Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDomański, Tomasz
dc.contributor.editorDomański, Tomasz
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-04T07:42:46Z
dc.date.available2016-07-04T07:42:46Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationT. Domański, New generation cultural and scientific institutions — dilemmas and strategic challenges, [in:] The Role of Cultural Institutions and Events in the Marketing of Cities and Regions, ed. T. Domański, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016, p. 167–189.pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8088-149-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/18606
dc.descriptionThis project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractRecent periods witnessed very strong development trend of new generation cultural and scientific institutions that can be distinguished by their interdisciplinary approach. They combine promoting culture and science with creative activities. Thus, a new category of actors emerge who very clearly divert from traditional institutions focused on selected usually mono-disciplinary functions. These are hybrid institutions that, besides combining various functions and artistic, exhibition activities that promote knowledge in different forms clearly go beyond the scale of former establishments and are closer to interdisciplinary centres of culture services. This is also the line joined by new generation and interdisciplinary science and entertainment centres (Pulh M., Mencarelli R., 2010). At this point, it is worth asking about strategic challenges and dilemmas over the idea and development of such institutions. We may have an impression that the development of these institutions is mainly marketing-driven and tends to concentrate many complementary activities in the field of arts and science in one place. This is supposed to encourage massive engagement in various cultural, science or entrepreneurial events. It would be good if such activities addressed to a wide audience could translate into new possibilities and forms of contact with arts and science. We also should not forget specific values that arise from intimate contact with exactly these two areas. This is a general question about how, in contact with art, we can stimulate the reflection of visitors and boost their sensitivity to artistic interventions . Managing such new institutions requires a completely new category of managers able to use knowledge in project management, marketing interdisciplinary events, and modern marketing communication who understand arts, and are open to changes, social innovation and entrepreneurial actions. Finding managers that would fit the profile is a huge challenge and their skills are decisive for the operating formula and idea of these institutions. New institutions imply posing questions about relationships that currently emerge between innovations in cultural and scientific institutions and broadly understood marketing and entrepreneurship and the deployment of modern technologies.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipThe publication was co-funded by Culture programme of the European Union as a part of Campus Culturae project (grant No. 2011-1177/001-001).pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof“The Role of Cultural Institutions and Events in the Marketing of Cities and Regions”, ed. T. Domański, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016;
dc.titleNew generation cultural and scientific institutions — dilemmas and strategic challengespl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Tomasz Domański, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Universytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016pl_PL
dc.page.number[167]–189pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Faculty of International and Political Studies, Department of International Marketing and Retailing, 91-131 Lodz, Poland, 59a Narutowicza Street.pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8088-150-1
dc.referencesBennet, T. (1994). The reluctant Museum Visitor: A Study of Non-Goers to History Museums and Art Galleries. Sydney: Australia Council for the Arts.pl_PL
dc.referencesDomański, T. (2005). Bliskość między siecią handlową a klientem — wyzwania strategiczne. Marketing Rynek, nr 1/2005, pp. 2–7.pl_PL
dc.referencesDomański, T. (2005a). Strategie rozwoju handlu. Warszawa: PWE, pp. 270.pl_PL
dc.referencesEllmeier, A. (2003). Cultural entrepreneurialism: on the changing relationship between the arts, culture and employment. International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 3–16.pl_PL
dc.referencesDelaney, J. (1992). Ritual space in the Canadian meseum of civilization. In: Shields, R. (Ed.), Lifestyle Shopping. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoulding, Ch. (2000). The museum environment and the visitor experience. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 34 Iss 3/4 pp. 261–278; permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560010311849.pl_PL
dc.referencesKay, P.L., Polonsky, W.M.J. (2009). Marketing cultural attractions: understanding non-attendance and visitation barriers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 27 Iss 6, pp. 833–854. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02634500910988717.pl_PL
dc.referencesKirchberg, V. (1998). Entrance fees as a subjective barrier to visiting museums. Journal of Cultural Economics, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 1–13.pl_PL
dc.referencesKraaykamp, G., van Gils, W., Ultee, W. (2008). Cultural participation and time restrictions explaining the frequency of individual and joint cultural visits. Poetics, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 316–332.pl_PL
dc.referencesLangman, L. (1992). Neon cages: shopping for subjectivity. In: Shields, R. (Ed.), Lifestyle Shopping. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesLindkvist, L. (2013). Cultural entrepreneurship and creative points of intersection. The island of furillen. In: Lindeborg, L. and Lindkvist, L. (Eds), The Value of Arts and Culture for Regional Development. A Scandinavian Perspective. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 284–303.pl_PL
dc.referencesLindkvist, L., Hjorth D. (2015). Organizing cultural projects through legitimizing as cultural entrepreneurship. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 8 Iss 4, pp. 696–714. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-07-2015-0064.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcLean, F. (1997). Marketing the Museum. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesPassebois-Ducros, J., Guintcheva, G. (2010). Coommunautés d’amateurs et création de valeur pour les musées. Le cas des Sociétés d’Amis des Musées (SAM). DM Decisions Marketing, No 60, Octobre–Decembre.pl_PL
dc.referencesPrentice, R.C., Davies, A., Beeho, A. (1997). Seeking generic motivations for visiting and not visiting museums and like cultural attractions. Museum Management and Curatorship, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 45–70.pl_PL
dc.referencesPulh, M., Mencarelli, R. (2010). Muséo-parcs et réenchantement de l’expérience muséale. Le cas de la Cité des Arts et des Sciences de Valencia. DM Decisions Marketing, No 60, Octobre–Decembre.pl_PL
dc.referencesSepe, M., Di Trapani, G. (2010). Cultural tourism and creative regeneration: two case studies. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, Vol. 4 Iss 3, pp. 214–227. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISNN 1750–6182.pl_PL
dc.referencesShields, R. (1992). Lifestyle Shopping: The Subject of Consumption. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesSwedberg, R. (2006). The cultural entrepreneur and the creative industries: beginning in Vienna. Journal of Cultural Economics, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 243–261.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8088-149-5.11
dc.contributor.translatorPołowińska, Beata


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record