Institutional Cooperation in the Brownfield Regeneration Process: Experiences from Central and Eastern European Countries

Perić, Ana

dc.contributor.author	Perić, Ana	en
dc.date.accessioned	2016-07-20T08:35:19Z
dc.date.available	2016-07-20T08:35:19Z
dc.date.issued	2016-07-07	en
dc.identifier.issn	1231-1952	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/18842
dc.description.abstract	The topic of brownfield regeneration has been the focus of planning debate for years. However, the aspect of institutional cooperation and strengthening the institutional capacity in order to cope with a complex task of brownfield regeneration is considered a challenge. This is particularly true for the post-socialist countries and, hence, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Serbia are chosen as the case studies of this research. By implementing a concise survey of both the institutions and policies related to the topic of brownfield regeneration in the selected countries, the research aims at determining the form, extent and nature of collaboration between different sectors, disciplines, and institutions. Based on such insights, it is finally possible to provide the recommendations for more effective institutional design within specific political and socio-economic context.	en
dc.publisher	Lodz Univeristy Press	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	European Spatial Research and Policy;23	en
dc.rights	This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.	en
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0	en
dc.subject	brownfield regeneration	en
dc.subject	institutions	en
dc.subject	cooperation	en
dc.subject	capacity-building	en
dc.subject	the Czech Republic	en
dc.subject	Hungary	en
dc.subject	Serbia	en
dc.title	Institutional Cooperation in the Brownfield Regeneration Process: Experiences from Central and Eastern European Countries	en
dc.page.number	21-46	en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Ana PERIĆ, Institute for Spatial and Landscape Development, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zűrich, Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, 8093 Zűrich, Switzerland	en
dc.identifier.eissn	1896-1525
dc.references	ADAMS, D. and WATKINS, C. (2002), Greenfields, Brownfields and Housing Development, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.	en
dc.references	ALKER, S., JOY, V., ROBERTS, J. and SMITH, P. (2000), ‘The definition of brownfield’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43 (1), pp. 49–69.	en
dc.references	BARTA, G., BELUSZKY, P., CZIRFUSZ, M., GYORI, R. and KUKELY, G. (2006), Rehabilitating the Brownfield Zones of Budapest (Discussion Papers no. 51), Pecs: Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences.	en
dc.references	BEGOVIĆ, B. (2002), ‘Ekonomski aspekti upravljanja lokalnom zajednicom: ka povećanju ekonomske efikasnosti (The economic aspects of the local community management: towards the increase of economic efficiency)’, [in:] BEGOVIĆ, B., VACIĆ, Z., LAZAREVIĆ BAJEC, N., RAIČEVIĆ, B., ROGANOVIĆ, M., SIMIĆ, A. M., STOJANOVIĆ, D. and HIBER, D. (eds.), Principi modernog upravljanja lokalnom zajednicom (The Principles of Modern Local Community Management), Belgrade: CLDS, pp. 112–128.	en
dc.references	BEGOVIĆ, B. (2003), ‘Reforma zakonodavstva o gradskom zemljistu, planiranju i izgradnji (Legislative reform of urban land, planning and construction)’, [in:] VACIĆ, Z. and MIJATOVIĆ, B. (eds.), Strategija reformi (The Strategy of Reforms), Belgrade: CLDS, pp. 196–208.	en
dc.references	BROOS, L., ERTEL, T., GRAY, A., SCHUG, B. and VEGTER, J. (eds.) (2007), European Brownfield Revitalisation Agenda, http://www.eubra.eu (12.06.2012).	en
dc.references	CABERNET (CONCERTED ACTION ON BROWNFIELD AND ECONOMIC REGENERATION NETWORK). (2007), CABERNET Network Report: Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration, Nottingham: University of Nottingham.	en
dc.references	CABERNET (CONCERTED ACTION ON BROWNFIELD AND ECONOMIC REGENERATION NETWORK). (2009), Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration, http://www.cabernet.org.uk (10.12.2008).	en
dc.references	COUCH, C., LEONTIDOU, L. and PETSCHEL-HELD, G. (eds.) (2007), Urban Sprawl in Europe: landscapes, land-use change and policy, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.	en
dc.references	GREENBERG, M., LOWRIE, K., MAYER, H., MILLER, K. and SOLITARE, L. (2001), ‘Brownfield redevelopment as a smart growth option in the United States’, The Environmentalist, 21, pp. 129–143.	en
dc.references	DANILOVIĆ, K. and DAMJANOVIĆ, D. (2011), ‘Mogucnosti ozivljavanja braunfilda u Srbiji (The possibilities of brownfield revitalization in Serbia)’, paper presented at the conference Susreti urbanista (The Meetings of Urban Planners), Novi Becej, Serbia, 22–23.09.2011, http://www.vuu.org.rs (26.11.2011).	en
dc.references	DIXON, T., RACO, M., CATNEY, P. and LERNER, D. N. (2008), Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: Liveable Places from Problem Spaces, Chichester, GBR: Wiley.	en
dc.references	DORSEY, J. W. (2003), ‘Brownfields and Greenfields: The Intersection of Sustainable Development and Environmental Stewardship’, Environmental Practice, 5 (1), pp. 69–76.	en
dc.references	EC (EUROPEAN COMMISSION). (2010), Action plan for the EU Strategy for the Danube Region, Brussels: European Commission.	en
dc.references	FALUDI, A. (2010), ‘European Spatial Planning: Past, Present and Future’, Town Planning Review, 81 (1), pp. 1–22.	en
dc.references	FOLDI, Z. S. (2006), Neighbourhood Dynamics in Inner-Budapest. A realist approach (doctoral dissertation), Netherlands Geographical Studies, No. 350, Utrecht: Utrecht University.	en
dc.references	GARB, Y. and JACKSON, J. (2001), ‘The search for brownfield leadership in Central European Cities: Overview and case study of the Czech Republic’, paper presented at the ITDP brownfield seminar Recycling Urban Land, Prague, http://www.brownfields.cz/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/brownfield-leadership-in-ceec-2001.pdf (05.12.2008).	en
dc.references	GARB, Y. and JACKSON, J. (2006), ‘Central Europe’s Brownfields: Catalysing a Planning Response in the Czech Republic’, [in:] ALTROCK, U. et al. (eds.), Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Member States – From Adjustment to Reinvention, Hampshire: Ashgate, pp. 271–286.	en
dc.references	GARB, Y. and JACKSON, J. (2010), ‘Brownfields in the Czech Republic 1989–2009: The long path to integrated land management’, Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 3 (3), pp. 263–276.	en
dc.references	GRIMSKI, D. and FERBER, U. (2001), ‘Urban Brownfields in Europe’, Land Contamination & Reclamation, 9 (1), pp. 143–148.	en
dc.references	GRISEL, M. and VAN DE WAART, F. (eds.) (2011), Multilevel Urban Governance or the Art of Working together – Methods, Instruments and Practices, The Hague: European Urban Knowledge Network.	en
dc.references	GCSD (GOVERNMENT COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT). (2010a), The Strategic Framework for Sustainable Development in the Czech Republic, Prague: GSDC.	en
dc.references	GCSD (GOVERNMENT COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT). (2010b), Spatial Development Policy of the Czech Republic, Prague: GSDC.	en
dc.references	HEALEY, P. (1997), Collaborative Planning – Shaping places in fragmented societies, London: MacMillan Press.	en
dc.references	HEALEY, P. (2007a), ‘Re-thinking Key Dimensions of Strategic Spatial Planning: Sustainability and Complexity’, [in:] DE ROO, G. and PORTER, G. (eds.), Fuzzy Planning: The Role of Actors in a Fuzzy Governance Environment, Abingdon, Oxon, GBR: Ashgate Publishing Group, pp. 21–41.	en
dc.references	HEALEY, P. (2007b), ‘The New Institutionalism and the Transformative Goals of Planning’, [in:] VERMA, N. (ed.), Institutions and Planning, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 61–90.	en
dc.references	HEALEY, P. and WILLIAMS, R. (1993), ‘European Urban Planning Systems: Diversity and Convergence’, Urban Studies, 30 (4/5), pp. 701–720.	en
dc.references	HIRT, S. (2005), ‘Planning the Post-Communist City: Experiences from Sofia’, International Planning Stuides, 10 (3–4), pp. 219–240.	en
dc.references	IMMUDTC (Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion). (2007), Leipzig Charter on sustainable European cities. Agreed on the occasion of the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion, Leipzig 24.05.2007, http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/themes/urban/leipzig_charter.pdf (11.06.2012).	en
dc.references	INNES, J. E. and BOOHER, D. E. (1999), ‘Metropolitan Development as a Complex System: A New Approach to Sustainability’, Economic Development Quarterly, 13, pp. 141–156.	en
dc.references	JANIN RIVOLIN, U. (2008), ‘Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: an unbearable cohabitation’, Planning Practice & Research, 23 (2), pp. 167–186.	en
dc.references	KAUKO, T. (2010), ‘Where have all the planners gone? The Law of the Wolf in an Era of Ignorance’, paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference, Pecs, Hungary, 24–26.05.2010, http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk/events/2010/may-pecs/papers/kauko.pdf (10.05.2011).	en
dc.references	KLUSÁČEK, P., KREJČI, T., KUNC, J., MARTINAT, S. and NOVAKOVA, E. (2011), ‘The Post-Industrial Lanscape in Relation to Local Self-Government in the Czech Republic’, Moravian Geographical Reports, 19 (4), pp. 18–28.	en
dc.references	Law on the Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia from 2010 to 2020. Official Gazette, No. 88/10.	en
dc.references	Local Self-Government Law. Official Gazette RS 129/07.	en
dc.references	MADARASZ, T. (2007), Brownfield redevelopment status and lessons from Northern Hungary, http://www.nicole.org/publications/Akersloot/madarasz_t_casehu.pdf (20.02.2012).	en
dc.references	MAIER, K. (1998), ‘Czech planning in transition: Assets and deficiencies’, International Planning Studies, 3 (3), pp. 351–365.	en
dc.references	MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND TRADE. (2008), The National Strategy for Brownfield Regeneration, Prague: Ministry of industry and trade.	en
dc.references	MTA RKK KETI (MAGYAR TUDOMANOS AKADEMIA, REGIONALIS KUTATASOK KOZPONTJA). (2007), Regionalis Fejlesztes Operativ Program (ROP 2.2.): A varosi teruletek rehabilitaciojat celzo intezkedesek ertekelese. Budapest: MTA RKK, http://www.nfu.hu, (05.12.2012).	en
dc.references	NDA (NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY). (2007), New Hungarian Development Plan, Budapest: NDA.	en
dc.references	NDA & MoEW (NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY & MINISTRY OF ENVIRONEMNT AND WATER). (2007), National Sustainable Development Strategy, Budapest: NDA.	en
dc.references	NEDOVIĆ-BUDIĆ, Z. (2001), ‘Adjustment of Planning Practice to the New Eastern and Central European Context’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 67, pp. 38–52.	en
dc.references	OECD (ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT). (2006), Competitive Cities in the Global Economy – Horizontal Synthesis Report, Bilbao, Spain.	en
dc.references	PALLAI, K. (2008), ‘Hungary’, [in:] RYSER, J and FRANCHINI, T. (eds.), International Manual of Planning Practice (IMPP), The Hague: International Society of City and Regional Planners (ISoCaRP), pp. 156–166.	en
dc.references	PERIĆ, A. (2013), ‘The Review of Planning Practice in Brownfield Regeneration – Some European Experiences’, Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 11 (1), pp. 1–8.	en
dc.references	PERIĆ, A. (2014), Brownfield Regeneration in the Danube Macro-Region: Institutional Dynamics, Saarbrucken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.	en
dc.references	PERIĆ, A. (2015), ‘The role of local governance in the process of brownfield regeneration: European planning practice’, Serbian Architectural Journal, 7 (3), pp. 263–284.	en
dc.references	PERIĆ, A. and MARUNA, M. (2012a), ‘Predstavnici društvene akcije u procesu regeneracije priobalja – slučaj braunfild lokacije „Luka Beograd“ (The Representatives of Social Action in Waterfront Regeneration − the Case of the Brownfield Site “Belgrade Port”)’, Sociologija i prostor, 50 (1), pp. 61–88.	en
dc.references	PERIĆ, A. and MARUNA, M. (2012b), ‘Brownfield Regeneration versus Greenfield Investment – Is Serbia on the Way to Integrated Land Management?’, Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 6 (1), pp. 79–90.	en
dc.references	PLUREL (Peri-Urban Land Use Relationships – Strategies and Sustainability Assessment Tools for Urban-Rural Linkages). (2010), National spatial planning policies and governance typology. (Deliverable Report 2.2.1), http://www.plurel.net. (25.05.2011).	en
dc.references	Planning and Construction Law. Official Gazette, No. 72/09, 24/11.	en
dc.references	RASP (REPUBLIC AGENCY FOR SPATIAL PLANNING). (2009), Spatial Development Strategy of the Republic of Serbia from 2009 to 2020, Belgrade: RASP.	en
dc.references	Regional Development Strategy of the Republic of Serbia from 2007 to 2012. Official Gazette, No. 21/07.	en
dc.references	Restitution and Denationalisation Law. Official Gazette, No. 72/11.	en
dc.references	RESCUE (REGENERATION OF EUROPEAN SITES IN CITIES AND URBAN ENVIRONMENTS). (2004), Guidance report for the management of the Brownfield Regeneration Projects. (Work Package 6, Deliverable 6.1), http://www.rescue–europe.com (26.11.2008).	en
dc.references	RICZ, J. and SALAMIN, G. (eds.) (2010), Handbook for the National Implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union – The Case of Hungary, Budapest: The Ministry for National Development and Economy, Republic of Hungary.	en
dc.references	SIEPA (SERBIAN INVESTMENT AND EXPORT PROMOTION AGENCY). (2011), Lokacije – SIEPA baza investicionih lokacija (Locations – SIEPA base of investment locations), http://serbia-locations.rs (25.11.2011).	en
dc.references	SKGO (STALNA KONFERENCIJA GRADOVA I OPŠTINA – STANDING CONFERENCE OF TOWNS AND MUNICIPALITIES). (2011), Reaktiviranje braunfilda u Srbiji – Sistemski pristup ili ad hoc rešenja? (Brownfield Reactivation in Serbia – System Approach or Ad-hoc Solutions?), Belgrade: SKGO.	en
dc.references	STANILOV, K. (ed.) (2007), The Post-Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism, Dordrecht: Springer.	en
dc.references	TASAN KOK, T. (2004), Budapest, Istanbul, and Warsaw: Institutional and Spatial Change, Delft: Eburon.	en
dc.references	THE MUNICIPALITY OF BUDAPEST. (2003), Budapest City Development Concept, Budapest: The Mayor’s Office.	en
dc.references	THE MUNICIPALITY OF BUDAPEST. (2005), The Podmaniczky Programme 2005–2013: Medium-Term Urban Development Programme of Budapest, Summary, Budapest: The Mayor’s Office.	en
dc.references	TIMBRE (TAILORED IMPROVEMENT OF BROWNFIELD REGENERATION IN EUROPE). (2012), Report on results of survey on brownfield regeneration and statistical analysis information, Brno: IOG.	en
dc.references	TOSICS, I. (2006), ‘Spatial restructuring in post-socialist Budapest’, [in:] TSENKOVA, S. and NEDOVIC-BUDIC, Z. (eds.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, Heidelberg: Psysica-Verlag, pp. 131–150.	en
dc.references	VOJVODÍKOVÁ, B. (ed.) (2010), Brownfields-Handbook: Cross-disciplinary educational tool focused on the issue of brownfields regeneration – Educational tool for Latvia and Lithuania, Ostrava: Technical University.	en
dc.references	VOJVODÍKOVÁ, B., BERGATT JACKSON, J. and HERMANN, G. (2006), ‘Drive Towards Sustainable Urban and Rural Development Skills’, http://www.socialpolis.eu/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=199&task=doc_download&gid=71 (05.12.2008).	en
dc.references	VUJOVIC, S. and PETROVIC, M. (2007), ‘Belgrade’s post-socialist urban evolution: Reflections by the actors in the development process’, [in:] STANILOV, K. (ed.), The Post-Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 361–384.	en
dc.references	ZEKOVIĆ, S. (2007). ‘Prostorno-planska politika i industrijski braunfildi u gradovima Srbije (Spatial Planning Policy and Industrial Brownfields in Serbian Cities)’, [in:] DANILOVIĆ, K. et al. (eds.), Oživljavanje braunfilda u Srbiji (Brownfield Revitalisation in Serbia), Belgrade: PALGO centar, pp. 61–70.	en
dc.contributor.authorEmail	aperic@ethz.ch	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1515/esrp-2016-0002	en

Pliki tej pozycji

Nazwa:: esrp-2016-0002.pdf
Rozmiar:: 402.9KB
Format:: PDF

Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

European Spatial Research and Policy Volume 23 (2016) Issue 1 [7]

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.