Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWicher, Andrzejen
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-03T11:45:31Z
dc.date.available2018-04-03T11:45:31Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-25en
dc.identifier.issn2084-574Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/24398
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to show the role, the possibilities and the limits of Wyspiański’s national thinking through Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Of particular importance, in this context, is the role the Ghost takes in Wyspiański’s celebrated interpretation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. By the Ghost we mean the spirit of history, the ghost of a father, the spirit of the fatherland, the voice of the ancestors, and particularly that of the Polish king Casimir the Great, as well as the Holy Ghost and the Evil Spirit because all these aspects of the Ghost belong to Wyspiański’s vision. The play in question bears witness to what the Polish poet calls “the truth of other worlds,” as well as the truth of the theatre, which Wyspiański calls the labyrinth. The poet manages to reduce, to some extent, this difficult truth to the truth of the world he cared most about, that is the present and historical reality of Poland, more specifically the city of Cracow, known as Poland’s spiritual, that is “ghostly,” and only virtual, capital. It is also remarkable that Wyspiański saw the Ghost in Hamlet in the context of other Shakespearean ghosts, apparitions and magicians, such as those that appear in Macbeth, The Tempest, Julius Caesar, A Midsummer Night’s Dream or Richard III. At the same time, Wyspiański realizes that the Ghost, with its irrationalism, offends the spirit of post-medieval times, and as such, is understandably neglected by Hamlet, who for Wyspiański, in anticipation of Harold Bloom, stands for modernity.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesText Matters;7en
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0en
dc.subjectHamleten
dc.subjectWyspiańskien
dc.subjectShakespeareen
dc.subjectthe dilemmas of nationalismen
dc.subjectold-fashioned heroism vs. modernityen
dc.titleWawel Meets Elsinore. The National and Universal Aspects of Stanisław Wyspiański’s Vision of Shakespeare’s Hamleten
dc.page.number214-238en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódźen
dc.referencesArtress, Lauren. “Enter the Labyrinth.” Laurenartress.com. 2009. Web. 14 Jan. 2016.en
dc.referencesBlok, Alexander. “I’m Hamlet.” Trans. Alec S. Vagapov. Samlib.ru. 2007. Web. 14 Jan. 2016.en
dc.referencesBloom, Harold. Shakespeare. The Invention of the Human. New York: Riverhead, 1998. Print.en
dc.referencesBoyce, Charles, ed. Shakespeare A to Z. New York: Dell, 1991. Print.en
dc.referencesEliot, T. S. Selected Poems. London: Faber, 1975. Print.en
dc.referencesFriedberg, Harris A. “Hamlet, Revenge.” Hfriedberg.web.wesleyan.edu. 2012. Web. 13 Jan. 2016.en
dc.referencesGraves, Robert, The Greek Myths. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990. Print.en
dc.referencesGraves, Robert. The White Goddess. London: Faber, 1960. Print.en
dc.referencesJoynes, Andrew, ed. Medieval Ghost Stories. Woodbridge: Boydell, 2006. Print.en
dc.referencesKerényi, Karl. Dionysos: Archetypal Image of the Indestructible Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1996. GoogleBooks. Web. 24 Oct. 2016.en
dc.referencesKott, Jan. Szekspir współczesny [Shakespeare Our Contemporary]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 1990. Print.en
dc.referencesMahiques, Myriam. “Labyrinths Concepts.” Myriammahiques.blogspot.com.2009. Web. 13 Jan. 2016.en
dc.referencesMorawiec, Elżbieta, ed. Stanisław Wyspiański. Myśli i obrazy [Stanisław Wyspiański, Thoughts and Images]. Olszanica: BOSZ, 2008. Print.en
dc.referencesWyspiański, Stanisław. Akropolis. Trans. The Wooster Group. Thewoostergroup.org. 2008. Web. 14 Jan. 2016.en
dc.referencesWyspiański, Stanisław. Dzieła zebrane t. 1–16 [Collected Works vol. 1–16]. Ed. L. Płoszewski. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 1958. Print.en
dc.referencesWyspiański, Stanisław. Hamlet. Ed. Maria Prussak. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, 2007. Print.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailandwich@wp.plen
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/texmat-2017-0012en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.