Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Confronting the International Order: Changes in US Foreign Policy from the Perspective of American Power Elites

dc.contributor.authorMania, Andrzej
dc.contributor.authorPugacewicz, Tomasz
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T12:39:12Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T12:39:12Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1641-4233
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/30024
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to present the most important voices on the role of the US in the international order during Donald Trump’s presidency in the debate held in the Foreign Affairs. The authors assume that Foreign Affairs expresses the opinions of the most crucial organisation bringing together the elites of American foreign affairs – the Council on Foreign Relations. The paper proposes a hypothesis according to which there is a difference of opinion due to the adopted theoretical perspective regarding Trump’s role in the destruction of the liberal international order among the American power elites, even though they agree that the ideological conflict between democratic and authoritarian countries around the world is escalating.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherLodz University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal; 1
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_GB
dc.subjectinternational orderen_GB
dc.subjectDonald Trumpen_GB
dc.subjectForeign Affairsen_GB
dc.subjectCouncil on Foreign Relationsen_GB
dc.subjectUS power eliteen_GB
dc.subjectinternational relations theoriesen_GB
dc.subjectideological rivalryen_GB
dc.subjectRussiaen_GB
dc.subjectChinaen_GB
dc.titleConfronting the International Order: Changes in US Foreign Policy from the Perspective of American Power Elitesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number11-31
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJagiellonian University, Institute of Political Science and International Relations
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJagiellonian University, Institute of Political Science and International Relations
dc.identifier.eissn2300-8695
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteAndrzej Mania - Professor title awarded by the President of Poland in 1993. Since 1997, Professor at the Institute of Political Science and International Relations and head of the Chair of Diplomatic History and International Politics. Simultaneously, since 1994, head of the Chair of American Studies. Between 2008 and 2016, Vice- Rector for Educational Affairs of the Jagiellonian University. Member of the Steering Committee of the International Research University Network (2008–2012). Chairman of the Steering Committee of the Sasakawa Young Leaders Fellowship Fund of the Tokyo Foundation at the Jagiellonian University. Fellow or visiting professor in more than ten foreign institutions, including Norwegian Nobel Institute in Oslo, Kennan Institute of Advanced Russian Studies in Washington and the University of Rochester. Authored or co-authored ten books, including The Department of State 1789–1939 (Jagiellonian University Press, Krakow 2011). Editor of another six books. Member of the Lions Club International (Krakow Stare Miasto).en_GB
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteTomasz Pugacewicz - PhD, Assistant Professor at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków. The theoretical aspects of his PhD dissertation were published in the monograph Teorie polityki zagranicznej. Perspektywa amerykańskiej analizy polityki zagranicznej [Theories of Foreign Policy. American FPA Perspective] (Jagiellonian University Press, Kraków 2017). During his internships abroad, he was a visiting researcher at the Johns Hopkins University, the State University of New  York, and the Heidelberg University. In 2018, he received a grant from the Polish National Science Centre for the project titled “Between Center and Periphery: A Comparison of Ludwik Ehrlich’s Theoretical Concepts with American-British International Relations in the First Half of the Twenty Century”. Holder of several scholarships, e.g. the scholarship of the Copernicus Society in America. In 2015, he participated in the Ideas Lab – the Young Professionals Programme at the Chancellery of the President of the Republic of Poland.en_GB
dc.referencesAbelson, D. Theoretical Models and Approaches to Understanding the Role of Lobbies and Think Tanks in US Foreign Policy. Policy Expertise in Contemporary Democracies. Ed. Stephen Brooks, Dorota Stasiak, and Tomasz Zyro. Burlington: Ashgate, 2012.en_GB
dc.referencesAbrams, E. Trump the Traditionalists. A Surprisingly Standard Foreign Policy, “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.4 (2017), pp. 10–16.en_GB
dc.referencesAllison, G. The Myth of the Liberal Order From Historical Accident to Conventional Wisdom, “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.4 (2018), pp. 124–133.en_GB
dc.referencesAnnual Membership Dues. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/CFRMemberDues-July2017.pdf.en_GB
dc.referencesBacevich, A.J. Saving “America First”. What Responsible Nationalism Looks Like, “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.5 (2017), pp. 57–67.en_GB
dc.referencesBiden, J.R. Building on Success, Opportunities for the Next Administration. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 95.5 (2016), pp. 46–58.en_GB
dc.referencesCirculation. “Foreign Affairs”. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/circulation.en_GB
dc.referencesCohen, E.A. The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force. New York: Basic Books, 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesCohen, E.A. Trump’s Lucky Year. Why the Chaos Can’t Last. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.2 (2018), pp. 2–9.en_GB
dc.referencesColgan, J.D. and Robert O. Keohane. The Liberal Order Is Rigged. Fix it Now or Watch It Wither. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.3 (2017), pp. 36–44.en_GB
dc.referencesDelury, J. Trump and North Korea. Reviving the Art of the Deal. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 46–51.en_GB
dc.referencesDeudney, D. and G.J.I. Liberal World. The Resilient Order. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.4 (2018), pp. 16–24.en_GB
dc.referencesFeigenbaum, Evan A. China and the World. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), pp. 33–40.en_GB
dc.referencesForeign Affairs Again Ranked Most Influential of All Media by US Opinion-Leader Study. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/news-releases/foreign-affairs-again-ranked-most-influential-all-media-us-opinion-leader-studyen_GB
dc.referencesFunding. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/who-we-are/funding.en_GB
dc.referencesGrose, P. Continuing the Inquiry: The Council on Foreign Relations from 1921 to 1996. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1996.en_GB
dc.referencesHaass, R.N. A World in Disarray: America Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order. New York: Penguin Press, 2017b.en_GB
dc.referencesHaass, R.N. Where to Go From Here. Rebooting American Foreign Policy. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.4 (2017c), pp. 2–9;en_GB
dc.referencesHaass, R.N. World Order 2.0. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017a), pp. 2–9.en_GB
dc.referencesHistory. “Foreign Affairs”. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/history.en_GB
dc.referencesIkenberry, G.J. The Plot Against American Foreign Policy. Can the Liberal Order Survive. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.3 (2017), pp. 2–9.en_GB
dc.referencesIndividual Membership. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/membership/individual-membership.en_GB
dc.referencesJames M. Lindsay. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/experts/james-m-lindsay.en_GB
dc.referencesKotkin, S. Realist World. The Players Change, but the Game Remains. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.4 (2018), pp. 10–15.en_GB
dc.referencesKroenig, M. The Case for Trump’s Foreign Policy. The Right People, the Right Positions. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.3 (2017), pp. 30–34.en_GB
dc.referencesLieber, R.J. Retreat and Its Consequences: American Foreign Policy and the Problem of World Order. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.en_GB
dc.referencesLind, J. Asia’s Other Revisionist Power. Why US Grand Strategy Unnerves China. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 74–82.en_GB
dc.referencesList the four journals that publish articles with the greatest influence on the way IR scholars think about international relations. TRIP Faculty Survey All Countries Combined (Sep. 9, 2014). Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://trip.wm.edu/charts/#/bargraph/38/5068.en_GB
dc.referencesMania, A. Europa Środkowa w celach polityki USA w latach I wojny światowej. 14 punktów Wilsona. Państwa europejskie na drodze do niepodległości: (w drugiej połowie XIX i XX wieku): studia ofiarowane Profesorowi Marianowi Zgórniakowi. Ed. Irena Stawowy-Kawka and Wojciech Rojek. Kraków: Historia Iagellonica, 2003.en_GB
dc.referencesMania, A., and Pugacewicz, T. Wybrane elementy kondycji Stanów Zjednoczonych u progu prezydentury Donalda Trumpa [Selected aspects of the United States’ condition on the threshold of Donald Trump’s presidency]. “Rocznik Strategiczny”, no. 22 (2017), pp. 247–259.en_GB
dc.referencesMazarr, Michael J. The Once and Future Order. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), pp. 25–32.en_GB
dc.referencesMazarr, Michael J. The Real History of the Liberal Order: Neither Myth Nor Accident. “Foreign Affairs” (Aug. 7, 2018). Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018–08–07/real-history-liberal-order.en_GB
dc.referencesMcGann, J.G. 2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2018.en_GB
dc.referencesMcGann, J.G. Think Tanks and Policy Advice in the US. Philadelphia: Foreign Policy Research Institute, 2005.en_GB
dc.referencesMead, W.R. The Jacksonian Revolt. American Populism and the Liberal Order. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 2–7.en_GB
dc.referencesMounk, Y. and Foa, R.S. The End of the Democratic Century. Autocracy’s Global Ascendance. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.3 (2018), pp. 29–36.en_GB
dc.referencesNiblett, R. Liberalism in Retreat. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), pp. 17–24.en_GB
dc.referencesNye, J.S. Will the Liberal Order Survive? “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), pp. 10–16.en_GB
dc.referencesParmar, I. Think tanks and power in foreign policy: a comparative study of the role and influence of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1939–1945. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.en_GB
dc.referencesPatrick, S.M. Trump and World Order. The Return of Self-Help. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 52–57.en_GB
dc.referencesPosen, B.R. The Rise of Illiberal Hegemony. Trump’s Surprising Grand Strategy. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.2 (2018), pp. 20–27.en_GB
dc.referencesPugacewicz, T. Teorie polityki zagranicznej. Perspektywa amerykańskiej analizy polityki zagranicznej [Theories of foreign policy: American foreign policy analysis Perspective]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2017.en_GB
dc.referencesRichard N. Haass. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/experts/richard-n-haass.en_GB
dc.referencesRose, G. Letting Go. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.2 (2018), p. C9.en_GB
dc.referencesRose, G. Out of Order. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), p. C9.en_GB
dc.referencesRumer, E.B. Richard Sokolsky, and Andrew S. Weiss. Trump and Russia. The Right Way to Manage Relations. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 12–19.en_GB
dc.referencesSchake, K. Will Washington Abandon the Order? “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), pp. 41–46.en_GB
dc.referencesSchulzinger, R.D. The Wise Men of Foreign Affairs: The History of the Council on Foreign Relations. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.en_GB
dc.referencesShirk, S. Trump and China. Getting to Yes With Beijing. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 20–27.en_GB
dc.referencesShoup, L.H. Wall Street’s think tank: the Council on Foreign Relations and the empire of neoliberal geopolitics, 1976–2014. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2015.en_GB
dc.referencesShoup, L.H. and William Minter. Imperial brain trust: the Council on Foreign Relations and United States foreign policy. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1977.en_GB
dc.referencesStaff. “Foreign Affairs”. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/staff#PUB.en_GB
dc.referencesSubmissions. “Foreign Affairs”. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/submissions-0.en_GB
dc.referencesSullivan, J. The World After Trump. How the System Can Endure. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.2 (2018), pp. 10–19.en_GB
dc.referencesThe Council on Foreign Relations: A Record of Twenty-five Years, 1921–1946. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1947.en_GB
dc.referencesThink Tank. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/think-tank.en_GB
dc.referencesThink Tanks. New York Times (Aug. 10, 2008). Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://ideas.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/10/think-tanks/.en_GB
dc.referencesTrimbath, S. Think Tanks: Who’s Hot. “The International Economy: the Magazine of International Economic Policy” (2005), pp. 10–15, 39–47.en_GB
dc.referencesWala, M. Council on Foreign Relations and American foreign policy in the early Cold War. Providence: Berghahn Books, 1994.en_GB
dc.referencesWala, M. Winning the peace: amerikanische Außenpolitik und der Council on Foreign Relations, 1945–1950. Stuttgart: F. Steiner, 1990.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailandrzej.mania@uj.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailtomasz.pugacewicz@uj.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1641-4233.23.02
dc.relation.volume23en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
Pugacewicz T..pdf
Rozmiar:
446.5KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.