Pokaż uproszczony rekord

On Multiple Metonymies Within Indirect Speech Acts

dc.contributor.authorKOSECKI, KRZYSZTOFen
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-12T11:20:20Z
dc.date.available2015-06-12T11:20:20Z
dc.date.issued2007-12-18en
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/9549
dc.description.abstractIndirect speech acts are frequently structured by more than a single metonymy. The metonymies are related not only to the illocutionary force of the utterances, but also function within the individual lexemes being their parts. An indirect speech act can thus involve not only multiple, but also multi-levelled operation of conceptual metonymy.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;5en
dc.rightsThis content is open access.en
dc.subjectconceptual distanceen
dc.subjectconstrual of salienceen
dc.subjectidealized cognitive model (ICM)en
dc.subjectindirect directiveen
dc.subjectindirect speech acten
dc.subjectmetonymic chainen
dc.subjectmetonymyen
dc.subjectmultiple metonymiesen
dc.subjectmulti-levelled metonymiesen
dc.subjectzone activationen
dc.titleOn Multiple Metonymies Within Indirect Speech Actsen
dc.page.number213-219en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódźen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4616
dc.referencesBarcelona, A. 2002. "On the Ubiquity and Multiple-Level Operation of Metonymy". In: Lewandowska - Tomaszczyk B. and K. Turewicz (eds), 247-259.en
dc.referencesDirven, R. and R. Pörings (eds). 2003. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.en
dc.referencesFass, D. C. 1997. Processing Metaphor and Metonymy. Greenwich, Conn. and London: Ablex.en
dc.referencesGibbs, R. W. Jr. 1994. The Poetics of Mind. Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.en
dc.referencesLakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesLewandowska - Tomaszczyk, B. and K. Turewicz (eds). 2002. Cognitive Linguistics Today. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.en
dc.referencesOrtony, A. (ed.). 1979. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.en
dc.referencesPanther, K.-U. and G. Radden (eds). 1999. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.en
dc.referencesPanther, K.-U. and L. Thornburg. 1999. "The Potentiality for Actuality Metonymy in English and Hungarian". In: Panther K.-U. and G. Radden (eds), 333-357.en
dc.referencesPanther, K.-U. and L. Thornburg. 2003. "Introduction: On the Nature of Conceptual Metonymy". In: Panther K.-U. and L. Thornburg (eds), 1-20.en
dc.referencesPanther, K.-U. and L. Thornburg (eds). 2003. Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.en
dc.referencesParadis, C. 2003. "Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets and Active Zones." The Department of English in Lund: Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 1-15.en
dc.referencesRadden, G. and Z. Kövecses. 1999. "Towards a Theory of Metonymy". In: Panther K.-U. and G. Radden (eds), 17-59.en
dc.referencesReddy, M. J. 1979. "The Conduit Metaphor - a Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language". In: Ortony A. (ed.), 284-324.en
dc.referencesRuiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. and O. Díez Velasco. 2003. "Patterns of Conceptual Interaction". In: Dirven R. and R. Pörings (eds), 489-532.en
dc.referencesStefanowitsch, A. 2003. "A Construction-Based Approach to Indirect Speech Acts". In: Panther K.-U. and L. Thornburg (eds), 105-126.en
dc.referencesTaylor, J. R. 1989. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.en
dc.referencesVosshagen, Ch. 1999. "Opposition as a Metonymic Principle". In: Panther K.-U. and G. Radden (eds), 289-308.en
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/v10015-007-0010-6en


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
v10015-007-0010-6.pdf
Rozmiar:
105.8KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord