Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Geoffreyen
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-12T12:35:32Z
dc.date.available2015-06-12T12:35:32Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-21en
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/9643
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an acoustic study of the speech of Polish leaners of English. The experiment was concerned with English sequences of the type George often, in which a word-final voiced obstruent was followed by a word-initial vowel. Acoustic measurements indicated the degree to which learners transferred Polish-style glottalization on word-initial vowels into their L2 speech. Temporal parameters associated with the production of final voiced obstruents in English were also measured. The results suggest that initial glottalization may be a contributing factor to final devoicing errors. Adopting English-style ‘liaison’ in which the final obstruent is syllabified as an onset to the initial vowel is argued to be a useful goal for English pronunciation syllabi. The implications of the experiment for phonological theory are also discussed. A hierarchical view of syllabic structures proposed in the Onset Prominence environment allows for the non-arbitrary representation of word boundaries in both Polish and English.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;10en
dc.rightsThis content is open access.en
dc.titleInitial glottalization and final devoicing in polish Englishen
dc.page.number159-171en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUAM Poznańen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4616
dc.referencesAshby, M. & J. Przedlacka. 2011. The stops that aren’t. Ms. UCL.en
dc.referencesBeckman, Mary & Jan Edwards. 1990. Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: 179-200. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesChen, Matthew. 1970. Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica 22: 129-159. doi: 10.1159/000259312en
dc.referencesDilley, L., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., and Ostendorf, M. 1996. Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics 24: 423-444. doi: 10.1006/jpho.1996.0023en
dc.referencesDukiewicz, L. and I. Sawicka. 1995. Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego - fonetyka i fonologia. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Języka Polskiego PAN.en
dc.referencesGolston, C. and H. van der Hulst. 1999. Stricture is structure. In B. Hermans and M. van Oostendorp, (eds.) The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 153-173.en
dc.referencesGonet, W. & G. Pietroń. 2004. The Polish Tongue in the English Ear. Zeszyty Naukowe PWSZ w Koninie, nr 1/2004 (4), pp. 56-65.en
dc.referencesGussmann, E. 2007. The Phonology of Polish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesKaźmierski, K. 2007. Dynamic specification in English vowels - implications for Polish learners. Unpublished BA thesis. UAM Poznań.en
dc.referencesMaddieson, I. (1997). Phonetic universals. In Hardcastle, W. and J. Laver (eds). The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences. Cambridge: Blackwell. 619-640. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000311879900010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesPöchtrager, M. 2006. The structure of length. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Vienna.en
dc.referencesPort, R. & J. Dalby. 1982. C/V ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception and Psychophysics 2. 141-152.en
dc.referencesRedi, L. and S. Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2001. Variation in the realization of glottalization in normal speakers. Journal of Phonetics 29: 407-429. doi: 10.1006/jpho.2001.0145en
dc.referencesRejniak, J. 2011. What is final? Factors affecting devoicing errors in the speech of Polish learners of English. Unpublished BA thesis. UAM Poznań.en
dc.referencesRubach, J. and G. Booij. 1990. Syllable structure assignment in Polish. Phonology 7: 121-158.en
dc.referencesScheer, T. 2008. Why the Prosodic Hierarchy is a diacritic and why the Interface must be Direct. Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, edited by Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedüs & Henk van Riemsdijk, 145-192. Amsterdam: Elsevier.en
dc.referencesSchwartz, G. 2010. Auditory representations and the structures of GP 2.0. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57: 381-397. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000285212300003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesSchwartz, G. 2011. Avoiding stop insertion after English angma - a representational solution. In: Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K.; Wrembel, M.; Kul,M. (eds.). Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech: New Sounds 2010. Berlin: Peter Lang: 241-250.en
dc.referencesStrange, W. 1989. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context. JASA 85: 2135-2153.en
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/v10015-011-0044-7en


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord