dc.contributor.author | Solska, Agnieszka | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-12T12:36:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-12T12:36:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-01-29 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1731-7533 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/9655 | |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Research in Language;10 | en |
dc.rights | This content is open access. | en |
dc.title | The Relevance-Based Model of Context in Processing Puns | en |
dc.page.number | 387-404 | en |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Silesia, Poland | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2083-4616 | |
dc.references | Attardo, Salvatore 1994. Linguistic theories of humor. New York: Mouton. | en |
dc.references | Attridge, Derek 1988. Unpacking the portmanteau, or who’s afraid of Finnegan’s Wake. In J. Culler (Ed.), On puns: The foundation of letters (140-155). New York: Blackwell. | en |
dc.references | Bielski, Marek 1999. “Puns and word-play in advertising”. In J. Arabski (Ed.), PASE papers in language studies (37-42). Katowice: PARA. | en |
dc.references | Bucaria, Chiara 2004. “Lexical and syntactic ambiguity as a source of humor: The case of newspaper headlines”. Humor, 17, no. 3: 279-309. | en |
dc.references | Carston, Robyn 2002. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. | en |
dc.references | Giora, Rachel 1997. “Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis”. Cognitive Linguistics, 7: 183-206. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183 | en |
dc.references | Giora, Rachel 2003. On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press. | en |
dc.references | Heller, L. G. 1974. “Toward a general typology of the pun”. Language and Style, 7: 271-82 | en |
dc.references | Koestler, Arthur 1964. The act of creation. London: Hutchinson. | en |
dc.references | Norrick, Neal 1984. “Stock conversational witticisms”. Journal of Pragmatics, 8: 195-209. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(84)90049-3 | en |
dc.references | Partington, Alan Scott 2009. “Linguistic account of wordplay: The lexical grammar of punning”. Journal of Pragmatics, 41: 1794-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.025 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000269094200009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3 | en |
dc.references | Pepicello, William J. & Thomas A. Green. 1983. The language of riddles. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. | en |
dc.references | Redfern, Walter 1982. Puns: More senses than one. London: Penguin. | en |
dc.references | Redfern, Walter 1984. Puns. Oxford: Blackwell. | en |
dc.references | Redfern, Walter 1996. “Puns: Second thoughts”. Humor, 9, no. 2: 187-198. | en |
dc.references | Sobkowiak, Włodzimierz 1991. Metaphonology of English paronomasic puns. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang. | en |
dc.references | Solska, Agnieszka (forthcoming a). “Relevance-theoretic comprehension procedure and processing multiple meanings in paradigmatic puns”. | en |
dc.references | Solska, Agnieszka (forthcoming b). “The relevance of the juxtaposition of meanings in puns”. | en |
dc.references | Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. | en |
dc.references | Tanaka, Keiko 1992. “The pun in advertising”. Lingua, 87: 91-103. doi: 10.1016/0024-3841(92)90027-G | en |
dc.references | Tanaka, Keiko 1994. Advertising language: A pragmatic approach to advertisements in Britain and Japan. London: Routledge. | en |
dc.references | Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber 2004. “Relevance theory”. In G. Ward & L. Horn (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (607-632). Oxford: Blackwell. | en |
dc.references | Yus, Francisco 2003. “Humor and the search for relevance”. Journal of Pragmatics, 35: 1295-1331. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00179-0 | en |
dc.references | Zwicky, Arnold & Elizabeth Zwicky 1986. “Imperfect puns, markedness and phonological similarity. With fronds like these, who needs anemones”. Folia Linguistica, 20: 493-503. | en |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | agnieszka.solska@us.edu.pl | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2478/v10015-012-0001-0 | en |