburban Lives. New Brunswick: Routgers, 1990. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Marsden, George M. Religion and American Culture. Orlando: Harcourt, 1990. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Méltányosság Politikaelemző Központ. “Merre tart a magyar pártrendszer [Where Is the Hungarian Party System Heading]?” Budapest: MPK, 2010. Web. 14 December 2013. <http://www.meltanyossag.hu/files/meltany/imce/doc /mc-merretartapartrendszer-090609.pdf> | pl_PL |
| dc.references | McDowell, Linda. Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Pétervári, Zsolt. “A Fidesz-MPSZ ideológiai változásának értékelése és a „konzervatív harmadik út [An Evaluation of the Ideological Changes in Fidesz-MPSZ and the “Conservative Third Way].” New York: Pro Deo State University OnLine Publishers Department, 2012. Web. 15 December 2013. <http://www.pdsu.eu/uploads/tartalom_pdf/A_Fidesz-Mszp.pdf> | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Putney, Clifford. Muscular Christianity: Manhood and Sports in Protestant America, 1880-1920. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Rose, Gillian. Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Sipos Balázs. “A nőkérdés a Horthy-korszakban [The Issue of Women in the Horthy Era].” Rubicon 20 (2009): 4. Web. 4 January 2014. < http://www. rubicon.hu/magyar/oldalak/a_nokerdes_a_horthy_korszakban/> | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Sanday, Peggy. Female Power and Male Dominance: On the Origins of Sexual Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Smith, Anthony D. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Sollors, Werner. “The Invention of Ethnicity?” The Invention of Ethnicity. Ed. Werner Sollors. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, 1-14. | pl_PL |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | iannus@lit.uszeged.hu | pl_PL |
