Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorŻylicz, Tomasz
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-07T13:44:55Z
dc.date.available2015-09-07T13:44:55Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationT. Żylicz, An economist looks at ecosystem services, [w:] Towards a green economy. From ideas to practice, ed. M. Burchard-Dziubińska, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2015, s. 11–29.pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-7969-622-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/11724
dc.description.abstractThis chapter lists ecosystem services and discusses what techniques can be applied in order to assess their economic value. The last five decades witnessed enormous progress in developing valuation techniques applied to non-market goods (i.e. the goods that do not have market prices). These can be broadly divided into direct and indirect techniques. The former aim at capturing them directly e.g. by asking people “how much they are willing to pay”. The latter derive values from observing prices not for the good of interest, but rather for a complementary good whose characteristics shed some light on peopleʼs relevant preferences. These techniques were successfully tested in many regions of the world, including Poland. The best known exercise of this sort is the one published by Nature in 1997, where an attempt was made to estimate the global economic value of annual ecosystem services. Numerous subsequent studies have allowed for much more accurate assessments. Consequently, researchers addressing valuation problems have an extensive accumulated research experience to rely on.en
dc.description.sponsorshipWydanie współfinansowane ze środków Miasta Łodzi w ramach zadania “Współpraca z wyższymi uczelniami” – umowa 100/03/2014pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof“Towards a green economy. From ideas to practice”, ed. M. Burchard-Dziubińska, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2015;
dc.subjectecosystem servicesen
dc.subjectvaluation techniquesen
dc.titleAn economist looks at ecosystem servicesen
dc.typeBook chapteren
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by University of Łódź, 2015en
dc.page.number11-29pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Warsawen
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-7969-623-9
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteProfessor Tomasz Żylicz Ph.D. Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw (UW) Graduated from Economics (1974) and Mathematics (1977) Departments of the UW. Economics and mathematics studies at the University of Wisconsin, Madison 1978/1979. Fulbright Visiting Fellow at the Institute of Behavioral Sciences at the University of Colorado in Boulder 1988/89. Visiting professor at the Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences in Stockholm 1992/93. In 1989–1991 employed by the Polish Ministry of Environment as the Economics Director, responsible for the state environmental budget where he co-authored a major environmental policy reform. In 1993 he received the “Pew Scholar Award in Conservation and the Environment”. He used the award to create the Warsaw Ecological Economics Center at UW. The Center carries out research on economic aspects of environmental protection as well as hosts fellowships for young scholars. Authored numerous academic papers including articles in Environmental and Resource Economics and Ecological Economics. The book Costing Nature in a Transition Economy. Case Studies in Poland (Elgar; Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA 2000) summarises many of the research projects carried out at the Warsaw Ecological Economics Center.en
dc.referencesBartczak A., (2002), Wartość czasu podróży [The value of travel time], „Ekonomia”, nr 7.pl_PL
dc.referencesBartczak A., Lindhjem H., Navrud S., Zandersen M., Żylicz T., (2008), Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: The case of Poland, “Forest Policy and Economics”, Vol. 10, Issue 7–8/2008.pl_PL
dc.referencesBorkowska M., Rozwadowska M., Śleszyński J., Żylicz T., (2001), Environmental Amenities on the Housing Market in Warsaw. Hedonic Price Method Research, „Ekonomia”, nr 3/2001.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrouwer R., Brander L., Kuik O., Papyrakis E., Bateman I., (2013), A synthesis of approaches to assess and value ecosystem services in the EU in the context of TEEB. Final Report, Free University of Amsterdam.pl_PL
dc.referencesBuszko-Briggs M., Giergiczny M., Ziezio J., Żylicz T., (2004), Wartość ekonomiczna Puszczy Białowieskiej [Economic value of the Bialowieza primeval forest], WWF–Polska, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesCICES (Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services) (2014), CICES V4.3, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, http://cices.eu/pl_PL
dc.referencesCostanza R. et al., (1997), The value of the worldʼs ecosystem services and natural capital, “Nature”, May 15, Vol. 387.pl_PL
dc.referencesCostanza R. et al., (2014), Changes in the global value of ecosystem services, “Global Environmental Change”, Vol. 26.pl_PL
dc.referencesCzajkowski M., (2008), Nośniki wartości dóbr środowiskowych [Value Drivers of Environmental Goods], praca doktorska, Uniwersytet Warszawski [Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warsaw].pl_PL
dc.referencesCzajkowski M., Bartczak A., Giergiczny M., Navrud S., (2013), Providing Preference-Based Support for Forest Ecosystem Service Management in Poland, “Forest Policy and Economics”, [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.11.002].pl_PL
dc.referencesCzajkowski M., Buszko-Briggs M., Hanley N., (2009), Valuing Changes in Forest Biodiversity, “Ecological Economics”, Vol. 68.pl_PL
dc.referencesCzajkowski M., Markowska A., Markiewicz O., Bartczak A., Scasny M., Melichar J., Skopkova H., (2007), Lake Water Quality Valuation-Benefit Transfer Approach vs. Empirical Evidence, „Ekonomia”, nr 19.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavis R. K., (1963), The Value of Outdoor Recreation: An Economic Study of the Maine Woods, Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.pl_PL
dc.referencesDe Groot R. S., Wilson M. A., Boumans R. M. J., (2002), A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services, “Ecological Economics”, Vol. 41.pl_PL
dc.referencesDzięgielewska D. A., (2003), Essays on Contingent Valuation and Air Improvement in Poland, Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, New Haven.pl_PL
dc.referencesDzięgielewska D. (Lead Author), Tietenberg T. and Niggol Seo S. (Topic Editors), (2007), Total economic value, [in:] Encyclopedia of Earth, Ed. Cutler J. Cleveland (Washington, D.C.: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment), http://www.eoearth.org/article/Total_economic_valuepl_PL
dc.referencesFankhauser S., Tol R. S. J., Pearce D. W., (1997), The Aggregation of Climate Change Damages: A Welfare Theoretic Approach, “Environmental and Resource Economics”, Vol. 10.pl_PL
dc.referencesGiergiczny M., (2008), Value of a Statistical Life – the Case of Poland, “Environmental and Resource Economics”, Vol. 41, Issue 2.pl_PL
dc.referencesHigh-Level Conference on Mapping and assessment of ecosystem and their services (MAES) in Europe (2014), http://biodiversity.europa.eu/topics/ecosystem-servicespl_PL
dc.referencesHotelling H., (1949), An Economic Study of the Monetary Valuation of Recreation in the National Parks, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service and Recreational Planning Division.pl_PL
dc.referencesJacewicz A., Żelazinski J., Żylicz T., (2002), Prawdy i mity o stopniu i zbiorniku wodnym we Włocławku [Truths and myths about the Włocławek dam], „Gospodarka Wodna”, 8/2002.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrutilla J. V., (1967), Conservation Reconsidered, “The American Economic Review”, Vol. 57, Issue 4.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarkiewicz O., (2008), Analiza opłacalnosci programów ochrony zdrowia na podstawie wyceny statystycznego życia i wyceny dodatkowego roku przeżycia w Polsce [Efficiency of health protection programmes in Poland based on the Value of a Statistical Life, and the Value of a Life Year], praca doktorska, Uniwersytet Warszawski [Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warsaw].pl_PL
dc.referencesMarkowska A., (2004), Koszty i korzyści wdrożenia w Polsce Dyrektywy 91/271/EWG w Sprawie Oczyszczania Ścieków Komunalnych [Costs and benefits of implementing the Council Directive 91/271/EEC concerning urban waste-water treatment in Poland], praca doktorska, Uniwersytet Warszawski [Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warsaw].pl_PL
dc.referencesMarkowska A., Żylicz T., (1999), Costing an international public good: The case of the Baltic Sea, “Ecological Economics”, Vol. 30.pl_PL
dc.referencesMill J. S., (1848), Principles of Political Economy, John W. Parker, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesRoughgarden T., Schneider S. H., (1999), Climate Change Policy: Quantifying Uncertainties for Damages and Optimal Carbon Taxes, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 27 (7).pl_PL
dc.referencesSmith V. K., (2004), Fifty Years of Contingent Valuation in: The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, a survey of current issues, T. Tietenberg, H. Folmer (eds.), Edgar Elgar Publishers, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesUNECE/FAO, (2005), European Forest Sector Outlook Study. 1960–2000–2020. Main report, Geneva.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeidema B. P., (2008), Using the budget constraint to monetarise impact assessment results, “Ecological Economics”, Vol. 68.pl_PL
dc.referencesŻylicz T., (1997), Economic Values and Policy Implications, [in:] A. Nordgren (ed.), Science, Ethics, Sustainability: The Responsibility of Science in Attaining Sustainable Development, Uppsala University.pl_PL
dc.referencesŻylicz T., (2000), Costing Nature in a Transition Economy. Case Studies in Poland, Edward Elgar, Chelthenham.pl_PL
dc.referencesŻylicz T., (2012), Valuating ecosystem services, „Ekonomia i Środowisko”, 2(42).pl_PL
dc.referencesŻylicz T., Giergiczny M., (2013), Wycena pozaprodukcyjnych funkcji lasu. Raport końcowy [Assessment of non-timber benefits in forestry. Final report], Uniwersytet Warszawski.pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord