dc.contributor.author | Kowalska, Alicja | |
dc.contributor.editor | Michałkiewicz, Anna | |
dc.contributor.editor | Mierzejewska, Wioletta | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-03T13:54:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-03T13:54:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kowalska A., The benefits of an anthropological approach in modern management sciences research, [w:] Contemporary organisation and management. Challenges and trends, Michałkiewicz A., Mierzejewska W. (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2020, s. 147-158, doi: 10.18778/8220-333-2.09 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-8220-334-9 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33299 | |
dc.description.abstract | How do new managerial models and socio-economic change impact the methodology of management sciences? The author aims to answer how best to describe and analyse the challenges of modern organization and their management system in light of the needs and expectations of employees. The goal of this article is to emphasize the necessity and the benefits of an anthropological approach in management sciences research. The author will present the concepts and methods of social, business and corporate anthropology as a framework for the scientific exploration of the technological revolution that influences various levels of human mentality and attitudes in a workplace. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartof | Michałkiewicz A., Mierzejewska W. (red.), Contemporary organisation and management. Challenges and trends, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2020; | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | business anthropology | pl_PL |
dc.subject | management sciences | pl_PL |
dc.subject | modern organization challenges | pl_PL |
dc.title | The benefits of an anthropological approach in modern management sciences research | pl_PL |
dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 147-158 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Economics in Katowice | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 978-83-8220-333-2 | |
dc.references | Burawoy M., Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism, University of Chicago Press, Chicago – London 1979–1982. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Calás M. B., Smircich, L, Re-writing gender into organizational theorizing: Directions from feminist perspectives, [in:] M. Reed, M. Hughes (eds), Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis, Sage, London 1992, pp. 227–254. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Davenport T. H., The rise of corporate anthropology, “Harvard Business Review” 2007, Digital Article. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Deal T. E., Kennedy A. A., Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading 1982. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Gładysz M., Zastosowanie metod antropologii biznesu jako innowacyjnej koncepcji badań konsumentów, “Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego” 2018, no. 52/2, pp. 379–388. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hine Ch., Virtual Ethnography, Sage, London 2000. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Jordan A. T., The Importance of Business Anthropology: Its Unique Contributions, “International Journal of Business Anthropology” 2010, no. 1, pp. 15–25. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kostera M., Antropologia organizacji. Metodologia badań terenowych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2005. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kostera M., Śliwa M., Zarządzanie w XXI wieku. Jakość, twórczość, kultura, Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, Warszawa 2010. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kozielski R., Wyczucie klienta, “Marketing w Praktyce” 2013, no. 6, pp. 18–20. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Linstead S. A., The social Anthropology of Management, “British Journal of Management” 2002, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 85–98. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Madsbjerg Ch., Rasmussen B., An Anthropologist Walks Into a Bar, “Harvard Business Review” 2014, https://hbr.org/2014/03/an-anthropologist-walks-into-a-bar (accessed: 1.04.2020). | pl_PL |
dc.references | Morais J. M., Waal Malefyt T. de, Business Anthropology Comes of Age. Anthropology News, 2017, https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/AN.670 (accessed: 1.04.2020). | pl_PL |
dc.references | Nader L., Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives Gained From Studying Up, [in:] D. H. Hymes (ed.), Reinventing anthropology, Pantheon Books, New York 1972, pp. 284–311. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Peters T., Waterman R., In Search of Excellence, HarperCollins Publishers, London 1982. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tharp B. M., Defining “Culture” and “Organizational Culture”: From Anthropology to the Office, “Interpretation a Journal of Bible and Theology” 2009. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tian R. G., Principles of Management: An Anthropological Perspective, 2010, http://businessanth ropology.blogspot.com/2010/11/principles-of-management.html (accessed: 1.04.2020). | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wright S., ‘Culture’ in anthropology and organizational studies, [in:] S. Wright (ed.), Anthropology of Organizations, Routledge, London 1994, pp. 1–34. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/8220-333-2.09 | |