Show simple item record

Beneficiaries of A Place: Whose Life Is Better?

dc.contributor.authorRozhkov, Kirill L.
dc.contributor.authorKhomutskii, Konstantin
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-01T06:33:26Z
dc.date.available2021-06-01T06:33:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-30
dc.identifier.issn1641-4233
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/36014
dc.description.abstract The paper shows relationships between the characteristics of residents and the places, where they live. A combination of three criteria of place attractiveness (retention and attraction, conditions for natural growth, and settling) was chosen to classify places, and profiles of their beneficiaries on the theoretical level. The results of the empirical study partially confirm the developed theoretical typologies. Two methods to segment place market are equal only if expectations of population are constant. Study results allow place marketers to identify emerging shifts in the structure of beneficiaries of specific places and predict their further evolution.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal;2en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectresidenten
dc.subjectbeneficiaryen
dc.subjectmarket segmenten
dc.titleBeneficiaries of A Place: Whose Life Is Better?en
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number11-25
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationRozhkov, Kirill L. - Higher School of Economics, Faculty of Managementen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKhomutskii, Konstantin - Higher School of Economics, School of Foreign Languagesen
dc.identifier.eissn2300-8695
dc.referencesAshworth, G. J., and H. Voogd. “Marketing the City: Concepts, Processes and Dutch Applications.” Town Planning Review 59.1. (1988): 65–79.en
dc.referencesDokmeci, V., et al. “Residential-location Preferences According to Demographic Characteristics in Istanbul.” Landscape and Urban Planning 48 (2000): 45–55.en
dc.referencesGe, J., and K. Hokao. “Research on Residential Environmental Evaluation of Local Cities Considering Regional Characteristic and Personal Residential Preference –a Case Study of Saga City, Japan.” J. Environ. Sci. 16.1 (2004): 138–144.en
dc.referencesKim, T., et al. “Life Cycle and Environmental Factors in Selecting Residential and Job Locations.” Housing Studies 20.3 (2005): 457–473.en
dc.referencesKotler Ph., et al. Marketing Places: Attracting Investment, Industry and Tourism to Cities, States and Nations. New York: The Free Press, 1993.en
dc.referencesLindberg, E., et al. “Residential-location Preferences across the Life Span.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 12.2 (1992): 187–198.en
dc.referencesMolin, E., et al. “Group-based versus Individual-based Conjoint Preference Models of Residential Preferences: A Comparative Test.” Environment and Planning A 31.11 (1999): 1935–1947.en
dc.referencesNiedomysl, T. “Residential Preferences for Interregional Migration in Sweden: Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Geographical Determinants.” Environment and Planning A 40.5 (2008): 1109–1131.en
dc.referencesParker, S., et al. “Class Places and Place Classes Geodemographics and the Spatialization of Class.” Information, Communication and Society 10.6 (2007): 902–921.en
dc.referencesRegan, C. L., and S. A. Horn. “To Nature or not to Nature: Associations between Environmental Preferences, Mood States and Demographic factors.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 25.1 (2005): 57–66.en
dc.referencesRozhkov, K. L. “Segmentation of Inhabitants in Place Marketing: The Case of Karelian Towns.” Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 02/MAN/2012. (2012). Retrieved http://ssrn.com/abstract=2071977en
dc.referencesRozhkov K. L. Tselevye gruppy, funktsii i izmeriteli rezul’tativnosti vnutrennego marketinga mest (stat’ya) // Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki 4 (2011): 232–235.en
dc.referencesStamps III, A. E. “Demographic Effects in Environmental Aesthetics: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Planning Literature 14.2 (1999): 170–174.en
dc.referencesUlaga, W., et al. “Plant Location and Place Marketing: Understanding the Process from the Business Customer’s Perspective.” Industrial Marketing Management 31.5 (2002): 393–401.en
dc.referencesVan Poll, R. “The Perceived Quality of the Urban Residential Environment: A Multi-attribute Evaluation”. (1997). Retrieved http://www.ub.rug.nl/eldoc/dis/science/h.f.p.m.van.pollen
dc.referencesWalters, W. H. “Assessing the Impact of Place Characteristics on Human Migration: The Importance of Migrants’ Intentions and Enabling Attributes.” Area 32.1 (2000): 119–123.en
dc.referencesWard, S. V. Selling Places: The Marketing and Promotion of Towns and Cities 1850–2000. London: Spon Press, 2004.en
dc.referencesZenker, S. “Who’s your Target? The Creative Class as a Target Group for Place Branding.” Journal of Place Management and Development 2.1 (2009): 23–32.en
dc.referencesZenker, S. et al. “Development and Implementation of the Citizen Satisfaction Index (CSI): Four Basic Factors of Citizens’ Satisfaction.” Research Papers on Marketing and Retailing, 39 (2009): 1–19.en
dc.referencesРожков К. Л. Целевые группы, функции и измерители результативности внутреннего маркетинга мест (статья)// Проблемы современной экономики, 2011. № 4, cc. 232–235.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailRozhkov, Kirill L. - natio@bk.ru
dc.contributor.authorEmailKhomutskii, Konstantin - khomutskiykonst@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1641-4233.24.02
dc.relation.volume24


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
6983-Article_Text-18442-1-10-2 ...
Size:
371.5Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0