dc.contributor.author | Lisowska, Katarzyna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-11T08:48:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-11T08:48:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2353-6098 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22534 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of the study is to consider feminist retellings of myths and legends. As an example,
Margaret Atwood’s book The Penelopiad is analyzed. The interpretation is situated in
a broader context of intertextual practices characteristic of the feminist vision of literature. I
present the ideas which Atwood shares with authors engaged in women’s movement. Among
these there is Atwood’s understanding of intertextuality (noticeable especially in The
Penelopiad). Bibliographical basis of the study comprises books which are fundamental to
feminist and gender criticism (e.g. Poetics of Gender, ed. by N. Miller, New York 1986;
S. M. Gilbert, S. Gubar The Madwoman in the Attic. The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-
Century Literary Imagination, New Haven and London 1984). What is more, the study refers to
the books which allow considering the notion of intertextuality (G. Allen, Intertextuality,
London and New York 2010, J. Clayton. E. Rothstein (eds.), Influence and Intertextuality in
Literary History, Wisconsin 1991) and connecting the interpretation with the problems crucial
to contemporary literary studies (L. Hutcheon L. A Poetics of Postmodernism. History, Theory,
Fiction, New York and London 1988, B. Johnson, A World of Difference, Baltimore and London
1989). | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Department of Studies in Drama and Pre-1800 English Literature, University of Łódź | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Analyses/Rereadings/Theories Journal;1 | |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | intertextuality | pl_PL |
dc.subject | feminist literary criticism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | arachnology | pl_PL |
dc.subject | reinterpretation | pl_PL |
dc.subject | humour | pl_PL |
dc.title | Women and Intertextuality: On the Example of Margaret Atwood’s The Penelopiad | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | Katarzyna Lisowska | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 18-27 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Wrocław | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnote | Katarzyna Lisowska is a Ph.D. student in the Institute of Polish Philology at the University of Wrocław. The subjects of her interest are Gender Studies, especially such currents as: Men’s Studies, Queer Theory, Gay and Lesbian Studies. In her doctoral thesis she is considering different kinds of metaphors in gender discourse. She published essays and reviews in e.g.: “Przegląd Humanistyczny,” “Zagadnienia Rodzajow Literackich,” and “Czas Kultury.” She was a participant of a number of conferences, e.g. International Interdisciplinary Conference „Kinds and Styles of Criticism,” „Pogranicza płci” (Katowice, 19.11.2012), VI Międzynarodowa Konferencja Doktorantów Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego (Szczecin, 25.10.2013), Interdyscyplinarna Konferencja Naukowa „Teksty kultury uczestnictwa” (Warszawa, 07.11.2013). | pl_PL |
dc.references | Abrams, Meyer Howard. A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York: Holt, Reinehart and Winston, 1981. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Abrams, Meyer Howard. A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York: Holt, Reinehart and Winston, 1981. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Aristotle. On Poetry and Music. Trans. Samuel H. Butcher. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1985. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Atwood, Margaret. The Penelopiad. Edinburgh: Canongate Books, 2005. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Atwood, Margaret. Introduction. The Penelopiad. Edinburgh: Canongate Books, 2005. xiii–xv. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bakhtin, Mikhail. “Epic and Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981. 3–40. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Hélène Iswolsky Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Clayton Jay, and Eric Rothstein. “Figures in the Corpus: Theories of Influence and Intertextuality.” Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Wisconsin: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 3–60. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cuddon, John Anthony. The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin Beds Group, 1992. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Draine, Betsy. “Chronotope and Intertext: The Case of Jean Rhys’s Quartet.” Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Ed. Jay Clayton and Eric Rothstein. Wisconsin: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 318-25. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Friedman, Susan Stanford. “Weavings: Intertextuality and the (Re)birth of the Author.” Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Ed. Jay Clayton and Eric Rothstein. Wisconsin: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 148-80. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Gilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic. The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 1984. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Głowiński, Michał. Intertekstualność, groteska, parabola. Szkice ogólne i interpretacje. Kraków: Universitas, 2000. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism. History, Theory, Fiction. New York: Routledge, 1988. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Johnson, Barbara. A World of Difference. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1989. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kraskowska, Ewa. Czytelnik jako kobieta: wokół literatury i teorii. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2007. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kristeva, Julia. “Problemy strukturowania tekstu.” Trans. Wiktoria Krzemień. Pamiętnik Literacki 4 (1972): 233–50. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kristeva, Julia. “Revolution in Poetic Language.” Trans. Margaret Waller. Kristeva Reader. Ed. Toril Moi. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. 89–136. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kristeva, Julia. “Word, Dialogue and Novel.” Trans. Alice Jardine, Thomas Gora and Léon S. Roudiez. Kristeva Reader. Ed. Toril Moi. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. 34–61. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Markiewicz, Henryk. Literaturoznawstwo i jego sąsiedztwa. Warszawa: PWN, 1989. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Miller, Nancy. “Arachnologies.” The Poetics of Gender. New York: Columbia UP: 1986. 270-95. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Rajan, Tilottama. “Intertextuality and the Subject of Reading/Writing.” Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Ed. Jay Clayton and Eric Rothstein. Wisconsin: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 61-74. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Rulewicz, Wanda. “Intertextuality, Competence, Reader.” Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny 2 (1987): 229–41. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own. British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1977. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sławiński, Janusz, ed. Słownik terminów literackich. Wrocław: Ossolineum, 2002. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Steele, Jeffrey. “The Call of Eurydice: Mourning and Intertextuality in Margaret Fuller’s Writing.” Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Ed. Jay Clayton and Eric Rothstein. Wisconsin: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 271-97. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.relation.volume | 2 | pl_PL |