Effects of two teaching methods of connected speech in a Polish EFL classroom

Kul, Małgorzata

dc.contributor.author	Kul, Małgorzata	en
dc.date.accessioned	2017-03-14T10:20:17Z
dc.date.available	2017-03-14T10:20:17Z
dc.date.issued	2017-02-23	en
dc.identifier.issn	1731-7533	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20880
dc.description.abstract	The results demonstrate that in general, NF proved more effective than NNF. With regard to individual processes of connected speech, NF was more effective in production, whereas no such effect was found for perception.	en
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Research in Language;14	en
dc.rights	This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.	en
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0	en
dc.subject	connected speech	en
dc.subject	Negotiation of Form instruction	en
dc.subject	non-native speakers	en
dc.subject	pronunciation pedagogy	en
dc.subject	EFL	en
dc.title	Effects of two teaching methods of connected speech in a Polish EFL classroom	en
dc.page.number	389-407	en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Adam Mickiewicz University	en
dc.identifier.eissn	2083-4616
dc.references	Abe, H. 2010. Form-focused Instruction in L2 Pronunciation Pedagogy: The Effect of Negotiation of Form in a Japanese Classroom. In: K. Dziubalska Kołaczyk, M. Wrembel and M. Kul (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, New Sounds 2010, 1-6. Poznań, Poland, 1-3 May 2010	en
dc.references	Bell, A. 1984. Language Style As Audience Design. Language in Society 13. 145-201.	en
dc.references	Bell, A. 2001. Back in Style: Reworking Audience Design. In: P. Eckert and J. R. Rickford (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 139-169. Cambridge: CUP.	en
dc.references	Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 2012. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. [Available from http://www.praat.org/]	en
dc.references	Bybee, J. L. 2013. Usage-based Theory and Exemplar Representation. In: T. Hoffman and G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 49-69. Oxford University Press.	en
dc.references	Bussmann, H. 1996. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.	en
dc.references	Carr, P. 2008. A Glossary of Phonology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.	en
dc.references	Cook, A. 1991. American Accent Ttraining. Hauppage, NY: Barron’s Educational Series.	en
dc.references	Cruttenden, A. 2008. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. 7h edition. London: Hodder.	en
dc.references	de Silva, V. et al. 2003. Common and Language Dependent Phonetic Differences Between Read and Spontaneous Speech in Russian, Finnish and Dutch. In: M. J. Solé, D. Recasens, and J. Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2977-2980. Barcelona, 3-9 August 2003.	en
dc.references	Ellis, R. 2006. Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar: An SLA perspective, TESOL Quarterly 40. 83-107.	en
dc.references	Ellis, L. and W. Hardcastle. 2002. Categorical And Gradient Properties of Assimilation In Alveolar To Velar Sequences: Evidence From EPG And EMA. Journal of Phonetics 30. 373-396.	en
dc.references	Ernestus, M, and N. Warner. 2011. Editorial of Journal of Phonetics 39. 253-260.	en
dc.references	Gonet, W. and L. Stadnicka. 2006. Vowel Clipping In English. Speech And Language Technology Vol. 8. Poznań: Polish Phonetic Association.	en
dc.references	Gonet, W., J. Szpyra-Kozlowska and R. Swiecinski. 2010. The Acquisition of Vowel Reduction by Polish Students of English. In: E. Waniek-Klimczak (ed.), Issues in Accents of English 2, 291-307. Newcastle upon Tyne: CSP.	en
dc.references	Gómez Lacabex, E., M. L. García Lecumberri, and M. Cooke. 2009. Training And Generalization Effects of English Vowel Reduction for Spanish Listeners. In: M. A. Watkins et al. (eds.), Recent Research in Second Language Phonetics/Phonology: Perception and Production, 32-42. Newcastle upon Tyne: CSP.	en
dc.references	Huber, D. 2010. The Extent of Place Assimilation Across Word Boundaries in Lancashire English. Presentation at the 15eme Colloque ALOES, Universite Paris 13, Villletaneuse. April 2010.	en
dc.references	Jaworski, S. 2007. Lenition Processes in English And Other Languages: A Hierarchy of Susceptibility To Inertia. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University.	en
dc.references	Johnson, K. 2004. Massive Reduction In Conversational American English. In: K. Yoneyama and K. Maekawa (eds.), Spontaneous Speech: Data and Analysis. Proceedings of the 1st Session of the 10th International Symposium, 29-54. Tokyo, Japan: The National International Institute for Japanese Language.	en
dc.references	Labov, W. 1994. Principles of Language Change: Internal Factors: Oxford: Blackwell.	en
dc.references	Lindblom, B. 1990. Explaining Phonetic Variation: a Sketch of the H&H Theory”. In: W. J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modeling, 403-439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.	en
dc.references	Lombardo, M. M. and R. W. Eichinger. 1996. The Career Architect Development Planner. Lominger Limited.	en
dc.references	Lujan, B. A. 2006. The American Accent Guide: A Complete and Comprehensive Course on the Pronunciation and Speaking Style of American English for Individuals of All Language Backgrounds. Salt Lake City: Lingual Arts.	en
dc.references	Lyster, R. 2001. Negotiation of Form, Recasts, and Explicit Correction in Relation to Error Types and Learner Repair in Immersion Classrooms. Language Learning 51 (Suppl. 1). 265-301.	en
dc.references	Morley, J. 1988. How Many Languages Do You Speak?: Perspectives on Pronunciation Speech-communication in EFL/ESL. Nagoya Gakuin Daigaku Gaikokugo Kyoiku Kiyo 19. 1-33.	en
dc.references	Munro, M. J. 2011. Intelligibility: Buzzword or Buzzworthy? In. J. Levis and K. LeVelle (eds.), Proceedings of the 2rd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, 7-16. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.	en
dc.references	Newman, R. S. and S. Evers. 2007. The Effect of Talker Familiarity on Stream Segregation, Journal of Phonetics 35. 85-103. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000243505600005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3	en
dc.references	Pica, T. 1994. Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal About Second-language Learning Conditions, Processes and Outcomes? Language Learning 44. 493-527.	en
dc.references	Roach, Peter. 1983/1991. English Phonetics and Phonology: a Practical Course.Cambridge: CUP.	en
dc.references	Rojczyk, A. 2011. Production and Perception of Vowel /æ/ by Polish Learners of English. In M. Wrembel, M. Kul and K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (eds.), Achievements and Perspectives in the SLA of Speech: New Sounds 2010, vol 2, 239-250. Peter Lang: Frankfurt an Main.	en
dc.references	Saito, K. and R. Lyster. 2012. Effects of Form-focused Instruction and Corrective Feedback on L2 Pronunciation Development of /ɹ/ by Japanese Learners of English. Language Learning 62. 595-633.	en
dc.references	Sawicka, I. 1995. Fonologia [Phonology]. In: H. Wróbel (ed.), Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Vol. 3. Fonetyka i fonologia [The Grammar of the Contemporary Polish Language. Vol. 3. Phonetics and Phonology.], 105-191. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Języka Polskiego PAN.	en
dc.references	Schwartz, G. 2011. Avoiding Stop Insertion After English /ŋ/ – a Representational Solution”. In M. Wrembel, M. Kul and K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (eds.), Achievements and Perspectives in the SLA of Speech: New Sounds 2010, vol 1, 243-252. Peter Lang: Frankfurt an Main.	en
dc.references	Shockey, L. 2003. Sound Patterns of Spoken English. Oxford: Blackwell.	en
dc.references	Spada, N. and Y. Tomita. 2010. Interactions Between Type of Instruction and Type of Language Feature: A Meta-analysis. Language Learning 60. 263-308. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000277711300001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3	en
dc.references	Thomson, R. I. and T. M. Derwing. 2014. The Effectiveness of L2 Pronunciation Instruction: A Narrative Review. Applied Linguistics (2014). 1-20. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000357423700004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3	en
dc.references	Trask, R. L. 1996. A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology. London & New York: Routledge.	en
dc.references	Waniek-Klimczak, E. 2011. Aspiration and Style: A Sociophonetic Study of the VOT in Polish Learners of English. In: M. Wrembel, M. Kul and K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (eds.), Achievements and Perspectives in the SLA of Speech:New Sounds 2010, vol 1, 303-316. Peter Lang: Frankfurt an Main.	en
dc.references	Wells, J. C. 1990. The Longman Pronunciation Dictionary. Longman Group.	en
dc.references	Wierzchowska, B. 1980. Fonetyka i fonologia języka polskiego [The Phonetics and Phonology of the Polish Language]. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków, Poznań: Ossolineum.	en
dc.contributor.authorEmail	kgosia@wa.amu.edu.pl	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1515/rela-2016-0024	en

Files in this item

Name:: rela-2016-0024.pdf
Size:: 1.127Mb
Format:: PDF

View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Research in Language (2016) vol.14 nr 4 [6]

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.