Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorLisowska, Katarzyna
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-11T08:48:27Z
dc.date.available2017-09-11T08:48:27Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn2353-6098
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/22534
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study is to consider feminist retellings of myths and legends. As an example, Margaret Atwood’s book The Penelopiad is analyzed. The interpretation is situated in a broader context of intertextual practices characteristic of the feminist vision of literature. I present the ideas which Atwood shares with authors engaged in women’s movement. Among these there is Atwood’s understanding of intertextuality (noticeable especially in The Penelopiad). Bibliographical basis of the study comprises books which are fundamental to feminist and gender criticism (e.g. Poetics of Gender, ed. by N. Miller, New York 1986; S. M. Gilbert, S. Gubar The Madwoman in the Attic. The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth- Century Literary Imagination, New Haven and London 1984). What is more, the study refers to the books which allow considering the notion of intertextuality (G. Allen, Intertextuality, London and New York 2010, J. Clayton. E. Rothstein (eds.), Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History, Wisconsin 1991) and connecting the interpretation with the problems crucial to contemporary literary studies (L. Hutcheon L. A Poetics of Postmodernism. History, Theory, Fiction, New York and London 1988, B. Johnson, A World of Difference, Baltimore and London 1989).pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherDepartment of Studies in Drama and Pre-1800 English Literature, University of Łódźpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnalyses/Rereadings/Theories Journal;1
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectintertextualitypl_PL
dc.subjectfeminist literary criticismpl_PL
dc.subjectarachnologypl_PL
dc.subjectreinterpretationpl_PL
dc.subjecthumourpl_PL
dc.titleWomen and Intertextuality: On the Example of Margaret Atwood’s The Penelopiadpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.rights.holderKatarzyna Lisowskapl_PL
dc.page.number18-27pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Wrocławpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteKatarzyna Lisowska is a Ph.D. student in the Institute of Polish Philology at the University of Wrocław. The subjects of her interest are Gender Studies, especially such currents as: Men’s Studies, Queer Theory, Gay and Lesbian Studies. In her doctoral thesis she is considering different kinds of metaphors in gender discourse. She published essays and reviews in e.g.: “Przegląd Humanistyczny,” “Zagadnienia Rodzajow Literackich,” and “Czas Kultury.” She was a participant of a number of conferences, e.g. International Interdisciplinary Conference „Kinds and Styles of Criticism,” „Pogranicza płci” (Katowice, 19.11.2012), VI Międzynarodowa Konferencja Doktorantów Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego (Szczecin, 25.10.2013), Interdyscyplinarna Konferencja Naukowa „Teksty kultury uczestnictwa” (Warszawa, 07.11.2013).pl_PL
dc.referencesAbrams, Meyer Howard. A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York: Holt, Reinehart and Winston, 1981. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesAbrams, Meyer Howard. A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York: Holt, Reinehart and Winston, 1981. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesAristotle. On Poetry and Music. Trans. Samuel H. Butcher. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1985. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesAtwood, Margaret. The Penelopiad. Edinburgh: Canongate Books, 2005. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesAtwood, Margaret. Introduction. The Penelopiad. Edinburgh: Canongate Books, 2005. xiii–xv. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesBakhtin, Mikhail. “Epic and Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981. 3–40. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesBakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Hélène Iswolsky Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesClayton Jay, and Eric Rothstein. “Figures in the Corpus: Theories of Influence and Intertextuality.” Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Wisconsin: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 3–60. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesCuddon, John Anthony. The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin Beds Group, 1992. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesDraine, Betsy. “Chronotope and Intertext: The Case of Jean Rhys’s Quartet.” Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Ed. Jay Clayton and Eric Rothstein. Wisconsin: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 318-25. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesFriedman, Susan Stanford. “Weavings: Intertextuality and the (Re)birth of the Author.” Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Ed. Jay Clayton and Eric Rothstein. Wisconsin: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 148-80. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesGilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic. The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 1984. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesGłowiński, Michał. Intertekstualność, groteska, parabola. Szkice ogólne i interpretacje. Kraków: Universitas, 2000. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesHutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism. History, Theory, Fiction. New York: Routledge, 1988. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson, Barbara. A World of Difference. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1989. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesKraskowska, Ewa. Czytelnik jako kobieta: wokół literatury i teorii. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 2007. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesKristeva, Julia. “Problemy strukturowania tekstu.” Trans. Wiktoria Krzemień. Pamiętnik Literacki 4 (1972): 233–50. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesKristeva, Julia. “Revolution in Poetic Language.” Trans. Margaret Waller. Kristeva Reader. Ed. Toril Moi. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. 89–136. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesKristeva, Julia. “Word, Dialogue and Novel.” Trans. Alice Jardine, Thomas Gora and Léon S. Roudiez. Kristeva Reader. Ed. Toril Moi. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. 34–61. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarkiewicz, Henryk. Literaturoznawstwo i jego sąsiedztwa. Warszawa: PWN, 1989. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesMiller, Nancy. “Arachnologies.” The Poetics of Gender. New York: Columbia UP: 1986. 270-95. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesRajan, Tilottama. “Intertextuality and the Subject of Reading/Writing.” Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Ed. Jay Clayton and Eric Rothstein. Wisconsin: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 61-74. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesRulewicz, Wanda. “Intertextuality, Competence, Reader.” Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny 2 (1987): 229–41. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesShowalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own. British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1977. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesSławiński, Janusz, ed. Słownik terminów literackich. Wrocław: Ossolineum, 2002. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesSteele, Jeffrey. “The Call of Eurydice: Mourning and Intertextuality in Margaret Fuller’s Writing.” Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Ed. Jay Clayton and Eric Rothstein. Wisconsin: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 271-97. Print.pl_PL
dc.relation.volume2pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska