| dc.contributor.author | Augustyn, Rafał | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-12T12:36:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-06-12T12:36:47Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-01-25 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1731-7533 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/9672 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Neosemantic noun-to-verb conversions such as beer → to beer, door → to door, pink → to pink, etc., constitute a particularly interesting field of study for Cognitive Linguistics in that they call for a discourse-guided and context-based analysis of meaning construction. The present article takes a closer look at the cognitive motivation for the conversion process involved in the noun-verb alterations with a view to explaining the semantics of some conversion formations in relation to the user-centred discourse context. The analysis developed in this article draws from the combined insights of Fauconnier and Turner’s (2002) Conceptual Integration Theory and Langacker’s (2005, 2008) Current Discourse Space. | en |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Research in Language;11 | en |
| dc.rights | This content is open access. | en |
| dc.subject | conversion | en |
| dc.subject | cognitive linguistic | en |
| dc.subject | conceptual integration | en |
| dc.subject | discourse space | en |
| dc.title | DISCOURSE-DRIVEN MEANING CONSTRUCTION IN NEOSEMANTIC NOUN-TO-VERB CONVERSIONS [MEANING CONSTRUCTION IN NOUN-TO-VERB CONVERSIONS] | en |
| dc.page.number | 141-161 | en |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland | en |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2083-4616 | |
| dc.references | Clark, Eve V. & Herbert H. Clark (1979). “When nouns surface as verbs”. Language, 55, 767-811. | en |
| dc.references | Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Coulson, Seana (2001). Semantic Leaps. Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo: Cambridge University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Dirven, René & Marjolijn Verspoor (2004). Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. | en |
| dc.references | Elsen, Hilke (2004). Neologismen. Formen und Funktionen neuer Wörter in verschiedenen Varietäten des Deutschen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. | en |
| dc.references | Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Fauconnier Gilles (1985). Mental Spaces. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. | en |
| dc.references | Fauconnier, Gilles (1994). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Fauconnier, Gilles (1997). Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner (1994). “Conceptual Projection and Middle Spaces”. San Diego: University of California, Department of Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://markturner.org. | en |
| dc.references | Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner (1998). “Principles of Conceptual Integration”. In J.- P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and Cognition (269-283). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. | en |
| dc.references | Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner (2002). The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books. | en |
| dc.references | Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner (2007). Conceptual integration networks. In V. Evans, B. K. Bergen & J. Zinken (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistic Reader (360-419). London, Oakville: Equinox Publishing Ltd. | en |
| dc.references | Grabias, Stanisław (1980). O ekspresywności języka. Ekspresja a słowotwórstwo. Lublin: UMCS. | en |
| dc.references | Gumperz, John J. (1992). “Contextualization and understanding”. In Ch. Goodwin & A. Duranti (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (229-252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Herberg, Dieter & Michael Kinne (1998). Neologismen. Heidelberg: Groos. | en |
| dc.references | Kardela, Henryk (2006). “(Nie)podobieństwa w morfologii: amalgamaty kognitywne”. In H. Kardela, Z. Muszyński & M. Rajewski (Eds.), Kognitywistyka: Podobieństwo (195-210). Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS. | en |
| dc.references | Kardela, Henryk (2007). “‘Good’ revisited: A mental space analysis”. In U. Magnusson, H. Kardela & A. Głaz (Eds.), Further Insights into Semantics and Lexicography (291-303). Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS. | en |
| dc.references | Kemmer, Suzanne (2003). “Schemas and lexical blends”. In G. Radden & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Motivation in Language. Studies in Honor of Günter Radden (69-95). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. | en |
| dc.references | Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press | en |
| dc.references | Langacker, Ronald W. (1991). Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter Langacker, Ronald W. (1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. | en |
| dc.references | Langacker, Ronald W. (2005). Wykłady z gramatyki kognitywnej. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS Langacker, Ronald W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press | en |
| dc.references | Langlotz, Andreas (2006). Idiomatic Creativity. A cognitive-linguistic model of idiomrepresentation and idiom-variation in English. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. | en |
| dc.references | Libura, Agnieszka (2007). Amalgamaty kognitywne w sztuce. Kraków: Universitas. | en |
| dc.references | Lieber, Rochelle (2004). Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Roberts, Craige (2004). “Context in dynamic interpretation”. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (197-220). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. | en |
| dc.references | Taylor, John R. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Taylor, John R. (2003). Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Twardzisz, Piotr (1997). Zero Derivation in English: A Cognitive Grammar Approach. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS. | en |
| dc.references | Veale, Tony & Cristina Butnariu (2010). Harvesting and understanding of on-line neologisms. In A. Onysko & S. Michel (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation (399-420). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. | en |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | augustraph@gmail.com | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2478/v10015-012-0026-4 | en |
