Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorSpyra, Piotren
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-29T12:30:51Z
dc.date.available2015-04-29T12:30:51Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-01en
dc.identifier.issn2083-2931en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/8490
dc.description.abstractThe Middle English Pearl is known for its mixture of genres, moods and various discourses. The textual journey the readers of the poem embark on is a long and demanding one, leading from elegiac lamentations and the erotic outbursts of courtly love to theological debates and apocalyptic visions. The heterogeneity of the poem has often prompted critics to overlook the continuity of the erotic mode in Pearl which emerges already in the poem’s first stanza. While it is true that throughout the dream vision the language of the text never eroticizes the relationship between the Dreamer and the Pearl Maiden to the extent that it does in the opening lines, the article argues that eroticism actually underlies the entire structure of the vision proper. Taking recourse to Roland Barthes’s distinction between the erotic and the sexual to explain the exact nature of the bond which connects the two characters, the argument posits eroticism as an expression of somatic longing; a careful analysis of Pearl through this prism provides a number of ironic insights into the mutual interactions between the Dreamer and the Maiden and highlights the poignancy of their inability to understand each other. Further conclusions are also drawn from comparing Pearl with a number of Chaucerian dream visions. Tracing the erotic in both its overt and covert forms and following its transformations in the course of the narrative, the article outlines the poet’s creative use of the mechanics of the dream vision, an increasingly popular genre in the period when the poem was written.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesText Matters - A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture;3en
dc.rightsThis content is open access.en
dc.titleBeyond the Garden: On the Erotic in the Vision of the Middle English Pearlen
dc.page.number13-26en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódźen
dc.identifier.eissn2084-574X
dc.referencesAnderson, J.J. Language and imagination in the “Gawain”-poems. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2005. Print.en
dc.referencesAndrew, Malcolm, and Ronald Waldron, eds. The Poems of the Pearl Manuscript. 5th ed. Exeter: U of Exeter P, 2007. Print. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000269119400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesBarthes, Roland. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1994. Print.en
dc.referencesBrown, Peter. “On the Borders of Middle English Dream Visions.” ReadingDreams: The Interpretation of Dreams from Chaucer to Shakespeare. Ed. Peter Brown. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999. 22-50. Print.en
dc.referencesBurrow, John. “William Dunbar.” A Companion to Medieval Scottish Poetry. Ed. Priscilla Bawcutt and Janet Hadley Williams. Cambridge: Brewer, 2006. 133-48. Print.en
dc.referencesChance, Jane. “Allegory and Structure in Pearl: The Four Senses of the Ars Praedicandi and Fourteenth-Century Homiletic Poetry.” Textand Matter: New Critical Perspectives of the Pearl-Poet. Ed. Robert J. Blanch, Miriam Youngerman Miller and Julian N. Wasserman. Troy, NY: Whitston, 1991. 31-59. Print.en
dc.referencesChaucer, Geoffrey. The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. F.N. Robinson. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1985. Print.en
dc.referencesConley, John. “Pearl and a Lost Tradition.” The Middle English Pearl: CriticalEssays. Ed. John Conley. Notre Dame, IN: U of Notre Dame P, 1970. 50-72. Print.en
dc.referencesDaileader, Celia R. Eroticism on the Renaissance Stage: Transcendence, Desire,and the Limits of the Visible. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. Print.en
dc.referencesDavis, Norman. “A Note on Pearl.” The Middle English Pearl: Critical Essays. Ed. John Conley. Notre Dame, IN: U of Notre Dame P, 1970. 325-34. Print.en
dc.referencesDerrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak.en
dc.referencesBaltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1976. Print.en
dc.referencesGross, Charlotte. “Courtly Language in Pearl.” Text and Matter: NewCritical Perspectives of the Pearl-Poet. Ed. Robert J. Blanch, Miriam Youngerman Miller and Julian N. Wasserman. Troy, NY: Whitston, 1991. 79-91. Print.en
dc.referencesHarwood, Britton J. “Pearl as Diptych.” Text and Matter: New Critical Perspectivesof the Pearl-Poet. Ed. Robert J. Blanch, Miriam Youngerman Miller and Julian N. Wasserman. Troy, NY: Whitston, 1991. 61-78. Print.en
dc.referencesHeng, Geraldine. Empire of Magic: Medieval Romance and the Politics ofCultural Fantasy. New York: Columbia UP, 2003. Print.en
dc.referencesHoffman, Stanton. “The Pearl: Notes for an Interpretation.” The MiddleEnglish Pearl: Critical Essays. Ed. John Conley. Notre Dame, IN: U of Notre Dame P, 1970. 86-102. Print.en
dc.referencesOlson, Glending. “Geoffrey Chaucer.” The Cambridge History of MedievalEnglish Literature. Ed. David Wallace. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999. 566-88. Print. “Pearl.”en
dc.referencesPearl, Cleanness, Patience, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Ed. A.C. Cawley and J.J. Anderson. London: Dent, 1978. 3-47. Print.en
dc.referencesPilch, Herbert. “The Middle English Pearl: Its Relation to the Roman dela Rose.” The Middle English Pearl: Critical Essays. Ed. John Conley. Notre Dame, IN: U of Notre Dame P, 1970. 163-84. Print.en
dc.referencesPrior, Sandra Pierson. The Pearl Poet Revisited. New York: Twayne, 1994. Print.en
dc.referencesStern, Milton R. “An Approach to The Pearl.” The Middle English Pearl:Critical Essays. Ed. John Conley. Notre Dame, IN: U of Notre Dame P, 1970. 73-85. Print.en
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/texmat-2013-0023en


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord