Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorMajer, Krzysztofen
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-04T11:05:21Z
dc.date.available2015-12-04T11:05:21Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-17en
dc.identifier.issn2083-2931en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/15024
dc.description.abstractBefore Joel and Ethan Coen’s 2009 production A Serious Man, Jewish motifs have consistently appeared in their cinematic output. However, the Jewish characters functioned in an ethnically diverse setting and rarely took centre stage, with the notable exception of the eponymous struggling leftist playwright in Barton Fink. Nevertheless, even here the Jewishness seemed to be universalized into “humanity.” Elsewhere, through their accessory characters, the Coens primarily offered a nod to the illustrious and/or notorious Jewish presence in various spheres of American society (e.g., smalltime gangster Bernie Bernbaum in Miller’s Crossing or movie mogul Jack Lipnick in the aforementioned Barton Fink). In addition, steadfast religious observance has been an object of affable ridicule (e.g., store owner Walter Sobchak in The Big Lebowski). A Serious Man, however, reveals an unprecedented strategy. Described by the Coens as their most autobiographical film to date, it has a predominantly Jewish cast, deals almost exclusively with a Jewish community in the Midwest, and is heavily steeped in themes which have long been the staple of the Jewish literary tradition. Most evident is the familiar figure of the schlemiel, the eternal loser, embodied in the protagonist Larry Gopnik, whose seemingly endless predicaments form the spine of the plot. Marketed as a comedy, A Serious Man nevertheless consistently exhibits a dark, existential undercurrent, which renders its decidedly grim ending a rather logical payoff. Drawing on the research of seminal scholars on the subject of schlemiel narratives (e.g., Ruth Wisse, Sanford Pinsker), the essay is an attempt to situate the film within this tradition. Furthermore, I argue that the Coens reinvest the figure of the schlemiel with a philosophical charge that it possessed in folk legends and Yiddish literature; at the same time, they adapt the schlemiel to the postmodern condition. This allows them to address the fundamental uncertainty of our age, signalled in the film through the formulae of Heisenberg and Schrödinger.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesText Matters;5en
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en
dc.title“Receive with Simplicity Everything That Happens to You”: Schlemiel (Meta)Physics in the Coens’ A Serious Manen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number79-94en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódźen
dc.identifier.eissn2084-574X
dc.referencesBuchbinder, David. “Enter the Schlemiel: The Emergence of Inadequate or Incompetent Masculinities in Recent Film and Television.” Canadian Review of American Studies / Revue canadienne d’études américaines 38.2 (2008): 227-45. Print. doi: 10.3138/cras.38.2.227 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000260450400002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesDenby, David. “Gods and Victim.” New Yorker 5 Oct. 2009: n. pag. New Yorker.com. Web. 8 Nov. 2013.en
dc.referencesEmerson, Jim. “A Serious Man: Kafka in Minneapolis.” Rev. of A Serious Man, by Joel and Ethan Coen. Scanners. RogerEbert.com. 18 Oct. 2009. Web. 28 Jun. 2014.en
dc.referencesFalsani, Cathleen. The Dude Abides: The Gospel According to the Coen Brothers. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2009. Print.en
dc.referencesFiedler, Leslie. Waiting for the End. Lanham: Stein and Day, 1964. Print.en
dc.referencesGillota, David. “Negotiating Jewishness: Curb Your Enthusiasm and the Schlemiel Tradition.” Journal of Popular Film and Television 38.4 (2010): 152-61. Print. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000284958200001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesHiller, Jordan. “25 Essential Jewish Films: A Serious Man.” Rev. of A Serious Man, dir. Joel and Ethan Coen. Bangitout.com. 27 Sept. 2009. Web. 28 June 2014en
dc.referencesThe Holy Bible, English Standard Version. Biblehub.com. 2001, 2007. Web. 18 June 2014.en
dc.referencesJohnson, Carla. “Luckless in New York: The Schlemiel and the Schlimazel in Seinfeld.” Journal of Popular Film and Television 22.3 (1994): 116-24. Print.en
dc.referencesPinsker, Sanford. The Schlemiel as Metaphor. Studies in the Yiddish and American Jewish Novel. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1971. Print.en
dc.referencesPurcell, Andrew. “Scott Rudin Is on a Roll.” Guardian. Guardian, 8 Feb. 2008. Web. 28 June 2014.en
dc.referencesRichler, Mordecai. Shovelling Trouble. London: Quartet, 1973. Print.en
dc.referencesRowell, Erica. The Brothers Grim: The Films of Ethan and Joel Coen. Lanham: Scarecrow, 2007. Print.en
dc.referencesSabo, Lee Weston. 2010. “Serious Joke: The Coen Brothers’ Emergence as Jewish Humorists.” Rev. of A Serious Man, dir. Joel and Ethan Coen. Brightlightsfilm.com. Bright Lights Film Journal 67 (2010): n. pag. Web. 28 Jun. 2014.en
dc.referencesA Serious Man. Dir. Joel Coen and Ethan Coen. Focus Features, 2009. Film.en
dc.referencesSinger, Isaac Bashevis. The Penguin Collected Stories. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1982. Print.en
dc.referencesSklar, Robert. Rev. of A Serious Man, dir. Joel and Ethan Coen. Cineaste Spring (2010): 58-59. Print.en
dc.referencesWisse, Ruth R. The Schlemiel as Modern Hero. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1971. Print.en
dc.references---. “A Serious Film.” Rev. of A Serious Man, dir. Joel and Ethan Coen. Commentary 1 Dec. 2009: 69-71. Print.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/texmat-2015-0007en


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.