Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKubátová, Helena
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-17T08:25:44Z
dc.date.available2018-09-17T08:25:44Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/25650
dc.description.abstractThe article focuses on the reflection of my research experience in obtaining qualitative data using narrative interviews. I confronted my own research experience with the phenomenological methodology of Alfred Schütz, dramaturgical sociology of Erving Goffman, and interpretative sociology of Max Weber. The article discusses three problems that emerged during a longitudinal study of everyday life transformation in the long-term horizon of sixty years: 1. How to create a concept of everyday life so it serves not only as a tool for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data, but also as a tool for understanding the meanings of the examined empirical world; 2. How to discursively create an image of everyday life transformations during an interview between a participant and a researcher and what it means in relation to the research subject; 3. How to reach understanding between the participant and the researcher during a face-to-face interview.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPalacký University Olomoucen_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;3
dc.subjectEveryday Lifeen_GB
dc.subjectNarrative Interviewen_GB
dc.subjectUnderstandingen_GB
dc.subjectTemporalityen_GB
dc.subjectHistoricityen_GB
dc.subjectGeneration Gapen_GB
dc.subjectLife-World (Lebenswelt)en_GB
dc.subjectSocial Realityen_GB
dc.subjectPhenomenological Sociologyen_GB
dc.titleResearch into Transformations in Everyday Life: Three Methodological Notesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder©2018 QSRen_GB
dc.page.number6-22
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPalacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesAnýžová, Petra, Helena Kubátová, and Petr Matějů. 2016. “Rodina a kariéra ve světle hodnot a víry.” Pp. 175-204 in Konfrontace hodnot v pozdní modernitě: Česko a Hlučínsko v evropském kontextu, edited by F. Zich et al. Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).en_GB
dc.referencesAnýžová, Petra, Helena Kubátová, and František Znebejánek. 2016. “Proměny hlučínské religiozity a hodnotové struktury hlučínského katolíka.” Pp. 149-174 in Konfrontace hodnot v pozdní modernitě: Česko a Hlučínsko v evropském kontextu, edited by F. Zich et al. Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).en_GB
dc.referencesAssmann, Aleida. 2006. “Memory, Individual and Collective.” Pp. 210-224 in The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, edited by R. Goodin and Ch. Tilly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesBerger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. The Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.en_GB
dc.referencesBertaux, Daniel and Martin Kohli. 1984. “The Life Story Approach: A Continental View.” Annual Review of Sociology 10:215-237.en_GB
dc.referencesBertaux, Daniel, Paul Thompson, and Paul Richard Thompson. 1993. Between Generations: Family Models, Myths, and Memories. Oxford: University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesBlumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en_GB
dc.referencesBourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesCorbin, Juliet and Anselm Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13(1):3-21.en_GB
dc.referencesCrystal, David. 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.en_GB
dc.referencesFlyvbjerg, Bjerg. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12(2):219-245.en_GB
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic. London: Tavistock Publications.en_GB
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.en_GB
dc.referencesHalbwachs, Maurice. 1992. On Collective Memory. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesHalfacree, Keith. 1993. “Locality and Social Representation: Space, Discourse and Alternative Definitions of the Rural.” Journal of Rural Studies 9(1):23-37.en_GB
dc.referencesHalfacree, Keith. 2006. “Rural Space: Constructing a Three-Fold Architecture.” Pp. 44-62 in Handbook of Rural Studies, edited by P. Cloke, T. Marsden, and P. Mooney. London: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesHann, Chris. 2015. “Backwardness Revisited: Time, Space, and Civilization in Rural Eastern Europe.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 57(4):881-911.en_GB
dc.referencesHekman, Susan. 1983. Weber, the Ideal Type, and Contemporary Social Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.en_GB
dc.referencesKubátová, Helena. 2013. “Changing Life Situations of Silesians in Hlučín Region.” Pp. 195-216 in Changes in Social Awareness on Both Sides of a Border Poland-Czech Republic, edited by U. Swadźba and D. Topinka. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.en_GB
dc.referencesKubátová, Helena. 2014. “Proměny způsobu života na Hlučínsku v mezigenerační perspektivě.” Český lid 101(2):209-231.en_GB
dc.referencesKubátová, Helena. 2016a. Proměny příměstského venkova a venkovské každodennosti. Olomouc: Vydavatelství Univerzity Palackého.en_GB
dc.referencesKubátová, Helena. 2016b. “Collective Memory and Collective Identity of Hlučín Region Inhabitants in the 20th Century.” Historická sociologie 1:11-32.en_GB
dc.referencesKubátová, Helena et al. 2015. Mezigenerační proměny způsobu života na Hlučínsku. Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).en_GB
dc.referencesMannheim, Karl. 1954. Ideology and Utopia. An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1944. “The Stranger: An Essay in Social Psychology.” American Journal of Sociology 49(6):499-507.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1945. “The Homecomer.” American Journal of Sociology 50(5):269-376.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1953. “Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14(1):1-38.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1954. “Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences.” Journal of Philosophy 51(9):257-273.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1962. “On Multiple Realities.” Pp. 207-259 in Collected Papers I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1964. “The Social World and the Theory of Social Action.” Pp. 3-19 in Collected Papers II. Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1966. “Some Structure of Life-World.” Pp. 116- 132 in Collected Papers III. Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy. The Hague: Martinuis Nijhoff.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1970. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1981. Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred and Thomas Luckmann. 1973. The Structures of the Life-World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesStrauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin, (eds.). 1997. Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesThompson, Paul. 2000. The Voice of the Past. Oral History. Oxford: University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesWeber, Max. 1949. “‘Objectivity’ of Social Science and Social Policy.” Pp. 50-112 in On the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Illinois: The Free Press of Glencoe.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailhelena.kubatova@upol.cz
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.14.3.01
dc.relation.volume14en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord